Jammu & Kashmir After Pahalgam Terror Attack: Centre's ‘High-Five' To Boost Tourism
Last Updated:
The Centre has identified five focus areas to support locals as Jammu and Kashmir tourism has been hit in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, say top sources
Amid the impact of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor on tourism in Jammu and Kashmir – the primary source of income of the Union Territory – the Centre has identified five focus areas to support locals, said top sources.
Meanwhile, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah, too, also made multiple appeals to the Centre for assistance to revive the state's fortunes.
In Pahalgam to chair a cabinet meeting. We came to express solidarity with the local population. We've also come to thank all the tourists who are slowly making their way back to Kashmir & to Pahalgam. pic.twitter.com/VhKVyWV4Kd — Omar Abdullah (@OmarAbdullah) May 27, 2025
A look at the five focus areas:
1. Better promotion: Various steps will be taken to reassure the public, using celebrities, influencers, and top political leaders, that India has responded decisively to Pakistan and that security forces are vigilant. Therefore, there is no reason for concern when travelling to the region. Several central ministers are expected to visit Jammu and Kashmir in the coming weeks. The source also stated, 'Many foreign delegations have approached India after the Pahalgam attack expressing their willingness to visit Jammu and Kashmir for meetings. This will significantly boost confidence-building measures."
2. Identifying Tourist Destinations: Beyond the usual tourist hotspots like Gulmarg and Pahalgam, the government is keen to identify other potential destinations to expand tourism in the state. The source added, 'We have identified at least three to four new destinations in both Jammu and Kashmir to diversify tourism offerings."
3. Financial Assistance: The Centre is also engaging with institutions like the World Bank to promote these new destinations and develop necessary infrastructure.
4. Supporting J&K: With the regional economy, significantly impacted by cancellations following the Pahalgam attack, the Centre is committed to supporting the state. This includes considering financial assistance if required.
5. Developing Untapped Areas: The government is also exploring the promotion of various untapped areas with significant potential in Jammu and Kashmir. This includes promoting religious tourism, adventure tourism, etc. 'Many significant places have been overlooked and hold immense potential. For example, numerous ancient temples located in secluded areas could become focal points for religious tourism," the source explained.
My honour and Privilege to share some time with the real heros & brave hearts ! What a beautiful evening 🙏🏻🇮🇳 https://t.co/AJeQWAG7K1 — Huma Qureshi (@humasqureshi) May 28, 2025
Since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, Jammu and Kashmir's tourism sector has experienced significant growth.
Between 2021 and 2024, the Jammu division consistently attracted more tourists than the Kashmir Valley.
In 2024, for instance, Jammu welcomed over 20 million tourists, while Kashmir received approximately 3.5 million visitors.
First Published:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Are we frittering away the gains of post-Pahalgam political consensus?
Are we frittering away the gains of post-Pahalgam political consensus? While all-party delegations project the face of a united India on foreign shores, divisive rhetoric and internal bickering back home are doing quite the opposite
Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage
The political class will do better if it stops desisting from trying to derive electoral mileage from the highly successful Operation Sindoor that was executed recently. The military aspects of the operation have been largely praised (even by objective western experts), but the political aftermath has proven far more complex. The ruling party has come under scrutiny for allegedly using the operation's success to enhance its nationalistic image ostensibly for electoral gains. On its part, the Opposition has done little better. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge called for a special parliamentary session to discuss the operation in detail. He raised concerns about inconsistencies in official narratives, particularly surrounding reports regarding the number of Indian aircraft lost during the strikes. He also accused the government of 'misleading the nation.' His statement came after the Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan acknowledged the loss of some Indian aircraft but emphasised that the armed forces had adapted quickly to changing tactical scenarios, ultimately achieving the mission objectives. Chauhan categorically refuted Pakistan's assertions of shooting down multiple Indian jets, labelling them as propaganda meant to distort facts. His remarks highlighted the critical role of clear and truthful communication in sustaining public trust and countering misinformation. The political discourse triggered by Operation Sindoor reflects a broader tension between safeguarding national security and navigating partisan interests. While it is natural for political parties to discuss significant national developments, it is imperative that such dialogues remain constructive and rooted in the national interest. Exploiting military operations for electoral advantage not only undermines the integrity of the armed forces but also erodes public confidence in the nation's democratic institutions. As India continues to assess the long-term implications of Operation Sindoor, there is a pressing need for political maturity and a unified stance on issues of national security. Recognising and honouring the courage and competence of the armed forces should transcend political divides. National security must remain above the realm of party politics, treated with the seriousness and dignity it deserves. Also, our political leaders must come to terms with a sobering reality: Operation Sindoor, while tactically successful and symbolically significant, was not a war that we won—nor even a full-scale battle. At best, it was a well-executed skirmish, a calibrated military response to the horrifying Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives. Its importance lies not in territorial gains or dramatic military victories, but in the message it has sent loud and clear-Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for supporting and harbouring terrorist outfits. Precision strikes on terrorist camps disrupted their operations and showcased India's strategic capabilities. However, this operation must not be mistaken for closure. The war on terror is a long and evolving struggle, requiring constant vigilance, strategic foresight, and, above all, national unity. True victory will come not with a single strike, but through sustained efforts to dismantle the networks of extremism to be assured of lasting peace and security. Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India's strategic capability and resolve in the face of terrorism. However, its legacy will be defined not just by military precision but by the manner the nation's political leadership chooses to engage with it. By fostering transparency, encouraging responsible dialogue, and prioritising unity, India can ensure that such operations serve their true purpose—protection and security of all its citizens.
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Kept pleading for help': BJP's Nishikant Dubey cites declassified files to slam Nehru's foreign policy
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey NEW DELHI: BJP MP Nishikant Dubey on Monday launched a sharp attack on the Congress, targeting former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru over his handling of the 1962 Indo-China war. Referring to Nehru's appeals during the conflict, Dubey said, 'Nehru kept pleading for help.' The remark came in response to the Congress party 's criticism of external affairs minister S Jaishankar for 'informing' Pakistan about Operation Sindoor . In retaliation, Dubey took to X to highlight what he called the flawed foreign policy of previous Congress governments, especially under Nehru. Dubey posted a letter written by Nehru to then US President John F Kennedy, calling it 'the second letter written by Iron Lady's father Nehru ji to the American President during the China war. He kept pleading for help.' Sarcastically attacking Nehru's diplomatic approach, Dubey added, 'Pakistan is a brother, a friend, a good neighbour, we will reach an agreement with them, everything was written. But carefully read the excellent foreign policy of the great Nehru ji.' According to Dubey, the US passed Nehru's letter to then Pakistani military ruler Ayub Khan . 'America sent this letter to Pakistan's military ruler Ayub Khan. After seeing this letter, did we give Pakistan a chance to attack India in 1965 or not? What can be said about the person who tells the country's weaknesses to foreigners, especially Pakistan?' Earlier in the day, Dubey also responded to Congress leader Pawan Khera's post on X by digging further into history. He referenced another letter, Nehru's 1945 communication to British Prime Minister Clement Attlee regarding Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.
