Sean Charles Dunn: DC Man Who Hurled Subway Sandwich at Federal Agent Charged with Felony Assault
Dunn was caught on camera as he allegedly shouted at and assaulted an officer using his Subway meal on August 10. The decision to slap criminal charges on Dunn comes as the White House vowed to "restore law and order" in the nation's capital. Police say that more charges could be pressed on the attacker.
Caught on Camera
Sean Charles Dunn seen throwing a Subway sandwich at a Federal agent during DC crackdown X
"He thought it was funny. Well he doesn't think it's funny today because we charged him with a felony: Assault on a police officer," Pirro said in a video posted to X. In a shocking video taken by a bystander, Dunn can be heard yelling at a group of US Border Patrol agents, calling them "f*cking fascists."
Holding his meal — his chosen weapon — he pointed at the federal officers and shouted "shame."
The tense confrontation unfolded right outside the busy Subway location where Dunn had bought the now-infamous sandwich.
After several moments of shouting from across the street, the suspect moved toward the agents and confronted Agent Gregory Lairmore directly.
While the agents stayed composed, Dunn grew more aggressive, standing just feet from one officer's face. He then hurled his footlong sandwich at Lairmore's chest before trying to make a run for it.
His escape attempt quickly failed, as agents chased him down and restrained him within moments of the attack.
Photos from the chaotic incident show the pink collared shirt-wearing suspect surrounded by officers from multiple agencies, including CBP and the FBI.
Dunn was arrested and booked at the Metropolitan Police Department's Third District. He allegedly told an officer: "I did it. I threw a sandwich."
No More Tolerance
Sean Charles Dunn seen confronting Federal agents before throwing a sandwich at one of them X
"We're gonna back the police to the hill. So there, stick your Subway sandwich somewhere else!" Pirro asserted in her video announcement. Dunn's arrest came as part of a broad crime crackdown launched under the Trump administration.
"We will rebuild our once-great cities, including our capital in Washington, DC, making them safe, clean, and beautiful again - and we want to make this city again safe," Trump said in January.
"We don't want people coming to Washington and getting mugged, shot, killed. We're going to stop it."
In March, Trump formed a task force with the purpose of "surging law enforcement to restore order and enhance' DC's infrastructure."
He has described the city as facing a "rampant crime crisis" and labeled it a "nightmare of murder and crime."
On Sunday, Trump wrote on Truth Social, "MR. NICE GUY. We want our capital back."
Earlier in the day, he criticized homelessness on the streets and announced that FBI agents would collaborate with DC police to address the problem, according to his post. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital," Trump posted on Truth Social.
"The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump revokes security clearance of 37 former and current officials
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Among those whose security clearance has been stripped is a senior Central Intelligence Agency analyst currently serving undercover. WASHINGTON – American President Donald Trump revoked the security clearance of 37 current and former national security officials, many of whom worked on Russia analysis or foreign threats to US elections, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Mr Trump has stripped security clearances throughout his administration, including from his best-known rivals like former president Joe Biden. But the actions announced on Aug 19 were a deeper cut, pushing far into the national security establishment. At least three current senior officials at various intelligence agencies, all with reputations for non-partisan work, are among those who lost their clearance and their jobs. They included Ms Shelby Pierson, a senior intelligence official who warned Congress about Russian meddling in the 2020 election; a senior Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) analyst currently serving undercover; and Mr Vinh X. Nguyen, a senior National Security Agency (NSA) data scientist. Rescinding security clearance appears to be part of a campaign by Ms Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, to reveal what she sees as flaws in intelligence assessments about Russian malign influence operations during the 2016 election. Ms Gabbard's attention to that issue has won praise from Mr Trump, who has long claimed without evidence that the Obama administration tried to undermine him in that vote. Critics also say that Mr Trump has turned the focus onto the 2016 election to distract from questions about disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'Gabbard's move to yank clearances from a seemingly random list of national security officials is a reckless abuse of the security clearance process and nothing more than another sad attempt to distract from the administration's failure to release the Epstein files,' said Democratic Senator Mark Warner, who is vice-chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Mr Warner said he had introduced legislation to create standards for security clearances and prevent political abuse of the system. Current and former officials said they were particularly distraught by the removal of Mr Nguyen, a gifted mathematician, from the NSA. Mr Nguyen was mentioned in an article in Real Clear Investigations that noted his work for the director of national intelligence at the time of the 2016 election assessments. The article was highlighted on social media by Mr Sebastian Gorka, a Trump administration national security official. Mr Nguyen is an expert on quantum computing, data science and cyber issues. He has been working on artificial intelligence projects for the agency. Former officials said the loss of his expertise could set back the US government's development of key technologies. Ms Gabbard is not the only administration official releasing documents or investigating the 2016 intelligence assessments. After she released a report and accused the Obama administration of a 'treasonous conspiracy', Attorney-General Pam Bondi announced a task force to look into potential wrongdoing. Mr John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, declassified a tradecraft review related to the 2016 inquiries and made a referral to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) seeking an investigation of Mr John Brennan, the former CIA head. On Aug 19 , Ms Gabbard released a memo on social media about her actions, which she said were taken at the direction of Mr Trump. 'Being entrusted with a security clearance is a privilege, not a right,' Ms Gabbard wrote. 'Those in the intelligence community who betray their oath to the Constitution and put their own interests ahead of the interests of the American people have broken the sacred trust they promised to uphold.' Ms Gabbard's office claimed that the people who would lose their security clearances were involved in the 'politicisation or weaponisation of intelligence' to advance partisan agendas, or had failed to adhere to tradecraft practices or to safeguard classified information. The memo provided no evidence that the individuals had mishandled material or used it for partisan purposes. While stripping the security clearances of current officials effectively removes them from their jobs, it is not clear how many of the 37 individuals were currently employed by intelligence agencies or held government contracts. It is also not clear how many of the former officials maintained a current clearance. Most former officials who are not working for government contractors do not need clearances, though some do informal or formal consulting for intelligence officials. Holding a clearance makes such advising easier. Many of the officials have only tangential ties or no ties to the original analysis of Russian malign influence operations. Some have been mentioned in reporting about the 2016 election assessments or have commented on the intelligence work publicly. Mr Edward Gistaro and Ms Beth Sanner, both of whom briefed Mr Trump during his first term, were also on the list. Both were mentioned in a recent book on the CIA written by Mr Tim Weiner. Many of the individuals have commented publicly on national security matters. Some, though not all, had been critical of the Trump administration. After serving as an election threat official, Ms Pierson returned to the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency to take a senior position. She has been leading the agency's analysis team, according to former officials. During the first Trump administration, Mr Richard Grenell, who was the acting director of national intelligence agency, opted to keep Ms Pierson in her post. Members of the Biden administration's national security staff will also lose their clearance, including Mr Maher Bitar, who was a senior director for intelligence, and Ms Emily Horne, a former spokesperson. The order stripping Mr Bitar of his clearance presents a potential separation-of-powers issue. He is now a senior national security aide to Democratic Senator Adam Schiff. Mr Mark Zaid, a lawyer who frequently represents intelligence officials and whose own security clearance was stripped by the Trump administration, said that stripping security clearances in the name of ending politicisation was hypocritical. 'These are unlawful and unconstitutional decisions that deviate from well-settled, decades-old laws and policies that sought to protect against just this type of action,' Mr Zaid said. Referring to the intelligence community, he continued: 'It has become clear that the current IC leadership itself constitutes a grave danger to national security.' Ms Gabbard has been removing security clearances of former officials in keeping with an executive order from Mr Trump and as part of her efforts to counter the 'politicisation or weaponisation of intelligence'. CIA and NSA officials declined to comment, and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency did not return a request for comment. NYTIMES
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump rules out US troops but eyes air power in Ukraine deal
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky (right) is welcomed to the White House by US President Donald Trump on Aug 18. WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump on Aug 19 ruled out sending US troops but envisioned extending US air power as Western nations began hashing out security guarantees for Ukraine before any potential summit with Russia. Mr Trump, in a flurry of diplomacy aimed at ending the war, brought Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and top European leaders to the White House on Aug 18, three days after his landmark encounter with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Mr Trump said President Putin, whom he called in the middle of the Aug 18 talks, had agreed to meet Mr Zelensky and to accept some form of Western security guarantees for Ukraine against Russia – promises met with extreme caution by Kyiv and European leaders. Mr Putin proposed holding the summit with Mr Zelensky in Moscow, three sources familiar with the Trump call told AFP. One source said Mr Zelensky immediately said no to the Russian capital. Mr Trump, long a fierce critic of the billions of dollars in US support to Ukraine since Russia invaded in 2022, said that European nations would take the lead by sending troops to secure any settlement – an idea that has been mulled by France and Britain. 'When it comes to security, they're willing to put people on the ground,' Mr Trump said in a Fox News interview. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore FairPrice apologises after worm found in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Married man who offered cash to 12-year-old girl for sexual acts gets 19 months' jail 'We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably, if you talk about by air, because no one has the kind of stuff we have. Really, they don't,' Mr Trump said. He added his 'assurance' that no US ground troops would deploy to Ukraine, and he again categorically ruled out Ukraine joining the Western military alliance Nato. Mr Trump has sided with Mr Putin in describing Kyiv's Nato aspirations as a cause for the war, in which tens of thousands of people have died. European leaders, Ukraine and Mr Trump's predecessor Joe Biden called the issue a pretext and pointed to Mr Putin's statements rejecting the historical legitimacy of Ukraine. Allies discuss next steps Following the Trump talks, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer brought together around 30 of Ukraine's allies known as the 'Coalition of the Willing' for virtual consultations. Mr Starmer told them coalition teams and US officials would meet in the coming days to discuss security guarantees and 'prepare for the deployment of a reassurance force if the hostilities ended,' a Downing Street spokesperson said. 'The leaders also discussed how further pressure – including through sanctions – could be placed on Putin until he showed he was ready to take serious action to end his illegal invasion.' Mr Macron, speaking to reporters before leaving Washington, also called for additional sanctions if Mr Putin does not show a willingness for peace. Britain's military chief, Admiral Tony Radakin, will travel to Washington on Aug 20 for the talks on reassurances. The military chiefs of staff of all Nato's 32 member countries will also meet by video on Aug 20 to discuss Ukraine, officials said. Geneva offered as host Russia has warned that any solution must also protect its own interests. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told state television channel Rossiya 24 that any deal must ensure the rights of 'Russian-speaking people who live in Ukraine,' another issue cited by Moscow for the offensive launched in February 2022. Moscow would surely be seen as a provocative location for a summit, with suggestions it would amount to a surrender by Ukraine. Mr Macron told French news channel LCI he wanted the summit to take place in Geneva, a historic venue for peace talks. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis said the government would be ready to offer immunity to Putin, who faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court related to abuses in the war. Mr Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz have both said the summit could take place in two weeks. Mr Trump also is seeking a three-way summit involving him, while Mr Macron has called for a four-way meeting to involve Europeans who will be vital to Ukraine's security. On the streets of Kyiv, there was scepticism about whether the latest talks can end the grinding conflict. 'The main problem is Putin himself doesn't want it,' said Anton, 32, who works in a warehouse. 'They can meet as many times as they want but Putin doesn't need it and Donald Trump doesn't really know what to do.' But in Moscow, some people were more optimistic. 'I hope we can agree on mutually beneficial terms,' said Vyacheslav, 23, who works for the government. AFP
Straits Times
9 hours ago
- Straits Times
More Republican governors send National Guard to Washington, backing Trump
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Members of the National Guard patrol after U.S. President Donald Trump deployed the force and ordered an increased presence of federal law enforcement to assist in crime prevention, in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 18, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno Hundreds of additional National Guard troops are headed to Washington, D.C., from half a dozen Republican-led states, bolstering President Donald Trump's aggressive move to flood the city with soldiers and federal agents in what he says is an effort to fight violent crime. The Republican governors of Mississippi, Louisiana, and Tennessee agreed to deploy troops to Washington, days after the Republican governors of West Virginia, South Carolina, and Ohio also did so at the Trump administration's request. Trump has characterized Washington as overrun with violence and homelessness, a description local officials have rejected. Federal and city statistics show violent crime rates have dropped sharply since a spike in 2023, though the city's murder rate remains higher than most other big U.S. cities. Trump announced on August 11 he had ordered 800 Guard troops to the city and temporarily taken control of the city's police department, an extraordinary exercise of presidential power over the U.S. capital. The federal government also dispatched agents from numerous agencies, including the FBI, to patrol the city's streets. Following a legal challenge filed by the city's attorney general, the administration negotiated a deal with Mayor Muriel Bowser to keep Police Chief Pamela Smith in charge of the department's operations. Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry said he had approved the deployment of about 135 Guard soldiers to Washington, while Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves said he had ordered 200 soldiers to the capital. Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has also deployed 160 Guard troops to the city, according to local media reports. "Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it," Reeves said in a statement. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore FairPrice apologises after worm found in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Married man who offered cash to 12-year-old girl for sexual acts gets 19 months' jail In total, the six Republican states have announced deployments of more than 1,100 Guard troops to Washington. TESTING LIMITS Guard soldiers, most of whom have civilian jobs and serve part-time, often respond to natural disasters and other emergencies. While the National Guard in Washington reports to the president, governors typically control the Guard in their own states. Trump tested that authority in June, when he ordered thousands of National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles as protests over his administration's immigration raids flared up. The deployment came despite opposition from California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. A federal judge in San Francisco is weighing whether Trump's actions in Los Angeles were illegal, after California sued the administration. Federal law generally forbids the use of the military in law enforcement, but there are exceptions, including for National Guard troops that are under state command, such as California's. In 2020, during Trump's first administration, the White House requested Guard troops from numerous states to help restore order in Washington in the wake of racial justice protests. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr said the National Guard remained under state command and was used to protect federal buildings and personnel. Even so, Barr said their duties would include controlling crowds, temporarily detaining people, and conducting "cursory" searches, activities usually associated with police. Critics said the 2020 experience in Washington potentially opened the way for the president to use armed troops against civilians. Trump has suggested he could target additional Democrat-led cities, though he would likely face more legal obstacles than in Washington, where the federal government still has broad oversight under the law. A White House official said on Tuesday that Guard troops in Washington may carry arms but were not making arrests. Instead, the soldiers are protecting federal property and providing "a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests." Some 465 arrests have been made in the 12 days since the Trump administration's operations began, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Tuesday, an average of 39 arrests a day. The city's Metropolitan Police Department arrested an average of 61 adults and juveniles per day in 2024, according to city statistics. REUTERS
