
Bought life insurance to save tax? Why it may be time to get rid of it under the new income tax regime - top things to check
Experts advise that if the policy is going to mature in 3-4 years, it is better to continue paying the premium. (AI image)
Most taxpayers are shifting to the
new tax regime
. They will not only pay less tax but also be free from the maze of deductions and exemptions. Taxpayers who made the mistake of buying life
insurance
only to save tax now have an opportunity to redeem themselves.
Life insurance is the lynchpin of a financial plan and a well-chosen policy safeguards all financial goals of an individual. But
traditional life insurance policies
offer very low coverage of just 10 times the annual premium. They are mostly bought for saving tax, not financial protection.
With no deduction available under the new regime, policyholders will not find them very useful. However, closing a policy prematurely has financial implications.
Total loss for new purchases:
Did you buy life insurance in the past two years? If a life insurance policy has not completed three years, all the premiums paid will be forfeited if the policy is prematurely closed. To many people, this may appear a losing proposition. Financial planners say losing 1-2 years' premium is better than continuing a policy that will yield a return of barely 5-6% for the next 10-15 years. They say it is better to take that loss and invest the future premiums in more lucrative avenues.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Mountain Gear for Extreme Conditions
Trek Kit India
Learn More
Undo
But there is another aspect that taxpayers must keep in mind when ending a policy prematurely. If you have claimed tax benefits under Section 80C, premature closure before three years could lead to a retrospective tax liability. The taxman will want you to pay up the tax you saved when you purchased the policy.
50-70% hit for older policies:
After you pay premiums for three years, an insurance policy acquires a surrender value.
This surrender value is not very high. If a policy with an annual premium of Rs 20,000 per year is surrendered after the third year, the policyholder can expect to get back around Rs 18,000 (or 30% of the Rs 60,000 paid over three years). The surrender value increases with every passing year. It may be close to 40-50% if premiums have been paid for 10-12 years.
Different rules for Ulips:
The rules are different for Ulips. These plans have a mandatory 5-year lock-in period, but premature closure is not as painful as in case of traditional policies.
If you stop paying the premium of a Ulip, the policy will terminate but the money you paid till then is not forfeited. The balance in the Ulip is moved to a discontinuance fund where it earns a minimal 4% per year and is returned to you after the five-year lock-in ends.
Experts advise that if the policy is going to mature in 3-4 years, it is better to continue paying the premium and reap the full benefits promised under the plan. If the policyholder is finding it difficult to pay the premiums, it is best to turn the policy into a paid-up plan. You stop paying the premium but the policy continues to be in force, although the sum assured (the death benefit or maturity amount) are proportionally reduced.
The reduced sum assured is better than surrendering the policy completely.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Vendors told to shift to new Morhabadi market building
Ranchi: The municipal corporation (RMC) on Tuesday formally sent notification to 161 selected vendors asking them to shift to the newly constructed vendor market near the Morabadi electricity office at the earliest. Additional municipal commissioner Sanjay Kumar said, "All allottees are to ensure the timely setup of their shops at the assigned stalls or platforms." He added, "The allotment was conducted with full transparency. Vendors who couldn't be allotted due to document issues can reapply during the second phase." The new market, built at a cost of Rs 1.36 crore with capacity to house 218 vendors, marks a push by the Ranchi Municipal Corporation to decongest footpaths and bring order to the vending ecosystem. Initially, 418 applied in April, out of which 169 were shortlisted based on eligibility, including PM SVANidhi registration and vendor IDs issued before March 5, 2022.


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bank fraud case: Court rejects plea of accused to take part in trial without bail
Kanpur: Special Judge Companies Act Azad Singh on Tuesday rejected the plea of two accused who sought permission to appear and participate in the trial of Rs 7,820 crore bank fraud case without seeking bail. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The judicial official not only dismissed their application but also ordered that a date be fixed every week in the case. June 17 has been fixed as the next date of hearing. The accused applicants, Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Verma, had submitted an application before the court to allow their participation in the trial. Kaushal Kishore Sharma, special prosecutor for the case, strongly opposed the plea, stating that without obtaining bail they can not be allowed to participate in the proceedings. The Companies Act contains special provisions regarding bail, which override those in the Cr PC. Consequently, the judicial official dismissed the application and fixed June 17 as the next date of hearing. Sharma stated that the Serious Fraud Investigation Office had lodged a complaint against 69 accused on behalf of several banks in bank fraud amounting to Rs 7,820 crore. Some name and famed persons of the city were also implicated in the case while as many as 20 accused were residing abroad and their files had been separated from the main case. Sharma mentioned that the court had already issued a non-bailable warrant against the accused, Satish Chandra Gupta, who is living abroad. The two accused Sunil Verma and Anoop Kumar Badhera had approached the apex court, where an order was passed that no coercive action should be taken against them, although their application is still pending. On Monday last, they moved an application before the court, which was dismissed. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now One of the accused, Vikram Kothari, has died, while others such as Rahul Kothari, builder Vishwanath Gupta, industrialist Suyash Desari and others have obtained bail orders in their favour from the apex court. The special prosecutor added that both accused have also applied for permission to travel abroad, and the court has reserved its order on that prayer. Speaking with TOI, the special prosecutor stated that the accused had formed a company for mercantile trading. They acquired a letter of credit from a bank, claiming that the company would purchase rice from one country and sell it in another. However, they used the funds for personal gains and only displayed sales and purchases on paper. The corporate ministry detected the nexus and ordered the Serious Fraud Investigation Office to lodge a complaint in the Companies Act court in 2020. Kanpur has the Companies Act court, which is the only one in Uttar Pradesh.


Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Andhra Pradesh attracted Rs 9.2 lakh crore investments in 11 months, says industries minister Bharat
1 2 3 Visakhapatnam: Industries minister TG Bharat on Tuesday said the NDA govt in the state had drawn investments worth 9.2 lakh crore within 11 months — an achievement the previous YSRCP regime failed to match in five years. The investments are expected to generate over 8.5 lakh employment opportunities. Addressing the Federation of Andhra Pradesh Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FAPCCI) Excellence Awards 2025 as chief guest, Bharat emphasised the govt's industry-first approach. "Our focus is on restoring investor confidence and addressing the long-standing concerns of the industrial sector," he noted. Highlighting reforms, Bharat said Andhra Pradesh now has among the most competitive industrial policies in the country. He urged entrepreneurs to leverage state-provided incentives and cited the "Speed of Doing Business" initiative for expediting approvals. He also called on businesses to participate in the P4 (People-Public-Private Partnership) model for inclusive growth. Visakhapatnam MP M Sribharat urged industry leaders to identify challenges and offer transformative ideas. "Your innovation could be the game changer Andhra Pradesh needs," he said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 나이들어 노안+백내장 절대 방치 하지 마세요! 부산백내장노안 전문안과 더 알아보기 Undo FAPCCI president Kankatala Mallikharjuna Rao commended the state's MSME policy, highlighting its generous incentives for tourism projects. These include a five-year 100% SGST exemption from the start of commercial production, full reimbursement of land conversion fees, and industrial tariffs for power bills. He assured that all reimbursements would be processed within six months. Awards were presented in 11 categories. Nekkanti Sea Foods Ltd, Visakhapatnam, was honoured for Excellence in Agri & Aqua Based Industries. Other winners are Ananda Enterprises (Export Performance – MSEs), Efftronics Systems (Product Innovation), and Ms. Annandi Suneetha (Outstanding Women Entrepreneur). Recognitions were also given to Steelon Call (Start-up), Divi's Laboratories (CSR), ITC – Agri Division (Employee Welfare), CCL Products (All Round Performance), Dalmia Cement (Green Energy), Aravind Industries (Rural Entrepreneurship), and Sarda Metals (Export – Large & Medium Enterprises).