logo
WA lawmakers discussing bill to reform pre-trial release policies

WA lawmakers discussing bill to reform pre-trial release policies

Yahoo18-02-2025
The Brief
Washington lawmakers are weighing House Bill 1252.
The bill would reform how pre-trial releases are handled across the state.
Some lawmakers say current policies endanger the public, while members of the ACLU argue the bill would do more harm than good.
OLYMPIA, Wash. - The House Community Safety Committee convened Thursday to hear testimony on House Bill 1252, which aims to reform pre-trial release policies in Washington state.
Sponsored by Rep. Lauren Davis, D-32, the bill seeks to make it more difficult for suspects who run from police to get out of jail and to increase judicial accountability.
The bill would require judges to classify suspects who flee from police as public safety threats, granting them the authority to impose higher bail amounts.
What they're saying
"We have a small collection of judicial officers, primarily concentrated on the I-5 corridor who are routinely making pre-trial release decisions that, by any objective measure, by any reasonable predictability are reckless and dangerous. These judges are, in fact, abusing their discretion, and they are doing so in a manner that endangers innocent Washingtonians and the brave peace officers who work tirelessly to keep us safe," said Rep. Davis.
Oftentimes, judges release defendants on personal recognizance or on low bail with Electronic Home Monitoring.
Rep. Davis says that provides a false sense of security. Strap cuts are common and there is no real-time monitoring by law enforcement.
Responses to violations, such as curfew breaches or device tampering, can take up to a day, leading to significant risks for the community. "We should not be sacrificing the safety of the entire community at the altar of liberty for one criminal defendant," she added.
Big picture view
Currently in Washington state, there is a presumption of release for defendants. After a preliminary court appearance, anyone charged with a noncapital offense should be released on personal recognizance pending trial.
This presumption can be overcome though, if the court finds that the defendant is likely to fail to appear, commit a violent crime, or intimidate witnesses or interfere with justice. Before imposing bail, judges must consider less restrictive options.
Local perspective
However, recent decisions by judges to release suspects pending trial for violent crimes has left family members of victims feeling frustrated.
"We've seen some judges claim to be part of quote, the resistance in a system quote, complicit and perpetuating oppression and seeking to speak quote, my truth as a judge. This kind of behavior only heightens the reason to simply require a judge to give a reason, at least allowing us to know why dangerous individuals are being released back into our communities," said James McMann of the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs who supports the bill.
The bill also received support from several local law enforcement leaders including Thurston County Sheriff Derek Sanders and Sumner Police Deputy Chief Andy McCurdy.
"I understand that incarceration can often worsen situations but for individuals committing violent crimes who lack a support system, temporary detention is often the only way to prevent further harm until intervention and prevention resources can be effective implemented," said Chief McCurdy.
He recounted a violent incident last year as an example. "We had two armed suspects who violently carjacked a woman at the Sumner Winco. They shot at bystanders. They shot one bystander in the head and severely injured the man who lost his eye and almost lost his eye as a result . After a lengthy manhunt with extensive resources, we finally got them in custody and then the judge quickly released one to the community. This sent the wrong message," said Chief McCurdy.
Renton Police Chief Jon Schuldt also added his support after several violent suspects were released and have remained on the run, "Far too often, the judges are showing more empathy towards the suspects and minimizing the suspect's behavior at the expense of public safety."
The other side
Opposition to the bill came from civil rights advocates, including Jasmine Clark from the ACLU.
She argued that the bill undermines the presumption of innocence and disproportionately affects marginalized communities. "This could lead to more juveniles held in detention, which studies have shown to have long-term negative effects on their development and rehabilitation," Clark cautioned. "This bill undermines the principle that individuals are innocent until proven guilty and disproportionately impacts marginalized communities who are more likely to encounter aggressive policing tactics." she added.
Romana Brandise, representing the Washington Defender Association and the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, contended that the bill violates the separation of powers between the judiciary and the legislature. "This bill changes the presumption of release, conflicting with court rules established by the Supreme Court," she stated.
What's next
A committee vote on whether to move HB 1252 forward is expected this week.
To comment on this proposed bill under consideration, please call or email your legislator directly. Details about commenting on legislation can be found here.
You can also download House Bill 1252.
The Source
Information for this article comes from original FOX 13 reporting.
Politics: Lawmakers propose pay-by-mile charge for WA drivers
Food: Starbucks phasing out plastic cups for cold drinks in WA, other states
Local: IRS tax refund schedule 2025: What you need to know
To get the best local news, weather and sports in Seattle for free, sign up for the daily FOX Seattle Newsletter.Download the free FOX LOCAL app for mobile in the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for live Seattle news, top stories, weather updates and more local and national coverage, plus 24/7 streaming coverage from across the nation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When the left made him angry, MAGA Hulk was born
When the left made him angry, MAGA Hulk was born

Fox News

time24 minutes ago

  • Fox News

When the left made him angry, MAGA Hulk was born

Stephen Davis, widely known as the "MAGA Hulk," said he experienced a powerful transformation before becoming a contributor for Turning Point USA. In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital at the Student Action Summit hosted by TPUSA in Tampa, Florida, Davis shared how he became a vocal force in the conservative movement. Davis shared that around 2017-2018, he had a political awakening. "I finally woke up and realized that I am the very problem that I have been fighting against." "I'm fighting against racism, and I'm the racist," he said. "Well, I guess I'm fighting against myself. So, I have to make a 180-degree turn, and I thank the conservative movement for standing up and being such a loud voice and planting a seed within me so that I can grow, flourish and go out there and plant seeds." Despite his evolution, Davis says the MAGA Hulk persona isn't going anywhere. "It's timeless, you know, it's one of those things that, what's wrong with standing for Americanism? What's wrong with making America great again? So, I think it's a timeless thing. I will always be the MAGA Hulk." Since then, Davis has gone to high school and college campuses to advocate for conservative values. "I'm not going back to the Democrat plantation. I am a free-thinking individual, I'm a free man, and I'm going to use my mind and my intellect to better the plight of the Black community as well as all of America," he said. Davis now advocates what he calls "American exceptionalism to the max." He believes this mindset is especially crucial for uplifting the Black community — one he says has been repeatedly misled and manipulated by the Democratic Party."What it is that they try to do every two to four years, use us for their purposes. They spread all the manipulation, all the lies, all the deceit, promises, all these different things," Davis said. Davis also shared he wants to see more opportunities for his community rather than handouts. "I don't even want to be promised different welfare programs. I want to be promised work. I want the Black community to be promised work so we can go out there and make a change for ourselves. It's not about entitlement programs and all these certain things. It's doing something, making ourselves useful," he said. Davis said, "When it comes to the Black community, I see us realizing that we don't need the entitlement programs. We don't all the things from big daddy government. We're gonna go out there and do [it] for ourselves." According to Davis, one key issue has particularly struck a nerve with the Black community. "I think the biggest thing that's really been waking up the Black community is the illegal alien situation where the government's catering. Actually, I'll say the Democrat Party's catered to the illegal aliens as opposed to the Black, or, not even just the Black man, to the American. And I think that due to this, we're waking up. We are seeing that the left has nothing to offer the Black community, has nothing to offer to the American people, so we are resonating with the right side of history, and we're going to continue on this trend for generations to come," he said. And in true MAGA Hulk fashion, Davis shared a fun fact about his strength — that he could bench 500 pounds. "It's definitely more than your typical liberal, I'll tell you that much."

Trump Is Deploying the National Guard to D.C.—Power Grab or Public Safety? Newsweek Writers Debate
Trump Is Deploying the National Guard to D.C.—Power Grab or Public Safety? Newsweek Writers Debate

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Is Deploying the National Guard to D.C.—Power Grab or Public Safety? Newsweek Writers Debate

President Donald Trump announced he would deploy the National Guard to Washington, D.C., and assume control of the city's police force. Was this announcement a sign of creeping authoritarianism? A legitimate measure to combat crime in the nation's capital city? Or just a publicity stunt? Newsweek contributors David Faris and Mark Davis debate: David Faris: Deploying the National Guard to Washington D.C. is an unconscionable abuse of federal power and another worrisome signpost on our road to autocracy. Using the military to bring big, blue cities to heel, exactly as "alarmists" predicted during the 2024 campaign, isn't about a crisis in D.C.—violent crime is actually at a 30-year low. President Trump is, once again, testing the limits of his power, hoping to intimidate other cities into submission to his every vengeful whim by making the once unimaginable—an American tyrant ordering a military occupation of our own capital—a terrifying reality. Mark Davis: In another masterstroke of messaging and practicality, President Trump has taken aim at crime in America's capital city, vowing to use the resources under his control to "make Washington safe again." No big city is ever safe enough, and there are cities with worse crime problems than D.C., but this is the city where Trump lives, as do countless politicians and media types who will criticize him while quietly enjoying a city with less violent crime. Democratic mayors and governors have done too little; Trump will act, and residents of every political stripe will benefit. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Associated Press Faris: There is nothing practical about deploying an expensive military force when crime is already in freefall. If President Trump actually cared about the city he escapes every weekend to go golfing, he would empower it with statehood or voting representation in Congress, not occupy it with troops. Davis: Washington residents—and I know plenty—may beg to differ on the "crime in freefall" observation. Last year provided a momentary breather by some measures, but this decade's crime numbers have spiked over the 2010s. Whatever current levels are, they will decrease with Trump's D.C. strategy, a goal that should be appreciated by all. Faris: I doubt that even one in ten Washingtonians would approve of deploying the military to combat a fabricated crime crisis. Trump did not consult with residents and doesn't care what they think. This is about dictatorial pageantry, a strongman applying the boot to places he believes are full of domestic enemies. Davis: My kingdom for a reliable flash poll, which I believe would show surprising support. But even if D.C. is filed with voters with a taste for high-crime Democratic governance as in Chicago, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and elsewhere, that doesn't mean Trump has to agree. And perhaps viewing murderers and carjackers as domestic enemies will actually dissuade those behaviors. Faris: It's telling that the cities Republicans bring up in these conversations are always in blue states, as if there aren't problems in Dallas or St. Louis, both of which are ruled by Republican-dominated state governments and policies. Why isn't the president threatening to send the National Guard to these cities? Davis: There are problems in every large city. The worst are the ones saddled with unchecked Democratic governance. I'm sure the president would love to send the National Guard into Chicago, but cities in both blue and red states are not under his direct authority. Washington is, and its residents are about to benefit from it. Faris: The American far right fears and loathes cities, and President Trump has long publicly fantasized about unleashing the military on them. A sanitized, terrorized capital city, with uniformed soldiers brandishing assault rifles on street corners, has been a hallmark of every authoritarian society I've visited. The militarization of Washington will not have any lasting effects on violent crime. But it's not intended to. It will only clarify President Trump's contempt for American democracy and his endless need to humiliate people he sees not as equal citizens but as disloyal subjects. Our depressing slide into sclerotic autocracy continues. Davis: In the final analysis, this comes down to whether safer streets are good. It is hard to fathom an argument to the contrary. The objections seem ginned up from the usual complaint that "Trump wants it, so it's bad." Critics tried that with borders and it failed. They said tariffs would sink us into depression. Hasn't happened, and it won't. Is there an element of political theater to this D.C. crime strategy? Sure, but it's also sound policy of the type that shows a president in touch with a concern real people have, which is served him well, and also the nation. David Faris is a professor of political science at Roosevelt University and the author of It's Time to Fight Dirty: How Democrats Can Build a Lasting Majority in American Politics. His writing has appeared in Slate, The Week, The Washington Post, The New Republic, Washington Monthly, and more. You can find him on Twitter @davidmfaris and Bluesky @ Mark Davis is a syndicated talk show host for the Salem Media Group on 660AM The Answer in Dallas-Ft. Worth, and a columnist for the Dallas Morning News and Townhall. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.

Texas woman claims US Marine got her pregnant, then spiked her drink with abortion pills after she refused to ‘get rid of it': lawsuit
Texas woman claims US Marine got her pregnant, then spiked her drink with abortion pills after she refused to ‘get rid of it': lawsuit

New York Post

time10 hours ago

  • New York Post

Texas woman claims US Marine got her pregnant, then spiked her drink with abortion pills after she refused to ‘get rid of it': lawsuit

A Texas woman claims a US Marine got her pregnant and then secretly spiked her hot chocolate with abortion pills — ending her pregnancy without her consent after she refused his repeated demands to 'get rid of it,' according to a federal lawsuit. Liana Davis filed the wrongful death suit Monday, accusing Christopher Cooprider, 34, of dissolving at least 10 misoprostol pills into a drink he gave her at her Corpus Christi home on April 5 while she was eight weeks pregnant with his child, according to the lawsuit obtained by The Post. Liana Davis accused Christopher Cooprider of dissolving at least 10 misoprostol pills into a drink he made for her at her Corpus Christi home on April 5 while she was eight weeks pregnant with his child. Getty Images Advertisement Within 30 minutes of drinking the hot chocolate, Davis began 'hemorrhaging and cramping,' while Cooprider allegedly fled the scene and stopped responding to texts, the suit — filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas — claimed. 'I am gushing blood. Please hurry,' Davis texted him around 12:30 a.m. Instead, Davis's disabled mother had to take an Uber to watch her three sleeping children while a neighbor rushed the bleeding woman to the hospital. Her unborn baby, whom she had already named Joy, did not survive, documents said. Advertisement The lawsuit also alleges Cooprider ordered the abortion pills without Davis' knowledge or consent from Aid Access, an international online pill provider founded by Dutch physician Dr. Rebecca Gomperts. Both Aid Access and Gomperts were also named as defendants in the lawsuit. The alleged drink spiking followed a months-long campaign by Cooprider, a Marine pilot in training who was temporarily stationed in Corpus Christi, to pressure Davis into an abortion after she told him she might be pregnant in late January, according to the suit. 'We're not in love,' he texted her after the pregnancy was confirmed. 'It would be messed up to bring a child into the world without both parents raising them,' he said, the suit claimed. Cooprider continued to tell David to 'get rid of it' after her pregnancy test came back positive — causing her stress. Advertisement 'Every time you say 'get rid of it,' it's like an electric shock,' she wrote, according to the lawsuit. 'I literally feel like I'm going down the steepest hill on a roller coaster when I read that.' The lawsuit also alleges Cooprider ordered the abortion pills without Davis' knowledge or consent from Aid Access, an international online pill provider founded by Dutch physician Dr. Rebecca Gomperts. AP Cooprider even brought abortion pills to Davis' house several times to ask her to 'kill' her unborn baby, the suit said. He would leave the pills behind, hoping Davis would change her mind, she alleged. Despite several heated text exchanges, Cooprider failed to convince Davis to have the abortion. The Marine even threatened to testify against her in a custody battle for her three children with an ex-husband, Davis claimed. Advertisement By April, Cooprider appeared to change his tune, proposing that they have a 'trust-building' night where they'd drink warm tea and reconnect. Instead, three days later, he allegedly served her the poisoned hot cocoa. When Davis returned home from the hospital, she found the open box of abortion pills, which she handed over to Corpus Christi police. Despite the allegations, Corpus Christi police said there is no active investigation into Cooprider, NBC reported. The lawsuit seeks Cooprider, Aid Access, and Gomperts to pay undisclosed damages for the wrongful death of Davis's unborn child.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store