logo
Centre using ministries to sidestep Section 69A safeguards: X to K'taka HC

Centre using ministries to sidestep Section 69A safeguards: X to K'taka HC

Business Standard14 hours ago
Social media platform X (formerly Twitter) has told the Karnataka High Court that the content takedown and blocking notifications issued by Union ministries were being done without 'application of mind'. These content blocking and takedown orders were not aimed at combating unlawful information of the respective ministries but rather designed to achieve the goals of government and the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to circumvent Section 69A of the IT (Information Technology) Act.
In a revised petition moved on Tuesday, X said that a content takedown template had been provided by MeitY to several Union ministries, state governments, and the Director General of Police of various jurisdictions in India, to issue blocking orders, which fell outside the established processes of content takedown under Section 69A of the IT Act.
The Sahyog portal of the Ministry of Home Affairs, which X termed the 'censorship portal' in its plea, is illegal because it creates a quasi-judicial body by executive fiat and also because it usurps judicial functions, the social media platform argued.
It told the court that a quasi-judicial 'process' under the censorship portal, wherein any Central or state executive officer could unilaterally adjudicate whether information was 'unlawful' and direct its removal under threat of loss of safe harbour protection, created a quasi-judicial body because executive officers within the 'censorship portal' exercised powers to determine 'unlawfulness' and impose prejudicial consequences.
The MHA's Sahyog portal, which X calls 'censorship portal' throughout its plea, is arbitrary, opaque, and violative of Articles 14 (right to equality) and 19 (freedom of speech and expression) of the Constitution, the company argued.
X further contended that Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules of 2021 was unconstitutional as it exceeded the limitations set by its parent statute, the IT Act, and thus violated the settled principles that subordinate legislation cannot exceed the limits of its enabling Act.
Rule 3(1)(d) of the Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 states that an intermediary, upon receiving actual knowledge of unlawful content through a court order or a notification from the appropriate government or its agency under Section 79(3)(b) of the IT Act, must not host, store, or publish such information. This rule is connected to Section 79, which provides intermediaries with protection from liability for user-generated content, but this protection can be revoked if they fail to remove unlawful content after being notified.
Centre's reply
In response, the Centre vehemently denied that the ministries are issuing notifications at the behest of MeitY. The Centre explained that many government departments/ministries have a NIC office or officer deputed only for ease of functioning related to IT infrastructure, which is managed by NIC at the national level. This does not mean that NIC was directing the functioning of all the ministries, departments and courts, it said.
The Central government further added that X was merely trying to conjure non-existent wrongdoing to bolster its arguments. Defending Rule 3(1)(d), the Centre said that it had sufficient safeguards to prevent misuse.
The first proviso to Rule 3(1)(d) states that notifications under the rule may only be issued by the authorised agencies notified by the appropriate government.
The requirement imposed on internet intermediaries not to 'host, store or publish' any unlawful information under Rule 3(1)(d) does not amount to a blocking order, the Centre said, adding that in case the intermediary continues to host, store or publish such information, the only change is that it cannot claim immunity under Section 79 and therefore may be prosecuted in court about that particular information.
The 'lifting' of safe harbour could in no way be equated to the blocking of information, the Central government said. X's reliance on the Kunal Kamra case was also misplaced because Article 19 talks about the rights of a user of an intermediary platform, not of an intermediary themselves, the Centre said.
The Karnataka High Court is hearing X's plea against the Centre, challenging unlawful content regulation and arbitrary censorship.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Work together under new state prez Naraparaju Ramachander Rao: Bandi Sanjay to cadre
Work together under new state prez Naraparaju Ramachander Rao: Bandi Sanjay to cadre

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Work together under new state prez Naraparaju Ramachander Rao: Bandi Sanjay to cadre

HYDERABAD: BJP MP and Union minister Bandi Sanjay on Tuesday advised party workers not to fall into the trap of Congress and BRS trying to sow seeds of division. Speaking at a meeting after the appointment of new BJP state president, he said those who have trolled their party disappeared over time. He emphasised that there were no groups within the BJP and their only captain is Prime Minister Narendra Modi . Bandi said that anyone can aspire to be party president, but the decision of the leadership must be followed. He called upon everyone to work together under new state president N Ramchander Rao's leadership. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Praising Ramchander Rao, Bandi recalled his selfless service for the party. He said that Rao's contributions as a student leader, party legal advisor and MLC are unforgettable. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Doctor's Day 2025 , messages and quotes!

CM Siddaramaiah demands rollback of train fare hike
CM Siddaramaiah demands rollback of train fare hike

New Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • New Indian Express

CM Siddaramaiah demands rollback of train fare hike

BENGALURU: CM Siddaramaiah on Tuesday urged the Centre to roll back the railway fare hike. 'This fare hike must be rolled back immediately. Don't make people's daily travel another jumla. Let the trains run, not the people's patience,' he stated taking to 'X'. The CM said daily wage workers, students, small traders, and the common man are struggling under rising prices. 'When we increased milk prices to help our farmers, BJP shouted on the streets, and called it anti-people. But now, when the BJP-led Centre hikes railway fares, there is deafening silence. Why? Because this hike doesn't help farmers or the poor, it only helps the BJP government fill its own coffers,' he said. Meanwhile, AICC general secretary and Karnataka in-charge Randeep Singh Surjewala on Tuesday lashed out at the Centre for increasing railway passenger fare and toll on highways. He also said the hike also affects motorists on the Electronics City Elevated Expressway in Bengaluru. He mocked Karnataka BJP for keeping mum over price rise and asked them to insist for the roll back the hike. He urged PM Narendra Modi to withdraw the hikes immediately without burdening the masses. 'From roads to rails to the kitchen, BJP is road-rolling India's common man with unprecedented price rise breaking the backbone of India's masses. The BJP government promised bullet trains, but gave us derailment, burning coaches, and broken hopes. While the tracks lie in disrepair and passengers hang on to life, they've silently hiked tolls and squeezed every paisa from commuters', he alleged while addressing a press meet. 'If Karnataka's BJP-JDS MPs and MLAs can't raise their voice against Delhi's loot, they should raise their hands and resign. You can't sit in power and play mute while the state gets looted — either defend Karnataka or vacate your seat for someone who will,' he suggested.

Tirupati Mayor overlooked for national conference
Tirupati Mayor overlooked for national conference

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Tirupati Mayor overlooked for national conference

Tirupati: The Andhra Pradesh government's decision to nominate Tirupati Deputy Mayor RC Munikrishna for a national conference in Gurugram on July 3 and 4 has sparked a political row. The conference, which will focus on the role of urban local bodies in the Constitution, democracy, and nation-building, is being organised at the national level. What has drawn criticism is the exclusion of Tirupati Mayor Dr R Sirisha, the city's elected head, from the event. The move has triggered strong opposition, particularly from Tirupati MP Dr M Gurumoorthy, who lodged a formal complaint with Union Housing and Urban Affairs Minister Manohar Lal. He called the State Government's decision a violation of protocol and an insult to democratic values. In his letter, the MP stressed that the Mayor is the highest elected representative in a municipal corporation and should have been the natural choice to represent the city. 'Overlooking the Mayor and nominating the Deputy Mayor instead is a clear affront to the people's mandate and democratic principles,' he wrote. Dr Gurumoorthy also highlighted Dr Sirisha's credentials, noting that she is Tirupati's first woman Mayor, a respected medical professional, and a member of the BC Yadav community. He said her election represents both gender equality and social justice, and her exclusion from the conference sends a negative message. Calling the nomination of the Deputy Mayor over the elected Mayor deeply inappropriate, the MP urged the Union government to intervene and ensure that Dr Sirisha is invited to the event. He also appealed for measures to prevent similar oversights in the future. 'This is more than just an issue of protocol — it's about respecting the democratic process and the dignity of elected office,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store