
Microplastics are everywhere: 6 ways to help protect your health — and the planet
Plastic pollution has reached every corner of our planet, from the highest mountaintops to deep ocean trenches. It also contaminates the air we breathe and water we drink.
According to a 2023 report from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world produces around 400 million tonnes of plastic waste annually. And around 85 per cent of it ends up in landfills, incinerators or the environment, where it breaks down into hazardous microplastics.
In Plastic People, a documentary from The Nature of Things, Sarika Cullis-Suzuki connects with science journalist Ziya Tong to explore our plastic-filled world and its potential impacts on human health.
Tiny particles, big impact
Microplastics — particles under five millimetres in length — can be deliberately manufactured for inclusion in products like cosmetics. But much of them come from the degradation of packaging, synthetic fabrics, paint, personal care products and other plastic items.
"Some of it, as it breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces, can go up into the atmosphere and travel globally that way," says ecologist Chelsea Rochman in the film.
"It is eaten by almost every level of the food chain … so it's [in] atmospheric currents, global dust cycles, the water cycle, the carbon cycle."
In the documentary, with the help of microplastics researcher Mary Kosuth, Tong uncovers the alarming extent of microplastic contamination, finding it almost everywhere — from household dust to backyard snow to her own body.
"We found it in my blood, we found it in my feces," Tong says. Microplastics have also been found in human lungs, placentas and even our brains.
A study commissioned by the World Wide Fund for Nature found that people could be ingesting five grams or a credit card's worth of plastic every week.
"The study of toxicity of microplastics is in its infancy, but we're beginning to learn that they are a transport mechanism for getting bad chemicals into people," says Pete Myers, chief scientist at the not-for-profit Environmental Health Sciences.
Phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA) are two compounds commonly found in plastic that can make their way into the body. In Plastic People, experts discuss how they impact the endocrine system and have been linked to various health problems, including obesity, fertility issues and cancer.
Addressing our microplastics problem
Purging our world of microplastics seems like a daunting challenge.
As a longtime activist against plastic pollution, Tong believes that change needs to happen at the government level. "Ultimately, this is about policy," she says in the documentary. "As individuals, we're in a trap. There's only so much we can do."
As a step toward this, the UNEP is currently developing an international legally binding agreement on plastic pollution. It will address "the full life cycle of plastic," the authority says, from production to disposal.
Meanwhile, there are lots of folks working on plastic alternatives. In Plastic People, Cullis-Suzuki visits CTK Bio, a Surrey, B.C., company that's developing innovative biodegradable materials and products — like a biostraw that would compost in three to six months.
However, until government change comes into effect and alternative materials are the norm, what can we as individuals do? Here are a few steps you can take to protect your health and the planet.
Tip 1: Go for natural fibres
The UNEP estimates that about 60 per cent of material made into clothing is plastic, and these synthetic fabrics are a major source of microplastic contamination.
"As we wear clothing that's increasingly plastic, those fibres shed, go down the drain, [and] wind up in the local lakes and rivers," says author and environmentalist Rick Smith in the documentary.
A simple change is to opt for clothing made from natural fibres, such as cotton, wool and linen, instead of garments made from polyester, nylon and acrylic.
Synthetic clothes don't just shed fibres during wear. Manufacturing, disposal and washing are all sources of microplastic pollution.
In fact, one study showed that a single load of laundry can unleash hundreds of thousands of microfibres into the water supply.
Washing synthetic clothes on a "gentle" cycle with cold water, however, can reduce microplastic shedding by nearly 70 per cent, according to research from conservation group Ocean Wise.
Additionally, using a washing bag can help capture microfibres before they enter the water system.
Tip 3: Replace plastic storage containers and kitchen tools
Plastic particles from containers and bottles can leach into food and drinks — particularly when heated — and over time, they break down into microplastics.
A simple swap is to replace plastic vessels with glass or stainless steel. These materials also tend to last longer, which is better for the environment.
Switching from plastic cutting boards and utensils to alternatives like bamboo, wood and stainless steel can also help minimize exposure.
"I threw out my plastic chopping board," Tong says in the documentary. "I was realizing, 'Oh my goodness, every time I use my knife, I am chopping microplastics into the food that I'm eating.'"
Tip 4: Avoid microbeads
Certain personal care products, such as cleansers, shampoos, toothpaste, shower gels and cosmetics, contain microplastics in the form of microbeads. These tiny plastic particles are frequently made of polyethylene and are used to provide exfoliation.
To reduce your exposure to microbeads (and prevent them from entering the water supply), check labels for ingredients such as polyethylene or polypropylene, and choose natural exfoliants instead.
Tip 5: Cut back on single-use plastic
According to the UNEP, over one million plastic bottles are bought every minute, and a staggering five trillion plastic bags are used every year worldwide.
"Almost half of all plastic produced goes into single-use items," says Smith in the documentary.
Invest in alternatives like reusable shopping bags, water bottles and containers — and bring them with you — to reduce your need to purchase and use these items.
Tip 6: Make swaps at the grocery store
To decrease microplastic exposure in food, avoid plastic-packaged products. Check if items are available in glass or paper packaging.
Recent research also shows that highly processed foods contain significantly more microplastics per gram than less processed options. This may be because these foods spend more time in contact with plastic production equipment, or spend more time exposed to dust and other airborne contamination. So you may want to consider swapping products like chicken nuggets for whole chicken breasts.
You can also limit your consumption of shellfish, since they're prone to microplastic buildup from oceans and we eat them whole — including their digestive systems.
Drink a lot of tea? Some tea bags are made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and nylon, and McGill University researchers found that steeping a single plastic-based teabag in hot water can release 11.6 billion microplastic particles per cup. To minimize plastic exposure, try switching to paper bags or loose-leaf tea.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
18-07-2025
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: David Suzuki taught me to fear the future — now I'm pushing back
As a university student, I read The Sacred Balance by David Suzuki in 1998. Like many young people, I was moved but also frightened. The book didn't just inform me; it left me with a deep fear about the future. I believed the world was headed for environmental collapse, and I carried those ideas for years. Article content Article content Article content Now, decades later, I've lived a full life. I've worked, created, raised a family and built a career trying to make a difference. And over time, I saw something remarkable: the world didn't fall apart. Humanity rose, technology advanced and real environmental problems were solved. The world, while still imperfect, adapted and improved. Article content Article content Article content But I also saw something else: a growing divide between those with access to affordable, reliable energy and those without. As a documentary filmmaker, I've seen the harsh realities of energy poverty around the world — its devastating impact on education, health care, safety and opportunity. The disparity I witnessed wasn't just economic; it was profoundly humanitarian. And energy poverty is too often ignored in fear-driven climate narratives. Article content Article content Article content So, when I read Suzuki's recent claim that 'it's too late,' that humanity has lost the fight against climate change, I knew I had to speak up. It's time we push back against this kind of environmental extremism. Article content Article content Just the other night, my teenage son told me about a video he saw online pushing the same despair I encountered almost 30 years ago. The message hasn't changed; it's just gotten darker. Suzuki now says we should 'hunker down' and prepare for collapse, suggesting survival will depend on isolated communities enduring the fallout. Article content What does it do for our children to hear that we've already lost? That 'we're going to overshoot' planetary boundaries? That our systems are too broken to fix? Let's call it what it is: alarmism. And it's not helping. Article content Article content We don't need exaggerated claims or bestselling books that fuel them. We need realism — balanced, science-based conversations that acknowledge the urgency of environmental concerns and the reality of global energy needs. That means embracing tradeoffs and recognizing that conventional energy still plays a critical role in our lives and in lifting people out of poverty. Article content Article content Many young people I work with already understand this. They know Canada's energy future must be a responsible blend of conventional and renewable sources — balancing emissions, innovation, affordability and meaningful partnerships with Indigenous communities.


National Observer
11-07-2025
- National Observer
Is Suzuki right that it's 'too late'? We are in an era of simultaneous wins and losses
I didn't mean for it to happen. I was watching a Disney show on my laptop with my 10-year-old son. But when the show ended, and I closed the tab, the next open tab filled my screen. It was an article from iPolitics with the neck-throttling headline: ''It's too late': David Suzuki says the fight against climate change is lost.' 'What?' cried my son. 'David Suzuki said that!' I was caught off-guard. 'It's complicated,' I stammered, that last refuge of scoundrels. 'He is wrestling with some despair after trying for so many years.' He's in good company. Truth is, the article caught many of us off-guard, if my social network is any indication. Some of its readers concur, while others were angry. 'I'm really annoyed about that Suzuki thing. It's irresponsible,' a colleague texted me. 'He is saying out loud the private thoughts that many of us have all the time,' wrote Devika Shah, executive director of Environment Funders Canada on LinkedIn. 'It was a tough read, but we humans are where we are. For my fellow climate peeps who think he is wrong to say this — please recognize that he's earned the right.' All of us who work on climate have long walked a razor's edge between hope and despair, and the last few months (or years) have made it near impossible to keep one's balance. But I would put the current predicament differently. While we all know Suzuki as a communicator, he is firstly a scientist and is speaking some basic scientific truths. He's also trying to sound an alarm and rouse us out of a collective stupor, and he's not wrong to want to do that — while polling indicates Canadians are worried about climate change, we are clearly not as scared as we should be. The scientific community as a whole is worried. The situation is grim — temperature increases are happening faster than predicted, extreme weather events are escalating, planetary boundaries are being breached. The assaults on the people and places we love aren't a distant threat somewhere else, sometime in the future — they are here and now. Governments throw in the towel I, too, am losing faith. All of us who work on climate have long walked a razor's edge between hope and despair, and the last few months (or years) have made it near impossible to keep one's balance. We are all wrestling with the jarring and growing disconnect between climate events and our politics. President Trump's brutal roll-back of climate actions south of the border is throwing us all for a loop. But even in our own country, our federal and provincial governments are acting like a bunch of surrender monkeys, walking away from their climate commitments. Our official climate plans are in a shambles and riddled with incoherence, as governments continue to approve new fossil fuel infrastructure while abandoning carbon pricing, emission caps and, potentially, vehicle mandates. The defeatism is hard to take. The complicated psychology of now All that said, I would put the current predicament differently than saying it's 'too late.' More accurately, it both is and isn't too late. Those of us trying to move the public to action must hold with care the collective psychology of the moment, and engage in responsible truth-telling. For example, the leaders we most remember from the Second World War were outstanding communicators who managed to walk a difficult line — they were forthright with the public about the severity of the threat, while still managing to impart hope. That's what this moment requires. We are motivated by a complicated and highly personal mix of hope and fear, love and anger. All of which needs to be tapped to win this fight. There is no place for false optimism. But as the climate scientist Kate Marvel says, this battle for our lives doesn't need optimists, it needs heroes — people of courage, which she defines as, 'the resolve to do well without the assurance of a happy ending.' Ten years ago, the countries of the world signed the Paris Agreement and committed to do what they could to keep global temperature rise below 1.5 degrees Celsius. Sadly, on that score, it is indeed too late. Admitting this defeat is not something that should be done nonchalantly; it is a brutal indictment of us all. In Paris, the rallying cry of Pacific Island nations and others from the Global South was '1.5 to stay alive.' That threshold is indeed existential for them, and we have failed them. But the climate fight is not something we either win or lose. As the saying goes, it functions as a 'matter of degrees.' Each incremental increase in temperature comes with devastating losses to the people and places we love. But it is also the case that each incremental increase we prevent saves millions. While we are already witnessing the death and destruction that comes with 1.5 degrees, a 2-degree world — which can still be prevented — will be that much worse, while a 3-degree world is unimaginable, and a 4-degree world is not one any of us would want our children and grandchildren to inhabit. To not continue to do everything we can to avoid that next incremental increase is obscene. The awkwardness of the current period is that, for the next many years, we are going to experience both losses and wins simultaneously. Yes, we need to be eyes wide open to the devastating extreme events now underway. But we also need to be alive to the hopeful trends: China looks to have peaked its GHG emissions, years ahead of schedule; Europe is driving down emissions much faster than Canada; in Norway, 97 per cent of new vehicle sales are now zero-emission; in the UK, emissions are now lower than at any time since the start of the industrial revolution in the late 1800's; and around the world, the adoption of renewable energy is exploding. The point being, the struggle to tackle the climate emergency is a steep climb down, not a cliff. This September, the global climate movement will be trying to recapture some of the lost momentum of recent post-pandemic years. At rallies across Canada and around the world, under the banner ' Draw the Line,' people are being invited to shake off their feelings of isolation and join this call: 'Floods, droughts, storms and heatwaves are getting worse. Food and energy costs are going up while a few billionaires profit and prop up the industries that harm people and pollute our lands, air and waters. Indigenous leaders from the Amazon to the Pacific have spoken out: our future is at stake. To solve this crisis, the answer is us — the people… This September we will come together to draw the line against injustice, pollution, and violence — and for a future built on peace, clean energy and fairness. This world is ours. This is our line to draw.'


Winnipeg Free Press
06-06-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
‘Nature of Things' looks at how parenthood changes men's brains and bodies with ‘Dad Bods'
TORONTO – A new episode of CBC's 'The Nature of Things,' timed to Father's Day, explores some of the ways men's brains and bodies adapt to parenthood. The episode titled 'Dad Bods' takes viewers across Canada and around the world to look at social and scientific elements of fatherhood. The Canadian Press spoke with director Christine McLean about how the doc, available now on CBC Gem, came together. CP: Tell me about the tone of the documentary. McLean: I like to think that it's not just humorous, but it's warm-hearted… I think the most important point that came out of all this science, most of it quite recent, only in the last 20 years or so, is that we as humans, we have these incredible bodies that are so adaptable. And especially our brains. What the science is showing us is that given the opportunity, we all have the potential, whether we're male or female, to be great nurturing parents. Dads become more empathetic than they might have been before they had children, but they also become experts in their own child. The part of the brain that's stimulated is the part that allows us to read social cues. And they really become very intelligent in terms of figuring out why a baby is in distress. CP: Did anything you learned while making the documentary surprise you? McLean: I did not know that a man's testosterone typically goes down after he has a child. It made a certain amount of sense because I think many of us notice that when a person becomes a parent, they become a softer, gentler version of themselves… I had no idea that that was linked to biological changes inside that person. That was the first surprise. All men are impacted by hands-on care of children: grandfathers, uncles, adoptive fathers. If they're holding that child, they have those hormonal changes happening. That was all new to me. I think new to most people was the recent science about the benefits of what they call skin-to-skin care, which is common in Canadian hospitals. I remember noticing a few years ago friends would send me photographs of babies being held by their dads, and the dads would have their shirts off. And I'm thinking, what is happening in the delivery room these days? It puzzled me. Is this a weird new selfie that people are taking? Little did I know that there's all kinds of physical benefits to that. The father's heart rate goes down, his blood pressure goes down, the baby is comforted. But also the baby often will take in the good gut bacteria that can be on the dad's skin and it helps their digestive system. And who knew that? That was only discovered a couple of years ago. And we now know that for babies who are born via caesarean section, they don't get the gut bacteria from the mom that they get with a conventional birth. And yet, if dads practise skin-to-skin care, the latest science shows that their contribution to that baby's gut health is as robust as the mom's would have been had she delivered vaginally. It's extraordinary. CP: The episode made me think about masculinity, and the conversations we're having around what masculinity means. McLean: It wasn't one of my goals to delve into that, but watching it, you can't help but think about these things. I would say that anybody watching this documentary is not going to be left with the feeling that a good father isn't masculine. I think they're going to have the exact opposite feeling. The book that inspired it ('Father Time: A Natural History of Men and Babies' by American primatologist Sarah Blaffer Hrdy) delves into that a little bit more. There is this sense that if we are to give men permission or at least encourage them to be close to their children, that the changes that happen in their body result in a different kind of masculinity. I'm not going to say it's less masculine… I think that there's kind of a new version of a hero that's evolving when it comes to fathering children. And I think today's heroes are the dads who get up in the night, the dads that change the diapers, the dads that worry about whether their children are happy. And I don't think that makes them less a man. I think it makes them a greater human being. And I think that discovering there was so much going on in the male body in a sense takes gender out of the equation. CP: How would you respond to someone who doesn't like the idea of their testosterone level going down? McLean: The fact that testosterone goes down, when that was discovered about 20 years ago, it attracted a lot of attention and led to this burgeoning field of science. And I can only assume that there was some concern about that on the part of men, because it's testosterone that allows men and women to build body mass. It leads to competitiveness, it leads to assertiveness. None of those things are bad. The thought of losing some of that, I can understand where somebody — particularly a young man — might not like thinking about that. But anybody who watches this documentary will see that the rewards for being a hands-on dad are so great. Losing a little testosterone in the process is no big deal when you see the rewards, the bonds that develop with your child. Weekly A weekly look at what's happening in Winnipeg's arts and entertainment scene. We couldn't fit everything into the documentary, but what the data shows is, in addition to fathers living longer and having greater health, they have stronger marriages. They have better relationships with their kids. We were focused on the dads, but if you were to look at the children, there are so many profound benefits to a child to having a hands-on dad, in terms of how well they do in school, how well their mental health is. And I think that a good dad makes for a good family, and good families make for a great community, and there's just these ripples of positive impact from dads being as involved as they are today. This interview was edited for length and clarity. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025.