logo
EMIs fall as state-run banks pass on rate-cut bonanza to existing borrowers

EMIs fall as state-run banks pass on rate-cut bonanza to existing borrowers

The 50 bps repo cut announced on June 6 is the steepest since May 2020 in response to the Covid pandemic when the RBI slashed it by a steeper 75 bps, while the 100 bps CRR is historic.(Representational Image)
(Photo | R Satish Babu, EPS)
Business
EMIs fall as state-run banks pass on rate-cut bonanza to existing borrowers
Major PSBs like BoB, PNB, BoI, and Uco Bank have slashed their repo-linked lending rates by 50 bps, leading the rate-cut trend to boost credit growth.
Benn Kochuveedan
MUMBAI: Many large public sector banks such as Bank of Baroda, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India, and Uco Bank have reduced their repo-linked lending rates by a full 50 bps to their existing borrowers in response to the Reserve Bank's unconventional 50 bps reduction in the repo rate to 5.5% last Friday. Also slashing the cash reserve ratio (CRR) by a steep 100 bps to 3% in a staggered manner between September and end-November which will help them protect their margins which have been under pressure since long due to higher pricing of deposits.
The 50 bps repo cut announced on June 6 is the steepest since May 2020 in response to the Covid pandemic when the RBI slashed it by a steeper 75 bps, while the 100 bps CRR is historic. The CRR reduction will release Rs 2.5 trillion in lendable money to banks, which means they can lend 10x more or worth Rs 25 trillion. The CRR will be reduced in four equal instalments of 25 bps each beginning September 1 and ending November 29. This will also protect banks' margins, which Crisil considers to boost their NIMs by 10-15 bps.
Leading the rate-reduction bandwagon are major public sector banks such as Bank of Baroda, Punjab National Bank, Bank of India, and Uco Bank which have reduced their repo-linked lending rates (RLLR) by a full 50 bps.
This means that existing home and auto loan borrowers would see their EMIs fall considerably or their loan tenor coming down. Typically for a Rs 50 lakh loan, a 25 bps reduction in interest rate means, EMI coming down by a month. In the present case, it means the loan tenor is down by two EMIs.
Bank of Baroda has cut its RLLR from 8.65% to 8.15% effective June 7, while PNB's rate will be down from 8.85% to 8.35%, starting June 9, and Bank of India has lowered the rates from 8.85% to 8.35% effective June 6 itself. Uco Bank has reduced its RLLR from 8.80% to 8.30% and has also cut its MCLR by 10 bps across all tenors.
However, the private sector peers who are more cautious of their margins are taking a more calculated approach, following suit with marginal reduction (10-20 bps) in MCLR rates. This is permissible as the RBI mandates banks to lower the repo cut only from the first day of the next month and not immediately.
Among the private lenders, HDFC Bank has cut its MCLR across tenures by 10 bps, effective June 7; Karur Vysya Bank has cut MCLR by 10-20 bps. But ICICI Bank and Axis Bank are yet to offer any reductions.
Industry leaders SBI and HDFC Bank have home loan rates as low as 8% now and if they pass on the entire benefit to existing customers their rates will be 7.5% for loans above Rs 50 lakhs and under 8.5% for lower loan amounts.
For the system, the rate cut move by the central bank means, better rate transmission. System-wide only almost 45% of loans are repo-linked but all new retail loans have to repo-inked. Repo linked loans came into force in October 2019.
RLLR is the rate at which banks lend to customers whose loans are directly linked to the repo rate, while the marginal cost of funds based lending rate (MCLR) is the minimum interest rate that a bank can offer on loans, determined by factors such as the bank's cost of funds, operating expenses, and required margins, and typically responds more slowly to policy rate changes than repo-linked rates.
While the move is favourable for existing borrowers, it has implications for depositors as banks are expected to cut pricing of fixed deposits and other term instruments, in line with falling lending rates and increased liquidity. Motilal Oswal estimates 30-70 bps in fixed deposit returns across tenures sooner than later.
While repo-linked loans respond instantly to monetary policy changes, deposit rates tend to adjust more slowly due to regulatory norms and competitive market pressures. As a result, lenders may face margin pressure, the firm noted in its report, over the next two quarters until deposit repricing aligns with the new rate environment.
The 100-bps phased reduction in the CRR will inject Rs 2.5 trillion into the banking system, with which they can make incremental lending of 10 times more—or worth Rs 25 trillion. Crisil sees the NIM compression which was seen at 10-20 bps earlier due to the past two repo reduction of 25 bps each in February and April, now coming down to 5-15 bps only.
'The CRR cut will support NIMs in two ways. One is the direct addition to income from the flexibility to deploy the funds till now parked as the CRR into the business. Two, more systemic liquidity after the CRR cut and the RBI's other measures will ease pressure on the cost of deposits, offsetting the downward pressure on NIMs,' Ajit Velonie, a senior director with Crisil said.
'The frontloading of the repo rate cut will have had a somewhat higher impact on the yield side of NIMs than previously expected. This is because 45% of the overall loan assets are linked to an repo-linked now. Typically, these are repriced rapidly after rate cuts. On the other hand, the MCLR -linked loans are re-priced at a relatively slower pace and by a lower extent than the external benchmark-linked loan rate. The frontloading thus accentuates the impact on loan yields,' Velonie said.
According to Subha Sri Narayanan, a director with Crisil, 'the direct impact on NIMs will be from the flexibility to deploy the Rs 2.5 trillion of liquidity released from the CRR cut into interest-bearing assets. Given the planned staggered implementation, in the current fiscal, this should benefit NIMs by 3-4 bps, while on a full-year basis, there would be a 7 bps benefit. Secondly, the additional liquidity available for lending will ease the pressure on deposit growth that, in turn, increases the flexibility banks have to cut their deposit rates. Overall, we expect the compression in bank NIMs to be 5-15 bps this fiscal, compared with 10-20 bps estimated earlier.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In a first in 14 years, PSU banks beat private ones in loan growth
In a first in 14 years, PSU banks beat private ones in loan growth

Time of India

time21 minutes ago

  • Time of India

In a first in 14 years, PSU banks beat private ones in loan growth

MUMBAI: For the first time since 2011, public sector banks (PSBs) have surpassed private banks (PVBs) in loan growth. At the end of FY25, PSBs outpaced PVBs by 4 percentage points, with PSBs recording a 13.1% year-on-year loan growth compared to 9% for PVBs. The strong performance was across multiple segments, including traditional areas like mortgages and corporate loans, as well as various non-mortgage retail segments such as auto loans. "Private banks have historically commanded premium valuations due to their steady market share gains, growing 6-7% faster than the system growth rates," said Pranav Gundlapalle, India head for financials at Bernstein. "If the growth advantage continues to narrow in the medium-term, the case for premium valuations weakens. While private banks still offer above average profitability and trade at reasonable valuations, the current risk of a relative growth slowdown may not be fully priced in." 'Capable competitors' ICICI Bank 's price-to-book (P/B) ratio is currently around 3.5. In contrast, State Bank of India P/B is around 1.5, reflecting differing market perceptions of the two banks' growth prospects, profitability, and risk profiles. Private sector banks have been flagging this increased aggression from public sector banks and the resultant increase in growth and profitability pressures. "There are very large, capable competitors who are also priced meaningfully below us," Anindya Banerjee , group CFO, ICICI Bank, said in its post earnings analyst call on April 19. "It does create some challenges in terms of growth, but I guess that's part of life. So, we will have to keep dealing with it as we go along and look at how we can drive other levers to continue to maintain profitable growth." HDFC Bank has also been flagging the same issue for several quarters. "We have seen over last 12 months, 18 months, the larger ticket corporate loans and the larger ticket SME loans, have been competitive, particularly coming from certain public sector institutions where the growth is an objective and not necessarily margin or returns, we have seen that pricing is very, very low on those," Srinivasan Vaidyanathan , chief financial officer, HDFC Bank had said in April. Substantial Loan Base RBI data and Bernstein analysis showed that the difference between loan growth of PSU and PVB banks was around 4% at the start of 2011. This reached a high of 20% in 2016. The growth differential started to reduce with the onset of Covid when it fell again to 4%. The impressive loan growth of public sector banks becomes even more remarkable when considering their substantial existing loan base. As of the end of FY25, PSBs held a total loan portfolio of ?98.2 lakh crore, representing 52.3% of the market share. In comparison, private sector banks (PVBs) had a loan base of ?75.2 lakh crore, accounting for 40% of the total loans. While on average the top 5 PSU banks grew their corporate loans by 10%, private banks saw less than 4% growth. The numbers were skewed because of negative growth for HDFC Bank and IndusInd Bank . On retail loans, while the top five PSU banks grew their book by over 22% at the end of FY25, private banks saw less than 12% growth. Analysts suggest that PSBs also have an upper hand due to higher levels of marginal cost lending rate (MCLR) loans, as they reprice with a two-quarter lag. "PSU banks are also relatively better placed to handle margin pressures due to the high share of MCLR, which ranges between 52-60%," Yes Securities said in a note. "Private sector banks have gained from savings account rate cuts, but they now stand largely equalized with PSU banks."

Shongtong-Karcham gets 2026 deadline, HP bets big on hydro
Shongtong-Karcham gets 2026 deadline, HP bets big on hydro

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Shongtong-Karcham gets 2026 deadline, HP bets big on hydro

Shimla: Himachal Pradesh chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu has set a firm Nov 2026 deadline for the completion of the long-delayed Shongtong-Karcham hydroelectric project, saying the 450-MW plant will generate Rs 1,000 crore in annual revenue and strengthen the state's green energy ambitions. Sukhu on Monday inspected the under-construction site in Kinnaur district — visiting both the power house at Karcham and the barrage site at Powari — where he met engineers and workers. He said that even though the project had dragged on for 13 years, the state's current Congress govt had fast-tracked its progress and was committed to commissioning it on schedule. "This project symbolises our focus on tapping river resources to drive economic growth," Sukhu said, adding that the state was moving actively to regain control over stalled or externally-managed hydroelectric initiatives. He claimed that the govt was assessing the total expenditure incurred on other major hydropower projects — including Dhaulasidh, Luhri, and Sunni — with plans to resume and regulate their construction under state-led terms. "Unlike the previous BJP govt, which compromised state interests, we are prioritising Himachal Pradesh's control over its energy assets," Sukhu said. The CM also announced that HP was advancing plans for a geothermal power facility at Tapri in Kinnaur and expanding its capacity in solar and green hydrogen energy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Despite being an energy-surplus state, HP still buys electricity from neighbouring states during winter for Rs 5 to 6 a unit. Sukhu said the state was ramping up solar-energy generation to offset this seasonal gap. "It has 626 MW worth of solar-power projects in various stages of development currently through the Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (HPPCL)," he said. Revenue Minister Jagat Singh Negi and senior district officials accompanied Sukhu during the site visit. MSID:: 121728609 413 |

Industries minister Harshwardhan Chauhan says Centre not distributing charity to Himachal
Industries minister Harshwardhan Chauhan says Centre not distributing charity to Himachal

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Industries minister Harshwardhan Chauhan says Centre not distributing charity to Himachal

Shimla: Himachal Pradesh industries minister Harshwardhan Chauhan on Monday said that the central govt is not distributing charity to Himachal Pradesh, but the state is only getting its share, like all other 29 states of the country. Responding to the statements made by BJP MPs Anurag Thakur, Suresh Kashyap, and others that the central govt is providing sufficient funds to Himachal, the industries minister clarified that if Himachal is getting funds under the Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Yojana, Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana, or MGNREGA, it is the right of the state. "It is not the case that Himachal started getting these funds only when the BJP came to power in the Centre. Himachal used to get the same funds even when the previous govt was at the Centre as per the set pattern," he added. The minister, however, accused the central govt of not releasing funds to the state govt, especially around Rs 10,000 crore under the post-disaster needs assessment (PDNA), though the state govt sent the claims to the Centre in the financial year 2023-24. He claimed that the central govt is indirectly benefiting other states ruled by the BJP or its allies. Chauhan questioned the BJP leadership in Himachal about whether they got any funds or schemes sanctioned for the hill state other than what the state is getting under the existing schemes. The cabinet minister also held former chief minister and current leader of opposition Jai Ram Thakur, as well as the previous BJP govt, responsible for putting Himachal into a financial mess and a vicious cycle of loans. MSID:: 121728401 413 |

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store