10-month-old orphaned in Himachal flash floods declared 'child of state', to get govt aid
The infant lost her parents and grandmother after a cloudburst struck Talwara village on the intervening night of June 30 and July 1. Her father, Ramesh, 31, died, while her mother, Radha Devi, 24, and grandmother, Purnu Devi, 59, are still missing.
Ramesh had stepped out to divert the flow of water entering the house, while his wife and mother followed to help. They did not return.
Neetika has been declared a 'child of the state' under the Chief Minister Sukh-Aashray Yojana of the Himachal Pradesh government, a senior official said.
Talking to PTI Videos, Revenue Minister Jagat Singh Negi said, "The state government takes full responsibility of the little girl's upbringing, education and future as part of a long-term plan. Whatever this girl wants to become in the future, a doctor, an engineer or an officer, the government will bear all expenses."
Several benefits are provided to orphans under the Sukh-Ashray scheme launched in 2023, which includes providing food, shelter, clothing, higher education, and skill development to unmarried orphans between 18 and 27 years of age who have no place to live and are unemployed.
The children get clothing and festival allowance, inter or intra-state annual exposure visits, stipend to meet personal expenses while pursuing higher education, vocational training or skill development, funds for startup and grants for building a house.
On the fateful night, Neetika was found crying alone in the house by neighbour Prem Singh, who informed her relative Balwant, a personal security officer for former chief minister and Leader of the Opposition, Jai Ram Thakur.
At present, the child is living with her aunt Kirna Devi, the younger sister of the deceased Ramesh, in Shikauri village, about 20 km away from Talwara village.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Battered by Trump onslaught, Modi trying to portray himself as farmers' champion: Congress
NEW DELHI: Now that he is "bruised and battered" by the "Trump onslaught", Prime Minister Narendra Modi is trying to portray himself as the great champion of Indian farmers, but "nobody is fooled", the Congress said on Friday. After US President Donald Trump doubled trade tariffs on India to 50 per cent over its crude oil imports from Russia, Modi on Thursday said India will never compromise on the interests of its farmers and that he was prepared to bear a significant personal cost if necessary. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said there was a time five years ago when the PM mocked protesting farmers as 'andolanjeevi' in Parliament. "Over 700 farmers were martyred in the agitation against the three black anti-farmer laws and the PM had no word expressing pain or regret or sympathy," Ramesh said on X. Farmers' organisations continue to demand a legal guarantee for minimum support price (MSP) set on the Swaminathan formula of the comprehensive cost of cultivation plus 50 per cent and meaningful debt relief, he said. The PM is totally silent on these demands, which were voiced even by the former vice president of India, Ramesh said in an apparent reference to Jagdeep Dhankhar.
The Hindu
2 days ago
- The Hindu
Armstrong murder: Madras High Court quashes detention of 17 accused under Goondas Act
Wondering how Greater Chennai Commissioner of Police A. Arun could have scrutinised 14,000 pages of voluminous documents in a single day, the Madras High Court on Wednesday (August 6, 2025) quashed the preventive detention orders passed by him against 17 accused in the murder of Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) Tamil Nadu unit president K. Armstrong. A Division Bench of Justices M.S. Ramesh and V. Lakshminarayanan pointed out that the sponsoring authority (Assistant Commissioner of Police, Koyambedu Range) under the Goondas Act had submitted a proposal before the detaining authority (Commissioner of Police) on September 19, 2024, along with around 14,000 pages of supporting materials. The detaining authority had accepted the proposal and passed the detention orders on the same day. Allowing a batch of habeas corpus petitions filed against the detention orders, the judges agreed with the detainees' counsel that it would be humanly impossible for an indvidual to go through such voluminous documents in a single day and take a decision after applying his mind. 'The detaining authority appears to have scrutinised approximately 14,000 pages in one single day... which is an impossible task for any human being... In light of these observations, we are constrained to hold that the detaining authority had not applied his mind while passing the grounds of detention as well as the detention order,' the Division Bench wrote. Authoring the verdict, Justice Ramesh pointed out the object of preventive detention was not to punish a man for an offence committed by him but to intercept him before he commits an offence and to prevent him from causing disturbance to public order on the basis of his antecedents. Therefore, the detaining authorities must be highly circumspect before issuing the detention orders. 'Any indifferent attitude on the part of the detaining authority... would defeat the very purpose of the preventive detention and turn the detention order as a dead letter and frustrate the entire proceedings,' the judges highlighted. Effect on bail proceedings When Additional Advocate General P. Kumaresan feared that the quashing of the preventive detention orders could become an influencing factor for the grant of bail to the accused in the murder case, the judges made it clear that both were mutually exclusive and that in no case, the quashing of a preventive detention order could be considered as a factor to grant bail in a criminal case. 'We intend to remind the bail courts that the standard or grounds for consideration of bail application is distinct from that of the grounds of consideration adopted by the High Court in interfering with the preventive detention orders. While punitive detention is made after proper application of mind, preventive detention touches upon a subjective satisfaction of a detaining authority,' the Bench said. 'In light of these discussions, we make it unambiguously clear that the bail court, in such cases, shall not give weightage to quashing of the detention order, as a ground for the grant of bail. This observation shall hold good for the present case also,' the judges concluded.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
Opposition's demand for discussion on votebandi non-negotiable: Congress
The Congress on Wednesday said the Opposition's demand for a discussion on the "votebandi" by the Election Commission is "non-negotiable" in both Houses of Parliament. There has been a logjam in Parliament over the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, which the Opposition has alleged is being done to cut votes ahead of the state election. Congress general secretary in-charge, communications, Jairam Ramesh, said the Chair in the Rajya Sabha is a continuing entity despite the comings and goings, scheduled and unscheduled. "Yesterday, the Deputy Chairman gave a ruling that because the Lok Sabha Speaker had said so on December 14, 1988, any matter concerning the Election Commission cannot be discussed in Parliament. But on July 21, 2023, the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, a Modi appointee, had categorically ruled that 'the Rajya Sabha is entitled to discuss anything under the planet with only one restriction'," Ramesh said in a post on X. "He had gone on to say that the 'only one restriction' related to the conduct of any judge except on a motion related to his removal. The then-Chairman had added that the concept of sub-judice was totally misconceived," the Congress leader pointed out. He said the Opposition is constantly reminded that Parliament runs on rulings and conventions "Why is the Rajya Sabha Chairman's ruling of July 21, 2023, being so wilfully ignored?" Ramesh said. "The Opposition's demand for a discussion on the votebandi and votechori being orchestrated by G2 through the Election Commission in Bihar & to be followed in West Bengal, Assam, and other states is non-negotiable in both Houses of Parliament," he said. The Opposition has been protesting in both Houses of Parliament against the SIR, alleging the EC's exercise was aimed at "disenfranchising voters" in Bihar ahead of the Assembly elections. They have been demanding a discussion on the issue in both Houses. Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Tuesday had dared the government to debate the Election Commission's voter roll revision in Bihar and claimed that the fact that the House is not being able to run smoothly is a manifestation of the ruling side's weakness. Her remarks came amid the logjam in Parliament due to vociferous protests by opposition parties demanding a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. Several MPs of the INDIA bloc parties have also been staging a protest in the Parliament House complex on the issue. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
