US extends deadline for reciprocal tariffs on EU to August 1
The order means that the deadline which had been due to fall tomorrow (Wednesday, July 9) will now be pushed back to August 1.
President Trump's decision was "based on additional information and recommendations from various senior officials, including information on the status of discussions with trading partners".
The US administration has already placed a 50% tariff on all US imports of steel and aluminium, along with a 25% tariff on cars and car parts.
A universal baseline 10% tariff also remains in place on most other exports to the US. The proposed US reciprocal tariffs could result in that baseline tariff increasing to 50% for the EU.
Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris, who was briefed on the ongoing EU-US trade talks last night, has welcomed the extension.
The Tánaiste said he remains "cautiously optimistic we can reach a balanced, forward-looking agreement in principle".
"However, it remains the position of the EU and the Irish government that we would like to conclude discussions on a trade agreement before August 1," he said.
"I want to be clear that while it is likely there will be some form of tariffs going forward, their imposition even at a lower rate is bad for consumers, jobs, economic growth and investment.
"As I have been saying for some time, the uncertainty is also bad for economic confidence and Irish businesses seeking clarity on the trading environment in which they operate.
"We have consistently called for zero-for-zero tariffs in as many areas as possible and I know the EU has advocated this course of action," he added.
The Tánaiste said his "hope is that in the coming days and weeks both sides can work intensively and constructively to bring about an agreement".
It is understood that Tánaiste Harris will update his Cabinet colleagues on the current situation today.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Trump's week: out of the rough for now
This week, not for the first time, Donald Trump was accused of cheating at golf. Video footage from a round at a Scottish course appeared to show an aide surreptitiously placing a ball in a more favourable position. The metaphor is almost too easy. In both golf and politics, the US president plays a game in which rules are negotiable and perception trumps process. Yet even by the standards of his tumultuous presidency, Trump had reason to feel buoyed this week. Two significant trade deals – one with the European Union, the other with Japan – allowed him to claim vindication for his unorthodox approach to international economics. He has long argued that the global trading system short-changes the US and that tough talk and tougher tariffs would redress the balance. His critics, including most mainstream economists, have warned of retaliation, inflation and lost jobs. But, so far, the economic data has not borne out those dire predictions. Stock markets remain steady and recent opinion polls suggest Trump is regaining public trust in his handling of the economy. Flush with this perceived success, he has pushed further. New and broader tariffs were announced on Friday, targeting countries he claims have taken advantage of American goodwill such as Canada and Brazil. At the same time, he has signalled a shift on Russia, threatening imminent fresh sanctions unless progress is made on the Ukraine conflict. But warning signs are emerging. Revised labour market data revealed a marked slowdown in job creation over the last quarter. That followed a disappointing GDP report indicating that consumer spending – a key pillar of US growth – is cooling. The Federal Reserve, long a punching bag for the president, may now be forced to re-evaluate its reluctance to cut interest rates when it meets in September. READ MORE The bigger picture remains murky. Few details of the much trumpeted trade deals have been finalised. Implementation timelines are vague. So far, the primary impact of Trump's tariff policy has been to inject uncertainty into the global economy, not least in Ireland. The Department of Finance warned this week that the latest round of US tariffs could reduce Irish job creation by as much as 70,000 over the next five years. This is a serious threat, though not an existential one. The true risk lies in the White House's apparent addiction to drama. If the remainder of Trump's presidency continues to be defined by impulse, personal grievance and sudden policy shifts, then this current period of relative calm could prove fleeting. For now, he may feel like a winner. But in politics as in golf, it is not how you start that counts. It is where the ball finally comes to rest.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump orders firing of labour statistics commissioner after dismal employment report
Donald Trump on Friday ordered that the commissioner of the US Labour Department's Bureau of Labour Statistics be fired after data showed weaker than expected employment growth in July and large downward revisions to the prior two months' job counts. Erika McEntarfer was nominated by Mr Trump's predecessor Joe Biden to serve in the role in 2023 and was confirmed by the US Senate the following year. It was not immediately clear whether Ms McEntarfer, whom Mr Trump accused of faking the jobs numbers, had been fired. 'We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified,' Mr Trump said in a post on Truth Social. The US president claimed that Ms McEntarfer had 'faked' employment figures in the run-up to last year's election, in a bid to boost his Democrat rival Kamala Harris's chances of victory. He insisted that the US economy was, in fact, 'BOOMING' on his watch. There is no evidence to back Mr Trump's claims of data manipulation by the bureau, the statistical agency that compiles the closely watched employment report as well as consumer and producer price data. The White House did not respond immediately to questions about Mr Trump's post. His comments come at a time when the Trump administration's mass lay-offs of federal government workers have raised concerns about the quality of US economic data, long seen as the gold standard. Earlier this year, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick disbanded two expert committees that worked with the government to produce economic statistics. Mr Lutnick has also floated the idea of stripping out government spending from the gross domestic product report, claiming 'governments historically have messed with GDP'. The bureau has already reduced data collection for its consumer price data and producer price reports. Economists attributed the sharply slower job growth to Mr Trump's trade and immigration policies. The report showed the US economy created only 73,000 jobs last month. Data for May and June were revised sharply down to show 258,000 fewer jobs created than had been previously reported. – Reuters (c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2025
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trading principles for predictability — what the EU gave up to avoid a tariff war
In the hours following the announcement that the US and EU had struck a deal last weekend on tariffs, European reaction was mixed. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the deal, which imposes 15% tariffs on most items going both ways, "creates certainty in uncertain times" and "delivers stability and predictability, for citizens and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic" as she tried to sell the deal to the 27 EU member states. But if Ms von der Leyen expected a lap of honour to ease her troubled start to her second term, one was not coming. "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission," French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou wrote on X of what he called the "von der Leyen-Trump deal". German Chancellor Friedrich Merz himself initially appeared satisfied, saying that the agreement "succeeded in averting a trade conflict that would have hit the export-oriented German economy hard". But by Monday, amid cross-party criticism, Mr Merz said the deal would "substantially damage" his nation's finances, but acknowledged that the negotiating team "couldn't expect to achieve any more" as Mr Trump's willingness to enter into a 30% trade war was apparent. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an ally of Mr Trump, said the US president "ate von der Leyen for breakfast" while Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said he would support it "without any enthusiasm". Across the bloc, there has been criticism of Europe's perceived capitulation, with many echoing Mr Bayrou's sentiments that it poses fundamental questions about the cohesiveness of the project. German Green MP Sandra Detzer told her parliament that the EU "has agreed to a deal that abandons fundamental principles of rules-based global trade, instead of long-term stability". Ms Detzer's alarm is representative of a particular sharp end of the deal. According to one think tank, the deal will cost the German economy around €6.5bn in terms of its GDP in the first year, while experts have slashed the country's growth forecasts in recent months. Fabio de Masi, a German MEP, told EuroNews this week that not only was the deal bad, it was "a betrayal" for which Ms von der Leyen should resign. The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceuticals entering the US, and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth €643bn over three years. But as the tariffs were set to kick in on Friday, the two sides had not agreed on all of the details, which Ms von der Leyen's commission has stressed will be a "set of principles" and not a trade deal. On Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said that "from there will flow the additional negotiated exemptions that we're looking to bake into our agreement with the US". Drinks tariffs What shape those carveouts take is still to be decided, with a 15% tariff applying until they are. That is of particular concern to the drinks industry across the continent. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. The US tariff on European spirits is currently 10%. Brussels is keen to reduce that to zero or, for wine at least, to the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) rates that are set on a fixed cost per litre basis, rather than in percentage terms. Until recently, spirits had benefited from zero tariffs between the US and EU following an agreement in 1997 that also included other countries such as Canada and Japan. That lasted until 2018, when the EU response to US steel and aluminium tariffs included increased duties on US bourbon and other spirits. These were suspended in 2021. From Irish whiskey to French and Spanish wines, exporters across Europe have been arguing for a carveout on their products. File photo US most-favoured-nation rates for wine are 19.8c per litre for sparkling and 6.3c per litre for most other wine, which equates to very low rates in most cases. But as Mr Trump signed an executive order overnight into Friday, there was no movement on the exemption and the drinks industry will, for now at least, pay the 15% rate. With EU officials privately briefing Reuters that negotiations could run into late autumn, that will mean financial pain for those businesses in the short-term, at least. Speaking to journalists at a press conference on Thursday, commission spokesperson Olof Gill said: 'The commission remains determined to achieve and secure the maximum number of carve-outs, including for traditional EU products such as wine and spirits. 'It is not our expectation that wine and spirits would be included as an exemption in the first group announced by the US tomorrow, and therefore that sector, as with all other economic sectors, will be captured by the 15% ceiling.' Motor tariffs In Germany, a number of car manufacturers revised down profit guidance on the back of the tariffs, which will face a 15% tariff as well, but for BMW, the impact of the agreement was "exaggerated". 'I think this tariff discussion is way exaggerated and also its effects on the industry,' chief executive Oliver Zipse told the Financial Times. 'What's more important is the question, are the products attractive?' Carveouts At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, enterprise minister Peter Burke updated ministers on the detail of the weekend's agreement, telling journalists that there will be exemptions to the tariff regime, with aviation one for which Ireland had successfully argued alongside others. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carveouts. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agri-foods and potentially spirits.' Ireland, like many other countries, is banking on the carveouts agreed protecting key sectors like agri-foods and that the rate for pharmaceuticals would not exceed 15%. Like many countries across Europe, ministers here are privately saying that the deal is far from ideal, but also query what else is to be done. By Friday, they could point to Mr Trump's executive order, which imposed tariffs on many countries with whom he had not negotiated. But there is also acceptance that the tariff regime brings with it a new reality, one with which the EU needs to grapple. If countries are arguing for exceptions, how does the European negotiating team balance those interests? And what will the reaction be when the final deal is reached?
