As Social Security turns 90, its problems are only mounting with age
When President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law on Aug. 14, 1935, he guaranteed for the first time that workers could rely on continuing income in retirement after they turned 65. As it enters its 10th decade, the program is only growing in importance amid an aging population, with a record number of Americans now collecting benefits.
In the next 10 years, Social Security is expected to swell by an additional 12 million recipients, according to the AARP. But even as it grows in importance, the program is also facing mounting problems and growing questions over its long term viability.
While many policy experts believe the program should be expanded, its outgoings now far outpace its income. Some Democratic lawmakers are also questioning the agency's ability to serve retirees after the Trump administration earlier this year made cuts to its workforce in what the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities referred to as the "largest staffing cut in SSA's history."
As these challenges have mounted, faith in the program has deteriorated, even as three-quarters of Americans say they believe Social Security is "one of the most important programs" the government offers, according to a recent AARP survey. Confidence in the future of Social Security has declined by 7% in the last five years, from 43% in 2020 to 36% in 2025, it found.
Asked about these concerns, the Social Security Administration pointed to a Fox News interview Thursday with its commissioner, Frank Bisignano, who said he's optimistic about the program's future and that the agency is working on improving its operations.
The White House also took issue with the criticisms, with spokeswoman Liz Huston telling CBS News that the administration is improving customer service and "preventing illegal aliens from accessing benefits. "President Trump has made Social Security great again," she said.
Funding woes
A major headwind facing Social Security may not be new, but it is fast approaching: The possible insolvency of its trust funds as the gap between its revenue and expenditure grows.
For instance, in 2024, the program cost $1.49 billion, but total income was $1.42 billion, according to the 2025 Social Security Board of Trustees' report.
Because of that trend — which is expected to continue given the aging population — the Social Security trust funds are forecast to be depleted by 2034, one year sooner than previously forecast, according to the most recent trustees' report. This so-called "go-broke" date has been a major source of stress for Americans who worry that there won't be enough money left by the time they reach retirement age.
While some workers believe that the trust funds' insolvency means Social Security will cease making payments after that date, that is incorrect. Because the program is funded through payroll taxes, Social Security has a constant stream of income — although without the trust funds' financial cushion, the program will face a shortfall, leading to a cut in benefits.
Without a fix, monthly benefits could be cut by as much as 23%, the Social Security Board of Trustees warned in its 2025 annual report.
But there are options for shoring up the trust funds. For one, there's a current cap on the amount of income subject to Social Security taxes, which stands at $176,100 in 2025, meaning any earnings above that amount are exempt from the payroll tax.
One remedy would be to lift the cap on payroll taxes, an option that some Democratic lawmakers prefer. Another idea, floated by some Republican lawmakers, is to raise the retirement age, which currently stands at 67 for people born after 1960.
Changes under President Trump
President Trump has vowed not to cut Social Security, noting in a "Meet the Press" interview in December that "we're not touching Social Security, other than we might make it more efficient." Nonetheless, concerns have mounted over the Trump administration's changes to the program, including cuts to its staff and the closure of some field offices.
During a press call Wednesday organized by advocacy groups, Sen. Bernie Sanders, an independent from Vermont, claimed Mr. Trump and others in his administration are "working overtime to try to dismantle Social Security."
Many Americans also say they're worried about what sort of changes the new administration could make. According to a new survey from NerdWallet, 61% of Americans believe Social Security benefits will be cut under the current administration.
The White House, however, contends that Social Security has become more efficient under Mr. Trump's leadership. In a statement released Thursday, the White House claimed that the agency is handling 70% more calls than last year and that it has cut down on wait times with the help of technology. It also said the average wait times for customers at field offices have declined by 23%.
"We have taken steps to reduce wait times, enhance security, and make it easier to navigate our programs," SSA commissioner Frank Bisignano wrote in an opinion piece for Fox News on Thursday. "All the while ensuring we pay benefits accurately to those who are eligible to receive them."
Mr. Trump on Thursday repeated his promises to protect the program.
The program will become "stronger, bigger and better" and is "gonna be around a long time" with Republicans in charge, he added in remarks from the White House.
Passenger arrested after allegedly causing disturbance midair and forcing flight to divert
When could Tropical Storm Erin become a hurricane?
From Helsinki to Alaska, Trump and Putin's evolving relationship
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
West Virginia National Guard being sent to DC as White House escalates police takeover
West Virginia National Guard troops are now being sent to Washington, DC, in an escalation of President Donald Trump's efforts to federally take over law enforcement in the city. 'At the request of the Trump administration, I have directed the @WVNationalGuard to support the President's initiative to make D.C. safe and beautiful. We are deploying 300-400 skilled personnel to the nation's capital, reflecting our commitment to a strong and secure America,' West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey, a Republican, said in an X post on Saturday. The efforts will be federally funded, and the state's National Guard will provide 'mission-essential' equipment and training, according to a statement from the governor's office. A White House official said Saturday that the troops are a part of 'Trump's ongoing effort to make DC safe and beautiful' and the 'National Guard's role has not changed.' Its role in DC this week has, so far, not been to make arrests. 'The National Guard will protect federal assets, create a safe environment for law enforcement officials to carry out their duties when required, and provide a visible presence to deter crime,' the official said. CNN has reached out to the DC mayor's office for comment. The troops' deployment is an escalation of Trump's efforts to take federal control of the DC police department as he rails against crime in the capital. The president previously announced that he was deploying over 800 DC National Guard troops to the city and surging federal agents into the streets, but Saturday's move marks the first time National Guard troops outside of the city have been directed to support the Trump administration. 'We stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region and contribute to the collective effort of making our nation's capital a clean and safe environment. The National Guard's unique capabilities and preparedness make it an invaluable partner in this important undertaking,' West Virginia Adjutant General Jim Seward, who will command the deployment of the state's troops, said in a statement. The move comes amid scrutiny over the takeover in the nation's capital. Washington, DC, sued the Trump administration on Friday to block Attorney General Pam Bondi's Thursday directive for the city to accept an 'emergency police commissioner,' acting Drug Enforcement Administration chief Terry Cole, and give him full control of the department during the federal takeover. Following a hearing in federal court, Bondi issued a new order Friday giving control of the Metropolitan Police Department back to its chief, Pamela Smith, in response to a judge's directive. Federal agents have been patrolling the city with local police and making arrests following Trump's order earlier this week declaring a crime emergency and federalizing DC's police. The order cited a public safety emergency after an assault on a former government worker. DC Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, has repeatedly said she wants to make sure the federal law enforcement surge is useful to the city, though she struck a more adversarial tone during an event this week, calling Trump's police department takeover an 'authoritarian push.' CNN's Alayna Treene contributed to this report.


Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
Dan Hoffman urges European countries to ‘step up' and deter Russian attacks on Ukraine
Fox News contributor Dan Hoffman discusses the impact of the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's upcoming visit to the White House on 'Fox News Live.'


CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Trump warned by top Senate Democrats to rethink advanced AI chip sales to China
Six Senate Democrats on Friday released an open letter asking President Donald Trump to reconsider his decision to allow tech giants Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices to sell AI semiconductor chips to China in exchange for 15% of revenue from the sales. The letter — signed by Senators Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Mark Warner, D-Va.; Jack Reed, D-R.I.; Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.; Christopher Coons, D-Del.; and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. — was in response to an Aug. 11 announcement by Trump that Nvidia and AMD would pay the U.S. government a 15% cut of revenue from chip sales to China in exchange for export licenses. "Our national security and military readiness relies upon American innovators inventing and producing the best technology in the world, and in maintaining that qualitative advantage in sensitive domains. The United States has historically been successful in maintaining and building that advantage because of, in part, our ability to deny adversaries access to those technologies," the letter states. "The willingness displayed in this arrangement to 'negotiate' away America's competitive edge that is key to our national security in exchange for what is, in effect, a commission on a sale of AI-enabling technology to our main global competitor, is cause for serious alarm," the letter continues. Senators also warned that selling advanced AI chips — specifically Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips — to China could help strengthen its military systems, a claim that Nvidia denies. In a statement to CNBC, a Nvidia spokesperson said: "The H20 would not enhance anyone's military capabilities, but would have helped America attract the support of developers worldwide and win the AI race. Banning the H20 cost American taxpayers billions of dollars, without any benefit." The letter from Senate Democrats also requests a detailed response from the administration by Friday, Aug. 22, regarding the current deal involving Nvidia and AMD, as well as any similar arrangements being made with other companies. "We again urge your administration to quickly reverse course and abandon this reckless plan to trade away U.S. technology leadership," the letter states. A request for comment from the White House and AMD was not immediately returned. Despite Trump allowing chip sales to resume, it has already become clear that China isn't welcoming Nvidia back with open arms, instead urging tech companies to avoid buying U.S. companies' chips, according to a Bloomberg report. "We're hearing that this is a hard mandate, and that [authorities are actually] stopping additional orders of H20s for some companies," Qingyuan Lin, a senior analyst covering China semiconductors at Bernstein, told CNBC. In a separate report, The Information said regulators in China have ordered major tech companies, including ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent, to suspend Nvidia chip purchases until a national security review is complete. —