Indian private sector in ‘developing' stage: Jitendra Singh
'We need a robust, developed private sector. There are some gaps...but that's also because past policy has not favoured the robust development of the private sector. It is only after Prime Minister Narendra Modi came that this has started happening. The space sector opened up to the private sector only four to five years ago, and so their capacity building has started only just now. Several projects have been rolled out, but we don't have the private sector acumen. This will take time, but there is now a shift in the policy,' said Dr. Singh.
He was responding to a question from The Hindu on why, despite the government's multiple claims of championing private sector participation in the space sector, no private company was selected to manufacture the Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV). Last week, public sector defence company Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) bagged a Transfer of Technology (ToT) deal, valued at ₹511 crore from the Indian Space Research Organisation to build and operate Small Satellite Launch Vehicles (SSLVs).
Bidding for SSLV
The SSLV is a three-stage vehicle to launch satellites that weigh less than 500 kg into the lower earth orbit (LEO). Apart from the HAL, which had applied independently, two other technically qualified bidders were shortlisted: Alpha Design Technologies Ltd. (ADT), Bengaluru, leading a consortium with Agnikul Cosmos and Walchand Industries Ltd.; and Bharat Dynamics Ltd., Hyderabad, leading a consortium with Skyroot Aerospace, Keltron and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (BHEL). ADT is a subsidiary of the Adani conglomerate. Among the three, the HAL emerged as the highest bidder.
Dr. Rajesh Gokhale, Secretary, Department of Biotechnology, which oversees the BIRAC (Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council) programme that funds biotechnology start-ups since 2012, said that while a start-up listing in the public markets was a sign of success, it was also important to consider market equity. 'The equity of biotechnology start-ups is currently around ₹7,000 crore...they have longer incubation periods,' he said in response to a query from The Hindu on when an Indian biotech start-up would hit the public markets.
Dr. Singh was addressing a press conference on the achievements of scientific departments — the Departments of Science and Technology, Biotechnology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), and the Ministry of Earth Sciences.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
INDIA bloc considering impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar
The Opposition INDIA bloc is considering to move an impeachment motion against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, sources told The Hindu. The decision was taken at the meeting of INDIA bloc floor leaders on Monday (August 18, 2025). Parliament Monsoon Session: Follow updates on August 18, 2025 The development comes a day after the CEC held a press conference in New Delhi in a bid to address the Congress's accusation against the poll body of large scale voter theft and alleging that the Commission is working in favour of the ruling party. According to the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, the CEC can be removed in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court Judge. This means, Parliament can remove the CEC by a motion with two-thirds majority in both the Houses. In order for the motion to be accepted, at least 50 members have to sign in favour of it. The Opposition does not have the requisite numbers to get it passed but a senior Opposition leader said the motion is to underline their protest at the conduct of the CEC.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Lok Sabha adjourned till noon amid Opposition uproar over Bihar SIR; Rajya Sabha adjourned till 2 pm
A special session of the Lok Sabha will commence at 2 pm today, with a key focus on the space sector. The discussion will include the recent mission led by Shubhanshu Shukla, and will be initiated by Union Minister Jitendra Singh. Additionally, the Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Bill, 2025 is scheduled to be introduced in the Lok Sabha on Monday. The bill will be presented by Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal. Meanwhile, both Houses have witnessed repeated disruptions during the ongoing Monsoon Session, as the Opposition continues to press for a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC asks MP Sanjay Singh to move Allahabad HC against closure of 105 UP schools
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to entertain Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) parliamentarian Sanjay Singh's petition challenging the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to close down 105 primary schools, observing that the matter ought to be raised before the Allahabad high court in the first instance. The Supreme Court allowed the withdrawal of the plea and granted Sanjay Singh liberty to move the high court. (HT PHOTO) A bench of justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih said that since Singh was seeking enforcement of rights under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (RTE Act), the proper course would be to approach the jurisdictional high court under Article 226 of the Constitution rather than invoking the Supreme Court's powers directly under Article 32. Senior counsel Kapil Sibal, appearing for Singh, argued: 'These children can no longer go to the school. And most of them are poor.' The bench asked: 'Are you not trying to enforce rights under the Right to Education Act? You cannot then camouflage this as an Article 32 petition [for enforcement of fundamental rights]. It is a local problem. It is a problem of UP [Uttar Pradesh], and it has not spilled over to some other states. Let the high court deal with the matter.' Sibal responded that the high court had already dismissed one such petition. Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, representing Uttar Pradesh, informed the bench that 'there is an intra-court appeal pending against this order in the Allahabad high court.' Reiterating its stance, the bench said: 'If it is a statutory right, then it cannot be camouflaged as a writ petition under Article 32. There is a three-judge bench decision on this.' Following the exchange, Sibal sought permission to withdraw the plea, with liberty to approach the high court. He requested that the high court be asked to hear the matter expeditiously, given that the issue involved the education of thousands of children. The bench allowed the withdrawal and granted liberty to move the high court with such a request. Singh's petition challenged the Uttar Pradesh government's June 16 order directing that primary schools with zero or low enrolment be 'paired' with other nearby schools. A subsequent list issued by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari, Lucknow, on June 24 identified 105 schools for pairing, effectively rendering them non-operational or merged with distant institutions. Filed through advocate Sriram Parakkat, the plea contended that this compelled children to travel longer distances, often without transport assistance, infrastructure, or prior notice, thereby violating their fundamental right to free and compulsory education under Article 21A, as enforced by the RTE Act and the Uttar Pradesh Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Rules, 2011. The Uttar Pradesh government has defended the move as part of policy restructuring and alignment with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, arguing that sustaining schools with negligible student strength was inefficient. Singh said that once established, schools cannot be closed or merged through executive instructions without legislative authority, and warned that the closures would hit children from marginalised backgrounds the hardest.
