
What is Google's AI Mode? How to use new tool in UK
AI Mode will start to appear as a tab on the Google Search results page and in the Google app for Android and Apple smartphones from Tuesday (July 29), and will be available to all UK users over the next few days.
But what exactly is AI Mode and how can you use it? Let's find out.
Our most powerful AI search is now rolling out in the UK 🇬🇧
AI Mode in Google Search expands on AI Overviews and allows you to go even deeper through follow-up questions and helpful links to the web.
Try it today! Learn more → https://t.co/EDyWBRrtEb pic.twitter.com/Qx4s0JanV3
The function was launched in the US at the end of May, followed by India earlier in July, and comes in addition to Google's AI Overview, which is now built into its searches.
Hailed as its most 'powerful AI search to date', it allows users to ask lengthy and complicated questions, as well as follow-ups.
The tool is powered by Google's latest AI model, Gemini 2.5, and allows users to ask nuanced questions that would have previously required multiple searches.
The new search works by breaking down questions into sub-topics and sending out a range of queries on behalf of users.
It will also allow so-called multimodal searches, either by text, voice or pictures.
Hema Budaraju, Google's vice president of product management for search, told the PA news agency it heralds a 'major shift' in the way people are using online searches, with questions now becoming longer and more complex.
In a blog announcing the launch, Ms Budaraju said: 'AI Mode is a new, intuitive way to address your most complex, multi-part questions and follow-ups, and satisfy your curiosity in a richer way.'
She added: 'AI Mode is particularly helpful for exploratory questions and for more complicated tasks like comparing products, planning a trip or understanding complex how-tos.
'In fact, we've found that early users of AI Mode are asking questions that are two or three times the length of traditional search queries.'
Recommended reading:
'Stop before you tap' warning amid 'malicious' apps threat on mobile phones
BT customers told to check accounts today as £18 million refunded
Viral petition to repeal 'pointless' Online Safety Act reaches 340K signatures
To summarise briefly, Google's AI Overviews provide AI-generated summaries above traditional search results and will offer a number of sources for readers to then click on and find out more information about a search query.
Meanwhile, AI Mode offers a conversational, chat-like interface that replaces the standard results page with more in-depth breakdowns of search queries.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
an hour ago
- Times
What is fair pay for a CEO? Modern bosses need to think long-term
What is fair pay? This week, Eamonn O'Hare, the boss of a little-known telecoms company, Zegona, listed on the London Stock Exchange, was paid £1.8 million; on top of that he was paid £129 million in shares — the highest ever sum awarded to the chief executive of a UK-listed company. Meanwhile, resident doctors have been on strike demanding an increase to their salaries, which now average £54,300, arguing their pay has failed to keep pace with inflation since 2008. You get 2,375 doctors for every O'Hare. To compare the pay packet of a telecoms chief executive with a doctor may seem strange. But 30 years ago this exact same contrast was being drawn after Sir Iain Vallance, the then boss of BT, was hauled in front of a parliamentary select committee. BT had been privatised for a decade and in that time the pay of the chief executive had increased in real terms by 970 per cent, with Vallance paid a total of £1.24 million, compared with £36,000 for the best paid junior doctors. Back then you got 34 doctors for every Vallance. He pointed out that he worked a 70-hour week, adding he 'would quite like a job as a junior doctor. It might be relaxing'. As you might imagine, the junior doctors of the time were about as amused by his comment as today's are when you point out their strikes are damaging the reputation of medics. Vallance's gaffe is retold with glee by Michael Aldous and John D Turner in their enjoyable recent book, The CEO — The Rise and Fall of Britain's Captain of Industry. The two are business historians, both at Queen's University Belfast, and their book is partly a rollicking tale of Britain's most famous bosses from the end of the Victorian era to 2020, including some who are now forgotten. I had never heard of Sir John Ellerman, who, when he died in 1933, had a probate valued at £36.7 million — the largest estate ever declared in Britain, three times bigger than the Guinness fortune. His vast riches came from shipping, before he expanded into mines, brewing, newspapers and London property. I also learnt that Alfred Lyttelton — the first man to be capped by England at both cricket and football — chaired the Law Union Insurance Company until his untimely death in 1913 from a stomach abscess which he developed after being struck by a cricket ball. The more famous figures — Lord Leverhulme, Ralph 'five times a night' Halpern, Fred 'the Shred' Goodwin of RBS infamy, and Cedric 'the Pig' Brown of British Gas also get a run out as the book tells the tumultuous history of Britain's strange relationship with its business leaders. Do we admire them for creating wealth, jobs and contributing to our tax base? Or do we revile them for being mostly 'concerned with making money', as Jim Slater famously declared, a class of executives responsible for the widening disparity between the 0.1 per cent and the rest? What makes Aldous and Turner's study more than just a series of pen portraits is their analysis, drawing on a database of 1,387 bosses at 475 of our largest companies. There has been a long-standing assumption that Britain became the sick man of Europe after the Second World War because, in Harold Wilson's 1963 reprimand, even though the MCC had abolished the snobbish distinction between amateurs and professionals in cricket, 'in science and industry we are content to remain a nation of gentlemen in a world of players'. Too many ill-qualified toffs were running Britain's top companies. One of the interesting conclusions of Aldous and Turner, however, is that Wilson was resoundingly wrong. Yes, in the first two decades of the 20th century, four in ten bosses were peers of the realm, but this had fallen to 5 per cent by the 1960s and you were far more likely in the UK to make it to the top as son of a bricklayer or postman than in the United States. Also, in the first two decades when aristos were in charge, their study 'shows no discernible difference in profitability and stock market valuation between companies led by gentlemen or players'. In more recent years, despite Britain catching up with America in sending bosses to business school, modern chief executives have failed to boost the productivity or the prosperity of the country. They argue, in fact, that the modern professional chief executive — 43 per cent of whom lose their job by being sacked or ousted after a takeover — is now too short-termist. Like football managers, they know they won't last long in the job so push for as high a salary as possible. O'Hare at Zegona was paid such a huge sum because the shares of his company leapt fourfold between 2021 and 2024. Zegona shareholders have done very well; no wonder they were happy to vote for his large pay packet. However, part of the company's impressive performance was down to slashing 28 per cent of the workforce. Aldous and Turner argue that the Edwardian aristos, and founders of family companies, were surprisingly good managers because they had long-term 'skin in the game'. The welfare of staff mattered to them. Crucially, many had a 'purpose' — that modish term. Lord Leverhulme, a Congregationalist, made such a success of Sunlight Soap because, in part, he genuinely believed in the importance of cleanliness. To pin the robustness of early 1900s companies on the noblesse oblige of the bosses, as Aldous and Turner suggest, seems a touch romantic. But they believe corporate Britain needs to recapture that spirit by chief executive pay being tied not just to the interests of shareholders but wider society too. That's ambitious at best, a legal quagmire at worst — but it is true more bosses need to act as longer-term stewards if they want a role in revitalising Britain's economy. There are only so many doctors they are worth.


Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
CEO Tim Cook says Apple ready to open its wallet to catch up in AI
SAN FRANCISCO, July 31 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab CEO Tim Cook signaled on Thursday the iPhone maker was ready to spend more to catch up to rivals in artificial intelligence by building more data centers or buying a larger player in the segment, a departure from a long practice of fiscal frugality. Apple has struggled to keep pace with rivals such as Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Alphabet's Google (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, both of which have attracted hundreds of millions of users to their AI-powered chatbots and assistants. That growth has come at a steep cost, however, with Google planning to spend $85 billion over the next year and Microsoft on track to spend more than $100 billion, mostly on data centers. Apple, in contrast, has leaned on outside data center providers to handle some of its cloud computing work, and despite a high-profile partnership with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for certain iPhone features, has tried to grow much of its AI technology in-house, including improvements to its Siri virtual assistant. The results have been rocky, with the company delaying its Siri improvements until next year. During a conference call after Apple's fiscal third-quarter results, analysts noted that Apple has historically not done large deals and asked whether it might take a different approach to pursue its AI ambitions. CEO Cook responded that the company had already acquired seven smaller companies this year and is open to buying larger ones. "We're very open to M&A that accelerates our roadmap. We are not stuck on a certain size company, although the ones that we have acquired thus far this year are small in nature," Cook said. "We basically ask ourselves whether a company can help us accelerate a roadmap, and if they do, then we're interested." Apple has tended to buy smaller firms with highly specialized technical teams to build out specific products. Its largest deal ever was its purchase of Beats Electronics for $3 billion in 2014, followed by a $1 billion deal to buy a modem chip business from Intel. But now Apple is at a unique crossroads for its business. The tens of billions of dollars per year it receives from Google as payment to be the default search engine on iPhones could be undone by U.S. courts in Google's antitrust trial, while startups like Perplexity are in discussions to try to dislodge Google with an AI-powered browser that would handle many search functions. Apple executives have said in court they are considering reshaping the firm's Safari browser with AI-powered search functions, and Bloomberg News has reported that Apple executives have discussed buying Perplexity, which Reuters has not independently confirmed. Apple also said on Thursday it plans to spend more on data centers, an area where it typically spends only a few billion dollars per year. Apple is currently using its own chip designs to handle AI requests with privacy controls that are compatible with the privacy features on its devices. Kevan Parekh, Apple's chief financial officer, did not give specific spending targets but said outlays would rise. "It's not going to be exponential growth, but it is going to grow substantially," Parekh said during the conference call. "A lot of that's a function of the investments we're making in AI."


Reuters
4 hours ago
- Reuters
Apple revenue forecast beats estimates, tariff costs projected at $1.1 billion
SAN FRANCISCO, July 31 (Reuters) - Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab forecast revenue for the current quarter ending in September well above Wall Street's estimates on Thursday, sending shares up despite a warning from CEO Tim Cook that U.S. tariffs would add $1.1 billion in costs over the period. As the centerpiece of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war, those tariffs cost Apple $800 million in the June quarter and spurred some customers to buy iPhones in late spring this year. Those purchases helped Apple's fiscal third-quarter sales beat expectations by the biggest percentage in at least four years, according to LSEG. The company still forecast growth, though, with Chief Financial Officer Kevan Parekh saying the company expects revenue growth for the current quarter in the "mid to high single digits," which would exceed the 3.27% growth to $98.04 billion that analysts expected, according to LSEG data. Apple reported $94.04 billion in revenue for its fiscal third quarter ended on June 28, up nearly 10% from a year earlier and beating analyst expectations of $89.54 billion, according to LSEG data. Its earnings per share of $1.57 topped expectations for $1.43 per share. Apple shares were up 3% in after-hours trading, extending gains after Apple provided its forecast. Sales of iPhones, the best-selling product for the company based in Cupertino, California, were up 13.5% to $44.58 billion, beating analyst expectations of $40.22 billion. Apple has been shifting production of products bound for the U.S., sourcing iPhones from India and other products such as Macs and Apple Watches from Vietnam. The ultimate tariff rates many Apple products could face remain in flux, and many of its products are currently exempt. Sales in its Americas segment, which includes the U.S. and could face tariff impacts, rose 9.3% to $41.2 billion. In Greater China, where Apple has faced long delays in approval to introduce AI features on its devices, sales were $15.37 billion, up from a year ago and above expectations of $15.12 billion, according to a survey of five analysts from data firm Visible Alpha. That gain was a turnaround from a year-over-year decline in China sales in the March quarter. In a conference call with analysts, Cook said some of that was due to a subsidy program in China to help revive the smartphone market, which boosted some of Apple's products. "It was the first full quarter of the subsidy playing out," Cook told analysts. In an interview with Reuters, Cook said the company set seasonal records for upgrades of iPhones, Macs and Apple Watches. He said Apple estimates about 1 percentage point of its 9.6% of sales growth in the quarter was attributable to customers making purchases ahead of potential tariffs. "We saw evidence in the early part of the quarter, specifically, of some pull-ahead related to the tariff announcements," Cook told Reuters, though he also said the active user base for iPhones hit a record high in all geographies. The U.S. is still negotiating with both China and India, with Trump saying India could face 25% tariffs as early as Friday. However, analysts said India could still retain cost advantages for Apple in the longer term. "The pull-forward in demand due to tariffs was somewhat expected given the uncertainty around pricing. However, it's important to put this in context as this is typically a slow quarter for Apple, yet they still delivered exceptional results with iPhone growth," Emarketer analyst Jacob Bourne said. Tariffs are only one of Apple's challenges. The company faces competition from rivals such as Samsung Electronics Co ( opens new tab in a tough market for premium-priced mobile phones. On the software front, Apple faces challenges from Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab, which is quickly weaving AI features into its competing Android operating system. While AI leaders Microsoft and Nvidia have seen their stock market values soar to record highs, Apple's shares have fallen 17% in 2025, with investors concerned about the impact of tariffs, and about what they view as slow progress integrating AI features into its products. Apple has delayed the release of an AI-enriched version of Siri, its virtual assistant, but Cook said the company is "making good progress on a personalized Siri." He also said Apple, which has thus far not engaged in the massive capital expenditures of its Big Tech rivals to pursue AI, is "significantly growing" its investments in artificial intelligence. "Apple has always been about taking the most advanced technologies and making them easy to use and accessible for everyone, and that's at the heart of our AI strategy," Cook said. Apple faces regulatory rulings in Europe that threaten to undermine its lucrative App Store business. Apple said sales from its services business, which includes the App Store as well as music and cloud storage, were $27.42 billion, topping analyst expectations of $26.8 billion. Sales of wearables such as AirPods and Apple Watches were $7.4 billion, missing estimates of $7.82 billion. Mac sales of $8.05 billion beat expectations of $7.26 billion, while iPads hit $6.58 billion in sales, missing expectations of $7.24 billion. Apple said gross margins were 46.5% in the fiscal third quarter, beating analyst expectations of 45.9%, according to LSEG estimates. The company forecast gross margins for the current quarter of 46% to 47%, with the entire range above estimates of 45.9%, according to LSEG data.