What is AGI? Artificial General Intelligence
In nearly every interview with one of the leading AI tech giants, you hear their teams, usually the CEO, talk about how the company is pursuing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Then they typically say something about how AGI is much closer to being delivered than we think.
But what actually is artificial general intelligence, and is it truly an innovation coming up the pipeline or simply a phrase designed to generate buzz and raise more money?
What is Artificial General Intelligence?
Artificial General Intelligence, or AGI, refers to an artificial intelligence (AI) system capable of performing any intellectual task that a human can do.
You might be saying to yourself, 'But that sounds a lot like what AI models are currently able to do.' There's some merit, and even some truth, to that thought. However, AGI is technically and functionally different from today's AI systems, which most people call 'narrow AI': artificial intelligence designed to perform specific tasks or a limited range of functions. AI chatbots fall into the category of narrow AI.
Narrow AI doesn't actually understand what's going on. It's just very good at recognizing patterns in large datasets, which it uses to produce outputs that appear intelligent. Behind the scenes, no comprehension or reasoning is happening, just data analysis, pattern matching, and predicting the next sequence of words based on the patterns it has learned from the massive datasets it was trained on.
By contrast, artificial general intelligence is supposed to resemble human intelligence more closely in how it reasons, learns, and adapts. It's meant to have a deeper level of understanding and the ability to use that to a range of tasks and situations, even ones it has never seen or been trained on, similar to a human thinking on their feet.
In perspective, narrow AI is like an autopilot that can follow a programmed route but gets confused if something unexpected happens. AGI would be like having a fully trained driver behind the wheel who can drive anywhere, adapt to the weather, and improvise using everything they know.
The advantages of AGI
At the moment, AI platforms still need a human somewhere in the loop, prompting the AI, giving it rules, guidelines, and directions, and then making corrections to the outputs to ultimately and eventually produce an acceptable result. On the other hand, AGI doesn't require a human in the loop.
An AGI system could learn any skill, 'remember' that skill alongside everything else it knows, and independently connect the dots between those skills and prior learnings to arrive at new conclusions.
People are hopeful this means AGI can unlock scientific and technological breakthroughs and lead to innovations at a much faster rate. Having AGI would essentially be like having a researcher who never sleeps, constantly generating and testing hypotheses. For many, that's the vision that makes AGI so compelling, and its supporters remain optimistic about what AI can do in the various industries that are derivatives of science, technology, math, and engineering. The AGI gold rush: Billions spent on a product you may never notice
Several tech giants are pouring billions into AGI. OpenAI, Google DeepMind (NASDAQ: GOOGL), and Meta (NASDAQ: META) have all made their intentions to achieve AGI clear; however, each has a different timeline for when they believe AGI will arrive. Some avoid making predictions altogether, while others hint it could be anywhere from a few years to a decade away.
Although AGI has mostly been a backdrop to the general conversation about AI and its capabilities, I'd bet it starts playing a bigger, more frequent role in that conversation. For starters, I think this is because AI has plateaued. The topics, promised products, and buzzwords of the past are losing their edge and failing to pick up traction. The industry needs something new and appealing for the world to cling to to keep the AI dream alive, and I feel that 'something new' will be AGI.
Beyond that qualitative speculation, there's no question that the promise of delivering AGI helps companies raise money, money they need in massive amounts to keep their AI operations going, especially since profits in this resource-intensive industry have remained elusive.
The biggest battle in the war on AI is being fought on the 'model' front. All else being equal, whoever has the best model has the best product and the best platform for consumers to tap into and developers to build on top of. The first company to legitimately create an AGI model will arguably be the 'winner' of the war, at least until other companies catch up and have an AGI of their own that can compete for market share.
But all of this raises a crucial question: Although the race to AGI matters on a technical level, will consumers actually feel the difference? I have a feeling that in most cases, the answer is no. Many people probably won't be able to tell narrow AI apart from AGI unless AGI manifests in some kind of hardware (like a lifelike robot) or a platform that's always on, creating the feeling that it's basically another intelligent person in the room with them at all times that makes its presence known.
Even then, I suspect consumers will encounter the same problem with new AI products. Many people just don't know how they're supposed to use them or how to get the most out of the AI that is available to them, so they default to treating AI as a search engine, which is a use case that seems to be becoming AI's killer app, with the most obvious path to revenue by way of advertising revenue.
The final frontier of AI or another overhyped AI promise?
This brings me back to the big question: Is AGI really the next and possibly final frontier of artificial intelligence? Or is it just the next chapter in AI marketing?
The grand vision tech giants are promising to deliver, the one that's getting investors excited to open their checkbooks, but that consumers, like they have with other overpromised AI products (think AI agents), don't actually demand, wouldn't know how to use effectively, and ultimately won't be able to differentiate from the systems they already have?
It's too soon to know. No company has achieved AGI yet, and the conversations regarding how it will affect consumers haven't kicked off yet either. But as time goes on, AGI will either materialize, or we will realize that AGI is yet another rebranding of neural networks, machine learning, and generative AI that keeps the money flowing into the fundraising rounds from tech giants and keeps the AI dream alive.
In order for artificial intelligence (AI) to work right within the law and thrive in the face of growing challenges, it needs to integrate an enterprise blockchain system that ensures data input quality and ownership—allowing it to keep data safe while also guaranteeing the immutability of data. Check out CoinGeek's coverage on this emerging tech to learn more why Enterprise blockchain will be the backbone of AI .
Watch: Artificial intelligence needs blockchain
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen> AI Artificial General Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Narrow AI
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Trump's big bill achieved what conservatives have been trying to do for decades
For decades, Republicans have argued that the US would be better off if taxes were low, and programs to help low-income Americans were harder to access. With Donald Trump's marquee tax and spending bill now set to become law, the country will find out what it's like to live under that sort of system. The massive legislation that Trump plans to sign Friday will make his campaign promises a reality by extending tax cuts enacted during his first term, and creating new deductions aimed at the working-class voters who backed his re-election. But it will also fundamentally reorder two major social safety net programs, slashing funding and imposing new work requirements that nonpartisan estimates say will cost millions of people their benefits. The ripple effects, experts say, will be felt across the country, and not just by the poor. 'Sometimes people like to feel like this is an us versus them [issue], but this is really all of us. It is the people that your kids are going to school with it, is your neighbor, the people that you play soccer with,' said Lelaine Bigelow, executive director of the Georgetown Center on Poverty and Inequality 'This is going to have a massive effect on a lot of people around this country.' The 'one big, beautiful bill', as Trump calls it, won final approval by the House of Representatives on Thursday, in time for his signature on 4 July, the US Independence Day holiday. In addition to the tax cuts, it will also channel tens of billions in dollars towards immigration enforcement and building a wall along the Mexican border. To cut costs, Republicans included provisions to end green energy incentives created under Joe Biden, but the bulk of the savings will come from changes to two programs: Medicaid, which provides healthcare to low-income and disabled Americans, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which helps low-income Americans afford food. Both programs will face new and stricter work requirements, and states will be forced to share part of the cost of Snap for the first time ever. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates the bill's Medicaid changes could cost as many as 11.8 million people their healthcare, and the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities forecasts about 8 million people, or one in five recipients, may lose their Snap benefits. The GOP argues that the bill will not cut Medicaid or Snap, but weed out 'waste, fraud and abuse' thereby making the programs more efficient. At one point, House speaker Mike Johnson circulated research from the conservative American Enterprise Institute finding that, after sleeping, playing video games was how Medicaid recipients who do not work spend most of their time. If they did not act, Republicans warned, the 2017 tax cuts would expire this year, many Americans would be forced to pay more, and economic growth would suffer. However, analyses of the law found that it was the highest earners who felt most of the benefit from the tax regimen. Bigelow warns that the benefit cuts will be the most widespread effect of the bill. Her center's research found that 34% of the country's population will be negatively affected by the bill, mostly through the Snap and Medicaid cuts, while just under 2% of taxpayers are in the income bracket that will get most of the tax relief. And though the bill cuts taxes on tips, overtime and car loan interest, they only to last through 2028. Even Americans who do not interact with federal safety programs could feel the economic effects of its retrenchment. Fewer Snap enrollees could mean less business for grocery stores, while rural hospitals could be hard hit by the Medicaid cuts, even with a $50bn fund included in the bill to help those in poor financial shape. Robert Manduca, a University of Michigan sociology professor, forecast a $120bn per year hit to local economies from the benefit cuts. Employees and business owners, he warned, 'might see their job become less secure because the demand in their local economy is getting reduced'. Paradoxically, the bill is still hugely expensive. The CBO forecasts it will add $3.3tn to the deficit through 2034, mostly due to the tax cuts. For fiscal hawks concerned about the sustainability of the country's budget deficit, which has yawned higher in recent years as Washington DC battled the Covid-19 pandemic with massive fiscal stimulus, there's little beauty in Trump's bill. 'Yes, the economy may well enjoy a sugar-high the next couple of years, as borrowing stimulates near-term consumption,' said Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, which advocates for lowering the deficit. 'But a sugar-high won't be sustained, it will do real damage, and often what comes next is the crash. The longer-term health of our economy, American families, and our children will be worse off due to this debt-financed bill.'
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
'I'm being paid to fix issues caused by AI'
AI is making me extra money, says Sarah Skidd, a product marketing manager who writes for tech and start-up May Ms Skidd was approached by a content agency to urgently rework website copy that had been produced via generative AI for a hospitality was supposed to save money had, instead, caused a host of problems. "It was the kind of copy that you typically see in AI copy – just very basic; it wasn't interesting," says Ms Skidd."It was supposed to sell and intrigue but instead it was very vanilla."Ms Skidd spent about 20 hours rewriting the copy, charging $100 (£74) an hour. Rather than making small changes, she "had to redo the whole thing".Ms Skidd, who lives in Arizona, is not worried that businesses are switching to AI, like ChatGPT, rather than using copywriters like herself."Maybe I'm being naive, but I think if you are very good, you won't have trouble."For now, she's hearing of writers whose main role now is to fix copy churned-out by AI."Someone connected with me and said that was 90% of their work right now. So, it's not only me making money off such missteps, there's other writers out there."Ms Skidd is certainly not anti-AI and believes it can be an excellent resource."My husband and son are dyslexic and writing for them is very difficult - anything to help somebody to write; it can be lifechanging."In the last few years, generative AI has taken off and businesses are turning to systems like ChatGPT developed by OpenAI, and Google Gemini to transform business practices, and cut time and than a third (35%) of small businesses plan to expand AI use within two years, rising to 60% among those aiming for rapid sales growth, according to research by the Federation of Small Businesses. However, some businesses are rushing in, and as Ms Skidd shows, it can often create more work and costs than originally that's the experience of Sophie Warner, co-owner of Create Designs, a digital marketing agency in Hampshire in the the last six to eight months, she seen a surge in requests for help from clients who have turned to AI for a quick fix, but have run into problems."Before clients would message us if they were having issues with their site or wanted to introduce new functionality," says Ms Warner. "Now they are going to ChatGPT first."Ms Warner says this has led to clients adding code to their website that has been suggested by ChatGPT. This, she says, has resulted in websites crashing and clients becoming vulnerable to points to one client who, instead of manually updating their event page, which she says would have taken 15 minutes, instead turned to ChatGPT for easier error ultimately "cost them about £360 and their business was down for three days".Ms Warner says it also happens to larger clients too."We are spending more time educating clients on the consequences [of using AI]. "We often have to charge an investigation fee to find out what has gone wrong, as they don't want to admit it, and the process of correcting these mistakes takes much longer than if professionals had been consulted from the beginning."Prof Feng Li, associate dean for research and innovation at Bayes Business School, says some businesses are too optimistic about what current AI tools can points out that AI is known to hallucinate - to generate content that is irrelevant, made-up, or inconsistent."Human oversight is essential," he says."We've seen companies generate low-quality website content or implement faulty code that breaks critical systems."Poor implementation can lead to reputational damage and unexpected costs – and even significant liabilities, often requiring rework by professionals." In Gujarat in northwesten India, copywriter Kashish Barot says she has been editing content written by AI for US-based clients to make it appear more human and remove sentence patterns that make it sound like the often-poor quality of the content, she says clients are becoming used to the speed of AI and that is creating unrealistic expectations."AI really makes everyone think it's a few minutes work," says Ms Barot, who says clients are using Open AI's ChatGPT."However good copyediting, like writing, takes time because you need to think and not curate like AI, which also doesn't understand nuance well because it's curating the data."The hype around AI has prompted many companies to experiment without clear goals, adequate infrastructure, or a realistic understanding of what the technology can deliver, says Prof Li."For example, companies must assess whether they have the right data infrastructure, governance processes, and in-house capabilities to support AI use. Relying on off-the-shelf tools without understanding their limitations can lead to poor outcomes," he says that ChatGPT can help with a wide range of tasks, "but results vary depending on the model used, the user's experience working with AI, and how the prompt is written".It also points out that there are several versions of ChatGPT."Each of our models has different capabilities for completing different tasks." Is Warner worried about the impact of AI, if – as expected – it rapidly improves?"Yes and no," she says. "While it seems like a quick and inexpensive option, AI rarely takes into account unique brand identity, target demographics, or conversion-focused design. As a result, much of the output looks generic and can actually damage the brand's reputation or effectiveness."She adds: "While AI can be a helpful tool, it simply cannot replace the value of human expertise and context in our industry."
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
What have tariffs really done to the US economy?
Soon after Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, he began raising tariffs, brushing off warnings from economists and businesses about the risks of economic damage. He started with Mexico, Canada and China, then targeted steel, aluminium and cars, and finally in April, on what he called "Liberation Day", unleashed a blitz of new taxes on goods from countries around the plans hit trade and roiled financial markets. But as worries mounted, Trump quickly suspended his most aggressive plans to allow for 90 days of that 9 July deadline approaches and the president crafts his approach, he will have one eye on the US economy. So what has the impact really been? The stock market - a wash Trump's plans included tariffs of 20% on goods from the European Union, punishing tariffs on items from China of 145%, and a 46% levy on imports from Vietnam, though on Wednesday he announced a deal that will see the US charge tariffs of 20% on US stock market suffered the most immediate hit, starting to slide in February and finally tanking in April after Trump unveiled the full scope of his plans, on so-called "Liberation Day". The S&P 500, which tracks 500 of the biggest companies in the US, dropped about 12% over the course of a week. But shares bounced back after Trump rolled back his plans, abandoning steep tariffs in favour of a more easily swallowed 10% rate instead. Now, the S&P 500 index is up about 6% for the year. In the UK and Europe, shares have also rebounded. But shares of tariff-vulnerable firms, such as retailers and car companies are still hurting - and there is more risk ahead, as the talks deadline approaches. The White House has left its options open, saying both that the deadline is "not critical" and that the president may simply present other countries "with a deal" on that Ann Sonders, chief investment strategist at Charles Schwab, said the rebound suggested "a lot of complacency" among investors, who risk being spooked again should Trump revive higher tariffs than they expect. Trade - at a crossroads Trump's tariffs precipitated a rush of goods to the US in the early part of the year, followed by a sharp drop in April and May. But zoom out a bit, and US goods imports in the first five months of the year were up 17% compared with the same period last year. What happens in the months ahead will depend on whether Trump extends his pause - or revives his more aggressive plans, said Ben Hackett of Hackett Associates, which tracks port traffic for the National Retail Federation."At this point it's anybody's guess," Mr Hackett said, noting that for now the situation was "in a holding pattern". "If the tariff freeze disappears and the high tariffs are reimposed then almost certainly we're going to have a short recession," he added. Prices - too soon to say In the US, imported goods are estimated to account for only about 11% of consumer spending. Trump and his allies have argued that fears that tariffs - which, on average, are now roughly six times higher than they were at the start of the year - will drive up the cost of living for Americans are have pointed in part to recent inflation data, which showed consumer prices stepping up just 0.1% from April to certain items, such as toys, saw far bigger jumps and many goods facing higher duties have not yet made it to shelves. Firms, especially those cushioned by strong profits, could opt to pass the increases on gradually, rather than alienate customers with an abrupt pressure from the president to "eat the tariffs", economists still widely expect customers to pay for them eventually. "If you're not digging more into the data you would think, 'nothing to see here' from an inflation standpoint," says Ms Sonders. "But it's premature at this point to hang the victory banner." Consumer spending - slowing Economic sentiment in the US started falling earlier this year, as Trump began to set out his tariff plans. But political views play a big role in shaping opinions on the economy, so whether the worries would actually lead households to clamp down on spending over the long term remained a matter of are now starting to see signs of pullback: retail sales dropped 0.9% from April to May, the second month in a row of decline. It was the first back-to-back fall since the end of consumer spending grew at the slowest rate since 2020 in the first three months of the year, and slipped unexpectedly in May, the most recent month for which data is available. But while growth is still expected to slow significantly compared with last year, most analysts say the economy should be able to escape a recession - so long as the job market continues to hold up. Though layoff notices have been pacing higher, for now, unemployment remains low, at 4.2%. Job creation last month continued at a pace similar to the average over the last 12 months. "We're sort of in this stall mode right now in the economy, a kind of wait-and-see mode, that is driven by pretty grave uncertainty and the instability in policy," Ms Sonders said, noting that many firms were responding with a self-imposed "time-out" on hiring and economy is unlikely to escape unscathed, she warned."It's hard to lay out a scenario of a pickup in growth from here," she said. "The question is more, will it just be a softening of the economy or a bigger slide."
