
Germany: Chancellor Merz's party sees approval rating rise – DW – 07/07/2025
Does Germany still need the Social Democratic Party (SPD), and if so — on what issues? This question was clearly hanging in the air at the party conference at the end of June. The center-left Social Democrats were shaken to their core by the February federal election, when the party recorded its worst result since 1887.
The result of the latest monthly poll is unlikely to lift their spirits. The SPD, which governs as junior partner with the conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and Christian Social Union (CSU) parties, has only continued to leak support since the election.
If national elections were held this Sunday, the SPD would only get 13%, according to the poll, conducted by the research institute infratest-dimap of 1,312 eligible voters between June 30 and July 2.
Led by Chancellor Friedrich Merz, the CDU/CSU has gained slightly compared to June, rising to 30% (+1). The Alternative for Germany (AfD), the far-right, anti-immigrant party that is officially considered partly right-wing extremist by Germany's domestic intelligence agency, would still have 23% of the vote.
The Green Party and the Left Party, meanwhile, could expect to receive 12% (+/-0) and 10% (+1), respectively. Other parties, including the newly founded Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW) (4%; +/-0) and the neoliberal Free Democratic Party (FDP) (3%; -1), would still not have enough of a vote share to enter the Bundestag.
The more left-wing members of the Social Democrats have accused their party leadership of doing too little to secure peace in Europe. In June, they issued a manifesto calling for "peacekeeping in Europe through defense capabilities, arms control, and rapprochement." For the signatories, this means more diplomacy with Russia, and less rearmament of the German armed forces.
Peace has historically been a signature priority for the SPD — going back to the days of Chancellor Willy Brandt's attempts to normalize relations with the Soviet Union in the late 1960s and early 1970s. But in the latest Deutschlandtrend poll, only 11% of respondents now said they considered the SPD to be a party of peace.
Some 31% trust the CDU/CSU most of all the parties to establish and secure peace in Europe, while 14% named the AfD. As many as 57% of respondents said they were frightened by how lightly the term "readiness for war" is currently being discussed in Germany. However, there are big differences on the issue between Germans from the former West and the former East — the term frightens significantly more people in the eastern German states.
Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, also of the SPD, has long been calling for the Bundeswehr to be "war-ready" again. Some 62% of those Germans surveyed in the agree with Pistorius and see this as a prerequisite for securing peace in Europe.
Not only that, 73% believe that Germany needs more soldiers to defend the country in an emergency. In their opinion, compulsory military service, which was suspended 2011, must be reintroduced.
Overall, more than half of those surveyed are in favor of reinstating compulsory military or civilian service for both men and women. However, there is a generational conflict here: About twice as many people under the age of 35 support another suspension than in the overall population.
Overall, armed conflicts, peacekeeping, and foreign policy is only the fourth most important issue for Germans — mentioned by 15% of those surveyed. Immigration/refugees (33%), the economy (21%), and social injustice (16%) were all mentioned more frequently.
Indeed, both the CDU/CSU and the SPD have said that Germany's economic recovery is the top priority. In fact, only 20% of Germans believe that the situation will actually improve in a year's time, while 41% believe that nothing will change, and 35% even expect the economic situation to deteriorate. However, two-thirds of those surveyed say that this will not affect their personal economic situation.
A good 60% of the population, meanwhile, believe that there is social injustice in Germany, the highest figure recorded by the Deutschlandtrend in 15 years. This perception is primarily due to the widening gap between rich and poor, while the tax and social security burden is perceived as too high or unequal. The gap between the lowest wage groups and the "citizen's income," as the basic unemployment benefit is called, is considered too small.
In Germany, single people who are temporarily or permanently unable to support themselves and are in need of assistance receive €563 ($663) per month, as well as support with their rent and heating bills. Couples receive €1,012. The overall costs of this have risen sharply recently, to over €50 billion per year.
The CDU wants to introduce tougher sanctions for citizens' income recipients who repeatedly refuse work. Currently, their benefits can be suspended for up to two months.
Overall, around half of those surveyed consider the existing sanctions to be appropriate, while 12% think they go too far, and 35% believe that the unemployed should be sanctioned more.
In their coalition agreement, the CDU/CSU and SPD agreed in principle to apply stricter rules. But the parties are arguing about what exactly that means. The CDU/CSU wants to drastically reduce spending across the board, while the Social Democrats are opposed. They say that no more than €4.5 billion can be saved in the next two years. Getting people into work also costs money, for example for further training and qualification measures.
Should the unemployed be placed quickly in reasonable jobs, or is it more important to provide them with appropriate training and further education so that they can find better jobs? Opinions are divided.
However, a look at party preferences shows that the majority of CDU/CSU and AfD supporters would prefer to get people into jobs quickly. Supporters of the Left Party and the Greens, on the other hand, prefer to prioritize training. Among SPD supporters, there are equal numbers of people in favor of either option.
The dispute is not just about money. It is also a fundamental socio-political debate about how to treat people who need help and what basic social security in Germany should look like.While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Germany urged to reverse Yazidi family's removal to Iraq – DW – 07/25/2025
Brandenburg's interior minister hopes to bring back a Yazidi family deported to Iraq despite a court ruling halting their removal. The case has sparked criticism over the deportation of people who escaped a genocide. The eastern German state of Brandenburg's Interior Minister Rene Wilke on Friday said he was pushing for the return of a Yazidi family recently deported to Iraq, saying the removal may have violated a court order. The Yazidis are a religious minority that suffered genocide at the hands of the "Islamic State" (IS) militant group in Iraq in 2014, making such deportations particularly contentious. The family, which includes four underage children, was deported on Tuesday, even though a court had lifted their obligation to leave the country on the same day. On Tuesday, 43 people were deported to Iraq on a charter flight from Leipzig to Baghdad. However, contrary to initial claims by the authorities of the participating federal states, the plane was not just filled with single men who were required to leave the country, some of whom had committed crimes in the past. The Yazidi family was also on board. The family's lawyer had filed an emergency appeal with the Potsdam Administrative Court before the flight. The court ruled in their favor, but the family was already en route to Baghdad by then. "Given the chain of circumstances, the specific fate of the family, and the imperative to restore legal compliance, I have instructed the relevant Brandenburg authorities to work with federal officials on bringing the family back — provided the court decision in their favor holds," Wilke said. He stressed that the federal government must issue the necessary travel documents and recognize the court ruling. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Wilke said the incident had personally moved him. The court's written decision, which retroactively suspended the deportation, wasn't available until after they had landed in Baghdad," he noted. "At that point, the involved authorities no longer had the ability to intervene." The Yazidi family, who had been living in Lychen in Brandenburg's Uckermark region, had filed a lawsuit in 2023 against the rejection of their application for international protection and the deportation order. The Federal Office for Migration and Refugees had denied the family's asylum application. Politicians from the center-left Social Democrats, the environmentalist Greens, and the socialist Left Party have called for the family's return. In 2023, the German Bundestag officially recognized the crimes committed by IS against Yazidis in 2014 as genocide. Many Yazidis who fled IS atrocities still can no longer return home because their villages in Sinjar remain destroyed or lawless. Some IS fighters and sympathizers remain active in parts of Iraq, particularly in rural or unstable areas. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The group Nadia's Initiative, which advocates for survivors of sexual violence and aims to rebuild communities in crisis, said it was concerned that the case was not an isolated incident. "The family—two parents and four young children—had lived in Germany for years. The children were enrolled in school and fully integrated into their community. This deportation has devastated the family and undermined their basic sense of safety and belonging." "Other Yazidi families in Germany have also received deportation notices, and many now live in constant fear of forced return to a region still grappling with the aftermath of genocide, displacement, and lack of tangible support from the Iraqi government."


Local Germany
5 hours ago
- Local Germany
Which foreign nationals are not eligible for dual-citizenship in Germany?
Widely celebrated by the foreign community , since the end of June 2024 Germany has opened up the possibility of dual-citizenship to individuals, regardless of their country of origin. In principle this means that anyone in Germany can become a dual-citizen as long as they meet certain qualifying criteria including German language and residency requirements. Foreign residents can gain a German passport whilst still keeping their home passport, and native born-born Germans can also gain a foreign country passport without forfeiting their German one. CHECKLIST: What do I need to apply for German citizenship? But a number of countries around the world aren't as liberal with their own citizenship rules. For people from these countries, unfortunately, the decision to naturalise as German would essentially mean having to renounce the citizenship that they've had since birth. For Indian citizens, for example, naturalising as German results in the automatic the loss of their Indian nationality. READ ALSO: 'Won't give up my passport' -Why Indians in Germany face hurdles to citizenship How Indians can protect their residency rights in India after becoming German In effect the same applies to citizens of other countries that don't recognise dual-citizenship such as China, Japan or the United Arab Emirates, for example. Until now, Ukraine recently was also among the countries that did not recognise dual-citizenship, but a reform to the country's citizenship law that took effect in June allows for dual-citizenship in specific cases, such as through birth, marriage, or for refugees and foreign volunteers. Advertisement Some countries that generally forbid dual-citizenship will make exceptions in specific cases. So if you'd like to seek dual-citizenship, it's worth checking with your embassy about the latest rules and possible exceptions. The following countries don't recognise dual citizenship: Countries that allow dual-citizenship are shown in green whereas those that limit dual-citizenship are red. Map: NuclearVacuum, Heitordp via Wikimedia Commons Andorra Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Belarus Botswana Bhutan China Cuba Congo Djibouti Ethiopia Haiti India Indonesia Iran Japan Kazakhstan Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Macau Malaysia Marshall Islands Micronesia Monaco Mongolia Mozambique Myanmar Nepal North Korea Oman Papua New Guinea Qatar San Marino Saudi Arabia Singapore Slovakia Solomon Islands Swaziland Tajikistan Thailand Tonga Turkmenistan Uzbekistan United Arab Emirates Venezuela Vietnam Yemen Zimbabwe


DW
5 hours ago
- DW
German politician steps down over swastika on ballot – DW – 07/25/2025
The German state of Baden-Württemberg's deputy speaker stepped down after admitting he drew a swastika on a ballot beside an AfD lawmaker's name. Daniel Born said he had made a "serious mistake" during a vote. The deputy speaker of the parliament in the southwestern state of Baden-Württemberg stepped down on Friday from his role after admitting he had drawn a swastika on a ballot paper next to the name of a far-right AfD lawmaker. Center-left Social Democrat (SPD) politician Daniel Born made the transgression during a vote involving two Alternative for Germany (AfD) lawmakers. In a statement, the Born said he had made a "serious mistake" and a "momentary lapse." The incident happened during Thursday's election of deputy members to the cross-border Upper Rhine Council, a consultative body. Two AfD lawmakers were on the ballot. A swastika was found on one of the ballots next to the name of AfD candidate Bernhard Eisenhut. The news that someone had drawn a swastika prompted widespread outrage. Initially, it was unclear who had drawn the Nazi symbol. State parliament president Muhterem Aras from the Green Party called the act a "criminal offense," and the parliament filed a criminal complaint with police on Thursday evening, initially against an unknown perpetrator. On Friday, Born said he would also step down from the SPD parliamentary group. However, Born stopped short of giving up his seat in parliament. "This was a serious error of judgment," he said. "I deeply regret this and accept the consequences." "I made a serious mistake and in a moment of rash emotion drew a swastika behind the name of an AfD candidate," Born wrote in an email to other parliamentary leaders, quoted by public broadcaster SWR. "I will never forgive myself for this failure." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The swastika was the symbol of National Socialism and the party logo of the Nazi Party. Whether marking a swastika on a ballot during a secret vote constitutes a prosecutable crime remains to be determined by investigators and possibly the courts. Under Germany's Criminal Code, the use of unconstitutional symbols can be punishable by up to three years in prison or a fine. Born, 49, had been a member of parliament since 2016 and served as one of the legislature's vice presidents since 2021. He also acted as the SPD's spokesperson on religious affairs. Explaining his actions, Born cited deep concern over the far-right AfD and its disruptive conduct during Thursday's vote. "The speeches yesterday and the chaos caused by the AfD shook me deeply," he wrote. "I was in a state of emotional distress and completely failed." Parliament president Aras spoke of a scandal and on Friday called on the "person responsible" to resign from their parliamentary seat. "I have come to know Daniel Born as a passionate parliamentarian," said Aras. "Nevertheless, I expect him to resign his seat as well." The AfD's effort to have a representative on the council, a German-French-Swiss body, ultimately failed.