logo
King Charles 'Livid' as He Faces Canceling Christmas Tradition at Country Estate: Report

King Charles 'Livid' as He Faces Canceling Christmas Tradition at Country Estate: Report

Yahoo2 days ago

King Charles may have to cancel a long-standing royal holiday tradition
The annual holiday shoot at Sandringham, Norfolk, is reportedly threatened by a decline in pheasant numbers
Following Queen Elizabeth's example, Charles continues to host the royal family for Christmas at his Norfolk estateKing Charles may have to call off an annual holiday tradition.
The King, 76, is said to be "livid" over a potential shortage of pheasants at his Sandringham Estate — possibly affecting the chances of a full shooting calendar this winter.
Charles inherited the estate, located about 110 miles north of London in the countryside, from his late mother, Queen Elizabeth. There, birds are reared in the wild for the annual shoots.
But the number of birds currently available has dropped, which may force Charles to cancel the traditional Boxing Day shoot — a central part of the royal family's Christmas holiday plans, The Sun reported.
A long-serving gamekeeper, responsible for managing the bird population on the estate, is said to have been let go in a recent staff shake-up.
Charles, who continues to undergo weekly treatments for cancer, is reportedly 'livid' over the situation, The Sun said. A source told the outlet, 'It was a total cock-up. No birds, no bang, just red faces. The King wasn't having it.'
Known as a champion of wildlife and the countryside, Charles supports traditional practices — and is said to oppose importing birds from elsewhere for the customary rural pastime.
However, the paper added that maintaining pheasant and other game bird populations has been 'challenging,' leaving pheasant numbers in decline.
Buckingham Palace, which doesn't comment on staffing matters, declined to respond to PEOPLE.
Like the late Queen, Charles hosts much of the extended royal family at Sandringham House over the Christmas holiday. Prince William, Princess Kate and their three children — Prince George, 11, Princess Charlotte, 9, and Prince Louis, 7 — have a country retreat, Anmer Hall, on the estate, and are usually based there.
Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on , and more!
In 2018, George was taken on his first grouse-hunting expedition at the family's Scottish estate, Balmoral.
Charles took over the running of the estate before his late mother Queen Elizabeth died in Sept. 2022, and has encouraged a switch to organic farming and has been re-modeling some of the magnificent grounds. Two years ago, he introduced a topiary garden at the front of the house. More than 5,000 Yew tree hedging plants, which will stand alongside more than 4,280 herbaceous perennial plants and flowers, including yellow and pink rose varieties such as Gabriel Oak and Skylark, were planted.
He has also painstakingly designed and developed his gardens at another country home, Highgrove House, in Gloucestershire, western England.
Read the original article on People

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Man With Drugs Just Broke into William & Kate's Home Months After the Couple Were Burglarized
A Man With Drugs Just Broke into William & Kate's Home Months After the Couple Were Burglarized

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Man With Drugs Just Broke into William & Kate's Home Months After the Couple Were Burglarized

Windsor Castle had an unexpected visitor after a man was arrested for trespassing on the Royal grounds, and the notable home of Prince William and Kate Middleton. The Thames Valley Police reported that a man trespassed the grounds on June 1, 2025, 'At just after 1 p.m. on Sunday (1/6) a man has entered restricted grounds at Windsor Castle.' More from StyleCaster Kate's 'Ruthless Discipline' as Queen Lines Up With William's 'Demanding' Reign Amid Reports They Could Ascend 'Sooner Than Anticipated' Prince William Accused of Being 'Pretty Demanding' Amid Reports He's Planning to 'Flex His Muscles When He's King' 'He was quickly challenged by Met police officers and arrested. He did not enter the inner grounds of Windsor Castle,' a spokesperson said on June 3 via People. 'He was arrested on suspicion of trespass on a secure site and possession of class A drugs. He has been bailed and an investigation is ongoing by Thames Valley Police.' 'A man in his 30s has been arrested on suspicion of trespass on a protected site and possession of Class A drugs after entering private grounds at Windsor Castle,' the statement from the Police department said. 'Officers in the grounds spotted the man just after 13:00hrs on Sunday, 1 June and quickly arrested him. He was then passed into the custody of Thames Valley Police.'It's not known whether the Prince and Princess of Wales were in their residence with their children—Prince George, 11, Princess Charlotte, 10, and Prince Louis, 7— at the time of the break in. The family lives in Adelaide Cottage which is five minutes away on the vast estate that surrounds Windsor Castle. The break-in comes months after a burglary on the Royal grounds. 'At around 11.45pm on Sunday October 13, we received a report of burglary at a property on Crown Estate land near to the A308 in Windsor. Offenders entered a farm building and made off with a black Isuzu pick-up and a red quad bike. They then made off towards the Old Windsor/Datchet area,' Thames Valley Police reported. 'No arrests have been made at this stage and an investigation is ongoing,' the statement concluded. Prince William, Kate Middleton, and their kids were at home at the time of the burglary, per The Sun. It came after the reported removal of armed police officers at the gate that the intruders used. The burglars were targeting farm machinery and used a stolen vehicle to crash through a security gate on the way out. Best of StyleCaster The 26 Best Romantic Comedies to Watch if You Want to Know What Love Feels Like These 'Bachelor' Secrets & Rules Prove What Happens Behind the Scenes Is So Much Juicier BTS's 7 Members Were Discovered in the Most Unconventional Ways

Swinney ‘must be held to account' over Scottish Water pay dispute, unions say
Swinney ‘must be held to account' over Scottish Water pay dispute, unions say

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Swinney ‘must be held to account' over Scottish Water pay dispute, unions say

Unions representing Scottish Water employees have said the First Minister 'must be held to account' as staff striking over pay accused the Scottish Government of 'hypocrisy' over its commitment to workers' rights. Members of GMB Scotland and other unions at the publicly-owned organisation began strike action on Monday and it will continue until Sunday. Staff represented by GMB, Unite and Unison previously rejected a 3.4% pay increase covering the last nine months as the company changed the date for annual rises to take effect from July to April. Speaking at a rally of striking workers at Scottish Water's Shieldhall depot in Glasgow on Wednesday, GMB general secretary Gary Smith warned the ongoing dispute could become one of the most significant in the country's public sector and he urged ministers to intervene. Unions also claim Scottish Water has failed to appropriately engage in pay negotiations, and that chief executive Alex Plant attended talks on Tuesday for the first time but only stayed briefly. Mr Smith said: 'How did we end up with workers being refused a fair pay rise while executives line their pockets with record bonuses? How did we end up with a chief executive finally turning up to pay talks after a year and only staying for 20 seconds? 'It is damning of the management of Scottish Water but damning too of the hypocrisy of a Scottish Government that advocates for fair work and the protection of public services. 'John Swinney and his ministers must be held to account for this growing scandal. From this point forward, every time they talk to us about fair work and how Scotland treats working people better, we will point to Scottish Water and its absolute failure to make good on that promise.' Tuesday's meeting escalated the dispute further, with unions now accusing the employer of weakening the pay offer. Workers carrying out emergency repairs, testing and maintenance are now striking, which they have warned will threaten the daily operations of the water supplier. Claire Greer, GMB Scotland organiser, said the unions had agreed to attend the hastily-convened meeting on Tuesday night in the hope of a better offer and a possible resolution. She said: 'Scottish Water has shown no interest in reaching a fair settlement and sat on its hands as a dispute that could have easily been resolved months ago escalated. 'The Scottish Government must now explain to its senior management team why its refusal to clearly and honestly engage with its own workforce cannot stand.' Unison regional manager Simon Macfarlane said: 'Scottish Water staff are very angry in how last night's pay talks were handled by the company. Scottish Water boss, Alex Plant, appeared at the table for less than five minutes. 'First Minister John Swinney needs to step in and help get this sorted. Scottish Water is behaving like a rogue employer, not an exemplar of fair work.' Sam Ritchie, Unite industrial officer, said: 'Unite members are angry and deeply frustrated with the management of Scottish Water. There has been disregard and arrogance shown towards the concerns of the workforce in meetings with management. This dispute is not just about wages, it's about fairness, dignity and respect. 'Alex Plant, chief executive, who received a pay package last year of nearly half a million pounds, came into the negotiating room for all of two minutes. 'If Mr Plant can collect an exorbitant salary from the taxpayer then at the very least he should listen to the staff who earn a fraction of his pay. Talks have hit a roadblock and they are not progressing. 'Unions and management are set to resume talks over the coming days but no new offer is currently on the table which would end this dispute.' Also in attendance was union body the Scottish Trade Unions Congress, and its general Secretary Roz Foyer said: 'The Scottish Government has a responsibility to step in and help find a solution. 'Workers and their unions are committed to securing a positive outcome, not only for their members but to uphold the standards within our public services. 'That cannot happen while Scottish Water continues its intransigence in this dispute.' A Scottish Water spokesperson said: 'This is a matter for Scottish Water and its trade unions, who we value our relationship with. 'Scottish Water has acted in good faith and with integrity throughout these negotiations. 'We have a long history of being a good employer – with wages rising by about 11% above inflation in the past decade – at a time when many people in other sectors saw their wages stagnate or go backwards. 'We've made another strong offer this time that is comfortably above inflation and prioritises those on the lowest wages.' The Scottish Government has been asked for comment.

University of Edinburgh lecturers to walk out over planned £140m cuts
University of Edinburgh lecturers to walk out over planned £140m cuts

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

University of Edinburgh lecturers to walk out over planned £140m cuts

Lecturers at the University of Edinburgh are set to walk out in a dispute over the university's refusal to rule out 'unacceptable' compulsory redundancies as part of plans to save £140 million. The action will see members of the University and College Union (UCU) strike during an open day on June 20, followed by a further five-day walkout in September to coincide with the university's 'welcome week' for new students. Union members are also set to take part in action short of a strike, including working to contract, not covering for absent colleagues, and a 'possible marking and assessment boycott'. The UCU announced the action following a ballot which saw a 60% turnout, with 84% backing strikes and 93% voting in favour of action short of a strike. The news came on the same day university principal Professor Sir Peter Mathieson appeared before a Holyrood committee, where he defended his six-figure salary and acknowledged the university is not in deficit. Sophia Woodman, UCU Edinburgh University branch president, said it is 'not too late' for the strike to be averted, and she called on senior management to rule out compulsory redundancies. 'Staff want a sustainable future for the university as much as anybody and we want to work with senior management to end this dispute,' she said. 'But we're clear that the use of compulsory redundancies is unacceptable. 'With the resources and reserves held by the university it can easily afford to rule out sacking staff. 'The decision to let the strike continue, with all the disruption to students that it entails and a possible marking and assessment boycott, is a matter of choice for Peter Mathieson and the university senior management. 'The union's door is open to talks and I'd appeal to them to heed this final warning, rule out compulsory redundancies and end this unnecessary dispute.' The union claimed the proposed £140 million of cuts would be the 'largest ever' made by a university in Scotland, and said management have failed to make a case for cuts of this size while at the same time planning 'record' investment in buildings and infrastructure. It added that research and teaching staff are the 'backbone' of the university, and cutting them rather than buildings is a 'false economy'. Jo Grady, UCU general secretary, said: 'UCU members at Edinburgh University are ready and willing to strike to save jobs and save this university, but disruption can still be avoided. 'Edinburgh University is a wealthy university with, at the last count, over £3 billion in its reserves. 'The Scottish Government should follow the lead of ministers in Wales and call on universities to use their reserves to avoid job losses.' The union said walkouts will take place on June 20 and September 8-12, with action short of a strike beginning on June 20. Responding to the announcement, Sir Peter said: 'We have been transparent about the savings urgently needed to secure our financial footing, with forecasts showing that we will be in deficit from the next financial year should we not act now. 'Failure to take preventative steps would leave us in an unsustainable situation, requiring deeper savings. 'We respect colleagues' right to take part in industrial action, and will do all we can to minimise disruption to students should this take place. 'We will also continue to work with our joint trade unions as plans develop to deliver these savings.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store