
Northbridge Town Meeting votes to put tax override for schools on election ballot
Northbridge Town Meeting approved placing a question on the May 20 town election ballot asking if voters will approve a nearly $5 million Proposition 2½ override to make up a spending deficit in Northbridge Public Schools.
The vote at Town Meeting was 413 in favor of placing the override on the ballot, and 205 voting in opposition.
Following approval of Town Meeting, which approved the question on Tuesday night, voters in the town will decide in two weeks on whether or not to approve a $4.95 million override to support Northbridge schools.
"I'm a big supporter of public schools and it is not about having the resources to send my kids somewhere else, it is about investing in a town and a community that has a lot of new people," Liz Roach, a parent of two Northbridge Elementary School students, told the Telegram & Gazette. "The town has a lot of potential, and instead of arguing about what happened in the past, we need to look at where we are currently and look at all the families who want their kids to have a quality public education."
If the override is approved, the money would be used to help balance the budget over the next five years, with $700,000 being factored into the budget for next fiscal year, and the amount marginally increasing over the following five years.
Heather Adler, a member of the Northbridge School Committee who presented the Town Meeting article to put the override question on the ballot, said that over the years, local and state Chapter 70 funding have not kept pace with the rise of inflation.
"The amount that is provided from the state and the local level can't keep up with the rising costs – and our district only spends 1.7% over the required minimum of what our sister districts are spending, so we can't keep up with inflation," Adler said. "We've tried to keep up with cuts and moving positions around where we can, and leaning into our revolving account – which is intended to be an emergency savings, to manage the deficit."
According to the School Committee, if the override is not approved, cuts will have to be made, including reductions to school staff, the dissolution of middle school sports teams, and a reduction in AP courses taught at the high school. School bus fees may also be increased.
"If we don't have the override approved, there are nine positions we are looking at moving, including the librarian at the elementary school. A majority of the cuts would be at the elementary school because in the past we have looked at the middle and high school to make some cuts," Adler said.
Northbridge has 1,838 students, including elementary, middle and high school.
Interest in getting the override approved has led to increased political activity among some Northbridge parents and concerned residents, such as Roach, who along with other parents launched Residents for a Stronger Northbridge to encourage approval of the override.
"We tried to vote for an override in 2014 and it was voted down," Roach said. "Consistently I guess there are about 2,500 people in Northbridge that will vote against spending more for the schools. Our position is the school budget is the most scrutinized budget. We are hoping that this activates a lot of the newer people in our community."
This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: Northbridge Town Meeting puts tax override for schools on ballot
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Permission granted for former chippy to be turned into 3 bedsits
A former Bury chip shop has been given the official go-ahead to be converted into three bedsits. The building at 89 Wood Street, which was the home of Wood Street Chippy for more than 40 years, will be used to house for up to four occupants. Planning was granted by the council on May 30 to convert the end terrace, which sits at the junction of Ashworth Street. All three bedrooms will have separate en-suite facilities, with residents using a shared kitchen with separate lounge and dining area. Given the occupancy levels, the property does not require a house in multiple occupation (HMO) licence. Get the latest news delivered straight to your inbox by signing up to the Bury Times morning newsletter as well as our breaking news alerts. Conditions state that the basement must not be used as a bedroom 'to ensure the development would not result in sub-standard living". An intercom system will be used for visitor access, along with space in the back yard to store up to three bikes and waste bins. There is no off-street parking available at the property which was highlighted in some of the 42 objections received on the council's planning portal, along with fears about road safety, anti-social behaviour and noise levels. READ NEXT: 'Rogue' park peacocks spotted in gardens across borough READ NEXT: Eight Bury schools set to receive share of £54m funding for essential work One resident said: 'I object to the HMO…one house is going cause more parking problems, my car gets damaged daily due to the state of how many cars are already on the street. 'I have a baby and cannot even park outside my own address have to park on the street next to my house or the back street." Another said: 'It is common that these sorts of premises accommodate occupants for easy money with a high turnover of occupants. 'This risks the safety of all the local residents and stability in the area by accommodating the unknown.' Developer Mark Houghton, owner of Tottington-based HDC Properties, spoke to the Bury Times in April about the concerns raised. He said: 'People tend to fear the unknown, and when they hear 'house of multiple occupancy' they fear the worst. 'Some objectors seem to be concerned that the property will bring the area down and is going to be used to house 'undesirables'. "It's my house so I'm not going to let just anybody live there." "There will be careful vetting, and because it's combined living, it's important that I get the balance right.'

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NYPD captain fired for harassing detective with explicit texts and lewd photos: NYPD
An NYPD captain has been fired for sexting a detective with explicit language and pictures of his penis, according to NYPD documents. Capt. Brian Flynn was canned by Commissioner Jessica Tisch in April — three months before his 20th anniversary on the job, meaning he lost the pension and health benefits to which he would have otherwise been entitled. Flynn had pleaded guilty, hoping to save his job — or at least be allowed to retire so he could keep his pension and benefits. He testified at a mitigation hearing at One Police Plaza that he took full responsibility for his actions, NYPD Trial Judge Jeff Adler noted in department documents, and admitted he had embarrassed his family and the NYPD. A department psychologist, Dr. Gregory Mack, testified on Flynn's behalf that the captain was traumatized by his past — based on Flynn telling Mack that his father physically and mentally abused him and that he discovered his mother's body when she killed herself in 2013, according to the documents. But Adler said that doesn't 'in any way excuse [Flynn's] egregious behavior in this case.' Adler noted the 'stream of sexually graphic, disturbing text messages, including a number of offensive photographs.' 'Moreover,' Adler added, '[Flynn] did so while he was on duty, when he should have been focusing on his public safety obligations.' Tisch, who has the final say in all disciplinary matters, on April 11 signed off on Adler's recommendation without commenting further. The detective who accused Flynn would not comment. She joined the NYPD in 2014 and said in a lawsuit filed two years ago that while working at Bronx Warrants she was subjected to two years of sexual harassment by Flynn beginning in April 2021, when he was named the unit's commanding officer. The suit, which is still pending, accuses Flynn of at least 10 times texting the detective photos of his erect penis, often while working — and of his ejaculate on a napkin. He made lewd text comments as well, according to the suit and police documents, including suggesting what he would do with his tongue if she ever arrested him. He also texted the detectives a photo of the lower half of her clothed body. 'I wanna eat it,' he said, according to the documents. Flynn, who is married, also asked for the detective's underwear, according to the suit, promising her a Commander's Day — a day off that a supervisor can grant to an underling for exemplary police work, such as a good arrest. When the detective refused Flynn's request she was denied days off and overtime, the suit says. After the detective filed an EEO complaint in November 2022, Flynn sought help from department doctors, the documents say. John Scola, the detective's lawyer, said Flynn got what he deserved. 'His conduct was predatory, vile and an unforgivable abuse of power against a subordinate who had the courage to say no,' Scola said. 'While this outcome is a step forward, protecting women in law enforcement demands real reform, not just damage control after the harm is done.' Flynn could not be reached for comment. His lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Walmart Announces 2025 Annual Shareholders' Meeting Voting Results
BENTONVILLE, Ark., June 05, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Walmart Inc. (NYSE: WMT) announced preliminary voting results from its Annual Shareholders' Meeting held earlier today. Approximately 91.4% of all outstanding shares were represented at the meeting. Doug McMillon, President and CEO, reviewed Walmart's strong results from fiscal year 2025. He emphasized investments in wages, opportunity, innovation, technology, and making communities better, stating the company can continue to "improve our ROI even as we make investments to strengthen our company." McMillon also said, "We're scaling higher-margin businesses while investing in our associates and keeping our merchandise prices as low as possible in today's environment." The Company presented four proposals for shareholder consideration and based on affirmative votes from a majority of total shares that were voted, these four proposals passed. Proposal #1: Shareholders voted to approve the election of each of Walmart's 12 director nominees. Each director nominee received affirmative votes from approximately 95.7% or more of the shares voted, excluding abstentions and broker non-votes, as follows (all percentages are rounded): Director Nominee For Cesar Conde 99.3% Timothy P. Flynn 98.0% Sarah J. Friar 99.5% Carla A. Harris 96.9% Thomas W. Horton 97.9% Marissa A. Mayer 98.6% Doug McMillon 99.3% Robert E. Moritz, Jr. 99.6% Brian Niccol 99.5% Greg B. Penner 96.9% Randall L. Stephenson 95.7% Steuart Walton 99.3% Proposal #2: Shareholders ratified the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Walmart's Independent Accountants, with affirmative votes from approximately 97.8% of the shares voted. The Board of Directors had recommended that shareholders vote for this proposal. Proposal #3: Shareholders voted to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of Walmart's named executive officers described in Walmart's 2025 Proxy Statement, with approximately 95.2% of the participating shares voting in favor of this proposal. The Board of Directors had recommended that shareholders vote for this proposal. Proposal #4: Shareholders voted to approve the Walmart Inc. Stock Incentive Plan of 2025, with approximately 98.3% of shares voted. The Board of Directors had recommended that shareholders vote for this proposal. Seven shareholder proposals, numbered 5-11, were presented during the meeting and failed to receive affirmative votes from a majority of the total shares that were voted, and accordingly, did not pass. Proposal #5: Request for Third-Party Assessment of Company Policies Regarding Law Enforcement Information Requests Related to Medication Use by Customers and Employees: Received approximately 4.1% of the shares that were voted Proposal #6: Report on Reduction of Plastic Packaging and Recyclability Claims: Received approximately 5.8% of the shares that were voted Proposal #7: Revisit Plastics Packaging Policies: Received approximately 0.5% of the shares that were voted Proposal #8: Racial Equity Audit: Received approximately 6.9% of the shares that were voted Proposal #9: Report on Delays in Revising Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Initiatives: Received approximately 0.4% of the shares that were voted Proposal #10: Health and Safety Governance: Received approximately 7.0% of the shares that were voted Proposal #11: Respect Civil Liberties in Advertising Services: Received approximately 0.4% of the shares that were voted The official voting results for each item voted on by shareholders will be disclosed in a report to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. About WalmartWalmart Inc. (NYSE: WMT) is a people-led, tech-powered omnichannel retailer dedicated to helping people save money and live better. Each week, approximately 270 million customers and members visit more than 10,750 stores and numerous eCommerce websites in 19 countries. With fiscal year 2025 revenue of $681 billion, Walmart employs approximately 2.1 million associates worldwide. The company aims to serve customers and members with great value, a wide range of quality items and services and a convenient, enjoyable shopping experience, while strengthening communities and providing opportunities for associates to grow and belong. Additional information about Walmart can be found by visiting on Facebook at on X (formerly known as Twitter) at and on LinkedIn at View source version on Contacts Media Relations Contact Annie Patterson800-331-0085 Investor Relations Contact Steph WissinkIR@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data