Fourth of July: New study warns there's ‘no safe amount' of hot dogs to eat
Why does this matter?
This comes as Americans are celebrating Independence Day. Hot dogs remain a staple during the July 4 celebrations. According to the outlet, more than 150 million hot dogs are expected to be consumed across the United States during the Fourth of July weekend.
The study contributes to the rising body of evidence that links processed meats to the risk of chronic disease. Notably, diet-related illnesses are already counted among the leading causes of death in the country.
Key findings of the study
As part of the analysis, the researchers took into consideration 77 different studies to find out the link between common chronic diseases and certain amounts of such food items.
Dr Demewoz Haile told Fox News Digital that habitual consumption of 'even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer.'
He suggested that there was 'no safe level of habitual consumption' of such food items and has advised people to refrain from adding these to their daily diet.
In terms of processed meats, the team found out that eating even 0.6 to 57 grams of it on a daily basis was linked to an 11 per cent greater likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes.
Moreover, daily consumption between 0.78 and 55 grams was discovered to be associated with a 7 per cent increase in colorectal cancer risk. A hot dog typically weighs around 50 grams and is made of almost entirely processed meat.
Further, the study found that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, between 1.5 and 390 grams per day, might increase the risk for type 2 diabetes by 8 per cent. Also, there is a risk of ischemic heart disease if consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages ranges between 0 and 365 grams on a daily basis.
FAQs:
1. What's the major takeaway from the University of Washington study?
It found out that there is "no safe level of habitual consumption" of processed food items.
2. How do daily servings of processed meat affect our body?
As per the study, it increases the risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer.
3. Is July 4 a federal holiday in the US?
Yes. Americans are celebrating Independence Day on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
6 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Fourth of July: New study warns there's ‘no safe amount' of hot dogs to eat
An all-new meta-analysis has suggested that there is no safe amount of hot dogs, or any other processed food, to consume. The study, led by Dr Demewoz Haile of the University of Washington's Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, was published in the Nature Medicine journal on June 30. Researchers found that even small daily servings of processed meat hold the potential of significantly increasing the risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer, Newsweek reported. Why you should skip eating hot dogs this Fourth of July Why does this matter? This comes as Americans are celebrating Independence Day. Hot dogs remain a staple during the July 4 celebrations. According to the outlet, more than 150 million hot dogs are expected to be consumed across the United States during the Fourth of July weekend. The study contributes to the rising body of evidence that links processed meats to the risk of chronic disease. Notably, diet-related illnesses are already counted among the leading causes of death in the country. Key findings of the study As part of the analysis, the researchers took into consideration 77 different studies to find out the link between common chronic diseases and certain amounts of such food items. Dr Demewoz Haile told Fox News Digital that habitual consumption of 'even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer.' He suggested that there was 'no safe level of habitual consumption' of such food items and has advised people to refrain from adding these to their daily diet. In terms of processed meats, the team found out that eating even 0.6 to 57 grams of it on a daily basis was linked to an 11 per cent greater likelihood of developing type 2 diabetes. Moreover, daily consumption between 0.78 and 55 grams was discovered to be associated with a 7 per cent increase in colorectal cancer risk. A hot dog typically weighs around 50 grams and is made of almost entirely processed meat. Further, the study found that consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages, between 1.5 and 390 grams per day, might increase the risk for type 2 diabetes by 8 per cent. Also, there is a risk of ischemic heart disease if consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages ranges between 0 and 365 grams on a daily basis. FAQs: 1. What's the major takeaway from the University of Washington study? It found out that there is "no safe level of habitual consumption" of processed food items. 2. How do daily servings of processed meat affect our body? As per the study, it increases the risk for type 2 diabetes, heart disease and colorectal cancer. 3. Is July 4 a federal holiday in the US? Yes. Americans are celebrating Independence Day on Friday.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
From coverage to crisis? How Trump's tax package could strip millions of Medicaid benefit
With Trump's tax cuts extended and Medicaid restrictions tightened, the bill is poised to redraw the contours of America's healthcare landscape. Its long-term impact will depend on how states choose to implement the new rules. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Safety-Net Shake-Up: Medicaid in the Crosshairs Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Mandated Work Requirements and Eligibility Checks Changes to Medicaid Financing: States to Feel the Pinch Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Republican Defense: Work for Welfare Consumer Watchdogs Worry About Mounting Medical Debt A Step Backward from Universal Healthcare? FAQs What does the new law say about Medicaid? How many people could lose health coverage because of this bill? Millions of Americans enrolled in Medicaid are set to face significant changes as the U.S. Congress approved President Donald Trump's expansive tax and spending package this week. While the bill extends key components of Trump's tax cuts, it also includes deep reductions in federal healthcare support—prompting growing anxiety among health policy experts and consumer newly passed legislation, which cleared the U.S. Senate on July 1 and the House of Representatives on July 3, is expected to reduce federal healthcare expenditures by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade. A substantial portion of these cuts target Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act (ACA) insurance to projections by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the law will result in 11.8 million Americans losing health coverage, with an additional 5 million affected by the discontinuation of pandemic-era tax credits that had subsidized ACA which provided health insurance to 78.6 million low-income Americans as of March 2025, will now come under stricter eligibility surveillance, including job verification requirements and reduced financial leeway for states to fund their share of the programme.A defining element of the bill is its imposition of work requirements on certain Medicaid recipients. Beginning in 2027, states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA must verify twice a year that "able-bodied" beneficiaries are employed for at least 80 hours per month or meet exemption criteria—such as being a caregiver, student, or of children above 13 years will also be subjected to these checks. States will be obligated to set up systems for regular job verification, though the Department of Health and Human Services can grant implementation delays through waivers for those acting in "good faith."During Trump's first term, 13 states sought similar waivers. Only Arkansas implemented them before a federal court halted the programme, which had disenrolled 18,000 people within seven months. Currently, Georgia operates the only state-approved Medicaid work requirement scheme, known as "Georgia Pathways," with fewer than 7,500 people eligibility criteria, the bill also reforms how states can finance Medicaid. Many states have used 'provider taxes'—fees on hospitals and other healthcare providers—to boost their federal Medicaid match. The new law freezes the current tax limit and then, beginning in 2028, lowers the allowable rate from 6% to 3.5%, as per a report by USA policy analysts believe this reduction could pressure states to reduce healthcare services or reconsider their expansion commitments under the ACA.'States are going to anticipate that loss of revenue and will be looking to make changes,' said Jennifer Tolbert, Deputy Director at KFF's Medicaid and Uninsured critics describe the bill as a rollback of Obama-era healthcare reforms, Republican lawmakers argue that the overhaul is a necessary realignment of federal assistance Mike Johnson, speaking before the House vote, defended the inclusion of work requirements, stating that they aim to 'restore dignity and purpose to those on taxpayer-funded benefits.'The bill also aligns with Trump's broader campaign promise to extend his 2017 tax cuts, eliminate taxes on tips and overtime, and ramp up border security—creating a sweeping fiscal package that redefines government spending advocacy groups warn that the new law could lead to a rise in medical debt, particularly among vulnerable populations who lose insurance debt already constitutes more than half of all debt in collections, as per a 2022 report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). A Biden-era rule intended to ban medical debt from credit reports is now at risk, as the GOP-led bill includes funding cuts to the CFPB, potentially weakening its ability to implement consumer protections.'The combination of reduced healthcare access and a weakened consumer watchdog agency is a double blow,' said Sally Greenberg, CEO of the National Consumers League. 'Consumers are going to pay—and patients are going to pay big time.'Health policy researchers view the legislation as a significant departure from the universal coverage ambitions of the Obama-era ACA.'This is a giant step backwards from the vision of universal coverage that was President Obama's legacy,' said Joan Alker, Executive Director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Trump's tax cuts extended and Medicaid restrictions tightened, the bill is poised to redraw the contours of America's healthcare landscape. Its long-term impact will depend on how states choose to implement the new rules—and how millions of Americans adjust to a potentially leaner public health safety newly passed legislation includes nearly $1 trillion in federal healthcare cuts over the next decade, with a significant portion targeting Medicaid. The law introduces work requirements, tighter eligibility checks, and limits on how states fund to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 11.8 million Americans are projected to lose health insurance coverage due to the Medicaid reductions and the expiration of pandemic-era tax credits for ACA plans.
Time of India
17 hours ago
- Time of India
AI couldn't crack it, but kids did: THIS puzzle proves how kids are smarter than AI
Researchers at the University of Washington developed 'AI Puzzlers,' a game featuring reasoning puzzles that AI systems struggle to solve. In the study, children outperformed AI in completing visual patterns, demonstrating their critical thinking skills. The kids also identified errors in AI solutions and explanations, highlighting the differences between human and artificial intelligence. We are living in an era where artificial intelligence (AI) is slowly taking over the world. While concerns arise if AI would replace humans one day, a new study shows it cannot defeat kids! A team of researchers developed a game that AI systems blatantly failed! Researchers at the University of Washington developed A game called AI Puzzlers to show kids an area where AI systems fail: solving certain reasoning puzzles. The findings were presented at the Interaction Design and Children 2025 conference in Reykjavik, Iceland. Kids beat AI The users have to solve 'ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus)' puzzles by completing patterns of colored blocks. The kids can ask AI chatbots to solve it. However, these bots nearly always fail. To understand if kids were smarter than AI, the researchers tested the game with two groups of kids. The researchers found that the children learned to think critically about AI responses and discovered ways to nudge the systems toward better answers. 'Kids naturally loved ARC puzzles, and they're not specific to any language or culture. Because the puzzles rely solely on visual pattern recognition, even kids who can't read yet can play and learn. They get a lot of satisfaction in being able to solve the puzzles, and then in seeing AI — which they might consider super smart — fail at the puzzles that they thought were easy,' lead author Aayushi Dangol, a UW doctoral student in human-centered design and engineering, said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo What are ARC puzzles Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus puzzles were developed in 2019. It was designed in a way it is difficult for computers, but easy for humans. These puzzles require abstraction: being able to look at a few examples of a pattern, then apply it to a new example. Though the current AI models have improved at ARC puzzles, they've not caught up with humans. Findings For the study, the researchers developed AI Puzzlers with 12 ARC puzzles that kids can solve. The kids can compare solutions with AI, and an 'Ask AI to Explain' button also generates a text explanation of its solution attempt. In some cases, when the system got the puzzle right, it still struggled to get the explanation accurate. The kids could correct AI, using an 'Assist Mode'. 'Initially, kids were giving really broad hints. Like, 'Oh, this pattern is like a doughnut.' An AI model might not understand that a kid means that there's a hole in the middle, so then the kid needs to iterate. Maybe they say, 'A white space surrounded by blue squares,'' Dangol said. Kids turned winners The researchers tested the system at UW College of Engineering's Discovery Days last year. More than 100 kids from grades 3 to 8 participated in the game. They also held two sessions with KidsTeam UW, a group that helps design technology with children. In those sessions, 21 kids aged 6 to 11 played AI Puzzlers and worked with the researchers. 'The kids in KidsTeam are used to giving advice on how to make a piece of technology better. We hadn't really thought about adding the Assist Mode feature, but during these co-design sessions, we were talking with the kids about how we might help AI solve the puzzles and the idea came from that,' co-senior author Jason Yip, a UW associate professor in the Information School and KidsTeam director, said. Children were able to spot errors both in the puzzle solutions and in the text explanations from the AI models. They were also able to recognize differences in how human brains think and how AI systems generate information. 'This is the internet's mind. It's trying to solve it based only on the internet, but the human brain is creative,' one kid said. 7 AI Chatbots You NEED To Know! (They're NOT All The Same!) 'Kids are smart and capable. We need to give them opportunities to make up their own minds about what AI is and isn't, because they're actually really capable of recognizing it. And they can be bigger skeptics than adults,' co-senior author Julie Kientz, a UW professor and chair in human-center design and engineering, added.
