Explained: Federal Prosecutor Maurene Comey fired - was it for 'botching' Epstein-Maxwell and Diddy cases?
Maurene Comey
, the federal prosecutor who helped convict
Ghislaine Maxwell
and recently prosecuted Sean "Diddy" Combs, has been fired by the
Trump administration
.
The Justice Department has not issued an official explanation, though the dismissal letter cited Article II of the Constitution.
Her role in the Epstein and Maxwell prosecutions has drawn renewed attention amid a public dispute over unreleased Epstein files.
Critics suggest her firing is politically motivated, due to her family connection to former FBI director James Comey.
Legal experts and prosecutors warn the move undermines
prosecutorial independence
and risks politicising
SDNY
.
Who is Maurene Comey?
Maurene Comey was an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), widely regarded as the most influential federal prosecutor's office in the country. She is the daughter of former FBI director James Comey, who was fired by Donald Trump in 2017.
Comey built a reputation for managing high-profile cases involving sexual exploitation, public corruption, and white-collar crime. Her career highlights include:
Ghislaine Maxwell trial (2021–22)
: Comey helped secure Maxwell's conviction on multiple counts related to the sexual exploitation of minors. She had been involved in the Epstein probe from the outset.
Sean "Diddy" Combs trial (2025)
: Comey prosecuted Combs on sex trafficking and racketeering charges. The jury acquitted him of the most serious counts but convicted him on a lesser prostitution-related charge.
She was also a lead attorney in Epstein-related matters and represented the DOJ in civil litigation seeking to block disclosure of certain investigative records, citing risks of harassment to victims and witnesses.
Why Was She Fired?
While the Justice Department has declined comment, several factors appear to have contributed to her abrupt removal:
1. Fallout from the Combs Trial
The mixed verdict in the Combs case reportedly sparked frustration in the Trump administration.
Although Comey secured a conviction, the acquittals on major charges were viewed internally as a prosecutorial failure. Independent observers, however, noted the case's legal complexity and the difficulty of securing trafficking convictions.
2.
Political Targeting
and the Epstein Fallout
Comey's firing came just days after renewed controversy over the Epstein investigation. President Trump has come under fire from supporters for refusing to release Epstein-related files.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
In response, he claimed without evidence that materials were 'concocted' by his political enemies—including former President Barack Obama, Joe Biden, and James Comey.
Although there is no direct link between the firing and Comey's involvement in the Epstein-Maxwell cases, legal experts say the timing strongly suggests a political motive. As recently as 2024, Comey filed declarations defending DOJ's decision not to unseal Epstein records, arguing that doing so would harm potential retrials and risk victim harassment.
3. A Wider Pattern at SDNY
Comey's firing is part of a broader shake-up of SDNY:
In
February 2025
, eight prosecutors—including acting US Attorney Danielle Sassoon—resigned after the DOJ dropped corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams.
In
April
, Matthew Podolsky stepped down under pressure, paving the way for Trump to appoint Jay Clayton as interim US Attorney.
Wednesday's dismissal of Comey is the most high-profile removal to date. Colleagues say she was informed by letter citing Article II and held an impromptu meeting with the co-chief of the Public Corruption Unit to share the news. She was reportedly escorted out with quiet respect from fellow prosecutors.
Why It Matters
The removal of a veteran prosecutor without a clear explanation—and during ongoing litigation involving her past cases—has raised serious alarms across legal circles.
Precedent of Politicised Firing
: Once rare, such terminations have become more common under Trump's second term, eroding norms around civil service protection.
Damage to Prosecutorial Independence
: SDNY is known for its independence in prosecuting political figures, corporate crimes, and sensitive public corruption cases. The replacement of career professionals with political loyalists raises fears of selective enforcement or non-enforcement.
Implications for the Epstein Files
: Comey's past efforts to shield sensitive investigative material from public release, citing victim protection, are now being cast in a political light. With her departure, the DOJ could potentially revisit those positions under new leadership.
FAQ
Q. Was Maurene Comey fired because of her father, James Comey?
There is no official confirmation, but Trump's long-standing animus toward James Comey, combined with Maurene Comey's role in politically sensitive prosecutions, suggests the name alone may have made her a target.
Q. Did the outcome of the Diddy trial contribute to her firing?
Yes. While the prosecution secured one conviction, the acquittals on more serious charges were viewed unfavourably within the administration.
Q. Is this part of a wider purge?
Yes. Her dismissal follows a series of resignations and removals at SDNY, marking a consolidation of influence over one of the most powerful US Attorney's offices.
Q. What happens to Epstein-related investigations now?
With Comey gone and DOJ signalling that no client list exists, further federal action appears unlikely. Her departure removes a key figure who had previously defended maintaining file secrecy.
Q. Has the DOJ or White House issued a response?
No. Both have declined to comment. Trump has said publicly that Epstein 'was never a big factor' and described the controversy as a distraction created by 'past supporters.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump briefed on DOJ files linking him to Epstein, report says; White House dismisses as ‘fake news'
US Attorney General Pam Bondi told President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared in Justice Department files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday (July 23), citing senior administration officials. It has triggered fresh scrutiny around Trump's past ties to Epstein. The White House quickly dismissed the claims as 'fake news.' 'Nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution,' said AG Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in a joint statement, avoiding direct reference to the Journal's allegations. 'As part of our routine briefing, we made the President aware of the findings,' the DOJ said, after filing a motion to unseal grand jury transcripts. Earlier this month, the DOJ released a memo concluding there was 'no basis' to continue probing the Epstein case, effectively halting investigations. That reversal from earlier promises of transparency has angered many of Trump's supporters, who demanded full disclosure of Epstein's high-profile connections. However, US District Judge Robin Rosenberg denied the Justice Department's request to release sealed transcripts related to federal investigations from 2005 and 2007, ruling that the material did not qualify for release under federal rules. The controversy has deepened what's become a political liability for Trump. After years of speculation and conspiracy theories about Epstein's alleged ties to powerful figures, Trump now finds himself under growing pressure from his own base. Last week, The Wall Street Journal published a 2003 birthday note allegedly sent by Trump to Epstein that read: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.' Trump responded by suing the Journal and its parent company, owned by Rupert Murdoch, claiming the letter is a fake. Amid the escalating tension, House Speaker Mike Johnson abruptly adjourned Congress a day early this week, avoiding a vote on a bipartisan resolution calling for full release of Epstein-related documents. The move temporarily blocked an effort led by both Democrats and Republicans to force the DOJ's hand. While the Florida court denied the DOJ's request, federal prosecutors still have pending motions in New York to unseal transcripts tied to Epstein's later indictments and those of his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking and other charges. Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. Though the official cause of death was confirmed by the medical examiner, doubts have persisted—especially among Trump supporters—fueling speculation of a cover-up. Trump has insisted his friendship with Epstein ended long before the financier's legal troubles began and denies any wrongdoing.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fake Ghaziabad diplomat partnered with UK bizman to set up brokerage firms: STF
Ghaziabad: Harshvardhan Jain, a fake diplomat arrested on Wednesday for running a fake embassy out of a plush, two-storey bungalow in Kavi Nagar, is a wealthy businessman's son who studied abroad. Jain completed his BBA from a private college in Ghaziabad before heading to London for an MBA. "His father JD Jain is an industrialist. He owned marble mines in Rajasthan and exported the stones to London," SP (Noida STF) Raj Kumar Mishra told TOI. Mishra said Jain had come into contact with Chandraswami, the astrologer and controversial spiritual adviser to former PMs, in 2000. "It was through these links that Harshvardhan met Chandraswami in 2000," said Mishra. Police believe Chandraswami introduced Jain to Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi and India-born Turkish national Ahsan Ali Syed. Together with Syed, Jain allegedly set up over a dozen brokerage firms in the UK. In 2006, he shifted base to Dubai's Umm Al-Quwain through a cousin living there. There, he partnered with Hyderabad-based Shafiq and Dubai's Ibrahim Ali-Bin-Shaarma to float more firms, ostensibly offering overseas job placements and business deals. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Police suspect these ventures were fronts for financial crimes and potentially illegal arms deals. You Can Also Check: Noida AQI | Weather in Noida | Bank Holidays in Noida | Public Holidays in Noida "Jain travelled across Gulf and African nations during this period, engaging in various forms of brokerage," Mishra said. In 2012, Ghaziabad police recovered a satellite phone from Jain, leading to a case under the Telegraph Buyers Unlawful Possession Act. Though arrested, he was released on bail within months. Investigations are now under way to determine if he was involved in arms trafficking or other illicit international dealings. Locals in Kavi Nagar, where Jain was living, expressed surprise. "He had personal guards and a luxury car. A police post is just 100 metres away. None of us imagined a conman lived among us," said Amit Gupta, general secretary of the local RWA. Gupta added that Jain's father, who lives just 50 metres away, is well-known and respected in the neighbourhood. "We assumed Harshvardhan was managing the family business," he added. Police have found the Mercedes with a diplomatic number plate found parked outside the bungalow is owned by Jain's father-in-law Anand Jain. Another car with an 'honorary consigliere principato di Seborga' registration plate is jointly owned by Ghanshyam Jain of Ghaziabad and Amit Shukla of Hardoi. The two other cars seized from the house, both with diplomatic registration plates, are owned by Bhavesh Dugar of Delhi and another by Indra Business Private Limited. Delhi. Cops are trying to find out how Jain got access to these cars.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
Man locks home & leaves as dad's body taken home
1 2 3 Thrissur: In a disturbing incident, the son locked the house and went away when his father's body was brought from an old age home to his house at Arimboor on the outskirts of the city on Wednesday. The deceased, Thomas Plakkan (80) and his wife Rosly (77), were shifted to separate old age homes in Nov last year following alleged torture by their son Jaison and daughter-in law Rincy. The couple had lodged a complaint with the Anthikkad police. Social justice department officials shifted Thomas to San Jose Care Home, Manaloor, and Rosly to Kripa Sadan at Karamukku by after local residents alerted them. "Someone had sent us a clandestinely recorded video of the abuse of the couple earlier. We went to the house along with the panchayat officials. The couple told us that they could not stay at the house anymore because of the torture. We shifted them to the poor homes, after informing the police," said Mala Ramanan of the social justice department. The maintenance tribunal for senior citizens, presided over by RDO, also registered a case. Following the tribunal's intervention, Jaison and Rincy agreed in May to deposit Rs 1 lakh each in the name of Thomas and Rosly. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cat Keeps Hugging its Friend - Then the Owner Notices Something is Wrong Tips and Tricks Undo The tribunal granted three months to do that as per the son's request. In the meantime, he was asked to pay Rs 1,000 monthly to his parents. The son had paid the amount for July accordingly, Ramanan said. Thomas died on Wednesday morning and when his body was brought home, the son and the daughter-in-law reportedly locked the front door and went out through the backdoor, according to the residents. Attempts to contact the son did not succeed as his phone was found switched off. The body was kept in the courtyard for some time and later the last rites were performed at St Theresa's Church, Eravu, with the support of Rosly, daughter, relatives and the residents in the area. Police officials were also deployed at the spot after residents alerted them. But the mother was against forcibly opening the door, a social justice department official said.
