How one developer outsmarted dozens of startups—and what it says about work today
He used his real name. Showed up on calls. Wrote some code. Then vanished—only to surface again at another startup, mid-sprint, fully onboarded. By the time each team realised something was off—missed meetings, odd excuses, clashing updates—he was already clocking hours elsewhere.
No fake profiles. No aliases. Just a clean trail of GitHub commits and Slack intros. Soham wasn't gaming the system. He simply walked through it.
And he did it over and over again.
***
Parekh, a full-stack developer, became an open secret in founder circles this month. Hacker News threads, Slack screenshots, Twitter jokes, Reddit rants—all echoed the same disbelief: 'Wait, we hired him too?"
One YC-backed startup claimed he worked with them nearly a year. Others noticed earlier, spotting odd overlaps in his LinkedIn timeline. One founder even recalled Soham attending a trial day in person—only to leave halfway through, saying he had to meet a lawyer.
But Parekh didn't disappear. He kept showing up. Just somewhere else.
'So this whole time, AI wasn't taking jobs. Soham was."
— @ArthurMacwaters
The rise of the overemployed
Parekh is not the first engineer to work multiple jobs in parallel. In November 2022, Vanity Fair published a piece titled Overemployed in Silicon Valley: How Scores of Tech Workers Are Secretly Juggling Multiple Jobs.
It told of engineers quietly holding down two, three, even four full-time roles. Some used mouse-jigglers to fake activity. Others ran multiple laptops. One admitted to outsourcing work to Fiverr, an online marketplace for freelance services. A few worked in coordinated Discord communities, sharing tactics.
'I'm not sure if they even know I'm here anymore," one engineer told the reporter. 'All my paychecks are still coming in."
At the time, it read like a side effect of the remote-work boom. A strange consequence of too many laptops and not enough oversight. Some employees simply treated employment like a short-term asset. If no one was watching, why stay loyal?
Parekh didn't need any of that infrastructure. He used his real name. Real resume. Showed up on video calls. Wrote code. Left a trail. He just moved through the system cleanly.
'He crushed our interviews. Worked for us almost a year. Solid job. We only let him go when we found out he was working multiple jobs."
— commenter 'dazzeloid', Hacker News
***
What his story shows is how little it takes to get hired—and stay hired.
One startup said he 'crushed the interviews." Another called him 'top 0.1%." Founders praised his GitHub, his side projects, his email follow-ups. The problem, they said, began only when the job did. That gap—between performance in a vetting process and actual engagement—isn't incidental. It's structural.
Startups, especially ones chasing growth, have narrowed hiring into structured calls and take-home tasks. Processes are recycled across founder networks. Culture fit becomes a checkbox. Most of the time, it comes down to gut feel. Which is just another way of saying: we don't really know.
In that kind of system, someone who interviews well and ships enough can coast for months. If that person is also working three other jobs, the signs fade gradually. By the time someone notices, it's already awkward to ask.
As one Hacker News commenter put it: 'Lots of YC companies copy each other's hiring process. Same blind spots. Same playbook. Easy to scam with the same persona."
The AI comparison isn't a joke
There's another wrinkle. Soham may not have been doing anything that couldn't be done today by an AI agent.
More than one founder joked—what if he was a bot? It's a joke that lands dangerously close to reality.
AI agents today can write code, respond to support tickets, and mimic Slack chatter. The boundary between human contributor and AI script is already thinning.
And if you can't tell whether you're working with a disengaged employee or a competent script—what exactly are you hiring?
***
We've seen this fragility before.
Back in 2022, Wipro fired 300 employees for moonlighting. Chairman Rishad Premji called it 'cheating—plain and simple." The public backlash, however, told a different story. Critics pointed out hypocrisy—executives sit on multiple boards, consultants juggle clients, why not engineers?
The Soham episode surfaces the same tension.
It's not just about overemployment. It's about trust, and the changing texture of work. Who gets to be considered present? What does loyalty mean in a system built on churn?
Parekh is a consequence of that mismatch. He's not a rogue actor. He's the product of a hiring culture that values performance over presence, delivery over connection. A culture that claims to build teams but rarely asks who's actually part of them.
***
So what happens when the next Soham is indistinguishable from an AI agent?
Srikanth Nadhamuni, the former CTO of Aadhaar, believes we'll need to rethink identity itself. In a recent paper, he proposed Personhood Credentials—a cryptographic and biometric framework to prove that a person behind a digital interaction is real, unique, and singular.
The concept sounds abstract, even dystopian. But Nadhamuni argues that in a world of deepfakes and synthetic voice agents, systems like Aadhaar—originally built for public verification—could help anchor digital interactions to actual humans. He describes it as a privacy-preserving firewall against the collapse of trust online.
Startups often claim to be 'people-first." But what happens when you can't even confirm there's a person?
The Soham Parekh story isn't about scamming startups. It's about the gap between how we hire and how we work. A system optimised for speed and scale, not relationship or accountability.
He didn't crack the system. He revealed it was already broken.
Pankaj Mishra is a journalist and co-founder of FactorDaily.
Read more stories by the author:
AI didn't take the job. It changed what the job is.
Factory floors reimagined: How Quess is putting AI agents to work
AI saved a boy from leukaemia in rural Maharashtra—before it was too late
India's unicorn obsession has a human cost
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
US Envoy says Israel's turn to 'comply' as Lebanon moves to disarm Hezbollah
U.S. Envoy Tom Barrack on Monday (August 18, 2025) called on Israel to honour commitments under a ceasefire that ended its war with Hezbollah, after the Lebanese government launched a process to disarm the militant group. Under the November truce, which ended more than a year of hostilities including two months of all-out war between Israel and Hezbollah, the Iran-backed group was to withdraw its fighters from near the Israeli border and weapons were to come under the control of the Lebanese state. Israel was to withdraw its troops from the country but has kept them at five border points it deems strategic and has continued to strike Lebanon, threatening to do so until Hezbollah has been disarmed. "There's always a step-by-step approach but I think the Lebanese government has done their part. They've taken the first step. Now what we need is Israel to comply," Barrack said following a meeting in Beirut with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun. "We're all moving in the right direction," he said after meeting parliament speaker Nabih Berri. Berri, a Hezbollah ally, said Israel's commitment to the ceasefire and its troop withdrawal was "the gateway to stability in Lebanon", a statement said. 'Progress' Asked by reporters whether he expected to see Israel fully withdraw from Lebanese territory and stop its violations, Barrack said that "that's exactly the next step" needed. "We need participation on the part of Israel, and we need an economic plan for prosperity, restoration and renovation," the US diplomat added, with Lebanon weighed down by an economic crisis. Barrack said Washington was "in the process of now discussing with Israel what their position is", adding that "in the next few weeks you're going to see progress on all sides." "It means a better life for the people... and at least the beginning of a roadway to a different kind of dialogue" in the region, he said. The visit comes after Lebanon's cabinet tasked the army with developing a plan to disarm Hezbollah by year end -- an unprecedented step since civil war factions gave up their weapons decades ago. The cabinet has also tackled a US proposal that includes a timetable for Hezbollah's disarmament, with Washington pressing Lebanon to take action. The cabinet endorsed the introduction of the US text, which lists 11 objectives including to "ensure the sustainability" of the ceasefire, and to phase out "the armed presence of all non-state actors, including Hezbollah" across all Lebanese territory. It also provides for demarcating Lebanon's land borders with Israel and neighbouring Syria, and a process involving the international community to support reconstruction. 'Lebanese process' Aoun told Barrack that what was needed was for "other parties to adhere to the contents" of the joint declaration, "more support for the Lebanese army", and expedited steps towards reconstruction, the presidency said. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam said Washington needed to "fulfil its responsibility in pressuring Israel halt hostilities", withdraw troops and release Lebanese prisoners it holds. Hezbollah, the only faction that kept its weapons after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war, emerged badly weakened from last year's war with Israel. On Friday, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem vowed to fight plans to disarm, saying that "the resistance will not surrender its weapons while... occupation persists". On Sunday, Aoun told the Saudi-owned Al Arabiya channel authorities would do "everything possible... to spare Lebanon any internal or external shock". If Lebanon rejected the US plan, "then Israel will intensify its attacks, Lebanon will be economically isolated, and none of us will be able to respond to the aggression", he said. Barrack on Monday stressed that "dealing with Hezbollah, as we've always said, is a Lebanese process".
Economic Times
4 hours ago
- Economic Times
WhatsApp calling gets major update; call scheduling, reactions now available
WhatsApp has introduced new features allowing users to schedule group calls and invite them to join in advance, the company said in a blog post. The move is aimed at making the platform more interactive and planned, catering to both personal and professional use, protected by end-to-end encryption. How does it work? Press the + button in your Calls tab Click on the Schedule call option Invite people or groups you want to schedule the call with Attendees will receive a reminder notification before the call begins Additionally, users can manage all the upcoming calls in the same tab alongside a list of attendees and call links. The individual who generates the call link will also receive notifications when someone joins. Personalisation weighs in In addition to scheduling calls, users can also react in multiple ways to express themselves on group calls, such as the 'raise hand' option. The development comes after the Meta-backed messaging platform unveiled 'Message Summaries' in late June, integrating MetaAI capabilities to generate private summaries for chats so that users get an idea of what is happening before reading the details in the unread messages. As per the report by AFP, the Mark Zuckerberg-owned company is also planning to roll out three new monetisation features exclusively within its Updates tab, i.e., paid channel subscriptions, promoted channels in its Discovery directory, and ads within Status. Also Read: Enterprises dial up cost savings with WhatsApp calling
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Mumbai boss narrates the emotional turmoil he suffered after saying 'today is your last day' to 25 employees in a day
A Mumbai-based corporate trainer, Sampark Sachdeva, has recalled the emotional turmoil he faced when asked to fire 25 employees in a single day. In a LinkedIn post, he described how managers were instructed to remain detached and deliver the words, 'Today is your last day,' without apology or compassion. He shared how the faces of a single mother, a father with a home loan, and others continue to haunt him years later. While many professionals empathised with his honesty, some online users criticised the post as overly dramatic. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Breaking Down After the Task Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mixed reactions online For many employees, losing a job is one of the most difficult professional setbacks. But the experience can also weigh heavily on those delivering the decision. This reality was recently described by Mumbai-based corporate trainer and former founder Sampark Sachdeva, who recalled the day he was asked to terminate 25 employees, one after the other. He described it as the 'darkest day' of his corporate a LinkedIn post that went viral, Sachdeva wrote about the emotionally draining process of telling staff, 'Today is your last day.' He explained that managers were instructed to stay detached—no softening of words, no apologies, no expressions of sympathy. Instead, the procedure was mechanical: collect ID cards, retrieve laptops, and assure the employees that HR would follow up with first person he spoke to was a single mother. Sachdeva remembered how she broke down as the reality sank in. Behind every name on his list, he said, was a different personal struggle—an employee with a home loan, a father worried about his children, and a young professional who had moved cities for the shared that while executing the instructions, he kept his composure. But once the final conversation was over, he stepped out and cried at work for the first time in his career. He admitted that he did not feel like a leader that day, but instead like a 'face delivering a system's decision.' He recalled being haunted by the silence in the room and the tears of his colleagues long after the day emphasised that corporate life often stresses resilience, but said it must also encourage compassion. According to him, leadership is not only about making decisions but also about living with their post quickly gathered attention online. On LinkedIn, many professionals expressed empathy, saying the account highlighted the unseen weight leaders carry. Industry veterans such as Rama Shankar Pandey called it a very human reflection, while another professional, Ransom Joseph, noted how rarely such experiences are spoken Reddit, however, reactions were divided. Some users in the 'LinkedIn Lunatics' community questioned whether the post was overly dramatic or performative, while others defended it as a much-needed reminder that behind every termination is a human concluded that years later, he still remembers the faces of those he had to let go. For him, the experience remains a lasting lesson: corporate organisations may move on, but the emotional weight of such decisions stays.
