
LDP, Komeito Eye Steps Against Election Interference; Foreign Bots Said to Spread Misinformation Online
The secretaries general of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito held talks in Tokyo and reached the agreement.
'Preventing foreign interference in elections is one of the most important issues,' said Komeito Secretary General Makoto Nishida at a press conference following the meeting.
False information and misinformation could distort election results. The LDP and Komeito plan to discuss the issue with the opposition parties, eyeing steps including possible revisions to the Information Distribution Platform Law.'We will continue to discuss specific measures in the future,' LDP Secretary General Hiroshi Moriyama said at the press conference.
In the upper house election, cases of anomalous dissemination of social media posts were reported to the government by private data analysis companies and others. According to government officials, it is believed that an automated posting program called a bot was used, and posts critical of the government were widely disseminated through a large number of 'likes' and repeated reposts.
In Europe and the United States, Russian interference in elections has become an issue. The Japanese government suspects that foreigners were involved in the case of the upper house election.'Our country is also a target of such operations,' said Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Kazuhiko Aoki at a press conference on July 16.
The Cabinet Intelligence and Research Office and the National Security Secretariat collect and analyze data related to the spread of false and misleading information believed to be from foreign forces, and not only during elections. However, the system is considered weak compared to that of other countries.
'The government does not have a department specifically assigned to this issue. We need to strengthen our system,' digital minister Masaaki Taira said at a press conference on Tuesday.
Within the government, there is a plan to establish a system to tackle the issue centered on the Cabinet Secretariat. The government will consider effective measures in the future.
The government plans to strengthen its ability to respond to election interference in cooperation with like-minded countries such as other members of the Group of Seven advanced nations. The government is considering plans to establish a specialized department for 'countering interference in domestic affairs' to share information with like-minded countries and to conduct analyses in collaboration with universities while respecting the 'freedom of expression' guaranteed by the Constitution.
'We aim to further strengthen our response capabilities by collaborating with countries that share the same concerns,' Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said at a press conference on the same day. 'We will work closely with relevant government agencies to take necessary measures.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Mainichi
a few seconds ago
- The Mainichi
Armenians and Azerbaijanis greet US-brokered peace deal with hope but also caution
YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) -- Residents and politicians in Armenia and Azerbaijan responded Saturday with cautious hope -- and skepticism in some cases -- after their leaders signed a U.S.-brokered agreement at the White House aimed at ending decades of hostilities. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed the agreement on Friday in the presence of U.S. President Donald Trump, who stood between the leaders as they shook hands -- a gesture Trump reinforced by clasping their hands together. While the agreement does not constitute a formal peace treaty, it represents a significant diplomatic step toward normalization of relations. The two countries remain technically at war, and the deal does not resolve the longstanding dispute over the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh. It does, however, reflect the shifting power dynamics following Azerbaijan's 2023 military victory, which forced the withdrawal of Armenian forces and ethnic Armenians from the region. Among the agreement's provisions is the creation of a new transit corridor, dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity," highlighting a changing geopolitical landscape amid declining Russian influence in the South Caucasus. Nagorno-Karabakh has been at the heart of the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict since the Soviet Union's collapse. Although internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan, the mountainous region was controlled for decades by ethnic Armenian forces backed by Armenia. Two wars -- in the early 1990s and again in 2020 -- left tens of thousands dead and displaced. In 2023, Azerbaijan regained control of most of the territory in a swift offensive. Hopeful for peace and a weaker Moscow Ali Karimli, head of the opposition People's Front of Azerbaijan Party, wrote on Facebook that the signing of the agreement "has undoubtedly brought Azerbaijan and Armenia significantly closer to peace," and noted that it delivered "another blow ... to Russia's influence in the South Caucasus," while deepening ties with the U.S. Arif Hajili, chairman of Azerbaijani opposition party Musavat, said he believed that "the most positive aspect of the initialing in Washington was the absence of Russia from the process." He said lasting stability in the region hinges on the continual dwindling of Russian power, which "depends on the outcome of the Russian--Ukrainian war." Hajili also warned of lingering challenges, including Armenia's economic dependence on Russia and some 2 million Azerbaijanis living in Russia. "Russia will continue to use these factors as levers of pressure," he said. Hope on the streets of Azerbaijan's capital "We have been waiting for a long time for this agreement to be signed," a resident of Baku, Gunduz Aliyev, told The Associated Press. "We did not trust our neighbor, Armenia. That's why a strong state was needed to act as a guarantor. Russia couldn't do it, but the United States succeeded." "The U.S. is taking full responsibility for security. This will bring peace and stability," said another, Ali Mammadov. "Borders will open soon, and normal relations with Armenia will be established." Abulfat Jafarov, also in Baku, expressed gratitude to all three leaders involved. "Peace is always a good thing," he said. "We welcome every step taken towards progress." More divided views in the Armenian capital Some people in Yerevan were unsure of the meaning of the agreement. "I feel uncertain because much still needs clarification. There are unclear aspects, and although the prime minister of Armenia made some statements from the U.S., more details are needed," Edvard Avoyan said. But entrepreneur Hrach Ghasumyan could see economic benefits. "If gas and oil pipelines pass through Armenia and railway routes are opened, it would be beneficial for the country," he said. "Until now, all major routes have passed through Georgia, leaving Armenia sidelined and economically limited." Others were skeptical that peace could be achieved, and expressed discontent with the terms of the agreement. "That declaration is unlikely to bring real peace to the region, and we are well aware of Azerbaijan's stance," Ruzanna Ghazaryan said. "This initial agreement offers us nothing; the concessions are entirely one-sided."


Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Lula and Putin Discuss Peace in Ukraine before US Summit
BRASILIA, Aug 9 (Reuters) – Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva spoke with Russia's President Vladimir Putin on Saturday for about 40 minutes, the Brazilian presidential palace said, adding that Putin shared information about his discussions with the United States and 'recent peace efforts between Russia and Ukraine.' The leaders also discussed their cooperation in the BRICS group of emerging countries and 'discussed the current international political and economic scenario,' according to the statement. The conversation with Lula is the latest of a flurry of calls between Putin and foreign leaders in recent days ahead of the Russian president's expected meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump next week. Putin spoke to the leaders of China and India, both also part of the BRICS group of developing nations, and other presidents from Central Asia and Europe on Friday to brief them on his contacts with the United States about the war in Ukraine. Lula has been in a public spat with Trump since the U.S. imposed a 50% tariff on the imports of Brazilian goods, which Trump linked to an alleged 'witch hunt' against his ally and Brazil's former right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro. U.S. imports of some Brazilian products, such as orange juice and aircraft, received a lower rate. Lula told Reuters on Wednesday he planned to call the leaders of the BRICS countries, which also include South Africa, to discuss a joint response to Trump's tariffs on U.S. imports. The Brazilian leader spoke with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday. Trump has threatened BRICS nations with additional 10% tariffs last month, as the group gathered in a summit in Rio de Janeiro in July.


Yomiuri Shimbun
2 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Expands Use of Tariffs to Reach National Security Goals
President Donald Trump's freewheeling use of tariffs as a tool of American power may have been more extensive than was publicly known, encompassing an array of national security goals as well as the interests of individual companies, according to internal government documents obtained by The Washington Post. This month, State Department officials considered demanding that U.S. trading partners vote against an international effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the oceangoing container ships that are the backbone of global trade. In a draft 'action memo,' Secretary of State Marco Rubio was told that department officials had sought 'to inject this issue into the ongoing bilateral trade negotiations' with maritime nations such as Singapore. That move came after administration officials this past spring debated broadening trade negotiations with more than a dozen nations, including by requiring Israel to eliminate a Chinese company's control of a key port and insisting that South Korea publicly support deploying U.S. troops to deter China as well as Seoul's traditional rival, North Korea, the documents said. Administration officials saw trade talks as an opportunity to achieve objectives that went far beyond Trump's oft-stated goal of reducing the chronic U.S. trade deficit. In the first weeks after the president paused his 'reciprocal' tariffs April 9 to allow for negotiations, officials drew up plans to press countries near China for a closer defense relationship, including the purchase of U.S. equipment and port visits, the documents said. 'This is the first time I've seen that type of request in a trade agreement. When you're sitting at the negotiating table, you're not talking about this stuff,' said Wendy Cutler, who spent more than a quarter century in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and is now vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute in Washington. The latest sign that Trump views tariffs as the Swiss Army knife of diplomacy came this week, when he threatened to impose a 50 percent tariff on Indian goods to compel New Delhi to halt Russian oil purchases that the U.S. says support Russia's war in Ukraine. In an eight-page list of 'supplemental negotiating objectives,' U.S. officials acknowledged that potential accords would cover issues, including military basing, 'not traditionally found in a trade agreement.' Officials also discussed pressing other nations to provide concessions for individual companies including Chevron, one of the world's 10 largest oil producers, and Elon Musk's Starlink. The negotiating document contained suggestions from other Cabinet departments in response to a request by the office of U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and bore a handwritten notation indicating that it was a May 1 draft. It is not clear whether the provisions were discussed in the negotiations. Trump has announced several framework trade agreements with the European Union, Japan, Vietnam and others. But the administration has not released formal texts. A USTR spokesperson declined to comment. 'The document sent shock waves through the government,' said one State Department employee who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the press. 'This isn't normally how it works.' Trump on several occasions has publicly mixed trade and unrelated issues. In January, the president said he would impose tariffs on Colombian goods unless that country's leader agreed to accept deported migrants, which he eventually did. Last month, Trump threatened 50 percent tariffs on imports from Brazil if the government did not halt its prosecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro for allegedly fomenting a coup. On April 2, Trump described his tariffs as a response to other nations' unfair trade practices that would reduce the $1.2 trillion U.S. merchandise trade deficit. The import taxes could be lowered for countries that 'align sufficiently with the United States on economic and national security matters,' his executive order said. As U.S. negotiators scrambled to prepare for simultaneous talks with 18 top trading partners, suggestions poured in from across the administration. The South Korean government should be urged to endorse a change in the positioning of U.S. troops stationed there under the U.S. Forces Korea command, according to an early draft of a U.S.-Korea agreement. Among the goals listed was a requirement that 'Korea will issue a political statement supporting flexibility for USFK force posture to better deter China while continuing to deter [North Korea],' it said. The U.S. also wanted Seoul to boost defense spending to 3.8 percent of GDP, up from 2.6 percent last year, and to increase its $1 billion-plus contribution to cover the annual costs of basing the roughly 28,500 American troops in South Korea. In a July 28 press briefing, Woo Sang-ho, South Korea's senior secretary for political affairs, confirmed that defense issues were 'on the negotiation list.' But they were not in the agreement that Trump announced two days later. Trump nodded to his concerns over allied burden-sharing tariff remarks April 2 in the Rose Garden, during what he dubbed 'Liberation Day.' 'We take care of countries all over the world. We pay for their military. We pay for everything they have to pay. And then when you want to cut back a little bit, they get upset that you're not taking care of them any longer,' the president said. The negotiating document showed that administration officials planned to push several governments including Taiwan, India and Indonesia to increase their defense spending or to buy more U.S. military hardware. Such national security considerations may help explain why most countries did not retaliate against the U.S. with their own tariffs on American goods, said Phil Luck, director of the economics program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'They don't think this is just an economic competition. They're concerned we will escalate above that [and] pull out of NATO or change troop deployments,' said Luck, who served as the State Department's deputy chief economist in the Biden administration. Indeed, some Trump officials envisioned using the trade negotiations to contain Chinese strategic influence. Administration officials hoped that Trump's threat of a 49 percent tariff on Cambodian goods would persuade government officials in Phnom Penh to allow the 'U.S. Navy to conduct annual (or bi-annual) ship visits and training exercises at Ream Naval Base' in southwestern Cambodia. Washington had grown concerned over a Chinese naval presence at the facility, which offers direct access to the contested South China Sea. The U.S. wanted the Cambodian government to prohibit Chinese military 'deployments outside of Ream,' the document said. Israeli officials were to be pushed 'to remove Chinese port ownership in Haifa,' a coastal city in northern Israel. In 2015, China's Shanghai International Port Group, a majority state-owned company, won a 25-year contract to operate a new automated container-handling facility there. U.S. concerns over the Chinese presence in Haifa date to the Biden administration. U.S. Navy vessels have often docked at an Israeli navy base that is adjacent to the commercial port. U.S. officials also worried about another port under Chinese control in the northern Australian city of Darwin, which hosts about 2,500 U.S. Marines on a rotational deployment. China's Landbridge Group signed a 99-year lease to operate the Australian port in 2015. U.S. negotiators wanted a 'signal' from the Australian government of its 'intent to revisit its arrangement on the operation of the Port of Darwin by a China-backed firm.' During the Australian election campaign this year, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged to return the port to local ownership. But port worries were just one element of a broader anti-China proposal. In East Africa, the administration wanted Madagascar to refuse to permit 'China to establish military bases and expand military cooperation.' Another East African nation, the tiny island of Mauritius, should conduct a study on removing telecom equipment made by China's Huawei, ZTE and Hikvision from its telecom and surveillance networks. And officials wanted Argentina to consult with U.S. experts about implementing 'control measures' at Chinese space installations in that country to 'ensure their exclusively civilian use.' The draft also suggested ways the U.S. government could prioritize the interests of specific companies. In Lesotho, a poor southern African nation that Trump had threatened with 50 percent tariffs, negotiators wanted the government to finalize deals with 'multiple U.S. firms.' OnePower, a renewable energy start-up, should be granted 'a five-year withholding tax exemption' and a license to develop a 24-megawatt project. Regulators should waive a legal requirement for Starlink, Musk's satellite-based internet provider, to provide a physical address in Lesotho before conducting business there, the document said. In mid-April, Newsday, a newspaper in Maseru, the capital of Lesotho, reported that there was no evidence of a Starlink office at the location the company had given as its registered address, 'raising serious legal and regulatory concerns.' In Israel, U.S. officials wanted the government not to 'proceed with any draft regulations or potential plans to force Chevron to sell its interests or status as operator in one of its offshore natural gas fields.' The Houston-based energy company has been operating in Israel since 2020. 'Chevron engages regularly with government officials and key stakeholders at home and abroad as a normal course of business. While we do not discuss details, our conversations always focus on the benefits we believe we bring to the communities where we operate, including the Eastern Mediterranean,' Chevron said when asked if it had requested U.S. government help. The administration continues to leverage trade talks for broader gains. McCoy Pitt, the senior official in the State Department's international organization affairs bureau, wrote the secretary of state this month about linking trade talks with hopes of killing a global climate change deal. Pitt urged Rubio to approve a strategy before a scheduled October vote by members of the International Maritime Organization on limiting greenhouse gas emissions by large container ships. The U.N. agency in April approved draft regulations, which the State Department memo described as a 'global carbon tax.' Pitt's memo, titled 'Protecting U.S. Shipping Interests by Defeating the International Maritime Organization's 'Net-Zero Framework,'' said that as part of any trade deal with the U.S., countries 'are instructed' or 'would be expected' to vote against the IMO proposal. Through an online portal, the State Department said: 'We do not comment on purportedly leaked documents. We do, however, look forward to the story on how the Trump Administration is using reciprocal trade negotiations to benefit and fight for the American people.'