logo
Could Trump executive order hold up money for NJ Transit projects, Gateway tunnel?

Could Trump executive order hold up money for NJ Transit projects, Gateway tunnel?

USA Today27-01-2025
One of President Donald Trump's day-one executive orders has already caused chaos and confusion — and could jeopardize billions of dollars in New Jersey transportation projects.
The order, in part, aims to stop funding 'Green New Deal' projects and specifically calls for a pause on two grant programs, the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program and the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant Program, which help fund electric vehicle infrastructure projects, such as charging stations.
But the order also more broadly says 'all agencies shall immediately pause the disbursement of funds' appropriated through two other acts, the Inflation Reduction Act and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act — a far more sweeping, and potentially illegal, action, some experts say.
Story continues below photo gallery.
'The president is bound to enforce the law. That's part of the fundamental oaths you take when you become president," said Kevin DeGood, senior director of infrastructure and housing policy for the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning think tank. "He's also obligated to spend money that Congress appropriates. Absent that, you have a king.'
There are billions of dollars authorized to be spent through the inflation reduction and infrastructure acts across the country on thousands of big and small projects — repairing highways, fixing bridges, buying new trains and buses, and building sidewalks.
On any given day, the federal Highway Trust Fund reimburses project sponsors about $218 million, while about $52.6 million is reimbursed daily for mass transit projects, DeGood said.
Money for new rail cars, zero-emission buses at NJ Transit
In New Jersey, these laws authorized spending on the purchase of new zero-emission buses at NJ Transit and badly needed railcars to replace the old ones that are frequently breaking down.
The laws are also partly funding the largest infrastructure project in the country, the $16 billion program to build a new two-track rail tunnel under the Hudson River for Amtrak and NJ Transit riders.
Trump's executive order is pretty close to an impoundment order, which is illegal under the Impoundment Control Act, said Andrew Rudalevige, a government professor at Bowdoin College.
That 1974 law does allow the executive branch to pause federal spending with a letter to Congress, but it can't be paused indefinitely unless Congress approves the rescission of funds, Rudalevige said.
In the near term there could be concerns about the effect on large-scale projects, and in the long term there are questions about checks and balances, Rudalevige said.
How can Congress "pass spending bills if they don't know that the president is going to live up to his end of the bargain?' Rudalevige said. 'This is a big question about how Congress can use its own constitutional powers.'
NJ transportation agencies wading through the confusion
The effect of Trump's executive order has already been felt across local, state and federal agencies.
The Federal Highway Administration last week temporarily shut down its computer system that reimburses agencies and municipalities for authorized projects. The Office of Management and Budget sent out a notice to clarify what programs are subject to the pause and directed agency heads to 'disburse funds as they deem necessary after consulting with the Office of Management and Budget.'
"The U.S. Department of Transportation is complying with President Trump's executive orders and revised guidance from the Office of Management and Budget," said a department spokesperson, who declined to answer emailed questions. The OMB did not respond to a request for comment.
Meanwhile, transportation agencies in New Jersey are scrambling to figure out whether they have already been affected by the FHWA shut down and whether the executive order will affect active projects.
Most agencies have so far interpreted the executive order and clarification from the OMB as applying only to grants related to the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program and the Charging and Fueling Infrastructure Discretionary Grant Program, but nothing is certain.
Steve Schapiro, a spokesman for the New Jersey Transportation Department, declined to say whether the agency has had trouble getting reimbursed for projects so far or what projects could be at risk, but said the agency is 'aware that the FHWA is working through the executive orders and awaiting its guidance.'
Melissa Hayes, a spokeswoman for the North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority, said it was awaiting guidance, but was under the impression that the executive order affects only the two programs related to electric vehicle charging infrastructure.
Steve Sigmund, a spokesman for the Gateway Development Commission, which is building the new rail tunnel beneath the Hudson, said it doesn't anticipate any delays to that mega project.
'GDC appreciates the Office of Management and Budget clarification that the order is not intended to impact nuts-and-bolts infrastructure projects like the Hudson Tunnel Project. We will work collaboratively with our federal partners to ensure we deliver the most urgent infrastructure project in the nation,' Sigmund said.
On Thursday, Jim Smith, an NJ Transit spokesman, said the agency hadn't encountered any issues in the last 48 hours but was evaluating the executive order to determine what effects it may have on NJ Transit projects and programs.
If money is not forthcoming, the recourse for agencies is getting Congress to pressure the president to spend the authorized money or to suing the administration, Rudalevige said.
Congestion pricing
Trump has also vowed to end New York's congestion pricing plan, a tolling program to reduce congestion in Manhattan below 60th Street that received federal approval and launched earlier this month.
So far, there have been no attempts at the federal level to end or pause the program, but many in the region are waiting to see if it will happen — and how such an attempt would be made.
Gov. Phil Murphy wrote a letter to Trump asking the president to take a closer look at the tolling plan, which Murphy said 'has never been well-designed or adequately studied.'
So far, a federal judge has largely disagreed with Murphy and his legal team's argument that the Metropolitan Transportation Authority's 4,000-page environmental review was inadequate, but the governor reiterated that he is still hoping for a lengthier federal review.
'The Biden administration … did not do what is called an environmental impact study, which takes longer but is more comprehensive,' Murphy told reporters last week. 'We're asking the Trump administration to do what the Biden administration did not do.'
Murphy said last Tuesday that he has not yet received a response.
Kate Slevin, executive vice president of the Regional Plan Association, which has advocated for congestion pricing for at least a decade, said the program so far has withstood potential legal challenges.
'It's been successful in reducing traffic as planned. It was authorized under state and federal law, and has been authorized under the federal Value Pricing Program agreement, which has benefited other states,' Slevin said. The MTA "really followed the process and abided by the law, and thus far that is what the outcomes of the legal challenges have shown.'
Yonah Freemark, principal research associate on fair housing, land use and transportation practice area for the Urban Institute, said anything is possible with the Trump administration.
'It would not surprise me if they try to mount a barrier to congestion pricing,' Freemark said. 'If that stands up in court is another question.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pason Systems Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations
Pason Systems Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pason Systems Second Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS Misses Expectations

Pason Systems (TSE:PSI) Second Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: CA$96.4m (flat on 2Q 2024). Net income: CA$12.6m (up 16% from 2Q 2024). Profit margin: 13% (up from 11% in 2Q 2024). EPS: CA$0.16 (up from CA$0.14 in 2Q 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Pason Systems EPS Misses Expectations Revenue was in line with analyst estimates. Earnings per share (EPS) missed analyst estimates by 4.0%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 2.9% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 9.6% growth forecast for the Energy Services industry in Canada. Performance of the Canadian Energy Services industry. The company's share price is broadly unchanged from a week ago. Risk Analysis You still need to take note of risks, for example - Pason Systems has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio

Sean Duffy is doing his a great job at NASA, but it might not be enough
Sean Duffy is doing his a great job at NASA, but it might not be enough

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Sean Duffy is doing his a great job at NASA, but it might not be enough

The naming of Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy as interim NASA administrator was as much of a surprise as was President Trump's withdrawal of his nomination of Jared Isaacman to the same post. So, how is Duffy doing, trying to bring the space agency out from its summer of discontent? Duffy has been spending a lot of his time boosting the Artemis program, designed to return astronauts to the moon and eventually send them to Mars. On the social media platform X, he posted that he 'spoke with the smart leaders of our mission directorates' and the consensus was 'America MUST dominate space and our critical moon mission, #ARTEMIS, must be as known & supported by America just as Apollo was!' He finished saying he was 'fired up and ready to launch.' Duffy repeated his advocacy of the Artemis program on the Fox News show Hannity. He noted that Artemis would proceed in three phases: a return to the moon, establishing a lunar base or outpost and crewed expeditions to Mars. Considering how well the Artemis program polls, Duffy is pursuing a sound political strategy. The trick is that the steps he laid out have to happen on a sensible schedule. Fortunately, Artemis II, the crewed trip around the moon, is slated to occur early in 2026. On the other hand, science journalist Robert Zimmerman gave Duffy the back of his hand for stating on Hannity that Artemis III, the next moon landing, is still a go for 2027. Considering the problems the SpaceX Starship has been having, few people believe that date is valid. However, SpaceX's Gwynne Shotwell has assured Duffy that it is. We'll see. According to Politico, Duffy has called for a 100-kilowatt nuclear reactor to be deployed on the moon by 2030, to provide power for a lunar base. He has also called for the acceleration of commercial space stations that would replace the International Space Station when it ends its operational life. The new plan promises to be very disruptive. Duffy also had a meeting at the Kennedy Space Center with his Russian counterpart. Reuter's Joey Roulette said the meeting discussed ''cooperation on lunar programs' and 'joint exploration of deep space' as well as ISS cooperation,' according to Roscosmos. International Space Station cooperation is a natural topic of conversation between the head of NASA and the head of Roscosmos. The United States and Russia have been partners on the space station since early in the Clinton administration. The partnership exists in its own little universe, separate from the tensions between the two countries brought about by Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Ars Technica reports that Bakanov brought up the possibility of using Russian hardware to deorbit the ISS in 2030. Clearly, he was attempting to take advantage of the feud between Trump and Elon Musk, whose SpaceX currently has the contract. Roscosmos would get a much-needed infusion of cash if it replaced SpaceX. However, the mention of cooperation on lunar programs and the joint exploration of deep space catches the eye. Russia has turned down participation in the Artemis program, preferring to be a partner on China's planned International Lunar Research Station. Russian participation in Artemis was likely dangled as an enticement for Putin to make peace in Ukraine on terms short of conquering the entire country. It would also serve as a way to separate Russia from China, something that has been a center of American foreign policy since the Nixon administration. Finally, Duffy has to deal with the NASA spending war that has developed between the Congress and the White House. A group of Democratic senators sent him a letter expressing their concerns not only about the planned cuts for the next fiscal year but plans to rescind some allocated money for the current fiscal year. They are also concerned about a planned buyout program that would cut 4,000 NASA civil servants. The Senate and House are concerned about NASA's plans to implement the spending plans in the 'big, beautiful bill.' They are demanding answers by Sept. 1. Duffy will need the diplomatic skills of a Henry Kissinger to reconcile the positions of the two branches over NASA funding. As able as he is, the situation cries out for a permanent NASA administrator, someone with the respect of both President Trump and the Congress. Otherwise, the chaos will just continue, hampering the space agency's ability to fulfill its mandate to explore space, for the betterment of the United States and all humankind. Mark R. Whittington, who writes frequently about space policy, has published a political study of space exploration entitled ' Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? ' as well as ' The Moon, Mars and Beyond ' and, most recently, ' is America Going Back to the Moon ' He blogs at

GOP mayoral candidate urges Trump to stay out of New York City race
GOP mayoral candidate urges Trump to stay out of New York City race

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

GOP mayoral candidate urges Trump to stay out of New York City race

New York City Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa said that President Trump's interference in the New York election could embolden Democratic candidate Zohran Mandani. 'In this situation, it doesn't help if he intervenes in New York City,' Silwa told Fox 5's Morgan McKay on 'Politics Unusual' on Friday. 'Every day it's Trump versus Zohran Mamdani, it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani. Every day that Cuomo and Adams talks about you, 'you drop out, you job out,' it's a good day for Zohran Mamdani,' he continued. The New York City race for mayor has sparked heavy tensions. Zohran Mamdani, the democratic nominee, surprisingly won the Democratic primary against New York Governor Andrew Cuomo. Cuomo is now running as an independent alongside the current NYC Mayor Eric Adams. Trump has been adamantly opposed to Mamdani's campaign for NYC mayor. He has called him a ' communist lunatic ' and said that if he is elected in November, 'He better behave. Otherwise, he will have big problems.' The New York Times reported on Wednesday that Trump had multiple phone calls with Cuomo and was considering 'getting involved' in the mayoral race. Sliwa, who is the only Republican candidate and in an underdog position, said he was not surprised that the president called Cuomo, as 'Cuomo's been talking to Trump for years.' He added, 'I would just say to the president, spend your time where it's needed more, on geopolitical interests that affect all Americans. This election in New York City does not affect all Americans.' Other candidates also raged against Trump's move. Mamdani posted on X, 'Today we learned Andrew Cuomo is directly coordinating with Donald Trump, even as this President sends masked agents to rip our neighbors off the streets and guts the social services so many New Yorkers rely on,' posted Mamdani on X. 'It's disqualifying and a betrayal of our city,' he added. But Cuomo on Thursday pushed back on the report. 'I can't remember the last time I spoke to President Trump,' Cuomo said during a press conference, adding that he has 'never spoken to him about the mayor's race.' Silwa has previously attacked Mandani and blamed Adam's mayoral term for Mandani's win in the Democratic primary. 'There is no Zohran Mamdani if Eric Adams had done a decent job,' Sliwa said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store