
Bought life insurance to save tax? Why it may be time to get rid of it under the new income tax regime - top things to check
Experts advise that if the policy is going to mature in 3-4 years, it is better to continue paying the premium. (AI image)
Most taxpayers are shifting to the
new tax regime
. They will not only pay less tax but also be free from the maze of deductions and exemptions. Taxpayers who made the mistake of buying life
insurance
only to save tax now have an opportunity to redeem themselves.
Life insurance is the lynchpin of a financial plan and a well-chosen policy safeguards all financial goals of an individual. But
traditional life insurance policies
offer very low coverage of just 10 times the annual premium. They are mostly bought for saving tax, not financial protection.
With no deduction available under the new regime, policyholders will not find them very useful. However, closing a policy prematurely has financial implications.
Total loss for new purchases:
Did you buy life insurance in the past two years? If a life insurance policy has not completed three years, all the premiums paid will be forfeited if the policy is prematurely closed. To many people, this may appear a losing proposition. Financial planners say losing 1-2 years' premium is better than continuing a policy that will yield a return of barely 5-6% for the next 10-15 years. They say it is better to take that loss and invest the future premiums in more lucrative avenues.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Mountain Gear for Extreme Conditions
Trek Kit India
Learn More
Undo
But there is another aspect that taxpayers must keep in mind when ending a policy prematurely. If you have claimed tax benefits under Section 80C, premature closure before three years could lead to a retrospective tax liability. The taxman will want you to pay up the tax you saved when you purchased the policy.
50-70% hit for older policies:
After you pay premiums for three years, an insurance policy acquires a surrender value.
This surrender value is not very high. If a policy with an annual premium of Rs 20,000 per year is surrendered after the third year, the policyholder can expect to get back around Rs 18,000 (or 30% of the Rs 60,000 paid over three years). The surrender value increases with every passing year. It may be close to 40-50% if premiums have been paid for 10-12 years.
Different rules for Ulips:
The rules are different for Ulips. These plans have a mandatory 5-year lock-in period, but premature closure is not as painful as in case of traditional policies.
If you stop paying the premium of a Ulip, the policy will terminate but the money you paid till then is not forfeited. The balance in the Ulip is moved to a discontinuance fund where it earns a minimal 4% per year and is returned to you after the five-year lock-in ends.
Experts advise that if the policy is going to mature in 3-4 years, it is better to continue paying the premium and reap the full benefits promised under the plan. If the policyholder is finding it difficult to pay the premiums, it is best to turn the policy into a paid-up plan. You stop paying the premium but the policy continues to be in force, although the sum assured (the death benefit or maturity amount) are proportionally reduced.
The reduced sum assured is better than surrendering the policy completely.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
7 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mumbai NCLT allows 90-day extension of insolvency resolution for Lavasa Corp
Mumbai: The Mumbai bench of National Company Law Tribunal ( NCLT ) has allowed a 90-day extension in the ongoing consolidated corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of Lavasa Corp beginning May 29. The planned city project is undergoing a fresh CIRP after the NCLT, in September 2024, directed that the entire process be restarted, following the successful bidder's failure to implement the approved resolution plan within the specified time frame. The company has admitted liabilities of more than ₹6,642 crore, while the erstwhile successful bidder, Darwin Platform Infrastructure , had proposed to pay ₹1,814 crore. "We are of the view that the present application deserves to be allowed," the division bench of judicial member Ashish Kalia and technical member Sanjiv Dutt observed on June 2. "Since the CIRP is at an advanced stage and resolution plans have already been submitted by PRAs (prospective resolution applicants), which are required to be considered by the CoC (committee of creditors), the extension is being sought in the interest of value maximisation and to ensure that the objectives of the Code ( Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ) are duly met." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 모공각화증, 저는 집에서 이렇게 해결했어요 (전후사진) 현명한소비자 Undo


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Shongtong-Karcham gets 2026 deadline, HP bets big on hydro
Shimla: Himachal Pradesh chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu has set a firm Nov 2026 deadline for the completion of the long-delayed Shongtong-Karcham hydroelectric project, saying the 450-MW plant will generate Rs 1,000 crore in annual revenue and strengthen the state's green energy ambitions. Sukhu on Monday inspected the under-construction site in Kinnaur district — visiting both the power house at Karcham and the barrage site at Powari — where he met engineers and workers. He said that even though the project had dragged on for 13 years, the state's current Congress govt had fast-tracked its progress and was committed to commissioning it on schedule. "This project symbolises our focus on tapping river resources to drive economic growth," Sukhu said, adding that the state was moving actively to regain control over stalled or externally-managed hydroelectric initiatives. He claimed that the govt was assessing the total expenditure incurred on other major hydropower projects — including Dhaulasidh, Luhri, and Sunni — with plans to resume and regulate their construction under state-led terms. "Unlike the previous BJP govt, which compromised state interests, we are prioritising Himachal Pradesh's control over its energy assets," Sukhu said. The CM also announced that HP was advancing plans for a geothermal power facility at Tapri in Kinnaur and expanding its capacity in solar and green hydrogen energy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Despite being an energy-surplus state, HP still buys electricity from neighbouring states during winter for Rs 5 to 6 a unit. Sukhu said the state was ramping up solar-energy generation to offset this seasonal gap. "It has 626 MW worth of solar-power projects in various stages of development currently through the Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (HPPCL)," he said. Revenue Minister Jagat Singh Negi and senior district officials accompanied Sukhu during the site visit. MSID:: 121728609 413 |


Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Industries minister Harshwardhan Chauhan says Centre not distributing charity to Himachal
Shimla: Himachal Pradesh industries minister Harshwardhan Chauhan on Monday said that the central govt is not distributing charity to Himachal Pradesh, but the state is only getting its share, like all other 29 states of the country. Responding to the statements made by BJP MPs Anurag Thakur, Suresh Kashyap, and others that the central govt is providing sufficient funds to Himachal, the industries minister clarified that if Himachal is getting funds under the Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, or MGNREGA, it is the right of the state. "It is not the case that Himachal started getting these funds only when the BJP came to power in the Centre. Himachal used to get the same funds even when the previous govt was at the Centre as per the set pattern," he added. The minister, however, accused the central govt of not releasing funds to the state govt, especially around Rs 10,000 crore under the post-disaster needs assessment (PDNA), though the state govt sent the claims to the Centre in the financial year 2023-24. He claimed that the central govt is indirectly benefiting other states ruled by the BJP or its allies. Chauhan questioned the BJP leadership in Himachal about whether they got any funds or schemes sanctioned for the hill state other than what the state is getting under the existing schemes. The cabinet minister also held former chief minister and current leader of opposition Jai Ram Thakur, as well as the previous BJP govt, responsible for putting Himachal into a financial mess and a vicious cycle of loans. MSID:: 121728401 413 |