logo
Rick Scott Reveals Republicans Are Absolutely Cutting Medicare

Rick Scott Reveals Republicans Are Absolutely Cutting Medicare

Yahoo06-03-2025

Notorious Medicare thief and Republican Senator Rick Scott is the only one who wants to admit that his GOP colleagues are plotting to gut an essential health care program.
During an appearance at the Rescuing the American Dream Summit in Washington Thursday, Scott said it was only a matter of time before the government would have to cut spending to 'any program you care about.'
'Because Medicare is going bankrupt, Social Security is going bankrupt. You know, inflation can't go away, interest rates can't come down. So, my belief is that … we're gonna have to do this,' the Florida Republican said.
Scott knows a thing or two about bankrupting Medicare. He served as CEO of Columbia/HCA Hospital, which was fined a total of $1.7 billion in 2003 for filing false Medicare claims. At the time, it was the largest health care fraud in history, and while that particular honor has since been passed to another, Scott's honor remains unrestored.
Scott is one of the few Republicans who doesn't seem to be in denial about what having approved the latest budget bill to power Donald Trump's agenda really means. The bill requires the Committee on Energy and Commerce, which oversees Medicaid, to reduce the deficit by at least $880 billion from 2025 to 2034. Mathematically speaking, cuts that big can only come out of massive programs such as Medicaid.
Cutting the incredibly popular program will undoubtedly prove, well, unpopular, but some Republicans have another strategy: Deny, deny, deny.
Republican Representative Brandon Gill tiptoed around the issue during an interview on Fox Business Thursday, driving host Maria Bartiromo up the wall.
'Congressman, I mean, with all due respect, you haven't given me one offset,' Bartiromo pressed. 'OK? You say that you're not gonna have one problem finding an offset, and so far all I've heard you talk about is Elon Musk's fraud, waste, and abuse cuts, as well as eliminating climate change rules. Again, 76 percent of the money is going to mandatory spending. You know that better than anyone! I've got the numbers in front of me. You've got $36 trillion in debt.
'Isn't it time to start looking at the mandatory spending, and trying to figure out how you're actually gonna cut—I mean, I know nobody wants to say this, but you've got stuff like Medicaid, don't you?' Bartiromo asked.
Gill insisted he had described areas that could be cut, but noted that, 'I agree with you, we are going to have to find some rationalizations.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Q&A: David Jolly wants to end Florida's culture wars
Q&A: David Jolly wants to end Florida's culture wars

Axios

time22 minutes ago

  • Axios

Q&A: David Jolly wants to end Florida's culture wars

David Jolly — the lone Democrat in the race for Florida governor — vows to end the state's culture war on Day One if elected. Why it matters: He's a Tampa Bay native and, to some, a déjà vu candidate: another former Republican who became an independent, then revived his political career as a Democrat. But don't call him Charlie Crist. "This isn't a campaign chasing the middle," Jolly told Axios in a recent interview. "It's a campaign chasing big ideas and big solutions." We caught up with him to learn more. Editor's note: This interview has been edited for length and clarity. What are the first three things you would do in office? Propose a catastrophic fund for property insurance to remove hurricanes and natural disaster perils from the private market. Second, we need generational property tax reform. First-time home buyers don't have access to housing, in part, because of the way we do property taxes in Florida. Then, we get rid of the culture wars. And we say this is a state where everybody's welcome, celebrated and lifted up. Your first challenge is to secure the nomination. How do you intend to appeal to the broadest range of Democratic voters, some of whom seem diametrically opposed lately? If we coalesce around an agenda that addresses the affordability crisis for everyone, delivers quality health care and quality public education and reduces the cost of housing. That's this race. I've been all around this state, and let me tell you, the issues that Byron Donalds and Ron DeSantis are talking about are distractions. The Florida Democratic Party is in dire straits. How do you intend to have a fighting chance without much of an apparatus to lean on? The party's values are right and must be amplified, not changed. These values are an economy that works for everyone, a government that administers services to everyone, and a party that restores respect and dignity to everyone, regardless of their skin color, who they love and who they worship. The other piece is that we must recognize that the math is real. There aren't enough Democratic voters in the state to elect a Democratic governor on their own. We have to lead with Democratic values, but build a coalition that includes independents and Republicans. What issues do you believe are the most important to Tampa Bay residents? And how do you plan to address those key issues? We have growth management issues in Tampa Bay and all around the state, where development has gotten ahead of smart growth. We see it in Pasco County, where the amount of development is providing a quality of life for families, but we're running out of water, and we're running out of school capacity. That's a real problem.

Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift
Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift

It appears that the group of American voters who have shifted in large numbers from Democrats to Republicans in recent years on the combustible issue of immigration are actually the nation's immigrants themselves. A look at pre- and post-election surveys from the 2020 and 2024 cycles indicates a 49-point swing by voters born outside the United States – the vast majority of whom are considered immigrants – on which major political party would do a better job handling the issue of immigration. American National Election Studies (ANES) data from the 2020 presidential election indicates voters born in another country said they favored Democrats rather than Republicans on the issue of immigration by a 58%-24% margin. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook Four years later, the data indicated 45% of voters born in another county who cast a ballot in the 2024 presidential election said the GOP would do a better job handling immigration, with 30% pointing to the Democratic Party. There was a smaller but still prominent shift from the Democrats to the Republicans by all voters, according to the data from ANES, which is the oldest election study in the world (dating back to 1952) and is often referred to as the gold standard for election surveys. Read On The Fox News App Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Daron Shaw, who serves as a member of the Fox News Decision Team and is the Republican partner on the Fox News poll, said the large shift toward the GOP on the immigration issue by those born outside the U.S. is "reflective of the fact that immigrant voters started so pro-Democrat. There's more room for them to shift." Shaw also noted that before President Donald Trump first ran for the White House in 2016, immigration and border security were generally seen as separate issues. "Since Trump has come on the scene, those issues have really melded to the Republican advantage," Shaw said. Shaw, a politics professor and chair at the University of Texas, also said "you're seeing a movement towards the Republican Party on immigration because it's been largely focused on border security. That's true with non-immigrant populations as well as immigrant populations." Head Here For The Latest Fox News Reporting, Analysis, And Opinion On The Issue Of Immigration Immigration and border security were key issues that Trump spotlighted as he campaigned to win back the White House in last year's presidential election. Republicans won back control of the presidency and the Senate and defended their small House majority in the 2024 elections. And Republicans made gains among Black, Hispanic and younger voters, all traditional members of the Democratic Party's base. Border security and immigration have remained in the nation's political spotlight in the nearly five months since Trump returned to the White House, thanks to the president's sweeping and controversial moves on the two issues. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by Trump have dominated national headlines for nearly a week. Fox News' Dana Blanton and Victoria Balara contributed to this article source: Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift

Headlines Scream That Democrats Are Doomed Come 2030—But The Reality Is Murkier
Headlines Scream That Democrats Are Doomed Come 2030—But The Reality Is Murkier

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Headlines Scream That Democrats Are Doomed Come 2030—But The Reality Is Murkier

From 30,000 feet, the trendlines for Democrats are cataclysmic: Blue states, particularly the powerhouses of New York and California, are leaching population that's being hoovered up by southern states, particularly Florida and Texas. Come the 2030 census, those blue states will lose House seats and electoral votes and the southern bloc will gain them, making Democrats' path to the White House and to a House majority impossibly difficult. Stack that new reality on top of Republicans' longtime, baked-in Senate advantage, and the future for the political left is grim. 'Texas and Florida will gain and New York and California will likely lose something — the general trends seem clear even if we don't quite have a magnifying glass or a microscope to see exactly what the future will be yet,' Michael Li, senior counsel in the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, told TPM. 'It's not if it's gonna happen, it's the degree to which it'll happen,' added Ken Martis, a political geographer and professor emeritus at West Virginia University. Various models predict the red states scooping up differing numbers of votes and seats. The looming problem twists the knife for an already beleaguered Democratic Party, smarting from a defeat in 2024 and confronted with the future of an increasingly authoritarian Donald Trump in the White House, a Congress under unified Republican control and a Supreme Court well stocked with conservatives. Many news outlets have picked up on the trend, prophesying the Democrats' doom: PBS declared the population shifts to be 'Democrats' future crisis'; the Associated Press underscored that 'Democrats are threatened' by the trend; Newsweek called it a 'problem much bigger than Donald Trump'; the Washington Examiner, perhaps with some glee, urged Democrats to 'come to grips' with the political tsunami rolling their way. Still, who is leading this domestic migration, the odd conditions of the 2020 census and the 'wildcard' of incoming immigration all significantly muddy the political picture, and invite humility about predictions of how America — and its political makeup — may look by 2030. 'The idea that this is an automatic good for Republicans I don't think is true,' Li said. Some of the current trendlines stretch back to the mid-20th century, when industrialized states, particularly the rustbelt, started to lose population. In this 'post-industrial era,' molded in large part by globalization, job hubs across the north started to wither. Within that 'megatrend,' as Martis calls it, are more recent, smaller ones. And a smaller trend that was in full swing at the time of the 2020 census was southern migration, as many jobs went remote during the COVID-19 pandemic and people sought cheaper housing, lower taxes and better climates — to New York and California's detriment and Texas and Florida's gain. Meanwhile, immigration into the United States all but stopped, removing a key means of growth for all of those states, but particularly the ones that weren't benefitting from domestic migration. In the years since, that rush to the south has slowed. As immigration began to flow into the U.S. again, California and New York recouped some of their losses. Still, some of the conditions forcing people out of those blue hubs remain; every expert TPM asked cited housing costs and cost of living as a large part of the southward push. Citing April data, Greg Morrow, a housing and land use policy expert at UCLA, told TPM that California issued 23 permits for new housing per 100,000 people compared to Texas' 71 permits — three times fewer. A gnarled knot of byzantine zoning codes, NIMBY (not in my backyard) protests, outdated, sometimes counterproductive environmental regulations and astronomical construction costs (at least $1 million per affordable housing unit in Los Angeles, according to Morrow) make it difficult for states like California to nimbly adjust. But politicians are reacting. Morrow pointed to a more aggressive stance in the last five years by California's state government to take over in the face of local inertia, proposing and passing laws that unwind some of the strict zoning requirements and allow for more building. 'Things are changing — but it's like turning the Titanic,' he said. But the other side of the ledger isn't stable either. Housing costs in the southern states have started floating up, in part due to the increased demand. Other factors, like skyrocketing home insurance costs in Florida caused by climate change-fueled extreme weather, may dissuade relocation too. And then there's the immigration 'wildcard,' said Bill Frey, a demographer and senior fellow at the Brookings Institute. 'If the Trump administration cools down and slows immigration, it'll impact negatively not only Florida and Texas, but also New York and California,' he said. 'Especially the latter two because they depend a lot on immigration.' When you look under the hood at who is moving to the southern states, it further complicates the political ramifications. 'The people who are adding to Texas' population growth and to Florida's and to North Carolina's are very diverse, a lot of people of color,' Brennan's Li said. 'That could change the politics of the states. We've seen that a little bit already in Georgia and North Carolina — they're on the board now for Democrats.' Li pointed to the Dallas suburbs as some of the fastest growing Black communities in the country. Still, while the politics of the region are already changing, Republicans have the far superior track record in winning those states. To avoid the catastrophe trumpeted by many other news outlets, Democrats will have to craft an electoral strategy — perhaps aided by the states' evolving political composition — that involves picking off some southern states to remain competitive. The next five years are as unpredictable a stretch of American history as we've ever seen: 'There were weird things at the beginning of the decade, and there could be weird things at the end,' Li said. But one thing is certain, he added: 'The party that wins the south wins the future.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store