Oil, metals, and crops hit as Trump's tariffs threaten demand and economy
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'Assuming they stick, which is a big assumption, they will weigh on global economic growth and be inflationary,' said Pierre Andurand, who runs hedge fund Andurand Capital. 'For commodities it will be overall negative for global demand, particularly for commodities used to move things around: ie oil.'
Advertisement
Of particular concern in commodities markets will be the impact on China, the world's top buyer of many raw materials. The country has already imposed tariffs on US farm products and there's a risk the trade war could escalate. Canada and Mexico — key sources of crude for refiners in the Midwest and Gulf Coast — aren't subject to the latest fees for now.
Advertisement
'The tariffs were bigger than expected,' said Giovanni Staunovo, a commodity analyst at UBS Group AG. 'The question now is how other nations will respond, including whether we will see stimulus measures.'
Commodities were pressured despite a weaker dollar, something that normally makes them more attractive to investors holding other currencies.
Energy
Oil, natural gas and energy products are among exempted goods, the White House said, sparing the direct impact on fuel flows. Still, crude has been whipsawed by Trump's policy changes, tariffs and sanctions on Iran and Venezuela. With the levies threatening consumption, declines in refined fuel markets outpaced those in crude.
'The anticipated hit to demand because of tariffs also has a negative impact on crude, refined products and some extent natural gas demand, which is the main reason for the downward move on prices,' Rabobank strategist Florence Schmit said. 'There is more at stake than meets the eye here as the future of the US LNG industry still hinges on large off-take agreements with buyers in Europe in Asia, who were just hit by sweeping tariffs.'
West Texas Intermediate crude came under added pressure as OPEC+ agreed to make a larger-than-expected oil supply hike in May, adding the equivalent of three monthly tranches from its previous plan to revive output.
Metals
Metals are being handled under a separate 'Section 232' tariff regime. Aluminum already has a blanket 25% fee on all US imports, while tariffs on copper are expected within weeks. Zinc, nickel, tin and a wide range of other commodities were also exempted from the country-specific tariffs, though they could be subject to Section 232 probes in future.
Advertisement
The threat of tariffs has caused major ructions in metals markets, with traders racing to ship billions of dollars of gold, silver and copper to the US before potential levies are imposed — and to take advantage of higher prices there.
While Trump has said he wants to impose specific tariffs on copper, the worry in precious metals markets was that they'd be ensnared by broader tariffs on all incoming goods. On Wednesday, the White House clarified that gold, silver and platinum-group metals will be exempt from the new reciprocal levies, bringing the massive arbitrage trade to an abrupt halt.
Crops
China is a key market for soybeans. If there is retaliation, the US may struggle to move its products to Asia, which is a major market for American grain and oilseed exports, said Ole Houe, chief executive officer at Sydney-based Ikon Commodities. China and other parts of Asia are also home to some of the world's biggest cotton importers — which also export textiles back to the US.
Trump exempted goods covered under the USMCA North American trade agreement, which could help maintain crop flows with key US trading partners Mexico and Canada.
Canola futures jumped to the highest in almost a month. The advance hints that markets had been pricing in further import tariffs on Canadian goods, said CRM AgriCommodities consultant Mike Verdin.
Trump Has Unveiled Reciprocal Tariffs. What Are They?: QuickTake
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's trade ‘deals' are economically self-defeating and a geopolitical failure
To President Trump's supporters, the one-sided trade 'deals' negotiated with the United Kingdom, Japan and most recently the European Union may seem like victories. They may seem like a vindication of the president's supposed street-savvy negotiating style. In reality, they are self-defeating in their economics and harmful to America's alliances. Under the trade arrangement concluded at the end of July, the EU will scrap tariffs on U.S. imports and commit to large-scale purchases on American energy and defense systems, as well further U.S. investment. In exchange, the EU gets a U.S. tariff of 15 percent, vastly exceeding average tariff rates across the industrialized world in the post-war era. At the risk of stating the obvious, the three 'deals' are not trade agreements in any meaningful sense. They lack the legal weight that foreign trade agreements carry. Nor do they entail a liberalization of trade — rather, they ratify America's imposition of new tariff barriers against some of its closest allies, while also extracting concessions from these nations under threat of even higher tariffs. Because tariffs are effectively taxes on Americans, the U.S. economy and consumers are the first and foremost losers of these new 'deals,' especially in sectors where imports from the three partner economies serve as inputs into U.S. economic activity. The BMW plant in Spartanburg, S.C., to cite just one example, uses a lot of EU-made components; barring special, yet-unannounced carve-outs, its production has just become less competitive. Jobs will be lost, just as they were lost in the aftermath of Trump's first-term steel and aluminum tariffs across industries that rely on those metals. The geopolitical ramifications are even more pernicious. 'It's about security, it's about Ukraine,' the EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic said to justify the European concessions back in July, not anticipating that the deal would have little impact on the administration's planned rapprochement with Russia, on full display in Alaska on Friday. American alliances since 1945 have been sustained by a perception of the U.S. as a fundamentally different kind of global superpower, one that was neither predatory nor seeking domination for its own sake. While Russia and China may have had control over their clients or over nations that they subjugated by brute force, the U.S. had real friends — at least until now. Europeans, the Japanese, or the Koreans have generally hoped for our leadership, comfortable in the knowledge that our decisions will be informed, at the very least, by a basic sense of decency. That sense is being shaken to the core. Trump is transforming a rules-based, voluntary system of international cooperation, imperfect as it was, into a system of quasi-colonial extortion. The MAGA camp might derive a sense of satisfaction from humiliating 'free-riding' U.S. allies, but the resulting arrangements are not sustainable. Canada and Mexico have learned that even a proper free trade agreement negotiated with a Trump administration and ratified by Congress offers little protection against new arbitrary tariffs. It will soon dawn on voters in Japan, the U.K. and the EU — if it hasn't already — that their country's trade deals are both hopelessly unbalanced and subject to change by Washington at a moment's notice. Even if the deals hold in the short term, they are bound the produce a political backlash, which will make the prospect of working together with the U.S. on matters of mutual interest far less likely. There was a reason why the Japanese government postponed the announcement of its trade deal with the U.S. until after its recent upper house parliamentary election, from which it has emerged badly bruised. Similarly, the European Commission will have a hard time selling its deal with Trump to member states — whose cooperation is essential if the promises of hundreds of billions in U.S.-bound investment and purchases of American goods are ever going to materialize. For decades, there have been voices in European politics decrying America's real or imaginary domination of the old continent. Today, they have a real, tangible grievance they can hold on to: The EU is essentially promising a large transfers of wealth to the U.S., in the form of future military and energy purchases as well as outbound investment, while acquiescing to being subjected to a trade policy that would have been essentially unthinkable a few months ago. If the Trump administration were purposefully trying to peel the EU, the U.K. and Japan away from America's system of alliances, it would be hard-pressed to find a more surefire method than these deals. They put to rest a benevolent vision of America that has underpinned our soft power worldwide for 80 years.
CNBC
26 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump administration moves to 'prevent benefits' for some under popular student loan forgiveness program
The Trump administration is moving to "prevent benefits" for some student loan borrowers under the popular Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, according to an announcement on Monday. The U.S. Department of Education said it issued a notice of proposed rulemaking on its regulations to halt loan forgiveness under PSLF for employees "of organizations that are undermining national security and American values through illegal means." PSLF, which President George W. Bush signed into law in 2007, allows many not-for-profit and government employees to have their federal student loans canceled after 10 years of payments. More from Personal Finance:Trump floats tariff 'rebate' for consumersStudent loan forgiveness may soon be taxed againStudent loan borrowers — how will the end of the SAVE plan impact you? Tell us For now, the language used by the Trump administration on how it will determine an organization is ineligible is vague, which advocates say could help it nix any non-profit it doesn't approve of. Organizations that provide support to undocumented immigrants or transgender people, for example, could be at risk, they say. "Public Service Loan Forgiveness was enacted in a bipartisan way to help incentivize hardworking people to go into public service," said Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers. "The Trump administration is trying, through executive authority, to limit who can access this benefit based on a litmus test of who they like and who they don't like." People can comment on the proposed rules at on or before Sept. 17, the Education Dept. said. In its proposed rule, the department says the changes "may delay or prevent forgiveness for a subset of borrowers." Experts say borrowers' best option right now is to stay the course, assuming their current employer has previously been considered qualifying. That's because it remains unclear exactly which organizations will no longer be considered a qualifying employer for PSLF under the Trump's administration's regulations. And some experts say the changes to eligibility could be challenged in court. Whatever the outcome, the overhaul of the PSLF program can't be retroactive, said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit that helps borrowers navigate the repayment of their debt. That means that if you are currently working for or previously worked for an organization that the Trump administration later excludes from the program, you'll still get credit for that time — at least up until the rule changes go into effect. "If an organization is deemed illegal, the borrower can switch jobs to another that isn't considered illegal," said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. The proposed narrowing of PSLF comes at the same time that more than 72,000 borrowers are stuck in a backlog of applications waiting for relief under the program.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Switzerland's M&A Deal Surge Leaves the Rest of Europe Behind
(Bloomberg) -- Switzerland is seeing a more than fivefold surge in mergers and acquisitions that's outpaced most of its European peers, giving bankers hopes for a lucrative payout this year. A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds The volume of takeovers targeting Swiss companies has jumped 465% to $16.7 billion so far this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Private equity firms are particularly active, with Advent announcing late Sunday it has agreed to acquire Zurich-listed chipmaker U-blox Holding AG in a deal valued at 1.05 billion Swiss francs ($1.3 billion). Switzerland's wave of dealmaking comes against a backdrop of macroeconomic challenges. Swiss companies are now facing a potential hit to revenues after the US unexpectedly imposed a 39% tariff on imports from the country. The levy is the highest in the developed world and prompted various Swiss companies from small to large to look at ways to lower the impact. The country's openness to foreign investment has helped drive inbound deal volume, as it doesn't have the restrictions that some other European nations have, according to Tino Gaberthüel, who heads the corporate and M&A practice at Zurich-based law firm Lenz & Staehelin. 'There is a high interest in Switzerland's mid-cap players that run cost efficiently, but may not have a globally critical size,' said Vincent Thiebaud, head of Swiss investment banking at Jefferies Financial Group Inc. Swiss firms themselves are also on the lookout for new technologies and for entering new markets or cementing their footprint in existing ones, said Reinout Boettcher, JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s head of Switzerland investment banking. 'The Swiss M&A market has historically been strongly influenced by outbound activities, also because Switzerland has a large number of leading global companies that want to strengthen their positions,' Boettcher said. Domestic Champion Mergers of domestic companies, on the back of a strong Swiss franc and the needs to boost returns, are also driving Swiss dealmaking. In April, Helvetia Holding AG agreed to combine with Baloise Holding AG to form the country's second-largest insurance group, marking the biggest announced deal in Switzerland this year. OC Oerlikon Corp. in May signed a deal to sell its Barmag textile machinery business to domestic rival Rieter Holding AG. Some Swiss companies are under pressure to simplify their operations to revive growth and boost profit margins. ABB Ltd., which has a $122 billion market value, is looking to spin off or sell its robotics unit, while Nestle SA has announced plans to separate a water business that's home to brands like Perrier, and Acqua Panna. 'We see positive activity in Switzerland including in the large-cap segment,' said Jens Haas, head of investment bank Switzerland at UBS Group AG. 'It is largely focused on transactions with a perceived high certainty of success, like breaking up conglomerate structures via spinoffs or divestitures.' Deutsche Bank AG expects the industrial, health care and financial services sector to remain hotspots for further deal activity in the second half of the year. 'We have naturally become an increasingly important address for many European topics for our clients,' said Urs Raeber, head of investment banking coverage and advisory at Deutsche Bank in Switzerland. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
