
Explained: Which US universities will pay higher endowment taxes from 2026 under Trump's law and why it matters
Donald Trump
's administration as part of a comprehensive spending bill, introduces a tiered tax system targeting the endowments of the wealthiest institutions.
While these universities are renowned for their vast financial reserves, the forthcoming tax increase raises critical concerns about potential impacts on financial aid, research funding, and university operations.
Understanding the new endowment tax structure
The concept of taxing university endowments is not new. During Trump's first term, a 1.4% excise tax was imposed on the investment income of private colleges and universities with substantial endowments.
However, the recent legislation amplifies this tax, introducing a tiered system based on the size of endowment assets per enrolled student.
Drawing on data from the
National Association of College and University Business Officers
, the new tax rates will be as follows:
An 8% tax rate will apply to universities with endowment assets exceeding $2 million per student.
A 4% tax rate will be levied on institutions with assets between $750,000 and $2 million per student.
The existing 1.4% rate remains for schools with assets ranging from $500,000 to $750,000 per student.
This tax framework applies exclusively to private institutions enrolling at least 3,000 students, raising the previous threshold from 500 students.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
No annual fees for life
UnionBank Credit Card
Apply Now
Undo
As Steven Bloom, assistant vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, noted, this effectively narrows the tax's focus to elite private research universities.
Which universities are most affected?
The legislation is expected to impact approximately a dozen universities. At the highest 8% tax tier, institutions such as Harvard University, Yale University, Stanford University, Princeton University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) will face substantial increases in their tax obligations.
Universities subject to the 4% tax include Notre Dame, Dartmouth College, Rice University, the University of Pennsylvania, Washington University in St. Louis, and Vanderbilt University. Institutions such as Duke University and Emory University narrowly missed the threshold last fiscal year but remain close to the cutoff.
The role of endowments and potential consequences
Endowments consist primarily of donor contributions invested to generate income that supports university operations.
Typically, colleges allocate around 5% of their endowment earnings annually toward their budgets. These funds are crucial for financing scholarships, faculty positions, and research initiatives.
Despite the considerable wealth held by these universities, the increased tax burden is likely to strain budgets. According to the
Associated Press,
Phillip Levine, an economist and professor at Wellesley College, explained that universities are seeking savings wherever possible.
He emphasised the significance of endowment spending in reducing the cost of education for lower- and middle-income students, warning that those institutions facing the highest tax rates are often those charging these students the least.
Rice University in Houston provides a concrete example. Officials anticipate an additional $6.4 million in tax payments, equivalent to over 100 student financial aid packages.
The university has pledged to explore alternatives to cutting aid but acknowledged the fiscal pressure.
How universities are responding to financial pressures
Already, universities are making adjustments in anticipation of the new tax. Yale University cited an estimated $280 million increase in endowment taxes as part of the rationale behind a campus-wide hiring freeze. Stanford University has announced plans to reduce its operating budget by $140 million for the upcoming academic year, including 363 layoffs and a continuation of its hiring freeze.
Nevertheless, Stanford has committed to maintaining undergraduate financial aid and funding for doctoral students.
Further compounding these financial challenges are reductions in federal research funding from agencies such as the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation. Harvard University, which possesses the largest endowment in the country valued at $53 billion, exemplifies this pressure.
Beyond the tax, Harvard faces a freeze on $2.6 billion in research grants tied to civil rights investigations, alongside additional policy impacts that could cost the university up to $1 billion annually.
Why this matters
While institutions like Harvard will remain among the world's leading universities, the combined financial pressures are unlikely to be without consequences. As Levine observed, although these universities are unlikely to become mediocre overnight, the strain will result in tangible challenges.
There may be reductions in support for students and researchers, and the accessibility of elite education for economically disadvantaged students could be at risk.
The tax hike under Trump's law signifies a pivotal moment in higher education finance. It reflects broader debates about wealth concentration in academia and the role of public policy in addressing inequality. For prospective students, families, and educators, understanding which universities will be affected and the potential ramifications is critical as the landscape shifts in 2026.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pune univ wing drops ‘Voice of Devendra' contest circular
Pune: The circular the National Service Scheme (NSS) wing of Savitribai Phule Pune University (SPPU) issued on Aug 5 to all student volunteers to participate to the maximum extent in the 'Voice of Devendra', a state-level elocution competition, was withdrawn on Tuesday by its director Sadanand Bhosale. The competition, according to the circular, is inspired by chief minister Devendra Fadnavis , and provides a platform to participants to connect with the concept of a 'Developed Maharashtra' and enhances their oratory skills. Dayanand Shinde, state coordinator of 'Voice of Devendra' movement said the event will be held in Nashik on Aug 17. Participants have to send their entries online and the finalists will be chosen. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai | Gold Rates Today in Mumbai | Silver Rates Today in Mumbai Students affiliated to National Students' Union of India and University Students' Struggle Action Committee protested on Tuesday on SPPU's campus calling it a political agenda. Shiv Sena (UBT) functionary Sushama Andhare and NCP (SP)'s Rohit Pawar too spoke against the circular. Pawar posted on his X account that the university has perhaps forgotten that it should not become part of a political agenda and should focus on improving academic quality and strengthening the voice of democracy rather than engaging in hero worship. Bhosale said the university was not organising the contest but merely informing students about it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Prettiest Icons In The History The Noodle Box Undo "We get proposals from organisations like Rotary Club, the police and others to popularise their contests or events such as tree plantation or other activities. Accordingly, we issue a circular stating the event and invite students to join voluntarily. Similarly, some Nashik-based organisations approached us with this contest, and we sent a letter so that students would know about it. NSS students or others didn't need to attend. The university was not involved in anything else. In light of the protests, we have withdrawn the circular," he added. Protesting students alleged SPPU officials are acting under the influence of the governing party. he added. NSUI president, university chapter, Siddhant Jambhulkar, said the contest shifts focus from the state's progress to promoting a political leader. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


News18
an hour ago
- News18
Trump, Vance To Meet Zelenskyy Virtually Before Alaska Summit With Putin: Report
The purpose of the dialogue is to address Ukraine's growing concerns about being side-lined in negotiations. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are scheduled to meet in Alaska on August 15 to discuss the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. The high-stakes summit will take place behind closed doors and will be limited to representatives from the US and Russia, raising significant concerns over Ukraine's exclusion from direct participation. Addressing criticism surrounding Kyiv's absence from the in-person discussions, the White House officials confirmed on Tuesday that President Trump will hold a virtual meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy prior to the summit, ABC News reported. The session is expected to take place on Wednesday. Sources familiar with the development said President Trump and Vice President JD Vance will join the virtual meeting, which will also include key European allies. The purpose of the dialogue is to address Ukraine's growing concerns about being sidelined in negotiations that could shape the outcome of the war and affect its territorial sovereignty. Recently, President Zelenskyy has issued repeated warnings that 'talks about us, without us, will not work." He has also rejected any possibility of agreeing to territorial concessions, especially the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the contested Donbas region in the east. The Donbas region, comprising Luhansk and Donetsk, has been a focal point of the war since Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. Moscow has since claimed both regions as part of its territory. Zelenskyy also expressed frustration with the Alaska summit, calling the direct Trump-Putin meeting a 'personal victory" for the Russian leader. Although the White House has framed the summit as a 'listening exercise" for President Trump, Ukrainian officials fear their interests may be compromised in backchannel talks. Still, Zelenskyy struck a hopeful tone, revealing that during a recent call with US envoy Steve Witkoff, he received a subtle indication that Russia may be open to negotiating a ceasefire. 'This was the first signal from them," he noted. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
No coercive action against overage vehicles: Supreme Court
NEW DELHI: In a relief to owners facing the threat of their overage vehicles being impounded by city authorities, Supreme Court Tuesday directed no coercive action be taken against them and agreed to re-examine its 2018 order by which it had banned the plying of over 15-year-old petrol and 10-year-old diesel vehicles. The respite came after SG Tushar Mehta and additional solicitor general Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for Delhi govt, appealed to a three-judge bench led by CJI Gavai to recall the order on the grounds it was causing hardships to citizens of Delhi and that pollution, contrary to assumption, is not directly related to the age of vehicles due to advancements in technology and use of BS VI emission norm. In its application, govt said there was a need for a graded, balanced and technology-driven regime to handle vehicular pollution, and that instead of an age-based blanket ban, a scientific and data-driven framework should be developed that considers all relevant indicators to ascertain pollution by individual vehicles. It submitted such a policy would ensure not only the protection of the environment through the phasing out of polluting vehicles but also preserve the rights of responsible vehicle owners. No scientific basis for taking overage vehicles off roads, govt pleaded in apex court A senior citizen and owner of a 2011 BMW car, apprehending impounding of his vehicle, also moved the court and his lawyer Charu Mathur contended that a complete ban on vehicles based on their age rather than fitness or compliance with emission norms was wrong and needed to be examined. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Sattva Lumina premium apartments: 2 BHK from ₹1.12 crore* and 3 BHK from ₹1.54 crore* Sattva Lumina Get Quote Undo by Taboola by Taboola The bench, also comprising Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria, after a brief hearing, agreed to examine their plea. "Issue notice. Returnable in four weeks. In the meantime no coercive steps should be taken against the owners of (such) vehicles on the ground... List it after four weeks," it said. The 2018 SC order was not vigorously implemented by authorities and was done only last year, which led to public outcry, following which the drive to impound the vehicles was halted. This compelled govt to seek recall of the SC order. The govt in its application said, "It is submitted that if the order of this court dated 29.10.2018 continues to operate, it will result in road worthy, non-polluting BS-VI vehicles also going off the roads in a matter of a few years without a scientific basis for the same. Further, it is respectfully submitted that there does not appear to be a scientific basis for mandating that even BS-IV vehicles which meet PUC norms should be taken off the roads in Delhi NCR. It is submitted that these are serious issues which may require a fresh scientific evaluation". "It is respectfully submitted that the order passed by this court was originally passed as an emergency measure during a period when BS-IV emission standards were in force and the migration to BS-VI, which has much stricter and advanced norms, had not yet commenced," the govt said. "However, it is submitted that to tackle the issue of pollution in NCR, a comprehensive policy is required which gives vehicle fitness based on the actual emission levels of an individual vehicle as per scientific methods rather than implementing a blanket ban based solely on the age of the vehicle," it said.