Row Over RSS Chief's 'Retire At 75' Comment, Opposition Reads Between Lines
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat's comments on leaders stepping back at 75 have stirred the pot, with the opposition taking digs at the ruling BJP. The RSS chief's remarks referred to a speech by Moropant Pingale, an RSS ideologue, on his 75th birthday, but the Congress and its ally Shiv Sena (UBT) seized the opportunity to read between the lines.
The RSS has clarified that the comments merely referred to Moropant Pingale and were not to be linked to anyone else. The BJP has yet to respond to the opposition barbs.
What RSS Chief Said
Speaking at the official launch of the book, 'Moropant Pingale: The Architect of Hindu Resurgence' in English two days ago, Mr Bhagwat had recalled a statement on turning 75 that the veteran pracharak (ideologue) had once said.
"Pingale once said that when the shawl of 75 years is draped over you, it means that you have reached a certain age and should step aside and let others work," Mr Bhagwat told a crowd that had gathered in the Vanamati auditorium in Nagpur.
Pingale had made the remark after being felicitated with a shawl on his 75th birthday during a Vrindavan visit, he said.
The shawl symbolised respect, but Pingale understood its deeper meaning - that it marked a generational shift and a quiet nudge to step aside for younger leaders, said Mr Bhagwat, adding that he gracefully embraced the gesture.
Mr Bhagwat's emotional speech, comprising untold anecdotes, was a tribute to the veteran ideologue, intended to highlight his humility and self-awareness.
Opposition Seizes Opportunity
The Opposition, however, is playing up the remark as reflective of an apparent friction between the BJP and the RSS, and that the BJP had always favoured senior leaders to step aside for younger leadership to take over.
Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi said it was a "clear message" and whatever is going on between the RSS and the BJP is clearly visible from their remarks.
"When the BJP formed the government in 2014, they put their leaders above the age of 75 years in the 'margdarshak mandali'. Now, the RSS is reminding the BJP after 11 years about the promises it made. Internal conflicts are now public. Nobody knows the fallout of this conflict," said Ms Chaturvedi.
"One arrow, two targets," quipped Congress leader Jairam Ramesh.
"What a homecoming - reminded by the RSS chief upon return that he will turn 75 on September 17, 2025. But the Prime Minister could also tell the RSS chief that - he too will turn 75 on September 11, 2025! One arrow, two targets," said Mr Ramesh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
13 minutes ago
- The Wire
The Kerala Precedent: How Article 356 Became a Weapon of Cold War Politics
Newly declassified British intelligence files have confirmed coordinated CIA-UK operations with Congress leaders that led to the downfall of Kerala's 1959 Communist government. EMS Namboodiripad. On July 31, 1959, the Nehru Government invoked Article 356 of the Constitution to dismiss a state government for the first time against a non-Congress administration. E.M.S. Namboodiripad, who had served as Kerala's chief minister from April 5, 1957, saw his Communist-led government terminated after 27 months in power. What followed was not just a change of government, but a constitutional precedent that would haunt Indian federalism for decades. For 65 years, the story of this dismissal has been contested territory. To supporters of the Vimochana Samaram (Liberation Struggle), the mass agitation that culminated in the dismissal represented a popular uprising against Communist overreach. To the Left, it was a carefully orchestrated conspiracy involving domestic and communal opposition with the help of foreign agents, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The story has taken a dramatic turn and become more intriguing with historian Paul McGarr's latest revelations. Drawing on recently declassified British intelligence files, McGarr's research reveals that the United Kingdom's MI5 and MI6, along with the CIA, mounted covert operations in coordination with senior Congress leaders and India's Intelligence Bureau to bring down the Namboodiripad administration. McGarr's findings reveal that when Kerala began gaining international attention as "The Indian Yenan" – a reference to the famous Chinese Communist revolutionary base – British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan became alarmed and authorised a "Special Political Action" program specifically designed to undermine the Communist Party of India's growing influence in the state. The operation included a covert training scheme that brought Congress leaders and union organisers to the UK for intensive anti-Communist instruction. The plan had the approval of IB chief B.N. Mullik and was politically green-lit by Union home minister Govind Ballabh Pant and Union finance minister Morarji Desai. Most significantly, the British archives reveal the careful diplomatic manoeuvering required to secure Indian government cooperation: "Having met Govind Ballabh Pant, India's Minister for Home Affairs, Morarji Desai, the Union Finance Minister, and Nehru himself, Lord Home reported back to London that Pant and Desai were firmly in favour. Nehru proved less enthusiastic. The Indian premier did, however, concede that it would be useful for the Indian government to be able to call on UK intelligence assistance in certain circumstances." The trained operatives were then "infiltrated into the Indian National Trade Union Congress," bolstering its ability to counter CPI-aligned unions. This created what McGarr describes as sustained political pressure that complemented CIA funding efforts. "The people of India have the right to know the truth about the 1959 dismissal of Kerala's first Communist government. I believe that much is still remaining hidden about the Vimochana Samaram, which was shaped not only by local politics but also by external interventions that influenced the course of democracy in postcolonial India. The newly revealed UK involvement is almost unbelievable, but surprisingly new," observed eminent political scientist G. Gopakumar. Ballot box Communists The undivided CPI's electoral victory in Kerala in 1957 created one of the earliest democratically elected Communist governments in the world. It was only the second revolutionary government ever elected democratically, after communist success in San Marino from 1945 to 1957. This democratic path to socialism sent ripples across the Cold War world, where the ideological battle between capitalism and communism typically played out through revolution or military intervention, not electoral politics. In Washington and London, policymakers watched apprehensively as Namboodiripad's government began implementing the radical reforms that had brought it to power. The Communist government's troubles began with its very success in implementing promised reforms. The Kerala Education Bill of 1957, piloted by state education minister Joseph Mundassery, aimed to bring the state's schools under tighter government regulation. The legislation required that teacher appointments in grant-aided private schools – many run by Christian churches and caste organisations – be made from government-approved lists. For the powerful Syrian Catholic Church and organisations like the Nair Service Society, these reforms represented an existential threat to decades-old control over education and patronage networks. The changes would have significantly affected the livelihoods and autonomy of thousands of teachers while reducing the influence of religious and community organisations over educational institutions. Even more explosive were the agrarian reforms championed by revenue minister K.R. Gouri. The legislation sought to confer ownership rights to long-term tenant cultivators, fix ceilings on landholdings, and prevent arbitrary eviction of tenants. For the landed elites – particularly the Nair and Syrian Christian communities who had dominated Kerala's rural economy for generations – these reforms were unacceptable. The gathering storm Opposition to the EMS government began coalescing almost immediately after the bills were introduced. The Syrian Catholic Church mobilised its considerable resources against the education bill, with Church leaders framing the legislation as an attack on religious freedom and minority rights. Simultaneously, the Nair Service Society, under Mannathu Padmanabhan's leadership, began organising against the land reforms. The Indian National Congress, smarting from its electoral defeat, provided political coordination for what would become a formidable opposition coalition. The protests, initially peaceful, gradually escalated. The turning point came on June 13, 1959, at Angamaly, where police firing on protesters resulted in seven deaths. Similar incidents followed across the state, creating a cycle of violence and political mobilisation that would ultimately provide the justification for central intervention. Evidence of foreign involvement The question of foreign involvement in the Vimochana Samaram has been the subject of scholarly investigation for decades. CIA funding of the Congress party has been documented on multiple occasions. The most significant admission came from Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who served as US Ambassador to India in the 1970s. In his memoir A Dangerous Place, Moynihan revealed that the CIA had secretly funded the Indian National Congress on multiple occasions, including operations targeting Kerala's Communist government. "In the 1950s, as the role of world policeman shifted from Britain to the United States, the CIA overthrew several democratically elected governments in the Third World, often with extreme bloodshed,' explains Thomas Isaac, CPIM leader and Kerala's former finance minister. Yet in former British colonies like British Guiana, India, and Iran, it was still British intelligence that held sway in the early years. The coup in British Guiana was initiated by Britain itself. 'Now, for the first time, concrete records reveal Britain's interventions in Kerala—until now known only through the memoirs of B.N. Mullik, then head of India's Intelligence Bureau," says Issac who co-authored the book Toppling the First Ministry: Kerala, the CIA, and the Struggle for Social Justice, along with Richard W. Franke. While the CIA's role in funnelling money to Congress politicians and anti-communist trade unions has been hinted at in past memoirs and research, McGarr's work adds detailed evidence of Britain's parallel campaign. The Cold War context Understanding the foreign dimension requires recognising Kerala's significance in Cold War calculations. A democratically elected Communist government in an Indian state represented a dangerous precedent from the perspective of Western policymakers who saw containment of Communism as a strategic imperative. Internal CIA documents, some later declassified, show the extraordinary level of attention Kerala commanded in Washington's intelligence apparatus. The agency produced detailed intelligence assessments tracking political developments in what internal communications referred to as "India's Communist State." The fear was not just about Kerala itself, but about the precedent it might set. If Communism could succeed through democratic means in one corner of the world, what would prevent similar outcomes elsewhere in the developing world? This concern shaped Western intelligence approaches to the crisis. The constitutional precedent On July 31, 1959, on the advice of the Union Cabinet, President Rajendra Prasad invoked Article 356 of the Constitution to dismiss Kerala's elected chief minister E.M.S. Namboodiripad and his cabinet, and ordered the dissolution of the state assembly. The decision came after months of escalating protests and violence, setting a precedent for using the provision against non-Congress administrations that would be repeatedly invoked in subsequent decades. Prime Minister Nehru, despite his initial reluctance as revealed in the British archives, ultimately accepted the advice of his Cabinet to dismiss the EMS government. The justification was the breakdown of law and order, but critics argued that the violence had been manufactured to create grounds for constitutional intervention. The dismissal of Kerala's Communist government established what would become known as the "Kerala precedent" – the use of Article 356 to remove an elected state government facing political opposition based on ideological grounds. While Article 356 had been used before in Punjab (1951) and PEPSU (1953), the Kerala case marked its first deployment against a Communist government and set the template for future political misuse of this constitutional provision. Over the following decades, Article 356 would be invoked repeatedly against state governments that were inconvenient to the party in power at the Center, fundamentally altering the federal balance envisioned by the Constitution's framers. Historical reassessment Recent research has begun to provide a more nuanced understanding of the Vimochana Samaram, moving beyond simple narratives of popular uprising or foreign conspiracy. The evidence suggests a complex interaction of genuine domestic grievances, opportunistic political calculation and foreign intelligence operations. The concerns of various Kerala communities about the Communist government's reforms were real and significant. The education bill openly threatened the autonomy of religious institutions, while the land reforms challenged established property relations. These fears of the elite provided the raw material for political mobilisation. However, the systematic coordination of this opposition, the sophisticated propaganda campaigns, and the strategic timing of escalations suggest influences beyond purely local concerns. The documented CIA funding and British intelligence cooperation indicate that foreign powers saw an opportunity to roll back a dangerous precedent and took it. McGarr's research reveals that the Kerala operation was not an isolated case. It mirrored interventions in other newly independent nations where Western powers feared communist electoral success could become a model for the developing world. The Kerala episode provides crucial historical context for contemporary debates about foreign interference in domestic politics. The techniques revealed in declassified documents – covert funding of political movements, sophisticated information campaigns, coordination between foreign operatives and domestic actors – bear striking similarities to modern concerns about electoral manipulation. Perhaps most importantly, the Kerala case demonstrates how constitutional provisions designed to protect democracy can be turned against it when political will is lacking. The misuse of Article 356, beginning with the Kerala precedent, would become one of the most contentious issues in Indian federalism. The unfinished story As archives continue to open and more documents become available, our understanding of the Kerala episode continues to evolve. The full scope of foreign involvement may never be completely known, as intelligence operations by their nature leave incomplete paper trails scattered across different countries and agencies. What remains clear is that the dismissal of Kerala's first Communist government represents a watershed moment in Indian democracy – a moment when the principles of federalism and electoral sovereignty came into conflict with Cold War imperatives and domestic political calculations. The Vimochana Samaram thus stands as both a historical case study and a contemporary warning about the fragility of democratic institutions. 'If the fresh revelations are true, it amounts [to] a Union government conspiring with foreign agents against one of its provinces, a rare moment in political history,' says Dr. Gopakumar. As India continues to grapple with questions of federalism and constitutional governance, the lessons of 1959 remain relevant. The Kerala precedent serves as a cautionary tale about the price of sacrificing democratic principles for immediate political advantage – a price that, once paid, may take generations to recover. M.P. Basheer, a journalist and writer based in Trivandrum, was the executive editor of Kerala's first TV news channel, Indiavision. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Advertisement
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka Assembly session: BJP questions benefits of Greater Bengaluru Authority; Bill passed
Opposition BJP members in the Legislative Assembly on Tuesday questioned the advantages provided by the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) to the city and termed the Greater Bengaluru Governance (Amendment) Bill, 2025, 'undemocratic and against the spirit of the decentralisation of powers to urban local bodies'. The intention of the GBA, headed by the Chief Minister, was to control five city corporations and destroy their autonomous powers, claimed Leader of the Opposition R. Ashok. Speaking on the Bill, Mr. Ashok, C.N. Aswanth Narayan, S. Suresh Kumar, Satish Reddy, S. Muniraju, Ravi Subramanya, and C.K. Ramamurthy (all BJP) termed the formation of Greater Bengaluru and the division of the erstwhile single city corporation into five city corporations as 'unconstitutional'. Instead of empowerment, GBA has disempowered the local bodies, they claimed. Who heads corporations Noting that Mayors head city corporations, BJP members questioned the necessity of setting up the GBA headed by the Chief Minister. Mr. Ahsok said the GBA aimed at centralisation of powers in the hands of the Chief Minister and Ministers, and demanded the withdrawal of the Bill. Mr. Subramanya said the division of the city into five corporations led to imbalances in revenue generation and development among civic bodies. Mr. Reddy said there was no clarity about the GBA and the Bill, and already the Commissioner has issued notices to 30,000 households for paying additional taxes. The Commissioner had not held a single meeting with the city MLAs to address the grievances, such as those concerning the e-Khata. The power and water connections have been denied to residents residing in small buildings having no occupancy certificates. Meanwhile, Mr. Muniraju claimed that Assembly constituencies represented by the BJP have now fallen into different corporations. For instance, the Dasarahalli constituency areas have come under two city corporations, which led to confusion among the public, he said. The Bill was passed in the House later. Why amendment Deputy Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar, who also holds the Bengaluru Development portfolio, said some people had filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the court, which has been rejected. However, an amendment had to be carried out to clarify that 'the GBA will not interfere in the functioning of the corporations', to avoid any confusion in future. The PIL had claimed that the government was planning to take control of the corporations. 'Our intention is that the Mayor and councillors must have full powers in the corporation as per the Constitution,' Mr. Shivakumar said. He noted that Mahadevapura contributes the highest taxes in Bengaluru, and there was not much collection in central areas.
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Videos of expunged proceedings should not be shared on social media: Rajya Sabha Chair
Amid continued stalemate between the government and opposition over the demand for a discussion on Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bihar, the Chair in Rajya Sabha on Tuesday (August 19, 2025) said that videos of expunged proceedings should not be shared on social media. Soon after the House met post-lunch, and the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill was tabled, Radha Mohan Das Agrawal of the BJP raised the issue of the Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge sharing videos of his expunged speech on social media. He said while Mr. Kharge raises the issue of SIR, the Chair disallows the same. However, the extracts of his speech are shared on social media, even after the Chair has clearly stated that the same will not go on record of the House. The Upper House, which has witnessed repeated adjournments in the Monsoon Session as Opposition has demanded a debate on the SIR issue calling it a threat to democracy, while the Government has maintained that the "sub-judice" matter can't be discussed, saw the two sides locking horns once again on Tuesday. The House saw the first adjournment soon after meeting at 11 a.m., and was adjourned till 2 p.m. over the SIR issue. When the House met post-lunch, the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2025 was taken up, even as Opposition MPs raised slogans demanding a debate on SIR. Leader of Opposition Kharge was allowed to speak by Chair Ghanshyam Tiwari who also cautioned that the Congress leader should not raise any sub-judice matter. Mr. Kharge once again tried to raise the demand for debate on SIR, but the Chair said it would not go on record as it is not related to the business. Minister of Coal and Mines G. Kishan Reddy, and Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs L Murugan said the government is ready to answer any questions related to the Bill. Opposition MPs staged a walkout from the House as the Minister was moving the Bill. Soon after the Minister tabled the Bill, BJP MP Agrawal raised a point of order, and said videos of proceedings, which included the portions which were not on record, were being circulated on social media. "I have been noticing whenever a debate starts, LoP stands, you give permission to speak on Bill, he goes straight to SIR. You give instruction that it will not go on record. But then we see that the video of his speech is shared on social media..." he said. "How can the video be posted on social media when it has been expunged in writing, is it not a breach of privilege?" he said. Mr. Tiwari, who was in the Chair, then said that anything which has been expunged should not be shared on social media. "Arrangements should be made so that anything that is not a part of the House proceedings should not go on social media through Sansad TV, or any other medium..." he said.
