Biden Derangement Syndrome? How Trump can't stop blaming everything under the sun on his predecessor
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
When Harry Truman served as president starting nearly 80 years ago, he famously had a sign on his desk which read: 'The Buck Stops Here.'
But if Donald Trump were to commission a similar ornament for the iconic desk hewed from timbers salvaged from HMS Resolute, it would probably say something like: 'That was Biden's fault.'
Since taking office in January, Trump has made a constant habit of invoking his predecessor's name at almost every public appearance he makes, either to blame the 46th president for whatever ills he is purporting to address with his latest executive actions, or to deflect from bad news while absorbing all the credit for anything positive that has happened recently.
He laid this out in bare terms on Friday when he sat for an interview with NBC News anchor Kristen Welker on Meet the Press. Pressed on his habit of bashing Biden for economic problems even though he routinely claims credit for a 'Trump effect' on the economy, Trump said he would only associate himself with 'certain aspects' of it.
'I think the good parts are the Trump economy and the bad parts are the Biden economy because he's done a terrible job,' he said.
Days later, he turned a question on whether his sit-down with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney could be made more difficult by the prime minister's declaration that his country was 'not for sale' into another opportunity to bash Biden.
Nearly half of Americans blame President Donald Trump for the current state of the U.S. economy, according to a new Gallup poll. The president has consistently blamed his predecessor, Joe Biden (REUTERS)
Trump began to answer in the negative and talk about how much the United States and Canada 'love each other.' But it wasn't long until a tangent about China's trade surplus with the U.S. turned into a rant about his predecessor.
'When I started, I say we were losing billions of dollars a day on trade that's rapidly turning around. We looked at numbers this morning. So we were losing the United States, during Biden, was losing more than – I won't even give you numbers because they're so embarrassing, but billions of dollars a day on trade,' he said.
Trump then claimed the massive import taxes he was imposing on American importers are 'rapidly' turning around America's trade deficits. But he couldn't help but bring up his predecessor's name. Again.
'The biggest investment ever made in the United States is being made right now, trillions of dollars. I would say we could be at nine. $9 trillion you could go back to other presidents. They haven't had $1 trillion for their entire term. Look at Biden. He had bad numbers. People leaving. They weren't coming in. They were leaving with Biden, and he didn't know the difference. The only thing he knew is people coming in,,' he said.
'You know who they were, illegal immigrants, okay, from prisons, from mental institutions, from all sorts of places that weren't good, from gangs from Venezuela. They were coming in, and they were criminals and murderers. 11,888 people that murdered, and at least half of them murdered more than one person. This is what Biden let into our country.'
Trump's riffing about Biden during the Tuesday bilateral wasn't the first time he'd invoked the man who defeated him in the 2020 election this week. He'd mentioned him twice during an Oval Office media availability to announce that Washington, D.C. would host the NFL draft in two years.
And the day before, when Trump was taking questions from a group of reporters aboard Air Force One while returning to Washington from his Palm Beach, Florida home, he'd couldn't help but do it again.
As he entered the cramped press cabin aboard the converted Boeing 757 he'd used for the past weekend's travel, he launched into a soliloquy about how there was 'a lot of good news' coming this week. Specifically, he said there would be 'good things coming out of the many war zones that were created by Biden and a group of incompetent people.'
But not wanting to elaborate further after insulting his predecessor once more, he added: 'We'll talk about that later or tomorrow.'
Since taking office for a second non-consecutive term that has no precedent in modern history, President Donald Trump has often remarked that no other presidents have done what he has done.
In one specific area — his near-obsessive invocation of his predecessor's name — he is absolutely, objectively correct.
Trump is an outlier among modern American chief executives in that he has steadfastly refused to let go of his predecessors as targets for political attacks or scapegoats for anything that goes wrong on his watch.
That's because the American political tradition, for better or worse, has always been to move forward and not obsess over blame for whatever came in the past.
When a president is inaugurated after knocking off an incumbent administration or after flipping control of the White House from the opposing political party, it's often because voters were dissatisfied with his predecessor in some major way.
In 1981, Ronald Reagan came into office with a mandate based on voters' rejection of the Carter administration's handling of inflation and high-profile foreign policy blunders. He did not spend his historic first 100 days carping about how bad his predecessor had been.
When Bill Clinton defeated George HW Bush in the 1992 presidential election, it was on the strength of Clinton's ability to convince voters that he understood the economic pain they were feeling as the country went through a recession that took the wind out of Bush's political sails in the wake of the first Gulf War. But Clinton hardly mentioned Bush during his first months in office.
Bush's father, George W. Bush, entered office with a mandate to restore trust in the presidency after Bill Clinton's marital infidelity — and his related perjury in the face of a special prosecutor's investigation — led to him being the first American president to face impeachment in more than a century. But Clinton wasn't much of a foil for Bush, who got to work on a host of conservative priorities until the September 11, 2001 terror attacks upended his presidency.
And the younger Bush's successor, Barack Obama, was swept into the presidency on the heels of a generational financial crisis and widespread discontent over the way Bush had prosecuted two wars, including the invasion of Iraq on false pretenses.
Harry S. Truman – the buck stopped with him (AFP via Getty Images)
Each of those presidents earned their place in the White House on the backs of failures by their predecessors, yet to a man they chose to move forward and push their own agenda based on their own electoral mandates, rather than prosecute claims against those who'd come before.
Not so with Trump.
Over his first 100 days, NBC News reported that he invoked Biden's name an average of more than six times a day, every day since January 20, the day he was sworn in.
Trump brought up Biden 12 times on the day he took office — a marked contrast to the man he'd replaced, who during his first few years in office scarcely uttered Trump's name — plus 16 times during his record-length address to a joint session of Congress in March. During his most recent cabinet meeting on Thursday, he and his top aides invoked the Democrat's name nearly 50 times over the course of two hours, including a question and answer session with reporters.
It was just hours after the Bureau of Economic Analysis published statistics showing that the first quarter of year — mostly during Trump's presidency — had resulted in the economy contracting for the first time in years.
Though he routinely took credit for economic highs during the latter years of the Biden presidency when he was running against him, Trump blamed Biden for his own bad numbers. When The Independent pressed him on why, he went so far as to suggest he'd blame Biden if the next three months were equally bad.
Biden attended Trump's inauguration in January. Trump had refused to do the same for his rival four years earlier (REUTERS)
He replied that he was 'not taking credit or discredit for the stock market.'
'I'm just saying that we inherited a mess,' he said. 'You could look at every single one of the people here and no matter who it is, they're doing better and they are far superior to what took place for four years before.'
Trump continued riffing on that theme during a pair of incongruous appearances on Thursday — a National Day of Prayer event in the Rose Garden and a commencement address at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
He mentioned Biden during both, using his name at times like an epithet and blaming him for the poor state of things.
Andrew Bates, a former principal deputy press secretary in the Biden White House, told The Independent via text message that Trump's inability to keep the former president's name out of his mouth was a telling sign of insecurity about how he has handled the economy Biden left him.
'Joe Biden handed Donald Trump an economy that was out-matching all our rivals; experts called it 'the envy of the world.' In 100 days, Trump sent that economy into an unprecedented tailspin with tariffs that are the biggest middle class tax increase in modern history — tariffs Joe Biden publicly warned against. Trump's about to worsen that self-inflicted damage with inflationary tax giveaways for the rich. Meanwhile, he's exploiting his private clubs to profit off the presidency,' he said.
'It makes sense that the name of a President with a better economic record is on Trump's mind, but I'm surprised he wants Americans thinking about how much better off they were before the Trump Crime Family was in charge."
Trump may want Americans to blame Biden for any negative results from his own policies, but it doesn't look like voters are interested for the most part.
Nearly half of voters surveyed in April by Gallup in a recent poll believe that Trump is more responsible for the unstable economy than Biden, up three percent from the previous month.
Larry Sabato, the director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics, told The Independent that Trump's deflections are only working on those who are going to believe him no matter what because his MAGA base won't ever tire of blaming Biden.
'Cult members always listen approvingly to the cult leader. As for everyone else, the Biden blame game is already stale. Yes, Biden is as unpopular as ever, but every person knows from their own experience that you have to accept some responsibility for what happens on your watch,' he said.
Sabato added that Trump has 'overdone' the Biden attacks, leading Americans to tune them out.
'If there's a recession, Katie bar the door. It will be the Trump Recession, and there's no escaping his personal responsibility,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
16 minutes ago
- Fox News
Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss
The Trump administration is fighting to pause a second court ruling that blocked President Donald Trump's sweeping and so-called reciprocal tariffs, the signature economic policy of his second term. The administration's new appeal, filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, comes less than a week after a very similar court challenge played out in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) in New York, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington. At issue in both cases is Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to enact his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariff plan. The plan, which Trump announced on April 2, invokes IEEPA for both his 10% baseline tariff on most U.S. trading partners and a so-called "reciprocal tariff" against other countries. Trump's use of the emergency law to invoke widespread tariffs was struck down unanimously last week by the three-judge CIT panel, which said the statute does not give Trump "unbounded" power to implement tariffs. However, the decision was almost immediately stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, allowing Trump's tariffs to continue. But in a lesser-discussed ruling on the very same day, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee, determined that Trump's tariffs were unlawful under IEEPA. Since the case before him had more limited reach than the case heard by the CIT – plaintiffs in the suit focused on harm to two small businesses, versus harm from the broader tariff plan – it went almost unnoticed in news headlines. But that changed on Monday. Lawyers for the Justice Department asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – a Washington-based but still separate court than the Federal Court of Appeals – to immediately stay the judge's ruling. They argued in their appeal that the judge's ruling against Trump's use of IEEPA undercuts his ability to use tariffs as a "credible threat" in trade talks, at a time when such negotiations "currently stand at a delicate juncture." "By holding the tariffs invalid, the district court's ruling usurps the President's authority and threatens to disrupt sensitive, ongoing negotiations with virtually every trading partner by undercutting the premise of those negotiations – that the tariffs are a credible threat," Trump lawyers said in the filing. Economists also seemed to share this view that the steep tariffs were more a negotiating tactic than an espousal of actual policy, which they noted in a series of interviews last week with Fox News Digital. The bottom line for the Trump administration "is that they need to get back to a place [where] they are using these huge reciprocal tariffs and all of that as a negotiating tactic," William Cline, an economist and senior fellow emeritus at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said in an interview. Cline noted that this was the framework previously laid out by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who had embraced the tariffs as more of an opening salvo for future trade talks, including between the U.S. and China. "I think the thing to keep in mind there is that Trump and Vance have this view that tariffs are beautiful because they will restore America's Rust Belt jobs and that they'll collect money while they're doing it, which will contribute to fiscal growth," said Cline, the former deputy managing director and chief economist of the Institute of International Finance. "Those are both fantasies." What comes next in the case remains to be seen. The White House said it will take its tariff fight to the Supreme Court if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiffs echoed that view in an interview with Fox News. But it's unclear if the Supreme Court would choose to take up the case, which comes at a time when Trump's relationship with the judiciary has come under increasing strain. In the 20 weeks since the start of his second White House term, lawyers for the Trump administration have filed 18 emergency appeals to the high court, indicating both the pace and breadth of the tense court battles.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
American Pacific Mining Among 3 TSX Penny Stocks To Consider
As the Canadian market navigates ongoing tariff uncertainties, investors are encouraged to maintain patience and diversification, with recent trends showing resilience in both U.S. and Canadian indices despite these challenges. In this context, penny stocks—though an outdated term—still represent a compelling investment area for those seeking growth opportunities among smaller or newer companies. By focusing on penny stocks with strong financial health, investors can potentially uncover valuable opportunities that combine affordability with promising growth potential. Name Share Price Market Cap Financial Health Rating Westbridge Renewable Energy (TSXV:WEB) CA$0.75 CA$75.86M ★★★★★★ NTG Clarity Networks (TSXV:NCI) CA$2.74 CA$116.41M ★★★★★★ Intermap Technologies (TSX:IMP) CA$2.30 CA$131.52M ★★★★★☆ Thor Explorations (TSXV:THX) CA$0.68 CA$446.12M ★★★★★★ Orezone Gold (TSX:ORE) CA$1.27 CA$669.5M ★★★★★☆ McChip Resources (TSXV:MCS) CA$0.84 CA$4.8M ★★★★★★ Hemisphere Energy (TSXV:HME) CA$1.74 CA$168.18M ★★★★★★ PetroTal (TSX:TAL) CA$0.58 CA$530.69M ★★★★★☆ Pulse Seismic (TSX:PSD) CA$2.65 CA$134.5M ★★★★★★ Findev (TSXV:FDI) CA$0.405 CA$11.6M ★★★★★★ Click here to see the full list of 877 stocks from our TSX Penny Stocks screener. Let's uncover some gems from our specialized screener. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: American Pacific Mining Corp. focuses on the exploration and development of precious and base metals in the Western United States, with a market cap of CA$51.49 million. Operations: Currently, there are no reported revenue segments for the company. Market Cap: CA$51.49M American Pacific Mining Corp., with a market cap of CA$51.49 million, is pre-revenue and focuses on exploration in the Western U.S. The company recently reported a net income of CA$3.49 million for 2024, marking a turnaround from the previous year's loss. Their ongoing 3,000-meter drill program at Madison Copper-Gold Project targets high-impact areas to explore skarn and porphyry mineralization potential, leveraging insights from the Silverstar Fault Complex. With no debt and experienced management and board members, American Pacific Mining is strategically positioned to potentially capitalize on its exploration efforts despite inherent risks in pre-revenue ventures. Navigate through the intricacies of American Pacific Mining with our comprehensive balance sheet health report here. Explore historical data to track American Pacific Mining's performance over time in our past results report. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★★★ Overview: C-Com Satellite Systems Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells transportable and mobile satellite-based antenna systems internationally, with a market cap of CA$45.21 million. Operations: The company generates revenue of CA$5.96 million from the design and manufacture of auto-deploying mobile satellite antennas. Market Cap: CA$45.21M C-Com Satellite Systems Inc., with a market cap of CA$45.21 million, is navigating challenges as its revenues declined to CA$0.70 million in Q1 2025 from CA$2.63 million the previous year, resulting in a net loss of CA$0.50 million compared to prior net income. Despite being debt-free and having seasoned management and board members with average tenures of 17.8 and 21.3 years respectively, the company faces profitability hurdles as losses have increased annually by 15.7% over five years, highlighting volatility typical for penny stocks while maintaining stability in share dilution and liabilities coverage through its assets. Jump into the full analysis health report here for a deeper understanding of C-Com Satellite Systems. Gain insights into C-Com Satellite Systems' past trends and performance with our report on the company's historical track record. Simply Wall St Financial Health Rating: ★★★★☆☆ Overview: Fuerte Metals Corp. focuses on identifying, exploring, and evaluating mineral properties in Chile, Mexico, and the Americas with a market cap of CA$41.60 million. Operations: Currently, Fuerte Metals Corp. does not report any revenue segments. Market Cap: CA$41.6M Fuerte Metals Corp., with a market cap of CA$41.60 million, is pre-revenue and faces challenges typical for penny stocks. The company reported a net loss of CA$2.5 million in Q1 2025, an improvement from the previous year's larger loss. Recent drilling at its Cristina project in Mexico has shown promising high-grade gold zones, suggesting potential resource expansion. Despite being debt-free and covering short-term liabilities with assets, Fuerte Metals has less than a year of cash runway and faces going concern doubts from auditors due to its unprofitable status and limited financial flexibility. Click here to discover the nuances of Fuerte Metals with our detailed analytical financial health report. Learn about Fuerte Metals' historical performance here. Investigate our full lineup of 877 TSX Penny Stocks right here. Want To Explore Some Alternatives? We've found 19 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yeild of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include CNSX:USGD TSXV:CMI and TSXV:FMT. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jamie Dimon says he's not retiring from JPMorgan Chase for 'several years'
Don't expect JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon to step down anytime soon. That's still 'several years away,' he said on Monday. 'I love what I do. I love my country, and I don't know what I'd do if I wasn't fighting for something every day,' he said in a Fox News (FOXA) interview. Dimon kept the door open to staying on as executive chairman of the board after stepping aside from the top job. 'It's up to God and the board,' he added. Last year, Dimon said he would retire from the CEO job within five years. He has helmed the nation's largest bank for nearly two decades and is among the longest-running chief executives on Wall Street. JPMorgan's stock has soared 500% since Dimon became CEO in 2006, the Wall Street Journal reported. JPMorgan Chase reshuffled its executive leadership team at the start of 2024, handing some key executives 'new and increased responsibilities' and installing new leadership in other critical divisions — many of whom have stood out as potential replacements for Dimon. In the Fox News interview, the JPMorgan Chase CEO warned of more turmoil in bond markets if investors wary of the nation's growing debt shun the American dollar. 'If people decide that the U.S. dollar isn't the place to be, you could see credit spreads gap out; that would be quite a problem,' Dimon said. 'It hurts the people raising money. That includes small businesses, that includes loans to small businesses, includes high yield debt, includes leveraged lending, includes real estate loans. That's why you should worry about volatility in the bond market.' —Rocio Fabbro contributed to this article. For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.