
How Brexit helped Poland become a European superpower
For Natalia Muszynska, the daughter of a Polish supermarket worker in Scotland, the journey home began with an internet search.
Despite studying business management at college in Aberdeen, she was finding it almost impossible to line up an internship. Then inspiration struck.
'I switched to a Polish advertising site, typed in 'internships', and thousands of options came up, including paid ones,' said Ms Muszynska, who moved to Britain with her mother shortly after Poland joined the EU in 2004, along with around a million other Poles seeking higher wages in the UK.
Curious about whether life in Poland now had more to offer, she relocated to Warsaw, joining hundreds of thousands of Poles who have moved back to their home country as it emerges on the world stage as an economic juggernaut and Slavic superpower.
After decades of suffering under communism, its economy is booming. It boasts a bigger army than Britain, France or Germany, and Donald Tusk, its centrist prime minister, is a former EU Council president who wields immense influence in Brussels.
At the same time, a metro ticket costs as little as 60p, a pint of beer will set you back less than £3, and the overall cost of living remains low in European league tables.
Britain – or perhaps, the decline of Britain, in the eyes of some Poles – has played a role in this success story. The number of Poles in the UK has fallen from a peak of around a million to 700,000 in the wake of Brexit, and Poland is reaping the reward.
Ms Muszynska says she is a 'prime example of this'. Not long after returning home, she started her own property business and was living in a flat with underfloor heating that she could only dream of having in Aberdeen.
'There are so many opportunities here – it's the fastest growing place in Europe,' she said. 'My mum moved to the UK because she couldn't find a job in Poland. I came back to Poland because I thought: this is the biggest opportunity ever.'
This Sunday, Poles face a choice that will define their country's place in Europe as they head to the polls for presidential elections. Rafal Trzaskowski, the liberal mayor of Warsaw and Mr Tusk's preferred candidate, is in a neck-and-neck race with the hardline conservative Karol Nawrocki.
Experts say membership of the European Union is by far the biggest contributor to the country's triumph, opening up free movement for Polish workers across the continent and full access to the EU's lucrative single market.
Since joining the bloc in 2004, the country is yet to experience recession, excluding a blip at the height of the Covid pandemic, while GDP has risen by four per cent on average each year. This year alone, a 3.3 per cent increase in GDP is expected, compared to just one per cent in the UK.
But with hundreds of thousands of young workers being lured back by the promise of a better life, Poland has also benefited from Britain's struggles.
Aleks Szczerbiak, a Polish politics expert and professor at Sussex University, said the return of Poles could also be linked to a sense that 2004's mass exodus was doing more harm than good in the long run.
'Access to western labour markets was one of the reasons EU membership was, and still is, so popular,' he said. 'But that quickly went from being the greatest achievement to being seen as a kind of sign of failure. Poles felt that in order to earn a decent salary they had to go abroad, and work at a level way below their qualifications.
'You had Poles with PhDs serving coffee in Starbucks because it paid more in the UK than Poland, and so there has been an effort to get people back.'
After two decades of EU free movement, the Polish government is posting adverts online urging citizens to return home: 'New Year's resolution to make: come back to Poland!' states one recent advert, which promises 'a flourishing economy, attractive salaries and a safe environment'.
One of the main draws is Warsaw itself, a city of 1.8 million people where skyscrapers, tech start-ups and trendy cafes serving French toast have replaced the old, urban sprawl of Soviet buildings.
Warsaw's most famous landmark used to be the Palace of Culture and Science, an imposing high-rise built in the Stalinist style in 1955. After the fall of Communism in 1989, its dedications to Stalin were scrubbed from the colonnade and lobby, while a new skyscraper – Varso Tower, the tallest in the EU – now rises above the city.
Middle-class neighbourhoods are also springing up in Warsaw, offering a Slavic version of Notting Hill or Knightsbridge to successful Poles heeding the government's call to return home.
In Zoliborz, northern Warsaw, gleaming white new-build apartment blocks have risen over flagstone courtyards and water fountains, with flat prices ranging from 600,000 to 1.9 million Polish zloty (£120,000-£375,000). BMWs fill many parking spaces.
Robert, a construction firm owner and resident of Zoliborz, described the transition of Warsaw over the past two decades as 'shocking to witness'.
'Our parents had, let's say, a mid-range quality of life, but we are an extremely hard-working nation and we have earned what we have now,' he said. 'You can see that we're building a lot in Warsaw, and there is more to do.'
Robert, 35, who did not wish to share his last name, added that when he started his construction firm a decade ago, he struggled to find workers – they had all moved to Britain and Germany. Now the reverse is the case – he is the one taking phone calls from Poles who have returned and are seeking work from him.
'And when the Germans visit, they are impressed by the phone signal,' he jokes, alluding to Berlin's outdated telecoms infrastructure.
The famously fierce Polish work ethic still has its admirers in Britain, such as Daniel Kawczynski, the former Conservative MP, who viewed Brexit as an opportunity to deepen British-Polish relations.
'I remember going back to Poland in 1983, when martial law was lifted, to see my beloved grandfather,' said Mr Kawczynski, who was born in Warsaw and served as the MP for Shrewsbury and Atcham from 2005 to 2024.
'At that time there was nothing in the shops, petrol was rationed and the Communist system was politically Orwellian and economically illiterate. Now Poland is set to overtake the United Kingdom as an economy, and it's down to the fundamental principle that Polish people are driven to work hard, as hard as they can, and put into the system.'
Fierce Ukrainian ally
No account of Poland's rise can overlook the moment when Vladimir Putin launched his invasion of Ukraine on Feb 24 2022. Poland immediately opened its border to nine million refugees, and that was only the beginning of its support for Kyiv.
When Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, told Western allies, 'I don't need a ride [out of Ukraine] – I need ammunition,' Poland was among the first to step forward.
To date, Poland has provided 47 military support packages to Kyiv's forces, ranging from hundreds of T-72 tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, to combat helicopters, artillery systems and vast amounts of ammunition.
Whichever candidate is elected, Poland's role as a leading EU supporter of Ukraine is set to continue, due to widespread public support for arming Kyiv against Russian invaders.
But the invasion also prompted massive rearmament of Poland's own armed forces: Poland's annual defence spending stood at 2.7 per cent of GDP in 2022 but is set to reach 4.7 per cent later this year – tantalisingly close to the new 5 per cent Nato target, which prior to Putin's invasion was considered a mere pipe dream.
That rapid increase of military spending began under the Right-wing Law and Justice leader Mateusz Morawiecki, and continues under Mr Tusk, who came to power in 2023, in a country where there is near-universal consensus for giving significant military support to Ukraine.
That sentiment is largely fuelled by geography, with Poland sharing a long border with both Ukraine and close Putin ally Belarus, but also by a historical revulsion towards Russian authoritarianism.
Mr Tusk himself is a former president of the European Council of EU national leaders in Brussels. His critics in Poland, who tend to be Eurosceptic, though not to the extent of wanting to see a 'Polexit,' say this makes him too close to the Brussels elite – perhaps so close that he no longer represents Polish national interests.
Declining birth rates
But Mr Tusk's supporters argue that this deep knowledge of the EU and its institutions makes him the right leader to hold maximum leverage over the bloc, particularly when it comes to contentious issues such as mass migration or farming subsidies.
Not everyone in Poland feels comfortable with its nascent superpower status, as reflected in an Economist editorial this week hailing its 'remarkable rise'.
One Polish industry source, who did not wish to be named, said that behind the effusive headlines about his country there lurked deep concerns about the economic future.
They cited as one example the significant decline in birth rates since 2017, from 1.48 to 1.26, as a sign that there could be a missing generation of workers in two decades.
There are also concerns on the Eurosceptic wings of Polish politics that too much sovereignty has been ceded to Brussels.
Poland – which since joining the EU in 2004 has received €246 billion (£200 billion) from the EU budget – is set to become a net contributor to that budget in future, rather than a recipient.
That could create a dynamic where Poles feel they are putting far more value into the EU than what they receive in return, similar to sentiment in pre-Brexit Britain and in Germany, the biggest net contributor to EU funds.
'You can't really say everything is perfect when nearly half the country is set to vote for Karol Nawrocki', the Polish industry source said, referring to the Right-wing, Trump-esque candidate in Sunday's presidential elections.
Opinion polls suggest the result will be extremely close, with 46 per cent backing Mr Nawrocki against 47 per cent for Mr Trzaskowski.
Beyond economics, politics and the military, Poland is also gaining significant soft power in the arts world. The fantasy role-playing video game The Witcher 3, one of the most critically acclaimed and lucrative worldwide, was developed in Warsaw.
The fame of CD Projekt Red, the studio behind The Witcher 3, is so widespread that fans travel from across the world to pay homage at its offices, tucked away on an industrial estate in the north-east of the capital.
Inside, a statue of The Witcher's silver-haired protagonist, Geralt of Rivia, greets visitors who have flown in to experience the country that produced their favourite video game.
'It's amazing to see fans from around the world come to Warsaw just to visit our studio,' said Jan Rosner, its vice-president of business development. 'The fact that our office has become a destination for them is a testament to the passion our community brings. It truly means the world to us.'
The $5.1 billion studio is now working on a sequel, The Witcher 4, already one of the most hotly anticipated game releases worldwide.
And the games have also raised the profile of Polish culture, as they are based on local folklore and the fantasy novels of Andrzej Sapkowski, the Polish author, who was virtually unknown outside of the country prior to the release of The Witcher 3. Now he is widely considered as the Slavic successor to JRR Tolkien.
As a result, the studio is among the most striking examples of Poland's rise on the world stage.
Two decades ago, when Poland joined the EU, some young Britons would have moaned that the plumbers of Poland were taking their jobs. Now they are getting on planes to Warsaw so they can pose for selfies with a statue of a Polish monster-slayer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
FORESIGHT SOLAR: Solar farm fund struggles to keep the lights on - but is fighting back
Stock market listed Foresight Solar Fund is in retrenchment mode. It's selling assets – some of its solar farm sites – and buying back shares from shareholders. In just two weeks it faces a discontinuation vote at its annual general meeting, although the special resolution is unlikely to garner sufficient support. Two thirds of shareholders would have to back it to go through – a similar vote last year was not supported. The trust's board also recently confirmed that it had been in 'discussions' with other parties about the future of the fund. Although Foresight remains schtum about the nature of these talks, they are likely to have involved a merger with a similar trust – or going private. It all represents a massive state of flux which will deter many investors from going anywhere near it. Yet Foresight has one big attraction, in the shape of the income it derives from the energy its solar panel farms generate. Since launching in late 2013 the trust has increased the dividends it pays to shareholders every year. For the 2024 financial year it handed out quarterly dividends totalling 8p a share. This year the intention is to tickle up the annual payment to 8.1p. For new investors this income is made all the more compelling by the fact that the trust's shares sit at a massive 30 per cent discount to the value of underlying assets. The result is a share price of 77p, compared to the £1 price that shares were issued at in October 2013 – and an annual dividend equivalent to 10.6 per cent. Foresight is not alone. Double-digit share price discounts are currently common within the renewable energy infrastructure trust sector – and, for that matter, across infrastructure funds generally. They are a reflection of higher gilt yields, making these income-focused trusts comparatively less attractive. Concerns over persistent inflation, weak economic growth and sticky interest rates have also dampened institutional interest. Over the past year the average renewable energy infrastructure trust has delivered investors a total loss of 6.7 per cent, while Foresight's losses are less at 1.5 per cent. To contextualise, Foresight has generated a ten-year return of 46 per cent. Ross Driver, manager of Foresight Solar, says they are doing all they can to improve matters. The solar sites it owns in Australia are being disposed of, as are selected operations in Spain and the UK. In total, it has sites in 58 locations. The proceeds of any sales, says Driver, will be part used to pay down borrowings and return cash to investors. He adds: 'We're selling assets and pulling all the levers while paddling with as many oars as possible in a tsunami.' Driver insists that if sentiment within the asset class improves his trust offers investors a good income, with the potential for share price growth. It's a view shared by some analysts. In a note last month, investment bank Peel Hunt said that Foresight Solar's shares offered 'an attractive tactical opportunity' while Rachel May, research analyst at investment group Shore Capital, says that the trust's board is trying hard to narrow the share price discount. While some people are unhappy about the impact of solar farms blighting the countryside, Driver says it's a trade-off. 'We need to decouple the country off a volatile gas price,' he adds. The trust's annual charges total 1.2 per cent and the stock market identification code is BD3QJR5. Its market ticker is FSFL. In total, investment house Foresight manages assets of £12 billion, primarily in infrastructure.


Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Rules are rules when it comes to trade... until all the major players ignore them
You cannot, Mr Bailey, get the toothpaste back into the tube. Last week the Governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, gave a speech to investment managers in Dublin on how important world trade was to global growth and how the system had to be reformed. So far, so good. But when you go through the detail it was all about trying to rebuild trading relations with Europe and how to make the so-called 'rules based' world trade system work better. And the problem there is that the world has changed. The UK will not go back to anything like a pre-Brexit relationship with Europe, and the US will not go back to a pre-Trump approach to global trade. The task for British political and financial leaders is to exploit the opportunities that have arisen, rather than hark back to a none-too-brilliant past. On Brexit, the Governor was careful to make the disclaimer that as a public servant he didn't take a position on it, but what he said had a clear spin. We had to 'minimise negative effects on trade' and that the changing relationship with Europe has 'weighed on the level of potential supply'. At least he didn't cite the Office for National Statistics' calculation that in the long run Brexit would cost 4 per cent of national output. On that figure I prefer the comment of one of his predecessors, Mervyn King, arguably the most notable UK economist of his generation: 'They can't possibly know that. They just make it up.' Nor did Bailey refer to the determined drive by Europe to make banks shift their business and people to EU centres, including Dublin. Instead it was all about trade in finance being 'a two-way street', failing to mention that the UK has a huge surplus on exports of financial services, or indeed that there were 678,000 jobs in the City of London at the end of 2023, some 30 per cent more than in 2016. Of course we need as good a relationship as possible with all trading partners, but we need to acknowledge that, insofar as the City has been successful post-Brexit, it is despite hostility from Europe. As the still bubbling row about transferring euro-derivatives clearing from London to the EU shows, realistically that hostility will continue. On world trade the Governor acknowledged that the system has come under too much strain 'and it is incorrect to dismiss those who argue for restrictions on trade as just wrong-headed'. And the blame for imposing that strain goes mainly to China, which as he noted, heavily subsidised key industries to help them dominate world markets. China imposed 5,400 'subsidy policies' between 2009 and 2022, two-thirds of the global total. He made the point, too, that it was reasonable for countries to seek security of supply, but suggested they do so by dealing with reliable partners rather than trying to bring production back home. These are sensible comments, in particular acknowledging that Donald Trump has a point and China has abused global trading rules. He notes the damage done to trade by Covid and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. He points out how important trade in services is, particularly for the UK. It's an interesting, thoughtful and conventional analysis, and maybe that is what we should expect from a central banker – but I fear it is a naive one. Why? Take Europe. There is a huge trading imbalance between the UK and EU. They sell far more goods to us than they buy, and we export more services to them. But they are not going to change their rules to increase their imports of services. Take China. It's not going to stop subsidising its industries for fear of getting ticked off by the World Trade Organization. As for the US, it has given up on the whole International Monetary Fund-WTO system, that's that. So instead we have to negotiate our way through a bilateral trading world. The UK has made a good start. There are lots of reasons to attack our Government's financial policies, but doing deals with the US, the world's largest economy, and India, soon to be the third largest, deserves to be welcomed. We seem to have a slightly better relationship with Europe, and I don't see why we shouldn't get on with China. Let's try to be nice, as Andrew Bailey was in Dublin, but let's be aware that the rules-based order is dead.


The Sun
27 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tesco launches new ice coffees by iconic chocolate brand for only £3.50 just in time for the summer
TESCO has launched a brand new ice coffee from an iconic chocolate brand in time for the summer months. The new Galaxy Frappes have hit stores now, and are available in caramel and mocha flavours. 2 These chocolatey treats are available exclusively at Tesco. A spokesperson said: "It's everything you love about frappes - now ready to make your way. "Feeling indulgent? Then, perhaps add whipped cream, your favourite syrup or maybe even top with strawberries. "It's the easiest way to enjoy a deliciously cool frappe at home or make to-go." How to save money on chocolate We all love a bit of chocolate from now and then, but you don't have to break the bank buying your favourite bar. Consumer reporter Sam Walker reveals how to cut costs... Go own brand - if you're not too fussed about flavour and just want to supplant your chocolate cravings, you'll save by going for the supermarket's own brand bars. Shop around - if you've spotted your favourite variety at the supermarket, make sure you check if it's cheaper elsewhere. Websites like let you compare prices on products across all the major chains to see if you're getting the best deal. Look out for yellow stickers - supermarket staff put yellow, and sometimes orange and red, stickers on to products to show they've been reduced. They usually do this if the product is coming to the end of its best-before date or the packaging is slightly damaged. Buy bigger bars - most of the time, but not always, chocolate is cheaper per 100g the larger the bar. So if you've got the appetite, and you were going to buy a hefty amount of chocolate anyway, you might as well go bigger. All you need to do is add ice and choice of milk to the mix to make the treat. It can be bought from Tesco, with an RRP of £3.50. The Galaxy Frappes are not the only chocolate treat to have hit Tesco's shelves in recent weeks. Shoppers have gone wild for a layered with a crispy cereal shell. They are described as a "deliciously light yet indulgent snack". It was posted to the popular New F when a keen-eyed shopper spotted in in stores. "We will have to be on the lookout for these they look good," another posted.