logo
What will happen if Donald Trump tries to fire Fed's Jerome Powell?

What will happen if Donald Trump tries to fire Fed's Jerome Powell?

The National7 days ago
Tension between the White House and the Federal Reserve is reaching a boiling point, with US President Donald Trump increasing his attacks on chairman Jerome Powell in recent days.
Fears that the US President could fire Mr Powell rose on Wednesday after reports that Mr Trump had indicated to House Republicans that he would be open to the move.
Mr Trump confirmed that he polled Republicans on the issue on Tuesday night but denied that he was planning to fire Mr Powell. The episode prompted whiplash in US markets.
Sacking the Fed chair could lead to a constitutional crisis that would probably upset financial markets, shatter decades of historical norms and lead to significant uncertainty in the US economy.
Here is what could happen if Mr Trump does try to fire the Fed chairman.
Federal Open Market Committee in question
Unlike most federal agencies, the Federal Reserve enjoys broad independence from the White House.
The Federal Reserve Act states that the Fed can make monetary policy decisions without interference from the executive or legislative branches. Fed officials can only be fired 'for cause', which is generally thought to mean malfeasance or neglect of duty. No Fed chair has ever been fired.
Mr Powell maintains that Mr Trump has no authority to fire him – 'not permitted under the law', he said in November – and that he will serve out his term as Fed chairman until May 2026. He has not indicated if he will serve out his term as Fed governor, which is up in 2028.
'Powell would almost certainly sue against any removal in court,' Derek Tang, an economist at LHMeyer/Monetary Policy Analytics in Washington, wrote to clients.
Should that happen, the case would probably go before the Supreme Court. The court signalled in a May ruling that, unlike other independent agencies, a president cannot fire a Fed official over a policy dispute.
Mr Trump said he wants a 'low interest' person to helm the Federal Reserve after Mr Powell. National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are considered to be the front-runners for the job. Fed Governor Christopher Waller is believed to be a possible contender, but a long shot.
Mr Bessent, who is leading the replacement search, told Bloomberg on Monday the process to pick a new Fed chair has begun.
But replacing Mr Powell with someone who backs Mr Trump's low-interest rate regime would not guarantee lower interest rates.
The president appoints only eight of the 12 members on the Federal Open Market Committee. Regional Fed banks appoint their own presidents who serve rotating terms on the committee. The New York Fed, which has a permanent vote on the committee, also selects its own president.
Minutes released from the Fed's most recent meeting showed that only a couple Fed officials would support a rate cut this month. Public comments from officials show that they support Mr Powell's wait-and-see approach.
'Firing Powell alone would not satisfy Trump's ideal, but the mere discussion certainly undermines independence. The damage might be done,' Mr Tang wrote.
A financial market meltdown?
The integrity of the Federal Reserve's independence will also be closely monitored by financial markets. The Fed's independence is seen as sacrosanct, with officials' staggered terms designed to ensure that monetary policy decisions are made with a long-view approach rather than for short-term political gains.
'We have all been schooled in the independence of the Fed,' said Peter Andersen, founder of Andersen Capital Management in Boston.
'If that were to be somewhat more nuanced and maybe a grey area … I think that would weaken the confidence that capital markets have in the Federal Reserve system.'
US markets gave Mr Trump something of a preview of what would happen if he were to fire Mr Powell.
We have all been schooled in the independence of the Fed
Peter Andersen,
Andersen Capital Management
The Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 both fell 0.6 per cent after reports that Mr Trump was moving closer to firing the Fed chairman, only to rebound after he said such an action was unlikely.
The two-year Treasury yield fell to 3.892 per cent while the yield on the 10-year Treasury rose to 4.48 per cent before settling at 4.46 per cent. The two-year Treasury is more sensitive to Fed rate moves, while the 10-year is more influenced by inflation expectations and future policy decisions.
It could also call into question foreign investment in the Treasury market at a time when Mr Trump's tariff policy has already brought fears of the possible reallocation of global capital. The US market has for decades been considered one of the most stable investment destinations, with the 10-year Treasury considered to be a safe-haven asset.
'It could have ripple effects in that foreign markets tend to hold on high esteem US Treasuries and the Treasury market,' said Mr Andersen.
'If that were to be questioned, even a subtle basis of the independence and how that would impact the overall impact of the Treasury, and the fact it is the highest calibre of currency in the world, that would come under some stress.'
US banking executives this week have voiced support for the Federal Reserve's independence, with JPMorgan Chase chief executive Jamie Dimon saying that interfering with the Fed could have 'adverse consequences'.
Goldman Sachs chief executive David Solomon told CNBC that the Fed's independence is critical. 'Stability in the Fed seat, I think, is important,' he said.
Bank of America Group chief executive Brian Moynihan also told CNBC that the Fed's independence is 'critical' to the US.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Emily Thornberry: Starmer has 'a golden opportunity' to sway Trump on Gaza
Emily Thornberry: Starmer has 'a golden opportunity' to sway Trump on Gaza

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Emily Thornberry: Starmer has 'a golden opportunity' to sway Trump on Gaza

Keir Starmer should encourage Donald Trump to 'quietly walk away' from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) during their meeting next week, Foreign Affairs Committee chair Emily Thornberry told Middle East Eye. 'We can't have any more children starving to death, anybody else shot to death simply queuing up for aid. It's just completely and totally unacceptable,' Thornberry said on Thursday. 'Donald Trump has shown in the past, when he appreciates the human cost of what's going on, he can turn on a penny and go, 'This won't do. It must stop.'' Thornberry's comments come with the release of the Foreign Affairs Committee's report on its inquiry into the Israel-Palestine conflict. The 72-page report calls, among other recommendations, for the urgent dismantling of GHF, the controversial US and Israeli-backed organisation, with over 100 aid organisations warning this week of the spread of mass starvation in Gaza under its tenure. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'We have a golden opportunity to say to Donald Trump, 'Look, whatever kind of goodwill there was behind doing this, it's not working. And actually, it's not working because you can't have four aid points instead of 400'," Thornberry said. ''We have to have something which is under the auspices of the United Nations and actually there was a lot more skill in handing out aid than people really thought . . . frankly, the other system just doesn't work. Let's quietly walk away from it'.' The report also recommends that the UK government take immediate steps to "prepare a comprehensive ban" on goods imported from Israeli settlements and recognise the state of Palestine "while there is still a state to recognise". 'To be honest, nobody else is going to stop Netanyahu apart from President Trump' - Emily Thornberry, MP and Foreign Affairs committee chair Starmer and Trump's scheduled talks fall on the same day as the start of a UN conference in which France had earlier suggested it might recognise the state of Palestine. But late on Thursday, French President Emmanuel Macron announced that his country would recognise a Palestinian state in September at the UN General Assembly. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy has repeatedly said that the UK wants to recognise Palestine as part of a pathway towards a two-state solution, but at time when recognition would be most conducive to securing a peace process. Thornberry said, whether next week or in September, she would like to see the UK recognise Palestine with France. Even if the move may be 'only symbolic' in some ways, it is an important first step to getting the UK 'back into the ring and saying, 'Right. Let's play our part'," Thornberry said. 'It has a power because they were the countries behind Sykes-Picot, the secret agreement that carved up the Middle East in the first place." Palestinian recognition would underline to the Israeli people 'just how isolated Netanyahu has made Israel' and would align the UK with Arab countries in a powerful way, she said. 'I think working together, there being a united, international voice that says, 'This is the only alternative that we know about',' Thornberry said. She said she doesn't think Trump and his advisors have thoroughly considered what recognising Palestine could accomplish and, again, suggested the UK use diplomacy to encourage a shift which she believes will restore the hope that will be neccessary to rebuild Gaza. 'We can do that heavy lifting and then give to Donald Trump a peace, wrapped up in a pink bow, and say to him, 'We now need you because we can't do it by ourselves. We need the man who has more strength than 10 presidents',' she said. 'To be honest, nobody else is going to stop Netanyahu apart from President Trump.' 'We really need to be much stronger' The committee's report noted that the UK has halted trade talks with Israel which it says it expects will continue until an internationally-recognised peace settlement has been agreed. However, it said there should be "a different approach" towards Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and that the government should prepare and apply a comprehensive ban on the import of goods from the settlements. "We should not be trading with the settlements, and we should be sanctioning companies that are involved in building settlements and facilitating the settlements," Thornberry told MEE. "The settlements are built on the land that we expect to be able to be used by a Palestinian state, so it's not only illegal. It's undermining peace, and we really need to be much stronger than we have been before now." Children in Gaza die as David Lammy says UK is 'happy to do more' to help Read More » The committee also urges the government to support a medical evacuation of critically injured children to the UK, including "the provision of safe transport and the efficient handling of travel permits and entry visas". Until now, the UK has only taken in two Palestinian children for medical treatment in Britain. The two girls, who arrived in April, had already been evacuated from Gaza to Egypt before they came to the UK for care that is fully funded by charitable donations. Unlike EU countries and the US, the UK requires potential medical evacuees from Gaza to obtain visas with biometrics, with the closest visa processing centres in Egypt and Jordan. Doctors and aid workers say this has complicated the process of bringing wounded and suffering children directly from Gaza to the UK for help, and have recently asked the government to help bring a group of 20 to 40 children directly from Gaza. Thornberry said her first trip of many to Israel and Palestine was in the late 1970s when she recalled her half-sisters receiving presents on Gaza Beach from a Father Christmas who arrived on the back of a camel. "Everytime I've gone, it's gotten worse, and it breaks my heart. And, of course, when it comes to this current conflict, it's really frustrating and distressing to see what's happening and to see just long periods where nothing seems to happen apart from more and more people dying," she said. "The temptation to just look away and go, 'This is just too hard, let's do something else', is a real one . . . But now, in all the distress and destruction and the death, maybe this is the time when people will finally take this seriously and do something about it."

US court rules that Trump's ban on birthright citizenship is unconstitutional
US court rules that Trump's ban on birthright citizenship is unconstitutional

Middle East Eye

time7 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US court rules that Trump's ban on birthright citizenship is unconstitutional

President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship was deemed unconstitutional by a federal appeals court in San Francisco on Wednesday. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 2-1 that Trump's order violates the Constitution's 14th Amendment – the latest blow to Trump in a series of legal back-and-forth rulings on the issue. Under the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, all children born in the US automatically become American citizens, but the Trump administration is looking to abolish that right for people who are in the country illegally or temporarily. However, opposition has been fierce. Several district judges have blocked Trump's attempt to end birthright citizenship. The appeals court on Wednesday affirmed a Seattle district court's nationwide injunction, calling the measure "necessary" to protect states from potential harm if Trump's order took effect. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Late last month, the US Supreme Court curbed the power of lower court judges to pause executive orders issued by Trump, while hearing the birthright case. In its 6-3 ruling, which was ideologically divided with liberal judges dissenting against the ruling, the court said that nationwide injunctions or pauses issued by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has granted to federal courts". Trump hailed the ruling as a "giant win". US Supreme Court limits judges from blocking Trump order on birthright citizenship Read More » But this week, according to the appeals court, an injunction limited to the state level is as ineffective as not blocking the order at all, because of the complications that can arise if people move between states with different citizenship rules. "The district court correctly concluded that the Executive Order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree," Judge Ronald Gould wrote. In the Supreme Court's June ruling, the judges did not rule on the constitutionality of Trump's executive order to end "birthright citizenship". This loophole has consequently prompted a raft of class action lawsuits to be filed challenging the legality of the Executive Order itself. Earlier this month, a federal judge granted class-action status to any child who would potentially be denied citizenship under Trump's order, and issued a preliminary halt to it as legal proceedings carry on.

UAE and US working to 'get chips moving' after AI deal
UAE and US working to 'get chips moving' after AI deal

The National

time7 hours ago

  • The National

UAE and US working to 'get chips moving' after AI deal

After this week's debut of the White House's Artificial Intelligence Action Plan, the UAE is ready to expedite its AI partnership with the US. This follows President Donald Trump's visit to Abu Dhabi in May, when he announced the US-UAE AI Acceleration Partnership, which included plans for a 5GW UAE-US AI Campus. Those plans allow for the UAE to obtain powerful CPUs and GPUs from the US which are necessary to build up AI infrastructure. Once completed, part of the campus, dubbed Stargate UAE, will be among the largest AI data centres in the world. Security guarantees to protect the UAE AI technology from falling into the wrong hands were are major aspect of the deal. Also bolstering the deal, Mr Trump's much-anticipated AI plan, unveiled on Wednesday, seeks to reduce regulatory barriers in place to build up AI infrastructure in the US, while pushing for increasing the prevalence of US AI technology around the world. That bodes well for the UAE, and other countries with similar AI aspirations. It's also a sharp contrast to the former president Joe Biden's policies. His administration sought tighter export controls on US chips to prevent them from being used in China. 'The UAE welcomes President Trump's AI Action Plan and is ready to fast track our strategic AI partnership with the US,' Yousef Al Otaiba, UAE Minister of State and ambassador to the US, said on Wednesday. 'As a trusted partner, we are working closely with leading US companies to adopt and scale American technology in the UAE and beyond.' Some pundits aren't sold however, and they're trying to exert influence to slow the US-UAE AI Acceleration Partnership. In an opinion article in The Washington Post, Christopher Chivvis and Sam Winter-Levy from the Carnegie Endowment, a US-based think tank, expressed concern about China somehow getting access to the US AI technology, among other things. 'To now approve the offshoring of the data centres that will house so many of the resulting chips to another conflict-prone region would be a major unforced error – one that will prove difficult to reverse,' they wrote. The UAE has addressed this by committing to a $1.4 trillion investment framework for AI infrastructure in the US. Regardless, the Wall Street Journal also reported that some in the White House have sought to take a closer look at the recently announced UAE deal, amid concerns about US technology diffusion. But last week, the White House cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence adviser beat back those concerns, and reaffirmed the US partnership with the UAE. 'These are countries that are long-standing partners and allies of the US going back many years,' White House AI chief David Sacks said during a round-table discussion at the Pennsylvania Energy and AI Summit, referring to the UAE. Mr Sacks added that the Trump administration thought that if US technology wasn't used in AI projects around the world, China-owned Huawei would step in to fill the vacuum. 'We don't want to create demand for Huawei,' he explained, also describing some of the chip smuggling scenarios that have become prevalent in media reports as quixotic. He said the newest standard data centres technology hardware is approximately 2.4m tall, with servers weighing 1,600kg, and that it's 'very easy to see' if they're being transported. 'I know that our Gulf State partners would honour our security agreement,' he said just hours before President Trump appeared at the event in Pennsylvania. 'This is ultimately a trust-but-verify situation, and all we have to do is send an inspector to a data centre and they can count the racks,' Mr Sacks explained, reiterating that he felt the scenarios of AI hardware smuggling were 'blown wildly out of proportion.' Meanwhile, there's no indication from the White House or Department of Commerce, which is ultimately responsible for allowing the export of US technology, that criticism of the UAE deal is gaining traction. In a statement to The National, the UAE ambassador expressed continued optimism about the AI plans with the US announced back in May. 'Signed just 60 days ago in Abu Dhabi, the UAE-US investment and Ai partnership will deliver enormous benefits to both countries,' Mr Al Otaiba said. 'High level teams have been actively engaging to advance the agreement, to get chips moving and to accelerate technology co-operation.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store