APEC Backs Global Push For WTO Investment Facilitation For Development Agreement
Jeju, Republic of Korea, 13 May 2025
With cross-border investment facing growing barriers and uncertainty, APEC member economies have expressed collective support for the Investment Facilitation for Development (IFD) Agreement, calling for its integration into the World Trade Organization (WTO) legal framework.
The agreement aims to improve transparency, streamline procedures and create a more predictable environment for investors, particularly in developing economies.
Meeting in Jeju during the Second APEC Senior Officials' Meeting and Related Meetings, the Committee on Trade and Investment and the Investment Experts' Group issued a joint statement encouraging broader participation in the IFD Agreement and its incorporation into the WTO legal framework.
'The IFD Agreement has significant potential to improve the investment and business climate across the world, reducing the cost of investment and making it easier for investors in all sectors to operate, expand and contribute to economic growth,' said Christopher Tan, Chair of the APEC Committee on Trade and Investment.
Tan noted that the IFD Agreement will contribute to the Putrajaya Vision 2040's goal of delivering a transparent and predictable trade and investment environment in the Asia Pacific Region, and further the region's interest to attract and sustain investment.
'Incorporating the IFD Agreement into the WTO framework would be a major step forward for global trade and investment, and a win for the region,' he added.
The joint statement further reinforces the newly updated Investment Facilitation Action Plan (IFAP) 2025, underscoring APEC economies' shared recognition of the IFD Agreement as a key driver in advancing the region's investment goals.
'The effective implementation of the IFD Agreement has the potential to significantly boost investment flows, foster inclusive economic growth and narrow the development gap between economies,' said Faizal Mohd Yusof, Convenor of the APEC Investment Experts' Group.
'It is essential that we sustain momentum toward integrating this Agreement into the WTO framework, ensuring that all economies, regardless of their level of development, can fully benefit,' he concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
06-08-2025
- The Spinoff
Lessons in bipartisanship from a de facto single-party state
At the national infrastructure conference, politicians from both major parties talked a big game about bipartisanship. But their actions tell a different story. The opening keynote at Infrastructure New Zealand's annual conference, Building Nations, was titled 'A Bipartisan Vision to Drive Infrastructure Investment'. It was a highly relevant headline. 'Bipartisanship' is the big buzzword in infrastructure right now. The speaker was Andrew Tan, a high-ranking civil servant in Singapore, talking about some of his country's major projects. That's right, New Zealand is learning about bipartisanship from a country that has had the same party in power since 1959. The second international address was by Dr Alex Katsanos, who spoke about the national infrastructure plan in his home country of Hong Kong. Yes, the place where only pro-Beijing 'patriots' are allowed to run for office and opposition parties have been barred from office and forced to disband. Both Singapore and Hong Kong are remarkable success stories of using infrastructure to support rapid economic growth. New Zealand can learn many things from them. Tan detailed Singapore's massive public housing programme, its urban greening and river cleanups. All highly commendable – but it wasn't achieved through bipartisanship. I asked Tan after his speech if it was ironic for New Zealand to look to Singapore for lessons on bipartisanship. He assured me that 'we do have an opposition, and it's growing stronger' [the Workers' Party currently has 12 of 99 seats in parliament, its largest-ever contingent] and the opposition supported the government's infrastructure programme. 'For Singapore, we've always seen the challenge as more external than internal, which is why it's necessary for us to have a very cohesive government, a cohesive society, and for everyone to work together.' Large infrastructure firms have consistently demanded more bipartisan long-term infrastructure planning. That's because big stuff takes a really long time to build. The infrastructure industry wants more certainty to know it can invest, hire staff and plan for the future. When politicians keep cancelling each other's projects, it creates a shock to the system and leaves less faith in the market. Both National and Labour have promised they're working on it. 'We are genuinely trying to achieve as much consensus on these big issues as we can,' said infrastructure minister Chris Bishop. Opposition infrastructure spokesperson Kieran McAnulty, sitting next to him on stage during an afternoon panel discussion, agreed. 'The stop-start-stop-start, we've got to end it.' The problem is that it is easy to say your opponents should be bipartisan in supporting your ideas. It's harder to agree to support your opponents' ideas. Both parties have been highly ideological in their infrastructure decisions. In 2017, the incoming Labour-led government scrapped a series of major highways. In 2023, the incoming National-led government scrapped light rail in Auckland and Wellington and the iRex project for new Interislander ferries. When I asked Bishop about this after his speech, he said, 'Those particular projects – that we campaigned on cancelling – actually, most people think were too expensive, unaffordable, unconsentable and unbuildable.' Which is entirely fair from a political standpoint; the government has the mandate to cancel those projects. But it's not bipartisanship either. Labour and the Greens may have been happy to negotiate a reset of those projects, but they certainly didn't want them scrapped. It's not just about big attention-grabbing projects. The industry leaders in the room were more frustrated about the 212 Kāinga Ora housing projects and 100 school builds the government has cancelled since 2023, disrupting a pipeline of contracts and employment that many businesses thought they could rely on. Bishop was asked about this twice, once in a media standup and once on stage by moderator Katie Bradford. Both times, he obfuscated, pointing out that Kāinga Ora built more homes in 2024 than 2023 – but not admitting any fault or even acknowledging that the cancellations happened. Labour MPs were willing to acknowledge some mistakes. McAnulty said some of the 2017 projects shouldn't have been cancelled. Chris Hipkins admitted Auckland Light Rail had become a mess and his government overestimated how much they could do in a three-year term. Of course, it's much easier to admit failures when you're in opposition, but it left Bishop in the awkward position of arguing that the two sides needed to meet in the middle, while maintaining that his government had never done anything wrong and was right to cancel all the other side's projects. Hipkins complained about the government's empty rhetoric: 'The current government believes that bipartisanship means saying what they're going to do and then telling everybody else they have to agree with it.' He said Labour had attempted to compromise by attending the government's Infrastructure Investment Summit in March, with some caveats around the use of Public-Private-Partnerships, 'and then we had our attempts to compromise manipulated, misrepresented and used to attack us by the current government. That isn't going to create an environment where bipartisanship is going to be embraced and is going to be endured.' Bishop insists his issue isn't a matter of cars vs trams, it's about good project selection and management – 'we've got to make sure we're building the right projects at the right time'. But he's also a highly opinionated guy whose definition of 'the right projects' is highly correlated to the party whose idea it was. That's not to excuse Labour either. In government, it had a particularly bad record of excluding the opposition from decision-making, to the extent that National had no idea how much the iRex project had blown out until it received a post-election update from Treasury. Given their track records, neither party's words are worth too much. McAnulty and Bishop sat on stage together in front of a huge room of executives who were braying for bipartisanship and promised them exactly what they asked for. But it's hard not to believe both would prefer to govern more like Singapore.
RNZ News
06-08-2025
- RNZ News
UK set to start turning around asylum seekers
United Kingdom correspondent Lucy Thomson spoke to Lisa Owen about the UK being set to start turning asylum seekers around within a matter of days, as well as several countries meeting in Geneva in hopes of finally reaching an agreement on plastic.
Scoop
05-08-2025
- Scoop
APEC Ministers Convene For First-Ever Digital And AI Ministerial Meeting
Issued by the APEC Digital and AI Ministerial Meeting Incheon, Republic of Korea, 4 August 2025 Ministers responsible for telecommunications, information and communications technology (ICT) and digital policy from the 21 APEC member economies gathered in Incheon for the first-ever APEC Digital and AI Ministerial Meeting, a milestone moment in the region's digital cooperation. The meeting underscores the growing urgency for trusted, reliable and human-centered approaches to digital transformation and artificial intelligence (AI) that benefit all our people across the Asia-Pacific. 'We are now standing at the forefront of a monumental wave of transformation driven by AI and digital technologies,' said Kyunghoon Bae, Minister of Science and ICT of the Republic of Korea and Chair of the meeting. 'How we respond to this massive 'coming wave' will shape the future for all of us.' Under Korea's theme of APEC 2025, ' Building a Sustainable Tomorrow,' the meeting offered ministers a platform to chart a collaborative course for digital and AI policymaking. Discussions focused on advancing meaningful digital connectivity, harnessing emerging technologies for public good and strengthening international cooperation to ensure AI systems are safe, broadly beneficial and trusted across borders. Minister Bae underscored the meeting's role in shaping future cooperation across the region, calling it 'an opportunity to design the future of our collaboration that encompasses innovation, connectivity, and ecosystems based on the diversity and experiences of APEC member economies.' The meeting builds on the forum's work under the APEC Internet and Digital Economy Roadmap, which guides cooperation in areas such as broadband access, digital trust, upskilling and AI governance. 'Because the future is digital,' said APEC Executive Director Eduardo Pedrosa in his remarks to APEC ministers. 'AI will shape everything from healthcare to education, trade to public safety, and it is our responsibility as a region to stay ahead of these conversations – anticipating what our economies will need in five or ten years' time, and ensuring that innovation supports long-term growth.' Ministers reaffirmed their commitment to digital transformation as a driver of growth that benefits all under the Putrajaya Vision 2040 and the Aotearoa Plan of Action. The outcomes of the meeting will feed into Korea's proposed APEC AI Initiative, which aims to foster future-oriented innovation, build capacity across society and sectors, as well as promote investment in robust AI infrastructure to ensure that all segments of society benefit from this transformation. The Ministerial is followed by the APEC Global Digital and AI Forum on 5 August, co-hosted by the Government of Korea and the World Bank, bringing together government leaders, innovators and researchers to translate policy commitments into practical action.
