Medical certificate enough for disabled to get family pension: Madurai bench of Madras HC
A bench of justices GR Swaminathan and K Rajasekar made the observation recently while hearing an appeal filed by the principal accountant general of Tamil Nadu against an order passed by the court directing payment of family pension to the intellectually challenged son of a forester. While hearing the appeal, the judges said though the order had been complied with in this case, the daughter of a late judge with similar difficulties was not lucky and expressed anguish over the delay.
The judges recalled that the widow of former acting Chief Justice of Madras High Court TS Arunachalam received pension since 2020. After her death in June 2024, their younger daughter filed an application seeking family pension for her sister, who has physical and intellectual disability.
After submission of all documents, the accountant general's (AG's) office forwarded it to the Union Ministry of Law and Justice to obtain sanction from the President of India. Later, the AG's office forwarded a letter from the Government of India seeking the very same set of documents and the matter is pending at this stage, the judges noted.
Expressing anguish over her struggle in getting pension, the judges called upon the Registrar General of Madras High Court to liaison with the authorities concerned and ensure that she gets family pension at the earliest.
They pointed out that both the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules and the Tamil Nadu Pension Rules make it clear that the son or daughter suffering from disorder or disability of mind, which prevents him or her from earning livelihood, will be entitled to family pension for life after the demise of the parents, upon production of a medical certificate proving the disability.
When the statutory rule doesn't mention requirement of any other document, the authority cannot ask for anything more, the judges added. This issue was settled by the Supreme Court three decades ago and the said decision has been consistently followed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Supreme Court upholds Madras HC order to remove political flagpoles from public places
NEW DELHI: In an important decision, the Supreme Court has rejected an appeal and upheld the order of the Madras High Court directing political parties and other organisations to remove permanent flagpoles erected by them in public places, including national highways and government lands. A bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi pronounced the order recently after hearing an appeal filed by Kathiravan challenging the HC's judgment. The petitioner's counsel challenged the direction and argued that the HC had passed a variety of directions, though the relief sought in the underlying case was limited. After hearing his submission, Justice Maheshwari asked, 'How can you use government land for political benefits?' The court also stressed that the scope of High Court jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is wide in nature, and dismissed the appeal. The root of the litigation is the order passed by Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on January 27, 2025, to remove flagpoles installed by political parties, communal organisations and others in public places within 12 weeks. 'After removal of flagpoles, the authorities concerned are directed to recover the cost of removal of flagpoles from the respective political parties,' the judge had said.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Strict confidentiality has to be maintained: Delhi High Court on Mahua plea against leaks in probe
THE DELHI High Court on Monday said it will direct the CBI and the Lokpal to maintain strict confidentiality in the Lokpal-ordered probe against Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra in the alleged cash-for-queries row, while hearing a plea by Moitra raising objection to leaks pertaining to the investigation. Represented by advocate Samudra Sarangi, Moitra argued that because of the 'leaks' she 'can't defend these allegations in the public domain, and it's a one sided attack'. The TMC MP requested the court to issue directions to the CBI and Lokpal to maintain confidentiality, as prescribed under the rules. She is expected to make filings based on the CBI probe report before the Lokpal by August 13. Objecting to the leak of the very fact that the CBI submitted its report to the Lokpal, which was made public through media in July, Moitra also expressed an apprehension that she was unaware if the probe report too had been leaked. Relying on a June 5 circular by the Lokpal of India, The TMC leader's counsel highlighted before Justice Sachin Datta that while referring complaints/matters to the inquiry/investigating agencies, absolute confidentiality shall be maintained, in accordance with Lokpal (Complaint) Rules, 2020. Moitra, in her plea before the HC, also referred to a tweet by a journalist who posted a screenshot of an email inbox where it was stated that 'the investigation report in Complaint No. 201/2023 has been submitted by CBI which is under consideration of Lokpal of India'. Justice Datta, orally remarked that 'there is no doubt that confidentiality has to be maintained'. 'I'll direct that confidentiality will be strictly maintained by all concerned as per rules,' he said. The Lokpal of India, in March 2024, ordered a formal investigation by the CBI into the bribe-for-questions complaint against the TMC MP. Moitra stands accused of sharing her Parliament login credentials with businessman Darshan Hiranandani, who allegedly posted questions on affairs related to industrialist Gautam Adani. It is alleged that Moitra did this for bribes, both in terms of cash and expensive gifts, received from Hirananadani. Moitra had denied the allegations. The CBI has already conducted a preliminary enquiry (precursor to an FIR) in the matter which came about on the direction of Lokpal on November 8, 2023.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
‘8 lakh' strays, no govt shelters, Delhi has to redraw its plan
With the Supreme Court underlining that stray dogs should not be returned to the streets, the Delhi government has been forced to rethink its strategy on controlling the canine population — estimated at around 8 lakh in the Capital. According to a senior Delhi government official, the current practice, as per the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023, is to pick up the stray dogs, take them to hospitals for sterilisation, and then release them back on the streets from where they were picked up. 'We have been focusing on the stray dog menace and have held several meetings but now, with the apex court's order, that becomes irrelevant as the context completely changes… The government will implement the order but it is not possible to pick up the dogs and move them out of the city or to the shelters right now,' the official said. The official said that as the government does not have any shelter of its own, the implementation of the court order may take longer than eight weeks. While the government has hospitals, all the shelters are currently run by non-governmental organisations (NGOs). In its order on Monday, the Supreme Court asked the authorities to make shelters to house stray dogs, saying they should first start work on a shelter for 5,000-6,000 dogs in the next six to eight weeks. It sought a report within eight weeks on the creation of infrastructure. Meanwhile, hours after the Supreme Court's directions, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) ordered that dogs admitted to its hospitals and other animal sterilisation centres should not be released after recovery. The corporation has also ordered an audit of the existing facilities to house dogs temporarily. 'We have asked the centres not to release the dogs there for sterilisation. We are discussing plans regarding building additional shelters, but this will take time. As of now, we have asked the centres to submit how many dogs they can accommodate. Dogs will also be housed in 77 units of vet hospitals run by the MCD. We will start picking up the dogs according to the available facility,' said Dr S K Yadav, project in-charge, Animal Programme, MCD. He said the corporation picked up 200 dogs from the Red Fort area ahead of Independence Day celebrations, and these would not be released now. 'The estimated population of stray dogs in the city is around 8 lakh. We will follow the SC's orders,' he said, adding that they would first focus on vulnerable areas like schools, colleges, hospitals and public spaces. Delhi Development Minister Kapil Mishra is scheduled to hold a meeting with the concerned departments and officials on Wednesday to discuss the matter. 'We are fully committed to abide by the orders and directions issued by the Supreme Court. We have been working on this issue proactively, to address it on the ground from day one, studying the legal and technical obstacles that existed in the previous system,' he said. He said the government would implement the order in a planned manner, keeping both the public as well as the dog lovers in mind. 'Our focus, while implementing this order, will be the welfare of animals,' he said. Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, meanwhile, said the 'stray dog menace' had assumed 'gigantic proportions' and assured that her government would bring in a policy soon. 'The people of Delhi have been worried about the stray dog menace for years… our only duty is to give them relief… Today, this problem has taken a gigantic form… it is very important for the government to resolve it with honesty and integrity,' she said. '… we are looking into what the previous governments did… Since our government was formed, it is continuously discussing the issue and holding meetings to provide relief to the people,' the CM said.
