
What will happen if Donald Trump tries to fire Fed's Jerome Powell?
Fears that the US President could fire Mr Powell rose on Wednesday after reports that Mr Trump had indicated to House Republicans that he would be open to the move.
Mr Trump confirmed that he polled Republicans on the issue on Tuesday night but denied that he was planning to fire Mr Powell. The episode prompted whiplash in US markets.
Sacking the Fed chair could lead to a constitutional crisis that would probably upset financial markets, shatter decades of historical norms and lead to significant uncertainty in the US economy.
Here is what could happen if Mr Trump does try to fire the Fed chairman.
Federal Open Market Committee in question
Unlike most federal agencies, the Federal Reserve enjoys broad independence from the White House.
The Federal Reserve Act states that the Fed can make monetary policy decisions without interference from the executive or legislative branches. Fed officials can only be fired 'for cause', which is generally thought to mean malfeasance or neglect of duty. No Fed chair has ever been fired.
Mr Powell maintains that Mr Trump has no authority to fire him – 'not permitted under the law', he said in November – and that he will serve out his term as Fed chairman until May 2026. He has not indicated if he will serve out his term as Fed governor, which is up in 2028.
'Powell would almost certainly sue against any removal in court,' Derek Tang, an economist at LHMeyer/Monetary Policy Analytics in Washington, wrote to clients.
Should that happen, the case would probably go before the Supreme Court. The court signalled in a May ruling that, unlike other independent agencies, a president cannot fire a Fed official over a policy dispute.
Mr Trump said he wants a 'low interest' person to helm the Federal Reserve after Mr Powell. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are considered to be the front-runners for the job. Fed Governor Christopher Waller is believed to be a possible contender, but a long shot.
Mr Bessent, who is leading the replacement search, told Bloomberg on Monday the process to pick a new Fed chair has begun.
But replacing Mr Powell with someone who backs Mr Trump's low-interest rate regime would not guarantee lower interest rates.
The president appoints only eight of the 12 members on the Federal Open Market Committee. Regional Fed banks appoint their own presidents who serve rotating terms on the committee. The New York Fed, which has a permanent vote on the committee, also selects its own president.
Minutes released from the Fed's most recent meeting showed that only a couple Fed officials would support a rate cut this month. Public comments from officials show that they support Mr Powell's wait-and-see approach.
'Firing Powell alone would not satisfy Trump's ideal, but the mere discussion certainly undermines independence. The damage might be done,' Mr Tang wrote.
A financial market meltdown?
The integrity of the Federal Reserve's independence will also be closely monitored by financial markets. The Fed's independence is seen as sacrosanct, with officials' staggered terms designed to ensure that monetary policy decisions are made with a long-view approach rather than for short-term political gains.
'We have all been schooled in the independence of the Fed,' said Peter Andersen, founder of Andersen Capital Management in Boston.
'If that were to be somewhat more nuanced and maybe a grey area … I think that would weaken the confidence that capital markets have in the Federal Reserve system.'
US markets gave Mr Trump something of a preview of what would happen if he were to fire Mr Powell.
We have all been schooled in the independence of the Fed
Peter Andersen,
Andersen Capital Management
The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 both fell 0.6 per cent after reports that Mr Trump was moving closer to firing the Fed chairman, only to rebound after he said such an action was unlikely.
The two-year Treasury yield fell to 3.892 per cent while the yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 4.48 per cent before settling at 4.46 per cent. The two-year Treasury is more sensitive to Fed rate moves, while the 10-year is more influenced by inflation expectations and future policy decisions.
It could also call into question foreign investment in the Treasury market at a time when Mr Trump's tariff policy has already brought fears of the possible reallocation of global capital. The US market has for decades been considered one of the most stable investment destinations, with the 10-year Treasury considered to be a safe-haven asset.
'It could have ripple effects in that foreign markets tend to hold on high esteem US Treasuries and the Treasury market,' said Mr Andersen.
'If that were to be questioned, even a subtle basis of the independence and how that would impact the overall impact of the Treasury, and the fact it is the highest calibre of currency in the world, that would come under some stress.'
US banking executives this week have voiced support for the Federal Reserve's independence, with JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon saying that interfering with the Fed could have 'adverse consequences'.
Goldman Sachs chief executive David Solomon told CNBC that the Fed's independence is critical. 'Stability in the Fed seat, I think, is important,' he said.
Bank of America Group chief executive Brian Moynihan also told CNBC that the Fed's independence is 'critical' to the US.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Etihad
an hour ago
- Al Etihad
US trade advisor says Trump tariff rates unlikely to change
3 Aug 2025 20:22 WASHINGTON (AFP) New US tariff rates are "pretty much set" with little immediate room for negotiation, Donald Trump's trade advisor said in remarks aired who has wielded tariffs as a tool of American economic might, has set tariff rates for dozens of economies, including the European Union, at between 10 and 41 percent, come August 7, his new hard deadline for the a pre-taped interview broadcast Sunday on CBS's "Face the Nation," US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said "the coming days" are not likely to see changes in the tariff rates."A lot of these are set rates pursuant to deals. Some of these deals are announced, some are not, others depend on the level of the trade deficit or surplus we may have with the country," Greer said."These tariff rates are pretty much set."Undoubtedly, some trade ministers "want to talk more and see how they can work in a different way with the United States," he "we're seeing truly the contours of the president's tariff plan right now with these rates."Last Thursday, the former real estate developer announced hiked tariff rates on dozens of US trade will kick in on August 7 instead of August 1, which had previously been touted as a hard deadline. Meanwhile, White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said that while talks are expected to continue over the next week with some US trade partners, he concurred with Greer's tariffs assessment in that the bulk of the rates "are more or less locked in."


Khaleej Times
4 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
India to maintain Russian oil imports despite Trump threats, government sources say
India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite U.S. President Donald Trump's threats of penalties, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. On top of a new 25% tariff on India's exports to the U.S., Trump indicated in a Truth Social post last month that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. But the sources said there would be no immediate changes. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Justifying India's oil purchases from Russia, a second source said India's imports of Russian grades had helped avoid a global surge in oil prices, which have remained subdued despite Western curbs on the Russian oil sector. Unlike Iranian and Venezuelan oil, Russian crude is not subject to direct sanctions, and India is buying it below the current price cap fixed by the European Union, the source said. The New York Times also quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials on Saturday as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. Indian government authorities did not respond to Reuters' request for official comment on its oil purchasing intentions. However, during a regular press briefing on Friday, foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," he said. The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. India's top supplier Trump, who has made ending Russia's war in Ukraine a priority of his administration since returning to office this year, has expressed growing impatience with Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. He has threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the leading supplier to India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, accounting for about 35% of its overall supplies. India imported about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. But while the Indian government may not be deterred by Trump's threats, sources told Reuters this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil after July discounts narrowed to their lowest since 2022 - when sanctions were first imposed on Moscow - due to lower Russian exports and steady demand. Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp , Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources told Reuters. Nayara Energy - a refinery majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft, and major buyer of Russian oil - was recently sanctioned by the EU. Nayara's chief executive resigned following the sanctions, and three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions, Reuters reported last week.


Khaleej Times
4 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Big Tech may be breaking the bank for AI, but investors love it
Big Tech is spending more than ever on artificial intelligence - but the returns are rising too, and investors are buying in. AI played a bigger role in driving demand across internet search, digital advertising and cloud computing in the April-June quarter, powering revenue growth at technology giants Microsoft, Meta, Amazon and Alphabet . Betting that momentum will sustain, Microsoft, Alphabet and Amazon are ramping up spending to ease capacity shortages that have limited their ability to meet soaring AI services demand, even after several quarters of multi-billion-dollar outlays. The results offer the clearest sign yet that AI is emerging as a primary growth engine, although the monetization journey is still in its early days, investors and analysts said. The upbeat commentary underscores how surging demand for the new technology is shielding the tech giants from tariff-driven economic uncertainty hobbling other sectors. "As companies like Alphabet and Meta race to deliver on the promise of AI, capital expenditures are shockingly high and will remain elevated for the foreseeable future," said Debra Aho Williamson, founder and chief analyst at Sonata Insights. But if their core businesses remain strong, "it will buy them more time with investors and provide confidence that the billions being spent on infrastructure, talent and other tech-related expenses will be worthwhile," she added. Microsoft shares rose 4% on Thursday, with the Windows maker crossing $4 trillion in market value - a milestone only chip giant Nvidia had reached before it. Meta was up even more, rising 11.3% adding around $200 billion to its market value of about $1.75 trillion. Amazon slipped 7% after-market, after rising 1.7% in regular trading, on disappointing cloud computing results. All the companies have faced intense scrutiny from investors over their ballooning capital expenditures, which were expected to total $330 billion this year before the latest earnings. And until a few days ago, the Magnificent Seven stocks were also trailing the SP 500 in year-to-date performance. SILENCING DOUBTS Microsoft said on Wednesday it would spend a record $30 billion in the current quarter, after better-than-expected sales and an above-estimate forecast for its Azure cloud computing business showcased the growing returns on its massive AI bets. The prediction puts Microsoft on track to potentially outspend its rivals over the next year. It came after Google-parent Alphabet beat revenue expectations and raised its spending forecast by $10 billion to $85 billion for the year. Microsoft also disclosed for the first time the dollar figure for Azure sales and the number of users for its Copilot AI tools, whose adoption has long been a concern for investors. It said Azure generated more than $75 billion in sales in its last fiscal year, while Copilot tools had over 100 million users. Overall, around 800 million customers use AI tools peppered across Microsoft's sprawling software empire. "It's the kind of result that quickly silences any doubts about cloud or AI demand," said Josh Gilbert, market analyst at eToro. "Microsoft is more than justifying its spending." Amazon, for its part, said it expected second-half spending roughly at the same clip as its second-quarter total of $31.4 billion, suggesting it would spend around $118 billion for the full year. Analysts had projected about $100 billion. Other AI companies have also attracted a clutch of users. Alphabet said last week its Gemini AI assistant app has more than 450 million monthly active users. OpenAI's ChatGPT, the application credited with kicking off the generative AI frenzy, has around 500 million weekly active users. Meta, meanwhile, raised the bottom end of its annual capital expenditure forecast by $2 billion, to a range of between $66 billion and $72 billion. It also said that costs driven by its efforts to catch up in Silicon Valley's intensifying AI race would push 2026 expense growth rate above 2025's pace. Better-than-expected sales growth in the April-June period and an above-estimate revenue forecast for the current quarter, however, assured investors that strength in the social media giant's core advertising business can support the massive outlays. "The big boys are back," said Brian Mulberry, portfolio manager at Zacks Investment Management, which holds shares in all three major U.S. cloud providers. "This simply proves the Magnificent Seven is still magnificent at this moment in time."