
Letters: Ukrainians just need to look to Crimea to see what reality of a ‘deal' would be
Incidentally, life is hell for Ukrainians in Crimea. 'Special measures' and tribunals have been set up to deal with any dissent.
How did we get it so wrong?
Daniel Smith, Blackrock, Co Dublin
The truth is that America keeps getting stronger the longer Putin's war goes on
America is winning the war in Ukraine.
Russia spends 7.1pc of its GDP on defence, double the US level.
Russia has suffered a million casualties; the US arms industry is booming as Europe re-arms.
Nato is buying US equipment to send to Ukraine. Russia has lost half its foreign income from oil and gas.
The longer the war goes on, the more Russia is weakened and America is strengthened.
John Doherty, Gaoth Dobhair, Co Dhún na nGall
Expansionist dictators now have a roadmap to getting what they want
Reports of Donald Trump's Alaska summit with Vladimir Putin, conducted not over hard diplomacy but filet mignon, halibut Olympia and green salad, ought to chill Europe more than amuse it.
What is at stake is not the menu, but the spectacle of two men deciding the fate of Ukraine without Ukraine present ('As Trump bows to Putin, Europe must prepare for the worst', Irish Independent, August 18).
The wider danger lies in the precedent. If borders and sovereignty can be redrawn in a dinner meeting, international law is reduced to table talk.
The extrapolation is clear: once this becomes an acceptable mode of negotiation, other authoritarian leaders will be emboldened to test the same weakness.
The prediction is bleaker still. A Ukraine carved up in Alaska may be only the first course. Moldova, the Baltics, even Taiwan, could follow as Moscow and Beijing take note of Washington's willingness to appease under the guise of expedience.
Europe, then, must prepare for the worst. To dine with Putin is one thing; to digest his terms is quite another.
Enda Cullen, Tullysaran Road, Co Armagh
When you look at world leaders it's clear that the agenda is someone else's
Watching world politicians waffling reminds me of what the British parliamentarian Pitt the Elder said: 'There is something behind the throne greater than the king himself.'
John Finegan, Bailieborough, Co Cavan
What's in a name? If you can inspire others by example, then quite a lot
The recent death of actor Terence Stamp reminds me of his wonderful performance in the movie Far From The Madding Crowd.
Sad indeed that fellow actors in that movie, Peter Finch and Alan Bates are also since departed.
It's nice to note that the female lead, Julie Christie, is hale and hearty at 85. Indeed by his own admission, singer Tony Christie was so impressed by her, that he adopted her surname.
Is there a greater compliment?
Tom Gilsenan, Beaumont, Dublin 9
Let's not forget – as some have – that the head of State is to remain neutral
Fionnán Sheahan writes that should former minister Heather Humphreys decide to enter the race for the Áras, she might be called on to explain 'why she stepped away from politics' recently ('Heather Humphreys is a better candidate but Simon Harris is a liability to campaign', Irish Independent, August 18).
One thing is certain, the response from the Monaghan woman will be straight and true.
The office of president is 'above politics'. And rightly so.
Though there are those who have lost the run of themselves while holding high office, causing no end of concern for our 'ordinary' political masters, as well as for the people they represent.
Another contender, it's been widely reported, has expressed 'distrust' of the UK, France and Germany recently. Not a great start for an aspiring head of State.
The incumbent has been known to 'cross the constitutional boundary' more than once during his almost 14 years in the Phoenix Park.
Let's hope the next holder of the 'highest office' maintains some apolitical equilibrium, save for those times that necessitate presidential intervention.
Peter Declan O'Halloran, Belturbet, Co Cavan
Eating disorders are often complex to treat, so rising numbers are a big worry
It was worrying reading last week that a study found that for under-18s with eating disorders there was a 121pc rise in hospitalisations between 2018 and 2022 – from 170 admissions in 2018 to 375 in 2022 – with a sharp spike during the pandemic.
Eating disorders are complex medical conditions that not only affect the young person concerned but also their loved ones, family and friends.
It strikes me that wraparound care is essential, requiring an increase in investment at a national level.
Not every treatment will work successfully for every person that presents at a hospital, or is diagnosed with an eating disorder.
If any reader, or professional working with young people, wants an insight into this issue, I strongly recommend Evanna Lynch's memoir: The Opposite of Butterfly Hunting.
It is a harrowing, haunting, honest and unflinching account, and yet a beautifully crafted read that reflects the author's own journey with an eating disorder that she ultimately overcomes. Let us hope these figures do not continue to rise.
Stephen O'Hara, Carrowmore, Co Sligo
We must be careful of any language that fuels the fire under racist attacks
The recent attacks on members of the Indian community are abhorrent.
They are also, as noted by many commentators, puzzling, as the Indian community continues to contribute so much to Irish society.
The fact that they are puzzling does not make them more abhorrent. All racist attacks are abhorrent, regardless of whether the target community contributes economically or not.
Chants of 'Get them Out' at anti-immigration protests may legitimise and encourage these appalling attacks. We all need to be careful with our language and not tolerate any racism, taunts, slurs or 'jokes'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
an hour ago
- The Irish Sun
Ukraine fires new ‘Flamingo' missile that can strike Moscow for the first time after it was ‘inspired by British bomb'
UKRAINE has fired a groundbreaking new long-range missile dubbed "Flamingo" which will let Kyiv to strike Moscow for the first time. The breakthrough weapon can hit targets sitting more than 3,000km away with a menacing 1,000kg warhead - and its design takes inspiration from a British bomb. 8 Ukrain'es new 'Flamingo' missile could hit Moscow from the frontline Credit: AP 8 The missile is said to be able to hit targets over 3,000km away Credit: East2West Advertisement 8 The groundbreaking weapon was captured in incredible footage Credit: East2West Extraordinary footage showed the warhead being shot from a ramp before launching into the sky at breakneck pace. The cruise missile, which is reportedly already in serial production, fires from a twin-axle ramp before propelling itself with a turbofan. The "Flamingo" has a six-metre wingspan and reaches speeds of up to 900km/h before decimating its targets. Advertisement And its maximum flight time is a whopping four hours. READ MORE WORLD NEWS SUITED… NOT BOOTED Trump pledges to protect Ukraine's security as Zelensky wins concessions Engineers designed the bomb to feature three main priorities: range, warhead mass and rapid deployment. Its developer, Fire Point, said the systems are being manufactured at a highly protected facility in the Carpathians, in the west of Ukraine. The breath-taking design also features a dorsal air intake for a jet engine and an X-tail. Advertisement To make sure the missile hits its target, it is also equipped with resistance to electronic warfare. The "Flamingo" is reportedly closely modelled on the FP-5 missile design - an unmanned cruise missile which can hit targets at subsonic speeds. The FP-5 is made by British weapons firm Milanion, a UAE-headquartered defence contractor which has supplied Ukraine in the past. Scheming Putin WON'T draw a line under Ukraine - here's why he won't give up the Donbas The new Ukrainian missile will dramatically boost the county's long-range strike capabilities to face down Putin's bloodthirsty regime. And it would be a gamechanger in defending against the invasion which started over three years ago. Advertisement The "Flamingo" missile would also complement Ukraine's cutting edge aerial arsenal - which consists of long-range drones and other extended-range missiles. It would also be able to deliver a more powerful blow against any fortified or high-value targets such as oil refineries or air bases. Ukraine has slowly but surely built up its missile program over the last few years to help defend against Putin's invasion. In April 2022, near the outbreak of the war, the "Neptune" anti-ship missile was fired to sink the Russian Moskva cruiser. 8 Extraordinary footage showed the incredible missile in action Credit: East2West Advertisement 8 The missile could hit strategically key Russian sites Credit: East2West 8 It comes as Trump met Zelensky and European allies on Monday Credit: Alamy Live News It comes as Putin continues to launch vicious assaults on Ukraine, while European allies work with Donald Trump to put together security guarantees for the war-torn country. The Don met with the likes of Sir Keir Starmer, Emmanuel Macron, Giorgia Meloni and other European leaders at the White House on Monday. The US President phoned Vladimir Putin during the summit to push him to meet with Zelensky face-to-face. Advertisement It remains unclear where the two will meet, but the bilateral summit is set to be followed by a trilateral one involving Trump. Switzerland could host the summit between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders, in the city of Geneva - and the country promised they would not arrest wanted war criminal Putin if he came for peace talks. The Zelensky-Putin meeting could take place "within two weeks", German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who was also at Monday's talks, said after the summit. Trump has also ruled out the prospect of US troops on the ground as a security guarantee for Ukraine. But the White House did not rule out the prospect of supportive American support by sea or air. Advertisement The US president also admitted Putin could have no interest in securing a deal - but warned that he would face a "rough situation" if he doesn't come to the table. European leaders floated the idea of Nato Article 5-like guarantees for Ukraine, but it is unclear what they would look like as part of any peace deal. Article 5 of Nato states that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all, obliging allies to come to each other's defence. 8 Donald Trump pictured alongside European allies in the White House on August 18 Credit: Getty 8 Zelensky says he is 'ready' to face Putin for peace talks Credit: AP


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
The cards are stacked against Ukraine — and against Europe
The most revealing moment in US president Donald Trump's White House meeting with European leaders came during a 'hot mic' moment when Trump was overheard discussing his relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin. 'I think he [Putin] wants to make a deal for me, you understand that? As crazy as it sounds,' he whispered to French president Emmanuel Macron. The idea that Putin is beholden to Trump, that some sense of personal magnetism or obligation to the American president is pushing him towards a deal that will end the conflict in Ukraine is indeed crazy. Putin has earned his reputation as a cold and vicious thug, solely interested in his own goals and unmoved by sentiment. Yet Trump has often spoken of his admiration for Putin. The latter has repeatedly broken Trump's red lines on Ukraine, refusing to agree to a preliminary ceasefire before talks, and even escalating Russia's military offensive in the immediate aftermath of calls with the US president. Trump has threatened to impose more sanctions, but ultimately always backed down. Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as 'fantastic'. Picture: AP /Julia Demaree Nikhinson Last week in Alaska, Trump described his relationship with Putin as "fantastic", even though he had threatened to impose sanctions if Putin did not offer concessions as a starting point to ending the war in Ukraine — none were forthcoming. The bromance is decidedly lopsided. Trump also has an outsized view of Russia's strength, telling journalists that only his intervention had prevented the Russian military from achieving victory in Ukraine. This overlooks Ukrainian successes in pushing back the Russian offensive in 2022 and the more than one million casualties, killed and wounded, inflicted on the Russian military since the start of the war. Russia, with an ageing population, a rusting and hydrocarbons-dependent economy, is not the Soviet Union of the Cold War. Despite his failed meeting with North Korea's president Kim Jong Un in Hanoi during his first term and the backlash following his fawning over Putin in Helsinki in 2018 when he accepted Putin's word over that of the FBI regarding interference in US elections, Trump still believes he can get a quick summit win on Ukraine. The search for moments of "great television" — as Trump's described his upbraiding of Ukraine's president Volodymyr Zelenskyy during their meeting in February — is an important motivation. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. Picture: AP /Mstyslav Chernov The problem for Europe and Ukraine is that there is a serious risk a trilateral summit between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy will descend into a two versus one pile-on. Trump's hostility towards Ukraine's president stretches back to his failed attempts to get the Ukrainian government to implicate the Biden family in a corruption scandal during Trump's first term in office. The vicious ambush of Zelenskky by both Trump and vice-president JD Vance in the Oval Office in February was shocking but it should not have been unexpected. On Monday, European leaders took their turns to praise Trump in Washington DC. This is viewed as a necessary tribute to keep the United States engaged on Ukraine's side of the war, supplying vital intelligence, communications and air defence systems. Europe can ramp up a lot of military assistance to Ukraine, but there are capability gaps that European militaries cannot hope to fill for some years yet. Paying homage to a capricious president may work in the short-term but if, as now seems likely, Trump turns on Zelenskyy and demands that he cede the remaining parts of the Donbas region controlled by Ukraine in the interests of "peace", then the inability of Europe to prevent such a stitch-up will call these tactics of obeisance into question. Allowing Washington, or Beijing, to believe Europe can be belittled, and then ignored with little consequence — whether on trade or Ukraine — could seriously backfire. Trump officials, like his envoy Steve Witkoff, say such concessions are a necessary precondition before putting in place "robust security guarantees" that will ensure a durable peace. Prior to the invasions of 2014 and 2022, Ukraine already had such assurances under the Budapest Memorandum of 1994; Russia as a signatory guaranteed Ukraine's independence and committed to never use military force against Kyiv. Ukraine, for its part, gave up all nuclear weapons systems which had previously been stationed in the country during the Cold War. It is still unclear what new guarantees the Trump administration believes would be sufficient to deter future Russian aggression. It is difficult to envisage a diplomatic breakthrough in the coming weeks. Putin's participation in talks are likely a gambit, a means for Moscow to try to shift blame to Ukraine as a spoiler of peace. Witkoff has shown his ineptitude and bias in recent months; he was unable to name the five Ukrainian regions — Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea — annexed or partly occupied by Russia. Witkoff also previously called Ukraine 'a false country'. Before any security guarantees are discussed, top of Trump's agenda will be transfers of land to satisfy Putin. President Zelenskyy cannot give up land which Russia does not occupy — even if he will be pressed to do so by Trump. Given the documented accounts of the mass abduction of children, rape, torture and murder in territories seized by the Russian military to date, the abandonment of more than 250,000 Ukrainians (more than the population of Cork City) living in unoccupied Donetsk to Russian control would be an unimaginable cruelty. Ukraine is struggling to get enough troops to the frontline. An angry Trump cajoling and then threatening Zelenskyy to give Putin what he cannot, will further demoralise Ukrainians — or so Putin hopes — at a time when Russia has gained considerable territory during its summer offensive in Donetsk. Trump has form, having presided over a disastrous deal with the Taliban in 2020, the Doha Agreement, that excluded the then Afghan government, and helped spur the Taliban to victory the following year. The best hope may be that Trump, notoriously inattentive, will simply move on and leave diplomacy on the Ukraine war to others. Dr Edward Burke is a lecturer in war studies at University College Dublin


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump offers assurances that US troops will not be sent to help defend Ukraine
President Donald Trump has offered his assurances that US troops would not be sent to help defend Ukraine against Russia after seeming to leave open the possibility the day before. Mr Trump also said in a morning TV interview that Ukraine's hopes of joining Nato and regaining the Crimean Peninsula from Russia are 'impossible'. The Republican president, Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and other European leaders held hours of talks at the White House on Monday aimed at bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. The White House meeting (Alex Brandon/AP) While answering questions from journalists, Mr Trump did not rule out sending US troops to participate in a European-led effort to defend Ukraine as part of security guarantees sought by Mr Zelensky. Mr Trump said after his meeting in Alaska last week with Vladimir Putin that the Russian leader was open to the idea of security guarantees for Ukraine. But asked on Fox News Channel's Fox & Friends what assurances he could provide going forward and beyond his term that American troops would not be part of defending Ukraine's border, Mr Trump said: 'Well, you have my assurance, and I'm president.' Mr Trump would have no control over the US military after his terms ends in January 2029. The president also said in the interview that he is optimistic that a deal can be reached to end the Russian invasion, but he underscored that Ukraine will have to set aside its hope of getting back Crimea, which was seized by Russian forces in 2014, and its long-held aspirations of joining the Nato military alliance. 'Both of those things are impossible,' Mr Trump said. Mr Putin, as part of any potential deal to pull his forces out of Ukraine, is looking for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, as well as recognition of Crimea as Russian territory.