logo
Sexual assault allegations seem to be a badge of honor in Trump's America. Was #MeToo an epic failure?

Sexual assault allegations seem to be a badge of honor in Trump's America. Was #MeToo an epic failure?

The Guardian30-03-2025

Dressed in his trademark sunglasses and a skintight black T-shirt, Andrew Tate strode into a Las Vegas arena like a returning king. He was there to watch Power Slap, a UFC offshoot where people slap each other in the face with such force that doctors say it could lead to brain damage and death.
Days earlier, Tate and his brother Tristan had been in Romania, their assets seized, awaiting trial on human trafficking charges. But following reported conversations between Romanian officials and the Trump administration, the Romanian government lifted a travel ban on the brothers. Now, as a heavily male crowd watched men slap one another so hard they collapsed, the UFC president, Dana White, warmly embraced the Tates. White, a Meta board member who was once caught on camera slapping his own wife, smiled at the Tates, looked them in the eyes, and told them: 'Welcome to the States, boys.'
The next day, the Tates were back for a mixed martial arts fight night. This time, they were joined in the crowd by the FBI director, Kash Patel, and the convicted domestic abuser Mel Gibson.
It was a show of manpower, in every sense of the word. And it's the kind of head-spinning display that has become a fixture of US politics.
Eight years ago, the words '#MeToo' was thumbed out more than 19m times on Twitter. Pundits feared that a single, unproven allegation could vaporize a man's career. Now, the Trump administration seems to treat such allegations as a job requirement.
Two members of Trump's cabinet stand accused of sexual assault, while another allegedly enabled the sexual abuse of children. Elon Musk, whose 'department of government efficiency' is now shredding federal agencies, has been said to treat women like sex objects 'to be evaluated on their bra size'. And, of course, there's Trump himself: a man who has gloried in 'grabbing 'em by the pussy', been found liable for the sexual abuse of one woman and faced accusations of sexual misconduct from dozens more. (All of these people deny wrongdoing, except White, who has admitted to slapping his wife.)
Meanwhile, famous women who say they were hurt are torn apart on the internet. Even Twitter is gone, cannibalized by Musk into X.
How did this happen? How could the United States, so recently the beating heart of a global movement to stop sexual violence, go so thoroughly – and brutishly – backwards?
Over years of interviewing sex and sexual violence researchers, educators, activists, pollsters and scores of ordinary Americans under 30, I have heard all kinds of thoughts and theories about sex and gender relations in the post-#MeToo US. Overall, people agreed, there is far more cultural awareness of sexual misconduct. Dozens of states have moved to protect people from workplace harassment, while nearly 30 have loosened their statutes of limitation around allegations of sex abuse, allowing people to pursue lawsuits that would have once been off-limits.
These are not small victories, but they are limited ones. Many of the #MeToo movement's demands were never cemented into policy.
But those demands, and the cultural strides that accompanied them, have proved enough to spark a revenge campaign that is not only setting fire to hard-won rights for women, LGBTQ+ folks and people of color but also sending young men careening to the right. These men are finding a home in the manosphere, that burgeoning online realm that is at best uninterested in women and at worst interested in violating them. The sweeping nature of the backlash to #MeToo – playing out in our federal government, on our screens, in our communities – can feel so all-encompassing as to be overwhelming.
Did it have to be this way? As Americans struggle to respond to the whiplash, the #MeToo movement's legacy reveals some much needed lessons about how progressives and feminists may move forward in a deeply uncertain time. For starters: talk about class, and talk to men. Indeed, these may be the same lesson.
The activist Tarana Burke started the Me Too movement in 2006, but #MeToo did not explode into the public consciousness until October 2017, when the New York Times broke the news of workplace sexual harassment allegations against Harvey Weinstein and the actor Alyssa Milano urged her followers to tweet 'me too' if they had endured sexual misconduct. What followed was nothing short of a worldwide reckoning: hundreds of high-profile men lost their jobs and untold numbers of people grasped for the first time that they, too, had survived sexual violence.
Some reprisal to #MeToo's progress might be expected, given that feminist organizing has a history of unleashing anti-women sentiments, as the journalist Susan Faludi chronicled in her seminal 1991 book Backlash. After first-wave feminists launched the fight for women's suffrage in the mid-1800s, states rushed to curb access to divorce, birth control and abortion. After the second-wave feminists of the 1960s and 70s fought to improve access to the very same resources, as well as better workplace conditions, Ronald Reagan's administration pushed women out of government, shut down initiatives for domestic violence survivors and gutted the only federal program dedicated to expanding equal education for girls.
Yet the 1980s backlash, in Faludi's view, now looks 'tame in comparison' to today's.
'In the 80s, the media and popular culture framed the backlash message as one of concern for women: Feminism was making these poor liberated ladies unhappy, unwed, barren and bonkers,' Faludi wrote in an email. 'If you want to be Pollyanna about it, I guess you could say at least now the backlash is out in the open – the wolf's no longer wearing sheep's clothing.'
In the weeks since taking office, Trump has launched McCarthyist campaigns to stamp out diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and 'gender ideology', erasing evidence of contributions to history by women, people of color and LGBTQ+ folks. He has eviscerated programs that help these groups succeed in public life, from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and National Labor Relations Board to civil rights offices to the nation's oldest family planning program. His administration's attacks on scientific research have hacked away at efforts to improve maternal mortality, intimate partner violence, access to contraception and sexual assault. At one major research agency, projects' inclusion of the words 'women', 'female' and 'gender' have been enough to trigger intense scrutiny for potentially violating Trump's executive orders.
But the backlash to #MeToo is not only unfolding in government corridors. It is also attempting to ruin people who live far from the halls of power.
In 2021, Bay Higginbotham published a blog post about a relationship with their older boss that, they said, involved sexual abuse. The Dallas-area hairstylist felt like their career would be at stake if they turned their boss down; sometimes, the sex became so violent that Higginbotham would be in 'physically unbearable pain', cry or throw up, court documents allege.
#MeToo, Higginbotham told me in an interview years later, helped them come forward. 'I don't think it would have been possible for me to even think that I could do that, without these hundreds of thousands of other people saying: 'Yeah, I've experienced something too,'' Higginbotham said.
Then, in April 2022, Higginbotham's former boss sued them for defamation. In a complaint that repeatedly misgendered Higginbotham, the boss denied all wrongdoing and accused Higginbotham of waging an inexplicable 'hate campaign'.
'You can't just lie about people and ruin their life's as the woke mob with a fake sob story and no proof will slander your name,' read one erratically punctuated post from a Facebook account under the boss's name, which was documented in court records. 'Million dollar court cases is the last resort to slap some sense into these lying females who often suffer mental illness, regret, shame, infidelity, hurt feelings, didn't get famous, didn't become successful, embarrassed or just want to be part of drama at other peoples expense.'
By silencing people who speak out about sexual misconduct, defamation lawsuits have quietly become a key feature of the #MeToo backlash. Out of the 400-plus cases supported by the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund, a post-#MeToo organization that helps people who have experienced sexual harassment at work, nearly a fifth were in defense of someone who'd been sued for defamation after alleging sexual misconduct.
In an interview, Higginbotham frequently and visibly trembled as they spoke about the lawsuit. 'It impacted everything – work, school, my relationships,' they said. 'I still feel nervous and scared to talk about my own opinions and thoughts with this. I have had those used against me a lot.'
Trump has filed a defamation suit of his own: against E Jean Carroll, who had accused him of raping her and sued him for defamation when he denied it. A judge tossed Trump's countersuit, while a jury found that Trump was liable for sexually abusing Carroll (but stopped short of finding him liable for rape). 'You've got to deny, deny, deny and push back on these women,' Trump reportedly once told a friend. 'If you admit to anything and any culpability, then you're dead.'
While the internet once ignited the #MeToo movement, it has also helped foment the backlash – in the form of the manosphere.
Once a word for the websites, blogs and forums that played home to incels, pick-up artists and other 'male supremacists', the manosphere is now sometimes believed to encompass less extremist personalities like Joe Rogan and the Nelk boys. Its denizens share a bunker mentality: Men aren't welcome in mainstream media anymore – but here, boys can be boys. By 2024, 65% of men between the ages of 18 and 29 agreed with the statement that 'guys can have their reputations destroyed just for speaking their mind', according to polling by YouGov and the Young Men Research Initiative, which examines young men's rightward drift. It's a belief with profound political consequences: 85% of young men who voted for Trump agree with that statement.
As the manosphere's prominence began to grow, more people started reporting online harassment that includes stalking, physical threats or sexual harassment. Nonconsensual image abuse, or 'revenge porn', has also skyrocketed: Between 2013 and 2023, sites that collect these intimate images grew from 40 to nearly 10,000, according to the scholar Danielle Citron.
'That proliferation of online spaces really boomed post-#MeToo,' said the researcher Katie Bogen. Their growth, she suspects, constitutes another aspect of backlash thinking: ''Women want to talk about sexual violence in online spaces? Survivors want to come forward in online spaces? Let's set up a retaliatory mechanism to keep these people in their place.''
Musk's X might be one of these spaces: content reported under its nonconsensual nudity policy, one pre-print paper found, is frequently left online.
#MeToo did not seem to lead men to even realize that they, too, had a stake in ending sexual violence. While women and LGBTQ+ people became more likely to report sexual violence to researchers, there was no corresponding rise in among cis, straight boys and men, one study found (even though one in three men have experienced 'sexual violence involving physical contact', according to the CDC). And in interviews with dozens of anti-sexual assault advocates, the researcher Shana Maier found that more than a quarter felt that #MeToo excluded men.
'One interesting thing that I saw very early in the #MeToo movement was the backlash against men who were joining in the hashtag thing and then people telling them, 'this is not your moment,'' one advocate told Maier. 'If a man was saying 'me too' people were like, 'This is about women. Why are you trying to make this about you?''
Although #MeToo raised cultural awareness around sexual misconduct and helped strengthen many laws, the movement's successes were ultimately, tragically limited.
Reports of sexual violence among women and LGBTQ+ people have surged since #MeToo – but primarily, it seems, in academic research, where survivors may only be asked to check a box or confide only in researchers. Multiple studies have concluded that most survivors have not become more likely to disclose their experiences to friends, family or the police, or to seek help from victim services.
'I knew it was a possibility to file a police report, but I also knew that it wasn't really done,' a 24-year-old woman from New Jersey told me in an interview conducted as research for a forthcoming book. She said that, at 18, she had been raped on prom night by her boyfriend. The couple frequented the local DIY music scene; she knew other girls in the scene who had also endured what she called 'experiences with other, older losers'. None had gone to the police.
'I felt so much pressure just to let it go and let it not be a big deal,' she said. 'By the time I came to my anger, I felt like it was too late.'
Nor are institutions necessarily taking sexual violence more seriously. The researcher Nicole Bedera spent 2018 and 2019 – the first full school year after #MeToo washed across social media – embedded at a university, studying its processes for handling reports of sexual harassment and assault. 'During my entire year in the field, I never heard a school administrator talk about #MeToo,' she said. 'Unless it was to disparage it and to say that women today – their expectations of men were too high, that they were blaming men for things that in the past were fine.'
An investigation of dozens of public universities found that, even when schools determined that a student should be held responsible for committing sexual misconduct, most were allowed to continue their education without disruption. In contrast, a survey of people who reported sexual violence to school officials found that almost 40% took a leave of absence, transferred or dropped out entirely.
'Sexual violence is one of the best predictors of whether or not a woman will complete her degree. The unwillingness to get it under control creates a lot of lifelong gender disparities across our society,' said Bedera, who turned her research into a book. 'It is a resegregation effort to say: 'Oh, we know that this thing leads women to exit public society, and if we keep that in place, we're going to have a workforce and education spaces that are more male-centered.''
In an ominous sign for the future, educational efforts to address sexual violence did not take hold after #MeToo. Although state lawmakers introduced 109 bills to advance comprehensive sex ed – which includes training about consent – in the first half of 2018, only six passed. Another six advocated for sex ed that preached abstinence. Such sex ed only teaches people to say 'no' to sex; it does not help them when someone says 'no' to sex and their partner doesn't respect it. By 2024, state-level bills that propose teaching about consent had virtually vanished (a development that also speaks to the Christian religious right's growing power).
Many of the young adults I interviewed had next to no memories of #MeToo. 'I remember seeing '#MeToo' everywhere,' a 19-year-old woman from Hawaii recalled. 'But I honestly don't even really know what it is.'
She did, however, know what it was like to grow up in a country that treated sexual violence as normal, even expected. 'Almost all of my friends in Hawaii were raped growing up,' she said. 'Looking back, I definitely should have said something. But at the time, my friends were begging me not to say anything to anyone.'
In the 1980s, the disappearance of manufacturing jobs and the demonization of welfare led men to scapegoat women for their economic frustrations. Men have always been more conservative than women, but poll after poll in those years found that single young men increasingly 'feared and reviled feminism', Faludi wrote. One pollster told her: 'It's these downscale men, the ones who can't earn as much as their fathers, who we find are the most threatened by the women's movement.'
In this moment of political peril and outright hostility towards feminism, the #MeToo movement's triumphs and losses offer organizers a lesson: focus on class and men.
Men's economic anxieties remain inextricably tied to their feelings about masculinity, feminism and sexual violence – and women remain easy targets. A 2023 not-yet-published study authored by Annabelle Hutchinson, an assistant professor of government at New York's Hamilton College, found that when white men are out of work, they become less likely to vote for women. They also become more likely to support statements like 'women who complain about discrimination and harassment cause more problems than they solve.' (White women, Black men and Latino men were not found to react this way.)
It would not have been a stretch to channel #MeToo's momentum into a workers' movement; after all, it broke out in response to the allegations of workplace sexual harassment against Weinstein. And some of #MeToo's most prominent backers did attempt to incorporate economic demands into the movement. In January 2018, Hollywood actors gathered together to announce a bifurcated new initiative to support working-class people fight against sexual harassment: the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund and a separate organization known only as Time's Up. But while the National Women's Law Center still runs the Defense Fund, the Time's Up organization – dogged by years of accusations of incompetent management and lack of focus – finally collapsed after news broke that some of its (wealthy) leaders had tried to help the former New York governor Andrew Cuomo fend off sexual harassment allegations. Their allegiance to the upper class seemed to trump any notion of sisterhood.
What if #MeToo's push to oust high-profile men had been accompanied by more organizing for better conditions for workers? We'll never know, but perhaps it could have created some cross-gender solidarity and held off one of the most powerful precursors of backlash. It could have even done something more powerful: lead men to recognize that feminism could benefit them, too.
In interviews with young men, Daniel Cox, director of the Survey Center on American Life at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, found that #MeToo had left men defensive. They worried they would be unjustly cancelled.
'There's a sense among a lot of young men that you need to be a little bit more on your guard and careful about what you say and what you do,' Cox said. 'Because it can land you in a lot of trouble.'
That attitude can understandably frustrate and exhaust feminists. Not only are men still unlikely to be held accountable for sexual misconduct, but before #MeToo, the bar for consent was so low that ants could backflip over it. A 1990s survey of thousands of Americans' sex lives found that only 3% of men said they had sexually forced a woman, but about 22% of women said they had been sexually forced by a man. Half of these women had been forced by a man they were in love with. 'Most men who forced sex did not recognize how coercive the women thought their behavior was,' researchers concluded.
If the modest changes wrought by #MeToo are so destabilizing for men, then how are we ever supposed to eradicate sexual violence? (Tellingly, young women don't seem to share their male peers' objections to #MeToo, as experts believe the movement is one of the main reasons why they are more progressive and politically engaged than ever.)
At the same time, dismissing men's opinion of #MeToo can lead to political ruin. Too many young men now see the Democrats as the sex police: punitive, small-minded and, frankly, not fun. Unfair or not, perceptions like these are the death knell of organizing.
'The Democrats are focusing so much on what you can't do, what's inappropriate, what's harmful,' Cox said. 'People don't want to feel that, at any moment, someone can look at what they're saying or doing and publicly shame them or get them in trouble with an employer.'
Shauna Daly, executive director of the Young Men Research Project, believes that Democrats can still right the ship. They need to start off, she said, by acknowledging that young men are really struggling: in addition to their stagnating wages, they are today less likely than women to go to college and more likely to die of suicide.
'The right has been able to weaponize that disorientation and that frustration and say that these changes and these lowered fortunes are because of women and immigrants,' Daly said. 'There's a persuasion that has to happen from the left that says: 'It is because of systems that are rigged against you, but let's go fix those systems. Let's make sure that men do have better options. Let's address the concentration of wealth that is sending money to billionaires while you're not able to get a better job.''
Many of the men who were seemingly felled by #MeToo have returned to the public eye with minimal consequences. For example, although a state investigation found that Cuomo had sexually harassed 11 women and created a hostile work environment, he is now running for mayor of New York – and polling far ahead of his competitors.
Yet the publicist Joanna Klonsky, at least, has not given up hope for #MeToo's legacy. 'I can point to so many survivors, who I've worked with, whose abusers or assaulters are no longer in a position of power over them or over other women,' said Klonsky, who helps sexual assault survivors get in touch with journalists. 'For that reason, it's impossible for me to say there's been no positive effect from this.'
The defamation case against Higginbotham finally went to trial in 2024. Higginbotham testified; so did several other witnesses. And in the end, the jury found that Higginbotham did not owe their ex-boss any money.
It is no small task to convince 12 strangers, in a conservative Texas county, to back a non-binary person telling a story of sexual violence, Higginbotham's lawyer, Justin Wood, pointed out.
'I think average people – when talking about it and dealing with it and listening to others – can come to the right conclusion,' Wood said. 'I'm definitely not going to say that everyone will always win, but I wouldn't say that it's hopeless.'
The ferocity of the #MeToo backlash is perhaps the strongest evidence that the movement was getting somewhere, that its rise and fall gave people a vocabulary to speak out about sexual misconduct and led people to take it more seriously. The cost of coming forward can still be immense. The backlash may still metastatize. But there are also still avenues for fighting back.
'It's why I spoke up in the first place,' Higginbotham said. 'So that other people can hear this and feel like they can share their truth as well.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China hits back at Trump, saying U.S. actions 'severely undermine' trade truce
China hits back at Trump, saying U.S. actions 'severely undermine' trade truce

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

China hits back at Trump, saying U.S. actions 'severely undermine' trade truce

HONG KONG — China on Monday accused the United States of breaching the 90-day trade truce agreed by the world's two largest economies, after President Donald Trump said it was Beijing that had 'totally violated' the agreement. Last month, the U.S. and China announced a 90-day pause on most of their tit-for-tat tariffs, which had reached higher than 100%. Trump initially hailed the truce as a 'total reset' but said Friday in a post on his Truth Social platform that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED' the deal. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce struck back at Trump's remarks Monday, saying that while China had implemented and actively upheld the deal, the U.S. had introduced a series of 'discriminatory and restrictive measures against China' that 'severely undermine' the agreement. The ministry said those measures included AI chip export controls, a reported pause on the sale of chip design software to China, and the announcement of U.S. plans to revoke the visas of Chinese students. 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, it has falsely accused China of violating the consensus, which is a serious distortion of the facts,' the ministry said in a statement. 'China firmly rejects these groundless accusations.' The ministry urged the U.S. to 'immediately correct its erroneous practices' and vowed to take 'strong and resolute' measures if Washington 'insists on acting unilaterally and continues to harm China's interests,' without providing details. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that China was 'holding back' exports of rare earths that it had agreed to release as part of the truce. 'That is not what a reliable partner does,' he said on the CBS news program 'Face the Nation.' Rare earth minerals are a crucial component of products that cut across the U.S. economy, including the tech sector, the energy industry and automobile manufacturing. China supplies 60% of the world's rare earth elements and is responsible for the refining of 90% of them, according to the International Energy Agency. Bessent, who said last week that U.S.-China trade talks were 'a bit stalled,' said he was 'confident' that rare earths exports and other details could be 'ironed out' in a call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman,' Bessent said, referring to Xi. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, also suggested Sunday that the two leaders could speak as early as this week. 'President Trump, we expect, is going to have a wonderful conversation about the trade negotiations this week with President Xi,' he said on the ABC news program 'This Week.' Hassett said he was unsure whether a specific date for that conversation had been set. The last publicly known conversation between the U.S. and Chinese presidents was on Jan. 17, days before Trump's inauguration.

Trump attacks conservative judges, Federalist Society. Why?
Trump attacks conservative judges, Federalist Society. Why?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump attacks conservative judges, Federalist Society. Why?

"I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges," Trump said on Truth Social. "I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations." With that, Trump shifted from being a Republican president with a strong legacy of appointing conservative judges to a Republican president with a growing legacy of attacking conservative judges. That's a bad sign for any of his upcoming judicial nominations. Trump turns on conservative legal movement he helped build Trump and former Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, helped deliver Republicans a 6-3 majority on the Supreme Court. A significant part of that effort was The Federalist Society, a conservative legal organization that advocates for an interpretation of the Constitution that adheres to its original meaning. During his first term, Trump's judicial picks were tightly curated by adviser Leonard Leo, then the executive vice president of The Federalist Society. Most notably, all three of Trump's Supreme Court picks - Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett - all had ties to the organization. Opinion: Vance is doing his best to help Trump tear down the Supreme Court These three justices had a hand in overturning Roe v. Wade, striking down unconstitutional firearm restrictions, striking down racist affirmative action practices, curbing the power of administrative state bureaucrats and blocking much of the illegal Biden agenda. Even beyond the Supreme Court, Trump nominated 226 federal judges during his first term, many of those nominations guided by Federalist Society advisers. When did Trump start to turn on conservative judges? While the beginning of this spiral happened when the Supreme Court refused to entertain his 2020 stolen election claims, things have accelerated in his second term. Now, originalist judges have halted Trump's unconstitutional trade policy and have ruled against parts of Trump's mass deportation attempts. Even so, Trump until now was reluctant to outright condemn The Federalist Society. After all, one of the high points of his conservative agenda was his redecorating of the American courts with top-tier judges. The track record of Federalist Society judges is nothing short of a resounding victory for conservatives and the single best accomplishment of Trump's first term in office. Opinion: Elon Musk is frustrated with Republicans wasting DOGE's effort to cut. So am I. None of that matters now. Trump despises those judges because their loyalty is to the Constitution, not to him. He cannot fathom the discipline or honor required to be committed to preserving America's founding documents, rather than his own self-interest. The partnership between the conservative legal movement and Trump was always a temporary one, and Republicans in Congress had to have known that. While Republicans used Trump to reach their goals within the conservative legal movement, they made the mistake of allowing him to undermine the very accomplishments they made in his first term. Trump's future judicial nominations have judges worried Data from Notre Dame Law professor Derek Muller shows that federal judges are retiring at a record-slow pace at the beginning of Trump's second term. Just 11 vacancies have opened up since January, likely because judges are thinking twice about retiring in the face of who may replace them. Trump's first slate of judicial nominees is taking longer than it did in his first term, with confirmation hearings to take place on June 4, according to Axios. There are also fewer vacancies compared with Trump's first term, when he was handed more than 100 on Day 1 as a result of a stubborn Republican Senate majority in President Barack Obama's second term. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Trump appears to be prioritizing his supporters in his early slate of judicial picks. Acting Deputy Attorney General Emil Bove, who has previously represented Trump personally, has been nominated to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Courtof Appeals and sparked some concern even among conservatives. Trump's early judicial picks will determine how comfortable more aging federal judges are with retiring under his second administration. Those committed to the Constitution are understandably worried about who may replace them, and his recent rhetoric does not help me feel better. As Trump's brand of the Republican Party drifts from most of the conservative values it once claimed to support, so too does his support for conservative legal philosophy. Now, anything that stands in the way of Trump is bad, even if it is conservative in ideology. Dace Potas is an opinion columnist for USA TODAY and a graduate of DePaul University with a degree in political science.

Volunteers search the desert for migrant remains
Volunteers search the desert for migrant remains

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Volunteers search the desert for migrant remains

Once a month, retiree Abbey Carpenter leads volunteers through a field of dunes near the border, searching for the remains of migrants. She has located 27 sites in southern New Mexico in under two years, artefacts of a wave of migration that has ebbed to a trickle. But the bones - femur, rib, jaw - take her breath away each time. In them, Carpenter, who taught English as a Second Language, sees the journeys made by her former students - migrants who live and work in the United States and learned English in her classroom. Men in construction. Women in service industries. When she first joined the desert searches, she said, "I just felt like I was walking in their footprints. I could see them: their backpacks, their shoes, their clothes." President Donald Trump's border crackdown has helped push illegal crossings to record lows over the past four months. With triple-digit summer temperatures looming here, there are growing hopes that the decline in migration could bring relief from the horrific death toll of the past two years in Border Patrol's El Paso Sector. Last year, border agents found the bodies of 176 migrants in the 264-mile sector stretching from West Texas across New Mexico. They discovered 149 remains the year before. The toll represented a shocking increase from the 20 deaths recorded in 2019. The sector has become a focal point. That's in part because of the rise in deaths and in part because local Border Patrol leaders shared the sector statistics during two deadly years, when the Biden administration failed to provide broader numbers - despite a congressional mandate. U.S. Customs and Border Protection didn't respond to a USA TODAY request for the missing data for fiscal years 2023 and 2024. Along the length of the U.S.-Mexico border, migrant deaths climbed five years running through fiscal 2022, the last period for which data is publicly available. Deaths rose to 895 from 281 over that time, according to CBP. The numbers include human remains found by Border Patrol and other federal, state, local and tribal agencies. The climbing death toll prompted CBP to create the "Missing Migrant Program" in 2017, under the first Trump administration. The goal was "to help rescue migrants in distress and reduce migrant deaths along the Southwest border," according to an Government Accountability Office report. The program also helped facilitate the identification and return of migrant remains to their families. Under the new Trump administration, the effort has been renamed the "Missing Alien Program." The vast majority of migrant remains in El Paso Sector have been found in a single county, New Mexico's Dona Ana, in an area painfully close to life-saving assistance: main roads, a cluster of factories, residential neighborhoods. Looking north from the border fence, the desert appears flat, the bare Franklin Mountains in the distance to the northeast. New Mexico's two-lane Highway 9 parallels the border about three miles to the north. The proximity to the urban footprint is in part what made this region such a heavily trafficked crossing point. But within minutes of hiking into the desert, creosote bushes and mesquite pull the sand into disorienting mounds that can, without warning, block the view in every direction. Should a tired migrant collapse in their scant shade, the sand can run as hot as 150 degrees in the summer. "We were wondering why these individuals, or these bodies, were found very close to the border," Border Patrol Agent Claudio Herrera, a sector spokesman, told USA TODAY. "The saddest thing," he said, is that migrants who survived told us "they'd been in a stash house for weeks ... without proper food and without water. So by the time they made the illegal entry, they were already dehydrated." An 'open graveyard' New Mexico's Office of the Medical Investigator is tasked with investigating reports of unattended deaths, including those in the desert near the border. In 2023, the agency officially began tracking remains that could belong to a "probable migrant." Last year, the agency positively identified 75% of migrant remains recovered in southern New Mexico, or 112 individuals, according to data provided to USA TODAY. Carpenter and her partner, Marine veteran James Holeman, organize the desert searches through a nonprofit, Battalion Search and Rescue. On a Saturday in May, as temperatures climbed toward 90 degrees, nine volunteers met Carpenter and Holeman at a Love's truck stop. They donned fluorescent orange-and-yellow shade hats. They readied their radios and turned on a cellphone GPS-tracking app, for safety and to map the terrain they covered. "It is a straight-up open graveyard," Holeman said of the 10- by 20-mile section of border they've been covering little by little since late 2023. Mary Mackay, a local school teacher, volunteered with Carpenter for the first time that day. "Emotionally, it was more than I expected," she later told USA TODAY. "You feel like you would be prepared to see a body, but then you actually see it and you realize that's a real person with an entire back story and family and wishes and dreams. And it all just ended there alone in the desert." The Battalion's search for migrant remains in New Mexico follows the footsteps of other volunteer teams working in deadly stretches of Arizona and California. Search volunteers typically try to comb through areas Border Patrol or local law enforcement might otherwise miss. The volunteers don't touch the bones, said Carpenter, also a former college administrator. They mark the sites with brightly colored tape tied to the brush. They record the precise location and alert local law enforcement in hopes that officials will come to collect the bones that remain. Sometimes they do; too often they don't, Carpenter said. Animals or wind sometimes scatter the remains, before volunteers or officials can reach them. Still, she said, each one matters in the quest to identify a missing migrant. A chipped bone could hold a clue. "It takes some time and effort to work wider circles around the site to identify everything," Carpenter said. "But that's important. Which family member wouldn't want all of their family's remains recovered?" Lauren Villagran can be reached at lvillagran@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store