South Korea election hit by misinformation
With South Korea set to vote on June 3 for a new president, there has been an explosion of false claims online. PHOTO: AFP
SEOUL - A photo of the frontrunner bowing to a Mao Zedong statue? News reports claiming US President Donald Trump endorsed a long-shot candidate? Not true, just examples of South Korea's election misinformation problems.
With the country set to vote on June 3 for a new leader to replace ex-president Yoon Suk Yeol, who was impeached over a botched martial law declaration, there has been an explosion of false claims online.
AFP takes a look at some of the worst offenders.
What are the claims?
Many of the claims focus on foreign interference, tapping into local fears of meddling by China, or fabricating support for the conservative camp from the United States.
One of the most prominent falsehoods circulating online suggested weaknesses in the overseas voter registration system, with Chinese nationals exploiting the system to cast fraudulent ballots.
'Even foreigners can vote as long as they have an email address!' read one widely shared post, which AFP Fact Check debunked.
Who gets targeted?
Opposition leader and election frontrunner Lee Jae-myung is a popular target for disinformation.
Many claims focus on his purported allegiance to Beijing – feeding into a long-running narrative among conservatives that casts progressive candidates as sympathetic to, or even controlled by, China.
For example, photos debunked by AFP journalists showed Lee kowtowing to a Mao statue, and wearing a face mask with the Chinese flag on it.
This trend reflects the fact that many voters are less swayed by claims politicians are pro-North Korea, said Dr Choi Jin-bong, a media communications professor at Sungkonghoe University in Seoul.
'It's now the claim that progressives are subservient to China that resonates – especially amid worsening US-China tensions,' he told AFP.
'Even when false, these narratives remain politically useful to conservatives as a last-ditch effort to blunt what looks like an inevitable Lee victory.'
What about the conservative candidate?
The disinformation involving South Korean conservatives tends to focus on their ties to the United States.
Doctored images have shown Mr Trump supporting former prime minister Han Duck-soo's presidential campaign announcement.
Mr Han since dropped out of the race, after a failed bid to become the conservative People Power Party (PPP) nominee.
Another claim involved a popular right-wing YouTuber falsely telling his 1.5 million subscribers that the Pentagon had endorsed PPP candidate Kim Moon-soo.
US Forces Korea told AFP it was 'completely untrue'.
But even if they are patently false, the claims 'remain persuasive because they benefit political actors', Dr Lee Jun-han, a politics professor at Incheon National University, told AFP.
'They tap into Korea's polarised landscape and its geopolitical anxieties, rallying each side with narratives that play on fear, identity and outside influence.'
What about AI?
In April, a deepfake video surfaced showing Lee supposedly ending a hunger strike – which he went on in 2023 to protest then-president Yoon's policies – and joking about eating fried chicken.
The video, which was shared widely in South Korea's right-wing online ecosystem, was generated using a real photo of Lee in a hospital bed.
An AFP analysis identified numerous signs of AI manipulation – disappearing background elements, warped body parts and inconsistent surroundings.
The video was fake, but it fed into a pre-existing narrative that Lee's protest was performative.
'AI-driven misinformation poses a serious threat to democracy by obstructing voters' access to reliable information,' said democracy and technology expert Song Kyeong-jae from Sangji University.
'When decisions are made based on manipulated content, they are irreversible – and the resulting social and political consequences can be profound.'
Fudged numbers
Other claims have also sought to misrepresent pre-election polling, which has consistently shown Lee commanding a large lead over his conservative rivals.
A viral graphic, shared days before early voting began, falsely claimed PPP candidate Mr Kim was leading Lee in recent polls.
In reality, the numbers came from January and February, and the original source clearly listed the survey dates.
These were deliberately cropped out to mislead viewers into thinking the results were current.
Official May polls showed Lee with a commanding lead of five points or more. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
South Korea election: Tensions with Pyongyang a key factor for voters in border areas
South Koreans will head to the polls tomorrow to pick their next president, with the race coming down to two main contenders. A recent Gallup survey showed Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung leading with nearly 50% support, while his main rival, Mr Kim Moon-soo of the conservative People Power Party, has managed to close the gap. Meanwhile, tensions between South and North Korea could be a key factor for some voters, especially in the border areas. People living close to the heavily-guarded demilitarised zone have backed conservative candidates for decades. Lim Yun Suk reports from Gangwon province.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Pro-Trump nationalist Nawrocki wins Poland's presidential election, rattling Europe's unity
Incoming Polish President Karol Nawrocki is a national conservative determined to obstruct the liberal agenda of Prime Minister Donald Tusk. PHOTO: REUTERS – Just two years after the liberals triumphed in Poland's parliamentary elections, the country is once again shifting sharply to the right. Mr Karol Nawrocki, the winner of the June 1 presidential election, is a national conservative determined to obstruct the liberal agenda of Prime Minister Donald Tusk. His victory not only jeopardises Poland's fragile return to democratic norms and rule of law but also delivers a serious blow to the European Union's (EU) unity. While the Polish presidency is largely ceremonial, the president wields significant power in key areas, including the right to veto legislation. This applies to judicial reforms, budget laws and military appointments. Although a presidential veto can be overridden by a three-fifths parliamentary majority, the current liberal coalition under Mr Tusk does not hold enough seats to do so. 'For the European Union, Mr Nawrocki's win is especially troubling because of the political chaos that is likely to follow in Poland. Mr Tusk's government will now be forced to focus on domestic infighting and the de facto start of the 2027 parliamentary campaign, leaving it little room to act on the European stage,' Dr Agnieszka Lada-Konefal, the deputy director of the German Poland Institute, said in an interview with The Straits Times. Just weeks ago, EU members France, Germany and Poland, alongside Britain, had demonstrated a new alignment in their policy on the war in Ukraine. During a joint visit to Kyiv in May, the leaders reaffirmed their support for the country invaded by Russia in 2022, and presented a united front in contrast to the increasingly erratic foreign policy signals from Washington. US President Donald Trump, through repeated softening of his demands on Russian President Vladimir Putin, has raised doubts about the US' reliability as a Nato partner and an ally of Ukraine, leaving much of Europe feeling strategically isolated. Ahead of the election, Washington had actively supported Mr Nawrocki. Not only did Mr Trump welcome the then candidate to the White House in early May, but US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem also openly endorsed him, calling Mr Nawrocki 'a leader as strong as Trump himself', and stating that he 'must become Poland's next president'. Such declarations carry weight in Poland, where the US has long been seen as the country's ultimate protector – often more trusted than the EU. Years of anti-German rhetoric from the political right have also left a mark. These parties accuse Germany of trying to dominate its eastern neighbour, continue to demand massive war reparations from Berlin and label Poland's liberals as overly pro-German. Narrow margin reflects polarisation of the nation Mr Nawrocki's victory, with just 50.9 per cent of the vote, came thanks to strong support not only from the conservative Law and Justice (PiS) party, but also from parties positioned even further to the right. He narrowly defeated liberal challenger Rafal Trzaskowski, who garnered 49.1 per cent. Voting patterns reveal a starkly divided country of more than 38 million. Liberal forces dominate Poland's western regions – particularly those bordering Germany – while the east, more rural and conservative, remains a stronghold of nationalist support. Mr Tusk and his coalition have failed to win over voters in these regions, despite initiating a political turnaround after defeating the PiS government in 2023. That government, in power from 2015 to 2023, had heavily politicised the judiciary and media, undermining democratic institutions. Brussels responded at the time with serious concerns over Poland's rule of law, imposing sanctions after the PiS introduced a disciplinary chamber to the Polish Supreme Court that could punish judges viewed as politically inconvenient. On the race leading up to the presidential polls on June 1, Dr Lada-Konefal said: 'This was a deeply personal campaign. It was less about policy and more about a bitter battle between two political camps.' She added: 'The election confirmed the consolidation of the right – a trend we're seeing elsewhere in Europe and in the US.' That consolidation means that even candidates like Mr Nawrocki – largely unknown, politically inexperienced, and dogged by scandals – can succeed. Allegations against him include shady real estate deals, links to prostitution and involvement in organised street brawls. Yet, much like Mr Trump, these controversies appear to not have affected his standing. The fragmented Polish right rallied behind Mr Nawrocki. A historian by training, Mr Nawrocki, 42, comes from a working-class neighbourhood in the northern port city of Gdansk. His father was a lathe operator and an amateur boxer. This modest background appeals to voters who feel alienated from the urban liberal elite. In contrast, Mr Trzaskowski, 53, has served as Warsaw mayor since 2018, and the liberal parties are perceived by many as representing the academic and cultural establishment. Sociologist Lukasz Pawlowski explained this sentiment in a recent interview with the national newspaper Gazeta. He said: 'There is a new top-down polarisation that is being accelerated by a global storm of discontent. Frustration with the establishment is especially high among 18- to 39-year-olds. Both major parties, the liberal Civic Platform and the conservative PiS, are seen as representing the upper classes – certainly not the working class, particularly in the eyes of young voters.' While Mr Nawrocki's political programme remains vague, several tendencies are already clear: He is expected to pursue a pro-US, anti-German, and hardline migration policy. He has repeatedly criticised the presence of the more than one million Ukrainian refugees in Poland, accusing them of draining social services and exploiting the healthcare system through what he called 'medical tourism'. In using this politically loaded term, Mr Nawrocki is alleging that Ukrainians travel back and forth between Ukraine and Poland to take advantage of Poland's healthcare system, creating longer waiting times for Polish citizens. Moreover, Mr Nawrocki, although generally supportive of Ukraine, opposes Kyiv's accession to Nato and the EU until Ukraine officially acknowledges responsibility for a 1943 massacre in western Ukraine of Poles during World War II. However, he has also clearly positioned himself against Russia. Setting a path away from Europe For Europe, Mr Nawrocki's election is disconcerting news. 'Mr Nawrocki's presidency has set the country on a path away from Europe,' said Ms Marta Prochwicz Jazowska, deputy head of the Warsaw office of the think-tank European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). Although Poland will maintain its commitment to the US and its role on Nato's Eastern Flank, 'the liberal Tusk government will only be able to maintain Poland in the core group of European countries for another two years at best', she added. 'Nawrocki will constrain Tusk's long-term European project of pivoting Poland away from over-reliance on the US,' she said. Ms Prochwicz Jazowska also expects more anti-European, anti-German and anti-migration rhetoric in public discourse. Mr Nawrocki's proximity to the US also suggests he may align with Washington's more confrontational stance on China. Although he has not spoken directly about China, he is unlikely to support the more pragmatic engagement pursued by previous Polish governments – particularly within the framework of the '16+1' initiative, which links China to central and eastern European countries. In recent years, China's growing ties with Russia and its tacit support for Russia in the ongoing war in Ukraine have led to a cooling of this cooperation. Markus Ziener is a professor at Media University Berlin and writes on political and security issues. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
America vs China: An avoidable war despite Thucydides' Trap
American soft power extends even to Chinese paramount leader Xi Jinping's family. His daughter, Xi Mingze, his only child, did not study at Tsinghua University like him but graduated from Harvard in 2014. He visited the United States several times, most notably in 1985, when, as a young provincial official, he spent two weeks in Iowa learning about American farming methods and stayed with an American family for three days. Yet, under his leadership, US-China tensions have escalated to the highest level since the early 1950s Korean War, when American soldiers fought the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA). As during the Korean War, America is urging other countries to contain China. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth appealed to Asian nations to increase defence spending. However, it was not a call to arms. As noted by Singapore's Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing, Hegseth specifically said: 'We do not seek war … we do not seek to dominate or strangle China, to encircle or provoke. We do not seek regime change, nor will we instigate or disrespect a proud and historic culture.' Indeed, what the Americans are trying to do is contain China without confronting it militarily. From strict export controls on advanced technology to attempts to diversify supply chains, Washington is trying to curb Beijing's economic power and reduce dependence on China. Beijing may see it as an act of hostility. But its own actions – from expanding its naval presence to wooing other nations with investments under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) — are challenging the status quo, undermining Pax Americana. See also China's Path Not Taken In Kevin Rudd's view Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd worries the tensions between the two countries may spill into bloody hostilities in what he calls an 'avoidable war'. That is the title of his book: The Avoidable War. The 2020s are 'the decade of living dangerously', he writes, the fallout unimaginable if the two countries go to war. According to him, 'armed conflict between China and the United States, while not yet probable, has become a real possibility'. He urges the two countries to take steps to avert war, like America and the former Soviet Union did after the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962. Indeed, as the Cold War demonstrated, superpower rivalry does not inevitably end in war. America and the former Soviet Union waged proxy wars, backing warring nations and rival leaders, but refrained from all-out war. There were military confrontations in Cuba and Berlin, but not gory battles. See also Australia says Xi's caring rhetoric does not match actions Will America and China follow the same course – geopolitical rivals but not warring enemies? Thucydides' Trap The danger that could trip them into full-scale war is called Thucydides' Trap. Named after the ancient Greek historian and Athenian general Thucydides, Thucydides' Trap is a concept popularised by the American political scientist Graham Allison. Discussed by Rudd and the animating idea behind an entire book by Allison, Thucydides' Trap is the hostilities unleashed when a rising power tries to displace a ruling power. Thucydides mentioned the phenomenon In his History of the Peloponnesian War. 'It was the rise of Athens and the fear that this instilled in Sparta that made war inevitable,' he wrote. The fifth-century BC Peloponnesian War was fought between Athens and Sparta and their allies, which included virtually every Greek city-state. It was the result of the then-dominant Sparta's fear of the growing might of Athens. Sparta eventually vanquished Athens after two decades of warfare. Thucydides' Trap is central to Allison's book, Destined for War, about America and China. The Harvard political scientist compares China's growing power to that of Athens before the Peloponnesian War. As Athens grew in importance, Sparta reacted with 'fear, insecurity, and a determination to defend the status quo'. The ensuing Peloponnesian War 'brought ancient Greece to its knees'. War is not inevitable between America and China, says Allison, but only if their leaders alter course. According to Allison, 'If Hollywood were making a movie pitting China against America on the path to war, central casting could not find two better leading actors than Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. Each personifies his country's deep aspirations of national greatness.' But a collision could be averted. 'If Xi and Trump listened to Lee Kuan Yew, they would focus first on what matters most: their domestic problems,' says Allison. Yes, Singapore's founding father, according to the Harvard scholar, could still mentor global leaders from beyond the grave. Featured image is from the Destined For War book cover
