CVS Omnicare ordered to pay $949 million in government fraud case
A federal judge has ordered CVS to pay $948.8 million in penalties and damages in a whistleblower case alleging that the company's Omnicare division illegally charged the U.S. government for prescription drugs.
Manhattan Judge Colleen McMahon imposed a $542 million penalty for what she called 'very big fraud' in her Monday order, and awarded $406.8 million in damages — three times the $135.6 million that a jury awarded in the spring, as required under the False Claims Act.
Omnicare filed more than 3.3 million false claims between 2010 and 2018, according to court documents. CVS, which acquired the pharmacy benefits manager in 2015, denied the allegations and said it planned to appeal McMahon's decision.
A former Omnicare pharmacist filed the lawsuit in 2015 accusing the PBM of improperly billing Medicare, Medicaid and the military's Tricare program for over $135 million in drugs that weren't actually covered by the programs.
Omnicare — the largest long-term care pharmacy services provider in the U.S. — fraudulently dispensed drugs to elderly and disabled people in long-term care and assisted living facilities without valid prescriptions, according to the complaint.
The Department of Justice joined the suit in 2019, and a jury ruled in favor of the government last spring.
The False Claims Act allows whistleblowers to bring complaints on the government's behalf and share in potential damages. The law is a key weapon in the government's arsenal for combating fraud, and the driving force behind a major share of healthcare recoveries.
The law requires tripling of damages, a stipulation that inflated CVS' penalty. The company argued that the $948.8 million award violates the Constitution's prohibition against excessive fines, but McMahon did not agree.
'Admittedly [the fine] is a very big number. But this was a very big fraud on the Government, one that lasted over almost a decade, and one that Omnicare was aware of but avoided taking steps to correct,' the judge wrote.
And CVS is getting off relatively easy, McMahon noted. According to her order, following the letter of the FCA, which outlines a minimum penalty of $5,000 for every false claim, would result in an 'astronomical' minimum penalty of $26.9 billion on top of the damages.
Still, CVS plans to appeal the judgment.
'This lawsuit centered on a highly technical prescription dispensing record keeping issue that was allowed by law in many states. The dispensing practices referenced were limited to Omnicare, ended in 2018, were used by many others in the industry at the time, and were accepted by CMS,' a spokesperson for the company said.
'There was no claim in this case that any patient paid for a medication they shouldn't have or that any patient was harmed. The decision on penalties is unconstitutional, especially given the fact that there is no evidence that a single patient suffered harm,' they added.
If the healthcare juggernaut's appeal fails, the penalty is small hit in comparison to its annual revenue, which reached $372.8 billion in 2024.
Still, it would mean a financial speedbump for CVS, which is struggling to adjust to reimbursement pressures in its legacy retail pharmacy business and higher medical costs for members in its Aetna health plans.
Recommended Reading
DOJ charges more than 300 in $14.6B healthcare fraud bust
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
ICE Accessing Medicaid Data Raises Privacy, Health Concerns
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will begin giving Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) access to personal Medicaid records, a decision that has ignited outrage from experts who warn that the move is illegal. Why It Matters The decision to allow ICE access to Medicaid data marks a significant shift in how health information is used in immigration enforcement. It's the latest development in the Trump administration's hard-line immigration agenda and has sparked concerns among experts about its potential to violate medical privacy laws and deter vulnerable populations from seeking care. The agreement is the latest in a series of actions that have aligned the Health Department with the Trump administration's immigration enforcement efforts. On July 10, the department expanded its interpretation of a law that restricts most immigrants from accessing federal public benefits. Federal agents standing outside an immigration court at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building in New York on July 17. Federal agents standing outside an immigration court at the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building in New York on July 17. Yuki Iwamura/AP What To Know The Trump administration's policy change allows ICE to use data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS)—including medical diagnoses, treatment history, home addresses and ethnicity—to locate and detain undocumented immigrants. Critics say the unprecedented use of sensitive health records for immigration enforcement marks a dangerous breach of both legal precedent and ethical norms. In response, the California Pan-Ethnic Health Network (CPEHN), a medical justice coalition, called the action cruel. Kiran Savage-Sangwan, CPEHN's executive director, said the policy could have devastating ripple effects on public health. "Health advocates are shocked and outraged by this deeply cruel and blatantly illegal action that threatens health care for millions," Savage-Sangwan said in a statement shared with Newsweek. "The Trump Administration aims to weaponize records of patients who accessed treatment for cancer, heart attacks, or their children's broken arms to not only accelerate its mass deportation agenda, but to further spread fear in communities already terrorized by ICE," she said. "For generations, federal law has guaranteed emergency medical care to anyone in need because as a nation we believe deeply that saving lives transcends politics," she added. The agreement, first reported on Thursday by the Associated Press, was signed on Monday. "ICE will use the CMS data to allow ICE to receive identity and location information on aliens identified by ICE," the agreement said, according to AP. "President Trump consistently promised to protect Medicaid for eligible beneficiaries," Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said. "To keep that promise after Joe Biden flooded our country with tens of millions of illegal aliens, CMS and DHS are exploring an initiative to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits that are meant for law-abiding Americans," she continued. Medicaid, the public health insurance program for low-income individuals, is funded jointly by states and the federal government. While undocumented immigrants are not eligible for Medicaid under federal law, 14 states and the District of Columbia offer coverage to eligible children regardless of immigration status. Seven of those states, along with D.C., also extend coverage to adults. Federal law has long protected access to emergency medical care regardless of immigration status. Advocates argue that the new agreement undermines decades of precedent and threatens to erode public trust in health institutions—not only among undocumented individuals but across all communities. "If upheld, Trump's policy to use sensitive medical data, which includes data on the types of health care services individuals receive, along with home addresses and ethnicities, for enforcement represents an irreparable turning point, forcing immigrant families to endure immense suffering or risk having their families torn apart," Savage-Sangwan said. "What's more, it marks a significant breach of trust for all Americans who have confidence in the privacy of our medical data," she continued. An HHS spokesperson told Newsweek: "CMS is aggressively cracking down on states that may be misusing federal Medicaid funds to subsidize care for illegal immigrants. This oversight effort—supported by lawful interagency data sharing with DHS—is focused on identifying waste, fraud, and systemic abuse." What People Are Saying CPEHN Executive Director Kiran Savage-Sangwan said in a statement: "We call on the courts to act swiftly to stop this unprecedented and dangerous violation of law." An HHS spokesperson told Newsweek: "With respect to the recent data sharing between CMS and DHS, HHS acted entirely within its legal authority—and in full compliance with all applicable laws—to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Centene (CNC) Falls on Investor Caution Over Q2 Earnings
We recently published . Centene Corporation (NYSE:CNC) is one of the worst-performing companies on Thursday. Centene Corporation saw its share prices touch a new all-time low on Thursday as investors turned even more cautious following one of its counterparts' disappointing earnings performance tied to its Medicaid and Affordable Care Act (ACA) services. At intra-day trading, Centene Corporation (CNC) dropped to its lowest 52-week price of $28.92 before slight buying persisted toward the end to push its share prices to $29.14. Investors appeared to have unloaded positions ahead of the company's second-quarter earnings results, after its counterpart, Elevance Health, reported a 24.2-percent drop in net income during the second quarter of the year. Additionally, Elevance Health updated its outlook to reflect elevated medical cost trends under the ACA and slower rate alignment in Medicaid. A doctor holding a clipboard in a hospital ward, discussing patient treatment plan with the nurses. Centene Corporation (NYSE:CNC) likewise offers Medicaid and ACA services. Earlier this month, the company withdrew its 2025 earnings forecast due to an expected slump in its revenues from commercial plans under the ACA or Obamacare. While we acknowledge the potential of CNC as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
2 hours ago
Georgia shows rough road ahead for states as Medicaid work requirements loom
This is a KFF Health News story. Every time Ashton Alexander sees an ad for Georgia Pathways to Coverage, it feels like a "kick in the face." Alexander tried signing up for Pathways, the state's limited Medicaid expansion, multiple times and got denied each time, he said, even though he met the qualifying terms because he's a full-time student. Georgia is one of 10 states that haven't expanded Medicaid health coverage to a broader pool of low-income adults. Instead, it offers coverage to those who can prove they're working or completing 80 hours a month of other qualifying activities, like going to school or volunteering. And it is the only state currently doing so. "Why is this marketing out here?" said the 20-year-old, who lives in Conyers, east of Atlanta. "It's truly not accessible." Each denial used the same boilerplate language, Alexander said, and his calls to caseworkers were not returned. State offices couldn't connect him with caseworkers assigned to him from the same state agency. And when he requested contact information for a supervisor to appeal his denial, he said, the number rang to a fax machine. "It's impenetrable," Alexander said. "I've literally tried everything, and there's no way." Millions of Americans trying to access Medicaid benefits could soon find themselves navigating similar byzantine state systems and work rules. Legislation signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4 allocates $200 million to help states that expanded Medicaid create systems by the end of next year to verify whether some enrollees are meeting the requirements. Conservative lawmakers have long argued that public benefits should go only to those actively working to get off of government assistance. But the nation's only Medicaid work requirement program shows they can be costly for states to run, frustrating for enrollees to navigate, and disruptive to other public benefit systems. Georgia's budget for marketing is nearly as much as it has spent on health benefits. Meanwhile, most enrollees under age 65 are already working or have a barrier that prevents them from doing so. What Georgia shows is "just how costly setting up these administrative systems of red tape can be," said Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Over the past two years, KFF Health News has documented the issues riddling Georgia's Pathways program, launched in July 2023. More than 100,000 Georgians have applied to the program through March. Just over 8,000 were enrolled at the end of June, though about 300,000 would be eligible if the state fully expanded Medicaid under the terms of the Affordable Care Act. The program has cost more than $100 million, with only $26 million spent on health benefits and more than $20 million allocated to marketing contracts, according to a KFF Health News analysis of state reports. "That was truly a pretty shocking waste of taxpayer dollars," Alker said. The Government Accountability Office is investigating the costs of the program after a group of Democratic senators -- including both members of the Georgia delegation -- asked the government watchdog to look into the program. Findings are expected this fall. A state report to the federal government from March said Georgia couldn't effectively determine if applicants meet the qualifying activities criteria. The report also said the state hadn't suspended anyone for failing to work, a key philosophical pillar of the program. Meanwhile, as of March, more than 5,000 people were waiting to have their eligibility verified for Pathways. The Pathways program has strained Georgia's eligibility system for other public benefits, such as food stamps and cash assistance. In April, the state applied to the federal government to renew Pathways. In its application, officials scaled back key elements, such as the requirement that enrollees document work every month. Critics of the program also say the red tape doesn't help enrollees find jobs. "Georgia's experience shows that administrative complexity is the primary outcome, not job readiness," said Natalie Crawford, executive director of Georgia First, which advocates for fiscal responsibility and access to affordable health care. Despite the struggles, Garrison Douglas, a spokesperson for Georgia's Republican governor, Brian Kemp, defended the program. "Georgia Pathways is doing what it was designed to do: provide free healthcare coverage to low-income, able-bodied Georgians who are willing to engage in one of our many qualifying activities," he said in an emailed statement. New federal requirements in the tax and spending legislation mean that the 40 states (plus Washington, D.C.) that expanded Medicaid will need to prepare technology to process the documentation some Medicaid recipients will now have to regularly file. The federal law includes exemptions for people with disabilities, in addiction treatment, or caring for kids under 14, among others. The Trump administration said other states won't face a bumpy rollout like Georgia's. "We are fully confident that technology already exists that could enable all parties involved to implement work and community engagement requirements," said Mehmet Oz, head of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, in an emailed statement. In a written public comment on Georgia's application to extend the program, Yvonne Taylor of Austell detailed the difficulties she faced trying to enroll. She said she tried to sign up several times but that her application was not accepted. "Not once, not twice, but three times. With no response from customer service," she wrote in February. "So now I am without coverage." Victoria Helmly of Marietta wrote in a January comment that she and her family members take care of their dad, but the state law doesn't exempt caregivers of older adults. "Georgia should recognize their sacrifices by supporting them with health insurance," she wrote. "Let's simplify this system and in the end, save money and lives."
