Easy-looking math sum leaves people confused - can you solve it without a calculator?
As elementary as it might feel, you'd be surprised how easy it is to be stumped by a seemingly simple equation.
This problem, posted on X, in particular may be challenging for even the best of mathematicians. Can you solve it without a calculator?
5+5 x 5+5
At first it may look easy, but it's important to go back to basics before diving in head first.
The acronym PEMDAS can be handy when solving a sum like this one. Its letters spell out the order in which you should solve complex equations.
The 'p' stands for parenthesis, then exponents, multiplication and division, and then adding or subtracting.
Now, give it a try for yourself.
Using the rules of PEMDAS, the first step is to solve the sum at the center of the problem, no matter how unnatural it may feel:
5 x 5 = 25
Now, the problem reads:
5+25+5
With simple addition from left to right, the final sum is easy:
5+25=30
30+5= 35
How did you do?
If you couldn't solve it, don't worry, there are a few common mistakes that could have led to a different answer.
The first, is adding on both sides before multiplying in the middle.
Adding first on the left:
5+5=10
Making the problem:
10x5+5
Then, adding on the right:
5+5=10
That makes the solution:
10x10=100
Unfortunately, that method totally ignores the rules of PEMDAS, rendering the answer incorrect.
Another easy error would be to solve from left to right, which may feel natural at first.
5+5=10
That leaves:
10x5+5
Then:
10x5=50
Which would make the solution:
50+5=55
But PEMDAS is a fool-proof way to guarantee the right answer every time and tease your brain with all-too-familiar math tricks.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
9 hours ago
- The Independent
Most popular A-level subject with 112,138 entries revealed
In 2025, more young people than ever have opened their A-level results to find out how they did in their maths exam. Once again, maths has been the most popular A-level subject, with 112,138 entries in 2025. This is up by more than 4% compared with 2024. Entries in further maths, an A-level that expands on the maths curriculum, have also risen – an increase of 7% since 2024, with over 19,000 entries this year. As a professional mathematician, this is pleasing news. Some of these students will be happily receiving confirmation of their place to study maths at university. The joy I experienced when I discovered in my maths degree that many of the subjects I studied at school – chemistry, biology, physics and even music – are woven together by a mathematical fabric, is something I've never forgotten. I'm excited by the idea that many young people are about to experience this for themselves. But I am concerned that fewer students will have the same opportunities in the future, as more maths departments are forced to downsize or close, and as we become more reliant on artificial intelligence. There are a number of differences between studying maths at university compared with school. While this can be daunting at first, all of these differences underscore just how richly layered, deeply interconnected and vastly applicable maths is. At university, not only do you learn beautiful formulas and powerful algorithms, but also grapple with why these formulas are true and dissect exactly what these algorithms are doing. This is the idea of the 'proof', which is not explored much at school and is something that can initially take students by surprise. But proving why formulas are true and why algorithms work is an important and necessary step in being able discover new and exciting applications of the maths you're studying. A maths degree can lead to careers in finance, data science, AI, cybersecurity, quantum computing, ecology and climate modelling. But more importantly, maths is a beautifully creative subject, one that allows people to be immensely expressive in their scientific and artistic ideas. A recent and stunning example of this is Hannah Cairo, who at just 17 disproved a 40-year old conjecture. If there is a message I wish I knew when I started studying university mathematics it is this: maths is not just something to learn, but something to create. I'm continually amazed at how my students find new ways to solve problems that I first encountered over 20 years ago. Accessibility of maths degrees But the question of going on to study maths at university is no longer just a matter of A-level grades. The recent and growing phenomenon of maths deserts – areas of the country where maths degrees are not offered – is making maths degrees less accessible, particularly for students outside of big cities. Forthcoming research from The Campaign for Mathematical Sciences (CAMS), of which I am a supporter, shows that research-intensive, higher-tariff universities – the ones that require higher grades to get in – took 66% of UK maths undergraduates in 2024, up from 56% in 2006. This puts smaller departments in lower-tariff universities in danger of closure as enrolments drop. The CAMS research forecasts that an additional nine maths departments will have fewer than 50 enrolments in their degrees by 2035. This cycle will further concentrate maths degrees in high-tariff institutions, reinforcing stereotypes such as that only exceptionally gifted people should go on to study maths at university. This could also have severe consequences for teacher recruitment. The CAMS research also found that 25% of maths graduates from lower-tariff universities go into jobs in education, compared to 8% from higher tariff universities. Maths in the age of AI The growing capability and sophistication of AI is also putting pressure on maths departments. With OpenAI's claim that their recently released GPT-5 is like having 'a team of PhD-level experts in your pocket', the temptation to overly rely on AI poses further risks to the existence and quality of future maths degrees. But the process of turning knowledge into wisdom and theory into application comes from the act of doing: doing calculations and forming logical and rigorous arguments. That is the key constituent of thinking clearly and creatively. It ensures students have ownership of their skills, capacities, and the work that they produce. A data scientist will still require an in-depth working knowledge of the mathematical, algorithmic and statistical theory underpinning data science if they are going to be effective. The same for financial analysts, engineers and computer scientists. The distinguished mathematician and computer scientist Leslie Lamport said that 'coding is to programming what typing is to writing'. Just as you need to have some idea of what you are writing before you type it, you need to have some idea of the (mathematical) algorithm you are creating before you code it. It is worth remembering that the early pioneers in AI – John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky, Claude Shannon, Alan Turing – all had degrees in mathematics. So we have every reason to expect that future breakthroughs in AI will come from people with mathematics degrees working creatively in interdisciplinary teams. This is another great feature of maths: its versatility. It's a subject that doesn't just train you for a job but enables you to enjoy a rich and fulfilling career – one that can comprise many different jobs, in many different fields, over the course of a lifetime.
Times
a day ago
- Times
Why A-level joy may turn to despair for the graduates of tomorrow
There is much to celebrate in this year's A-level results. Teenagers across Britain have jumped for joy that record numbers are heading to university — with more than a quarter of a million being accepted into their first choice of university, a record 82 per cent. In total, 439,180 applicants have been accepted on to higher education courses. This year's students are the second cohort to have their grading returned to pre-pandemic standards across the board. For those who achieved what they wanted, we offer many congratulations and good wishes for the next stage in your education. These results are a testament to the hard work put in by pupils, teachers, schools and their families. And for those who did not fulfil their expectations, they can take comfort in the fact that many who went on to great success did not boast academic prowess. Winston Churchill, for example, was a notoriously poor student and failed the entrance exam to Sandhurst twice. Jeremy Clarkson, who left school with a C and two Us at A-Level, has reminded us in his annual tradition on social media that his life has turned out rather well after all. There are two notable shifts in this year's results. One is that boys have pulled ahead of girls: 9.9 per cent of their entries were marked grade A compared with 9.1 per cent for girls — the first time since 2018 that boys came ahead of their female counterparts. The other is that science subjects appear to be on the rise. Politicians have worried about the lack of appetite for science subjects but this year's results suggest otherwise. The Institute of Physics reports that the number of A-levels for the subject is the highest this century. This may be future-proofing their careers ahead. • Emma Duncan: Did results day prove girls are really cleverer than boys? Yet the world that awaits this future graduate cohort is far from cheerful. Artificial intelligence is already threatening the market for entry-level jobs, with reports suggesting the number of openings has fallen by a third since the end of 2022. The chief executive of Anthropic, an AI company, has warned that half of entry-level white-collar jobs could be eliminated within the next five years. According to the Department for Education, degrees such as medicine and engineering have the highest salaries ten years after graduation. These are as good a bet as any against the gathering storm. But what is just as concerning for new students is debt. The average pile accumulated at university is £53,000, a significantly higher level than graduates can expect to earn in salary for some time. Thanks to inflation, fees have been declining in real terms since 2012 and the cap on what institutions can charge will rise to £9,535. Thanks to the absurdly high interest charged, graduates face a de facto tax from the day they enter the workplace for decades ahead. More transparency is vital on the link between studies and earnings. The government has promised to make such data accessible, albeit with little progress. Pupils should be able to find out which degrees can benefit them the most. The level of debt speaks to a wider rot within the universities sector. Ever since Tony Blair decreed in 1999 that he wanted 50 per cent of young adults to go into higher education, too many students have been studying degrees that are unlikely to reap great rewards — all propped up by ever-rising fees. A drop in international students will worsen the funding challenges. The UK can proudly claim some of the world's finest universities, but it is overdue a serious rethink about what is viable.
Telegraph
a day ago
- Telegraph
Why boys did better than girls at A-levels
Girls outperforming boys at school is something we had almost begun to take for granted. Yet while it still holds true throughout primary and secondary education, 2025 is the year the tables turned when it comes to A-levels. This year, 28.4 per cent of male candidates received an A* or A score, compared to 28.2 per cent for their female counterparts. This is the first time boys have taken the lead since 2018, and only for the third time in modern grading history. What or who could explain this unexpected reversal of academic fortunes? Experts were quick to suggest the success was down to boys' subject choices: they tend to favour STEM fields where the right-or-wrong answers allow exam-takers to get closer to full marks than in the humanities or arts. While their soaring popularity is undoubtedly real – with male entrants for further maths up 7.6 per cent on last year and economics up 5.7 per cent – the subjects driving the overall gain are far broader. Boys improved year-on-year in the share of top grades in 25 out of the 41 subjects on offer, according to the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ). Girls did so in only 16. Amongst courses available in all UK nations, boys' performance increased the most in art and design (up 2.8 points), modern languages (up 2.8 points) and drama (up 2.3 points). But the impact of the most subscribed subjects, even if small, cannot be ignored. Maths was the most popular once again for both genders, accounting for 12.7 per cent of papers handed in this summer. While boys' equation-solving skills held firm – their A*/A share rising 0.1 points – the girls lost a full percentage point. Factoring in the number of candidates sitting each exam to obtain their weighted contribution to the overall change reveals chemistry had the biggest influence. Boys' share of top grades in chemistry, their fourth most popular subject, rose 1.2 points from 34.3 to 35.5 per cent. The roughly 28,000 boys producing that result alone dragged their sex's all-round result up by 8.3 per cent. Their newfound prowess in art and design came second (a 7.3 per cent boost), followed by business studies (6.7 per cent). Another hint comes from the headline result split by age. Adding an extra decimal shows the headline difference between the genders across all UK candidates came to 0.26 points (so actually 0.3 when rounding). But looking at the grade distribution for 18-year-old candidates alone, this space shrinks to 0.12 points. Exam-sitters of this age made up the vast majority of candidates – 807,420 out of the total 882,509, or around 91.5 per cent. This suggests that among the 75,000-odd entries in other age groups, such as pupils taking their A-levels early aged 16 or 17 or people who resat them after the age of 18, the male contingent excelled. National figures, meanwhile, suggest English boys deserve particular acclaim. They improved the most of either gender in all three nations, up 1 point from 27.4 to 28.4 per cent. As England makes up the lion's share of all UK candidates – over 9 in 10 of the roughly 400,000 boys that sat exams this year – they had a profound effect. For their part, English girls fought back with a gain of just 0.2 points. Boys also made headway across the Irish Sea (up 0.7 points), where girls saw a modest decline (down 0.3 points). However, as stressed by the official examination board, the swing in favour of boys is quite marginal. The JCQ said fluctuations from one year to the next were inevitable, and that this slim disparity was well within their expected margins. Further down the grading curve, boys are not outperforming girls at all. The latter actually fared better in avoiding the lowest possible grades: 79.6 per cent of them got a C or above, compared to 76 per cent of boys. A total of 12,151 male candidates received a U (ungraded), compared with 10,252 for their female counterparts. Regional disparities Pupils in England were again outshone by their counterparts elsewhere, with 28.2 per cent of entries awarded an A* or A this summer – rising to 29.5 per cent in Wales and 30.4 per cent in Northern Ireland. But this masks stark differences between the English regions, where the proportion of top grades increased everywhere except the North East and the West Midlands, where they declined one percentage point and 0.6 percentage points respectively. Pupils in the East Midlands saw the highest jump in A*s and As to 23.8 per cent – up from 22.5 last year. But London remained by far the strongest region, with 32.1 per cent of A-level entries scooping the top two grades. Rutland tops the counties At an even more granular level, Rutland's reign atop the county charts continued for a seventh year in a row, according to separate data published by Ofqual since 2019. Some 41.2 per cent of candidates in the rural East Midlands shire clinched top marks in 2025, the only area where more than two-fifths of pupils were able to boast as much. Greater Manchester, however, proved the setting for the greatest uplift in grades, rising two points since 2024 from 26.1 to 28.1 per cent A*/As. Overall, just over two-thirds of English counties (68.1 per cent) saw a rise or flatline in top grades. Grammar schools catch up to independents The attainment gap between private schools and the state sector narrowed slightly this year after selective schools posted their best ever results outside of the pandemic. Grammar schools and other selective institutions saw 43.7 per of their A-level entries receive A*s and As – up one percentage point compared to 2024. Meanwhile, the share of top grades in the independent sector slipped by 0.1 percentage points to remain broadly stable at 48.5 per cent. The results come at a crucial moment for private schools as they try to prove their worth, after the Government's VAT policy forced most to raise fees by around a fifth from Jan 1. The narrowed gap between grammar schools and private schools this year will likely toughen competition in the state sector, as fee-paying parents consider their options. Struggles in STEM subjects Maths, psychology and biology remained the most popular A-level subjects this year, alone accounting for just under 30 per cent of all exams sat. Of the three, however, only maths saw an increase in entries. Excluding digital technology, only on offer in Northern Ireland, art and design subjects clocked the highest increase in top grades, rising 3.5 per cent this year, tailed by modern languages other than French, Spanish or German, media studies and English language. The increase follows some concerns that students may be using AI tools such as ChatGPT for coursework-heavy subjects. By contrast, several core STEM (Science, Engineering, Technology and Mathematics) experienced slight falls, with maths down 0.3 percentage points this year, chemistry down 0.1 points, and further maths down 0.2 points.
