Iran's four possible responses to Israeli attack

The Age

14-06-2025

Israel's attack on Iran opens the next phase of the Great Middle Eastern War that began on October 7, 2023. Over the past 20 months, that war has played out on fronts across the region and has drawn in actors from around the globe.
There is much we don't yet know about what has happened, let alone what will happen. But it is clear that Iran has suffered significant damage to its leadership, its military and industrial capabilities, and perhaps its nuclear program. The endgame of this conflict and the future of the region will be profoundly shaped by how a wounded Iran responds.
There are four basic possibilities. Their consequences range from a bigger, bloodier Middle Eastern mess to a potentially surprising diplomatic denouement: a far stronger nuclear deal than United States President Donald Trump could have secured just a few days ago.
First, Iran could go nasty but narrow, striking back against Israel but avoiding US bases or other regional targets. Drone, missile or terrorist attacks against Israel (some of which are already underway) would offer a measure of vengeance. But this strategy would seek to avoid triggering a larger, riskier conflict with Washington.
The problem is that America is already involved in this conflict: Trump has pledged to help Israel defend itself. A narrow response could thus look pathetic if Tehran's remaining weapons can't penetrate Israel's multi-layered (and multi-nation) air and missile defence. And even if Iran draws blood, Israel will just keep coming, as these opening strikes were the beginning of a larger military campaign.
If Iran needs to make a bigger statement, it could go big and broad. In addition to hitting Israel, it could strike US personnel, facilities and partners from Iraq to the Persian Gulf. It could also activate its proxies – the Houthis, Iraqi Shia militias, and what remains of Hezbollah – in a bid to set the region on fire.
That strategy has appeal as a way of restoring deterrence against dangerous enemies. It would remind the world that even a weakened Iran can cause real pain. But it would also cross the red line Trump has drawn against attacks on US targets. So Iran could find itself fighting a bigger war against Israel and the US, fraught with existential dangers for an already battered regime.
The third possibility – nuclear breakout – could be just as dangerous. Depending on how much nuclear infrastructure is left – particularly the buried, hardened uranium enrichment facility at Fordow – Tehran could withdraw from the non-proliferation treaty and make a desperate push for the bomb.