Brit kids 'must do their bit' amid threat of war in UK, government report warns
Britain has been plunged into a dangerous crisis zone 'between peace and war' with increasing attacks from hostile states led by Russia, an alarming new report reveals. And the cross-party Defence Committee has called upon Britons - including even children - to be taught measures to combat the threat, which is just below the 'threshold for war.'
Called Defence in the Grey Zone it warns we need a 'whole of society' approach to beat attacks from countries such as Russia. It warns the UK is being targeted in the 'Grey Zone' between peace and war and it is worsening daily with attacks of sabotage, espionage, cyber-attacks and disinformation campaigns.
One of the biggest threats that may still be below the threshold for all-out war, it to the UK's undersea cables linking Britain and Europe's communications to the US. And chillingly the report, out today but launched two years ago, said that: 'Recently, the speed, scale and intensity of grey zone threats in the UK has increased.'
It identifies the main and immediate threat as Russia, which has become alarmingly aggressive since the Ukraine invasion and the UK's support for Kyiv. The report reads: 'Russia's hostility has long been evident.'
'Witness the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko in 2006 and the assassination attempt on Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury in 2018 using the Novichok nerve agent, but has accelerated significantly since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. It argues that the MoD must help spread awareness of the threat to wider society, even dumping some responsibility for the battle on schoolchildren.
And once society has become used to the precautions it must take against hostile threats, that will leave the military to prepare for the possibility of going to war. The report says: 'Defence in the Grey Zone' urges the Ministry of Defence (MOD) to proactively engage with wider society – including businesses, schools and communities – to help generate an informed dialogue around grey zone threats to the UK and build consensus around a common response.
'The MOD could pitch this 'offer' to society, in conjunction with building cyber skills and awareness – from protecting critical national industries, and preventing ransomware attacks, to teaching school children to stay safe online. 'By sharing its crisis management expertise with other departments and wider society, the MOD can help strengthen long-term resilience planning and preparedness across the UK.
'This would also allow the Armed Forces to focus on their primary responsibility during any serious international conflict, deterring or defeating military threats. . .' The Committee argues that nobody in the UK is excluded from the daily threat which chairman, Labour MP Tan Dhesi says helps 'unsettle the fabric of our day-to-day lives.'
He added: 'Grey zone threats bring war to the doorstep of each and every one of us. These attacks do not discriminate; they target the whole of our society and so demand a whole of society response, in which we all must play our part.'
And he said the nature of this new Cold War - often called a 'hybrid war ' means the responsibility of fighting it does not just fall on the MoD. He said: 'The MOD plays an important part in defending the nation from grey zone attacks, but it is only a part.
'We must now assume that any vulnerability will be exploited against us. The industries and technologies we rely on most are clear targets for hostile states. This is why, in today's report, we are calling for a shoring up of our digital and cyber skills and protections. The report argues that often hostile states disguise the source of the attack by using proxies, such as extremist sympathisers, 'hacktivists' or criminal gangs.
These can launch cyber or sabotage attacks leaving the enemy state at arm's length.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Ministers face £5bn Nuked Blood bill as they refuse to reveal evidence
Ministers have refused to tell Parliament what evidence they have found about human radiation experiments on troops. The Nuked Blood Scandal threatens to land the MoD with a potential £5bn lawsuit Ministers have uncovered government plans to conduct radiation experiments on troops, but refused to give details to Parliament. It comes days after the Defence Secretary told MPs he was 'deeply uncomfortable' about a super-injunction that prevented him discussing a £7bn data leak about Afghan troops and translators. Now the Mirror can reveal that his department is again hiding potentially expensive errors behind the cloak of a 'ministerial review' - with final costs estimated at a further £5bn. Tory grandee Sir John Hayes said: "Given that the ministers will have discovered a great deal in this review, it's important they inform Parliament of it at the earliest opportunity to maintain good faith, and I will be raising this in the House as a matter of urgency." The inquiry was ordered last year after a BBC documentary showcased our investigation of the Nuked Blood Scandal, a Cold War programme of mass blood and urine testing on servicemen conducted in Australia and the Pacific for more than a decade. The results are missing from medical files, effectively denying them war pensions, compensation, and the right medical treatment. MoD officials have repeatedly told Parliament and the courts that blood testing never took place. Veterans Minister Al Carns has been asked several times by MPs of all parties to reveal his findings from the 10-month review of Ministry of Defence archives, but has rejected the calls, saying he is hunting for evidence of an official policy of blood-testing. 'I will update the house when I am in a position to share the findings of the exercise that is looking at concerns raised with me about some nuclear test veterans' medical records,' he told the Commons. His staff have examined 43,000 files, amounting to more than a million pages. They include a 1957 request from Charles Adams, the scientific director of the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment that blood counts should be done on troops even if others 'thought it unnecessary'. A second AWRE letter examined by his team says blood tests are needed 'from the medico-legal aspect' for all troops and civilians before they leave the UK because 'we wish to exclude people with existing pathological conditions... we wish to be able to demonstrate that this has been done in any case in which a claim for damage is made'. The review is also thought to have uncovered a 1958 operational order from Bomber Command stating that 'all personnel who go to Christmas Island should have the following blood examinations made and the results recorded in [their file]'. READ MORE: Video of Labour's broken promises to nuke veterans gets 3 million views as pressure grows It is not known whether these documents have been personally shown or briefed to the minister, but his officials are known to have examined the files between January and July. The MoD is facing a lawsuit from veterans and widows about non-production of the medical records, estimated to top £5bn. Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: 'The data leak which has caused so much outrage was blamed on the previous government, but this happened entirely on Labour 's watch. 'They set up the review, they've been briefed on the findings, and they've refused repeated requests from Parliament to reveal what they know. They don't even have the excuse of a super-injunction to hide behind - this is the government's own doing.' A spokesman for the MoD said: 'The Minister for Veterans and People has commissioned officials to look seriously into unresolved questions regarding medical records as a priority, and this is now underway. "This work will be comprehensive, and it will enable us to better understand what information the department holds in relation to the medical testing of service personnel who took part in the UK nuclear weapons tests, ensuring that we can be assured that relevant information has been looked at thoroughly.' The spokesman was unable to confirm whether the minister had personally reviewed the files seen by his team.
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Afghan nationals: have you arrived in the UK under the Afghanistan Response Route?
Thousands of Afghans have been relocated to the UK under a secret government scheme following a data leak. Personal information about more than 33,000 Afghans seeking relocation to the UK after the Taliban takeover was released in error by a defence official. Fears that the individuals named would be at risk from reprisals from the Taliban led the last government to set up a secret relocation scheme, the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), involving 20,000 people. The secret scheme, which can only now be reported after a High Court judge lifted a superinjunction on Tuesday, was first obtained by the MoD in August 2023. The scheme is closing down but the government has said it will honour any outstanding offers. Have you been affected by the MoD leak? Have you arrived in the UK under the ARR? We will not publish your response without contacting you first. We would like to hear from any Afghans who have arrived in the UK under the ARR scheme or are due to come. You can share anonymously if you prefer Please include as much detail as possible. Please note, the maximum file size is 5.7 MB. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. Your contact details are helpful so we can contact you for more information. They will only be seen by the Guardian. If you include other people's names please ask them first. Contact us on Signal at +447766780300. For true anonymity please use our SecureDrop service instead. If you're having trouble using the form click here. Read terms of service here and privacy policy here.
Daily Record
a day ago
- Daily Record
First Minister not informed after massive UK Gov data leak
Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed a super injunction banning the reporting of the Ministry of Defence fiasco was to be lifted last week. A massive data leak and a secret scheme to bring more than 18,000 at-risk Afghans to the UK was kept hidden from Cabinet Ministers and the Scottish Government. Defence Secretary John Healey confirmed a super injunction banning the reporting of the Ministry of Defence fiasco was to be lifted last week. He revealed that the personal details of thousands of Afghans who had applied to resettle in the UK after the Taliban seized power in Afghanistan had been leaked in 2022. They had applied to the UK Government's Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) scheme – for those who had helped British forces during the 20-year conflict. It has now emerged personal details of special forces personnel and serving spies were also compromised. Dave Doogan, the SNP's defence spokesman said: 'One breach of ARAP data could be considered careless albeit to a callous degree given what we were trying to protect the applicants on this list from, but sadly this was one of [several] leaks we know about. 'It therefore has the appearance of institutional incompetence comp-ounded by a galling lack of ministerial grip by the previous secretary of state.' The Tories' then- defence secretary Ben Wallace was only told of the breach 18 months after it happened when details about the leaked data were mentioned on Facebook. The MoD set up a secret scheme, the Afghan Response Route (ARR), to relocate those named. About 6900 people were relocated using that scheme, estimated to have cost about £800million. Wallace personally applied for an injunction to stop the media from reporting the scandal or parliamentarians being informed. The gagging order was only intended to last four months but when Grant Shapps succeeded Wallace it was upgraded to a superinjunction and remained in place until last week. The Sunday Mail has now learned that no serving Cabinet ministers other than Wallace, Shapps and then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak were told about the scandal. One ex-Cabinet minister said: 'We were not informed.' And despite the MoD setting up an entire scheme to relocate Afghans whose data had been compromised, including housing them in Scotland, they failed to inform Humza Yousaf, who was first minister at the time. Senior Scottish Government sources said they were not told. An adviser said: 'We knew nothing about it until everyone else found out from John Healey and neither did Humza at the time. I'm sure he also learned about it from watching Parliament TV last week.' The Labour government applied to extend the superinjunction three times – in May and November last year and this January – and commissioned a review into what options it had to put an end to the ARR. The report by retired civil servant Paul Rimmer found there was 'little evidence of intent by the Taleban [sic] to conduct a campaign of retribution.' It went on to say the leaked data 'may not have spread nearly as widely as initially feared. We believe it is unlikely the dataset would be the single, or definitive, piece of information enabling or prompting the Taleban to act.' Thousands of Afghans have settled in Scotland since the Taliban took power in 2021. But thousands more are still thought to be living in fear there. Doogan said: 'When the current Secretary of State for Defence took us round the houses on this mess in Parliament his statement included a curious focus on the cost to the taxpayer going forward, with an even more inappropriate stress on any impact on immigration figures. His statement should have been limited to an apology, the steps taken to remedy the apparently sieve-like nature of a government department entrusted with our security and the debt we still owe to those compromised.' He said the government's reliance on the Rimmer Report showed 'a staggering degree of complacency from members of a bureaucracy whose collective and sustained incompetence, I greatly fear, has left brave Afghans, wherever they are hiding, to endure even greater threats'. The MoD said: 'As the Defence Secretary outlined in his statement there was a super injunction in place meaning they could not inform others and knowledge was kept to a narrow compartment.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'We were not made aware of this issue before the UK Minister of Defence's statement to the House of Commons. 'This incident is clearly deeply concerning and we urge the UK Government to ensure it prioritises the safety and protection of people affected.' The 18,714 Afghans fearful of Taliban reprisals due to the leak are unlikely to get compensation. The MoD said any claims will be robustly defended. This month, Armed Forces minister Luke Pollard announced £1.6million in compensation for a separate incident involving the release of Afghan nationals' data. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.
