Edinburgh University accused of bias against ‘non-black' students
The group, identifying as academics from the institution, said evidence showed that white working-class boys were least likely to enjoy higher education as they hit back at a race review commissioned by university management.
Sir Tom Devine, an historian and emeritus Edinburgh University professor, also said the findings of the review were not 'intellectually credible' and described the university principal's deep apology for the institution's links to slavery and colonialism as 'a rush to judgment'.
'This report has the very real potential to damage the university's historic reputation when it is already experiencing criticisms over its financial management,' he said.
'Therefore, crucially, careful consideration of the review's controversial content should first have been considered by acknowledged representatives of the university community and not confined only to the principal and his coterie before any major public statements were made.'
The Race Review was ordered in 2021 by university leaders after the Black Lives Matter movement emerged.
•
Its findings, made public this week, include 47 recommendations such as renaming buildings and the creation of scholarship programmes to support students from underrepresented ethnic groups at undergraduate, postgraduate and postdoctoral level.
In response, the university has promised to take a series of actions including boosting scholarship opportunities.
A statement, issued by a group calling itself Edinburgh Academics 4 Free Speech, and which is said to represent 130 staff, said: 'The University already discriminates against non-black students by allowing race-based scholarships.'
They cited the Andrea Levy Scholarship, in memory of the novelist, which is directed at those with a black African or Caribbean background.
The statement continued: 'The university, in today's response, appears to be committed to increasing the level of scholarships which are based purely on skin colour.
'Many colleagues have raised concerns directly with [university principal] Professor Mathieson, arguing that as an evidence-based organisation which should use empirical data to inform its policies, the university should be funding those students which research shows are most excluded from higher education.
'Countless studies have shown that white working-class boys remain the most academically disadvantaged group in the UK.'
The group highlighted UK education department statistics showing university participation grew 21 per cent faster for Asian students and 17 per cent faster for black students compared with white students, adding: 'In choosing to ignore this overwhelming evidence, the University of Edinburgh is going against the very basis of academic rigour: evidence-based decisions.'
Mathieson described the publication of the review as a 'landmark moment'. It found that one of Edinburgh's celebrated moral philosophers and mathematicians, Dugald Stewart, taught thousands of students that white Europeans were racially superior.
The university's role as the seat of Scottish enlightenment is also reconsidered. It says: 'The University of Edinburgh was a haven for professors and alumni who developed theories of racial inferiority and white supremacism, such as the idea that Africans were inferior to whites and that non-white peoples could be colonised for the profit of European nations.'
Devine, who edited a book detailing Scottish connections to the slave trade and the wealth it generated, warned the review 'crudely imposes early 21st-century values on the pre-1900 past'.
'The report gives the impression that Edinburgh was the centre for racist thought,' he added. 'Yet such views were commonplace not only among university thinkers and informed members of the public in the 19th century throughout Europe and North America.
'Only by situating Edinburgh in an international academic comparative context of analysis could rigorous conclusions be drawn. This was not done or even hinted at.'
The report describes the university as 'a haven for professors and alumni who developed theories of racial inferiority and white supremacism'
ALAMY
In taking forward recommendations, including the renaming of buildings, he called for the university senate and court to be fully informed and the wider views of the university community to be considered.
The Academics 4 Free Speech statement said its members needed to remain anonymous. It flagged the case of Neil Thin, a senior tutor who was falsely accused of being racist after opposing the renaming of the David Hume Tower owing to slavery connections.
Fiona McClement, the university's equality, diversity and inclusion lead and co-leader of the Race Review Response Group, said: 'We want to ensure that are a welcoming and nurturing environment in which all members of our community feel a sense of belonging, and can flourish and succeed without facing unjust racialised barriers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
Met Police's use of facial recognition tech ‘breaches human rights'
Scotland Yard's plan to increase the use of live facial recognition technology is incompatible with human rights law, the equality watchdog has said. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said the Metropolitan Police's policies for deploying the technology 'fall short' and could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights when used at protests. Privacy concerns about live facial recognition (LFR) intensified this week as the Met finalised plans to use it on the approaches to, but not within the boundaries of, the Notting Hill Carnival over the bank holiday weekend. LFR links cameras to a watch list of photos of wanted suspects. Biometric data from a person's face is extracted and compared against the list, and a positive match alerts officers who can seek and stop them.
Times
35 minutes ago
- Times
MSPs call for oath to King to be scrapped
Holyrood should follow the lead of Grenada by scrapping a requirement for politicians to swear allegiance to the King, more than a dozen MSPs have claimed. A motion put forward by Kevin Stewart, a former SNP minister, heaped praise on the Commonwealth island nation for this month officially abandoning the need for officials to pledge loyalty to the monarch, and instead promise to serve the 'people of Grenada'. The Aberdeen Central MSP said that the Scottish parliament should also have the power to 'have its members pledge allegiance to the people of Scotland and not an unelected monarch'. His call has so far been backed by 14 of his colleagues, with mainly nationalists from the SNP and Greens putting their names to his motion, as well as Mercedes Villalba, the left-wing Labour MSP. On entering parliament, MSPs are required by law to swear to be 'faithful and bear true allegiance' to the British head of state, despite a sizeable number of republicans sitting in Holyrood. Murdo Fraser, the Tory MSP, accused Stewart of launching a 'shameless bid to try and pander to republican voters both inside and outside his party'. While official SNP policy remains to retain the British monarch as head of state should Scotland become independent, the position is widely seen as being designed not to alienate royalist voters. In her memoir, Nicola Sturgeon admitted she was a republican 'at heart and by instinct', a position shared by her successor Humza Yousaf. John Swinney has reiterated that it is the SNP's position that an independent Scotland would keep the King as head of state, but he has not made his personal views on the issue known. 'The reality is that the King and the monarchy remain one of the most loved and respected institutions across Scotland,' Fraser said. 'Most people will wonder why nationalist MSPs are focusing on this constitutional navel-gazing at a time when they should be tackling the real priorities of Scots. 'They want this SNP government to be focused on reducing NHS waiting times, growing the economy and restoring standards in our schools, rather than engaging in the worst sort of petty student politics.' Under the Scotland Act, which created the devolved parliament, MSPs must take the 'oath of allegiance' and are not allowed to take part in proceedings until they have done so. Those who do not do so within two months of being elected cease to be MSPs. Holyrood does not have the power to change the requirement, meaning the law would have to be altered at Westminster for the rule to be abolished or changed. Republican MSPs who feel strongly opposed to swearing allegiance to the monarch have typically undertaken acts of protest before doing so, for example by stating that their real allegiance is to the Scottish people. Dickon Mitchell, Grenada's prime minister, wants the nation to become a republic and remove Britain's monarch as its head of state. The legal changes to oath requirements on the island took effect earlier this month as Caribbean nations marked Emancipation Day, the anniversary of slavery being abolished in the British Empire in 1834. The law states that the word 'Grenada' should replace 'His Majesty King Charles the Third, his heirs and successors' in its oath. It adds that in any law requiring an oath the words 'our sovereign lord the King' must be deleted and replaced with 'the people of Grenada'. Asked whether the Scottish government supported Stewart's call for Holyrood to gain the powers to make similar changes, a spokesman declined to comment.
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Pagan groups and IBS clubs in Holyrood's ‘dog's dinner' of staff networks
Civil servant groups for pagans and those with irritable bowels are among a sprawling number of diversity networks which are helping 'shape the culture' of Scotland's devolved government. A list released after a freedom of information request shows that there are 25 separate staff networks — internal lobby groups which connect staff members and promote their interests — within the Scottish government. Advocates of staff networks, which originated in the United States but have become increasingly common in both the private and public sectors in the UK over the past decade, claim that they can help shape a positive culture and boost staff retention. However, one critic branded the huge number of internal factions within the government a 'dog's dinner' and said increasingly powerful staff networks were promoting inappropriate political activism and conflict in the workplace. It emerged last week that complaints from the LGBT staff network at the National Library of Scotland was influential in ensuring that a gender critical book, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht, was banned from a major public exhibition. JK Rowling has called the decision to censor the book from public display a 'craven, bootlicking capitulation to the gender Taliban' with Amina Shah, Scotland's chief librarian, facing intense criticism for the move. An LGBT staff network at Police Scotland has also played an active role in shaping the policies of the national force, with the help of an annual grant of about £30,000 from the Scottish government. Tanya de Grunwald, an expert commentator on HR issues, said the list of more than two dozen Scottish government staff networks suggested a 'complete loss of control'. 'Staff networks have become very popular within large organisations, but this is certainly the longest list I've ever seen from one employer,' she said. 'This list is a dog's dinner. What are these groups for? Vague mentions of 'inclusion', 'safety' and 'support' cannot justify this amount of time and attention being sucked up. 'I have serious questions about guardrails and supervision. The mental health groups sound downright dangerous. Unless this is run by a qualified professional, the Scottish government is effectively hosting unsupervised group therapy sessions for some of their most vulnerable and troubled staff.' The list of officially recognised staff networks within the Scottish government show five separate groups based on race or nationality, including an 'EU Nationals Network', 'Race Allies Network' and a 'Black Identity Group'. Among eight others related to physical or mental conditions are an 'IBS Network' and two 'neurodiversity' groups. There are seven separate religious networks with a 'Pagan Network' established alongside groups for Christians, Jews, Muslims and Sikhs. A 'menopause warriors' group is listed as one of four sex-based groups, including a 'Women's Development Network', which Holyrood has previously heard is open to women as well as 'those who identify as women'. Each group has a designated 'executive team ally' and a senior 'champion', giving them privileged access to senior decision makers. The government claims the groups 'help positively shape the culture of the Scottish government and create safer and more inclusive workplaces'. De Grunwald, host of the podcast This Isn't Working, which explores workplace issues, said that when they were originally established, staff networks were often harmless, for example being designed to create informal links between women in male-dominated industries. However, she said they were increasingly causing problems, particularly as they were taken over by young graduates who feel empowered to bring activism they had engaged in at university into the workplace. 'There has been mission creep, and in some cases they have become an activist cell, which feels empowered to criticise the organisation from within or clash with other groups, which obviously is a terrible idea,' De Grunwald said. 'If you have a Muslim group, which becomes very pro-Gaza, and Jewish staff, that is going to create problems. 'It is becoming clear that identity politics in the workplace is becoming a problem for employers, who should generally want to bring people together as much as possible.' Staff networks first emerged in the United States in the 1960s, as a response to race riots amid the civil rights movement, with Xerox's 'Black caucus' often cited as the first of its kind. Isabel Távora, a senior lecturer in human resource management at the University of Manchester, has researched the increasing prominence of staff networks in the UK. Távora said they were 'increasingly embraced' by organisations as part of equality and diversity efforts, and that research suggested they could help retain staff from minority backgrounds and contribute to the success of businesses and organisations. However, she said there were also potential disadvantages, such as creating friction in the workplace. 'Based on research evidence available and our own, we believe staff networks are generally a positive development in organisations that provide increased opportunities to under-represented groups of employees that tend to have less influence in the workplace,' Távora said. 'There is of course a risk that there are conflicting interests and views between different social groups: that then creates dilemmas for organisations.' At the National Library of Scotland, the LGBT staff network threatened to 'notify LGBT+ partners' if managers did not cave into their demands to abandon plans to display The Women Who Wouldn't Wheesht in an exhibition marking the institution's centenary, after it was nominated by the public. Shah backed down due to what she said were fears not over the book's content, but over the library's reputation and fears 'key stakeholders' would withdraw support for the exhibition and centenary. Tess White, the deputy equalities spokeswoman for the Scottish Conservatives, said: 'Scots will find it astonishing that resources are being squandered by the SNP government on an ever-growing army of diversity staff networks. 'While supporting diversity in the workplace is important, people will question the proliferation of such groups — including one to support those with irritable bowel syndrome. 'The public want SNP ministers to prioritise our overwhelmed public services, not schemes which only serve the SNP's so-called inclusion agenda.' A Scottish government spokesman said: 'Staff networks are valued for the connections, opportunities and peer support they deliver for their members, as well as the contribution they make to enhancing inclusion at the Scottish government.'
