
Should you help your children buy a home?
The Bank of Mum and Dad is not a benevolent institution. It is an inequality engine. Helping your kids get on the property ladder may feel like good parenting, but it fuels a system that rewards birthright over merit and privilege over effort.
And this is not just about fair play — although that matters. It is about distortion. Housing should be about what you earn, not who you are born to, and yet we're hurtling towards a feudal set-up where access to shelter hinges on parental wealth. In 2023 more than half of first-time buyers had financial help from family — so much for social mobility.
• Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts
Meanwhile, the parents are often the ones doing the sacrificing. Draining pensions, dipping into savings, compromising their retirement or their future care needs to prop up a politically induced broken housing system.
Others face tricky family politics. What if one child gets help and another doesn't? Suddenly the family WhatsApp group turns into a minefield. And don't forget the long-term cost, because if that gifted deposit pushes mum or dad below the threshold for local authority-funded care, the state picks up the tab. So we all end up paying for this bad idea.
It also warps the market. When we inflate demand from cash-boosted buyers, it keeps prices high and shuts out the truly independent. It's no coincidence that areas with the most intergenerational support are often the least affordable — and the most resistant to change.
Many of those lobbying against new homes do so under the guise of 'heritage' or 'environmental protection'. All the while ignoring the paradox: if you really want to help your children, stop blocking homes for them to live in.
This is the real betrayal of Britain's working class. We have normalised parental bailouts instead of fixing the system. Homeownership should be a reward for work and not a birthright.
Parental gifts may be well intentioned. But they entrench inequality, destabilise retirement and price out millions. Let's call it what it is: a personal favour that perpetuates a national failure.
• Rachel Reeves is right, but she is walking a tightrope — with our money
Helping your children get on the property ladder is a deeply personal decision — but if you're in a position to offer support, I'd argue it is a good idea.
Intergenerational fairness is one of the strongest reasons why helping your child buy a home is the right thing to do. Many parents benefited from a housing market that has since become vastly less accessible.
In the 1980s the average age of a first-time buyer was about 27. Today it's closer to 34 — and that's often with help. Property prices have risen much faster than wages, making it almost impossible for many twentysomethings to buy without a financial leg-up.
If you plan to pass on wealth to the next generation, why not do it when it could make the biggest difference? An inheritance often arrives when adult children are already financially stable or even nearing retirement themselves. But helping them in their earlier years will allow them to stop wasting money on rent and start investing in a secure, long-term home.
A study by the HomeOwners Alliance found that 54 per cent of homeowners with adult children had either already helped them buy a home or expected to in the future. Among homeowners whose children do not yet own property, 59 per cent worried about their chances of ever buying a home.
But help doesn't have to mean writing a big cheque. There are several ways in which parents can support their children without handing over large sums. You might consider acting as a guarantor on a mortgage or getting a joint mortgage with your child.
There are also distinct financial advantages to the so-called Bank of Mum and Dad. A gift used for a house deposit is inheritance tax-free, provided you live for seven years after giving it. This can also reduce the size of your estate and potentially lower inheritance tax on other assets.
Helping with a deposit means your child may qualify for better mortgage rates, so that they have lower monthly repayments. A larger deposit can also help them to buy a better home — whether that means a larger space or a more suitable location — and reduce the need (and cost) of them moving again soon.
Of course, this all depends on your own financial situation. And one final piece of advice: be fair. Helping one child and not others can lead to family tensions. If you're lending, be clear and be consistent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Imported dogs could carry disease or behaviour risk, RSPCA warns
An animal charity has called for stricter regulations on animal rescues importing dogs into the UK, citing concerns about disease risks and behavioural issues Government statistics reveal that in 2023, 320,000 pets were brought into the UK under travel pet schemes and 44,000 entered as commercial imports. RSPCA spokesman David Bowles likened the process to ' Deliveroo for dogs' and called on the Government to tighten regulations on animal rescues. He told the BBC: 'The RSPCA's major concern is these dogs are essentially ticking time bombs – coming over, not being health tested. 'Diseases are now coming in through these dogs. They're affecting not just the dogs that are being imported, they could also affect the dogs already in this country and their owners. 'They've almost set up a Deliveroo for dogs and that is a real problem.' There is no requirement for rescue organisations to be licensed in England, Wales or Northern Ireland. It comes weeks after a bill that aims to stop animal smuggling and cruelty cleared the Commons with cross-party support. Legislation put forward by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers will reduce the number of animals for non-commercial entry into the UK, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant dogs and cats, and introduce a halt on the import of dogs and cats who have been 'mutilated', including having their ears docked. The MP for Winchester's Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill was supported by the Government, and will now proceed to the House of Lords on its passage to becoming law. Dr Chambers said: 'As a vet, I've seen the devastating consequences of puppy smuggling. It's unimaginably cruel to separate puppies and kittens from their mothers at a very young age, and then bring them across borders in substandard conditions where they're then sold for maximum profit by unscrupulous traders who prioritise profit over welfare.' He added: 'Careful consideration has been given to setting these limits, balancing the need to disrupt illegal trade with minimising impact on genuine pet owners. To underpin this, only an owner, not an authorised person, will be permitted to sign and declare that the movement of a dog or cat is non-commercial. He criticised the influence of social media on the increased demand for dogs with docked ears, and a party colleague hit out at the platforms' role in publishing animal abuse. He said: 'One reason that there is such an interest in dogs with cropped ears is that a lot of influencers on Instagram and other social media platforms pose with these dogs or show they have these new dogs with cropped ears. Many people aren't aware that this is a mutilation. 'They think it's how the dogs' ears normally look, and it drives a demand for dogs that look like this.'


Times
10 minutes ago
- Times
Financial Ombudsman Service boss paid £230,000 after ousting
The ousted head of the Financial Ombudsman Service received a pay-off of almost £230,000, it has been disclosed in the annual report. Abby Thomas, who left abruptly on 6 February, was paid £229,869 in severance payments on top of her normal salary. The payoff included £100,000 for loss of office, £107,692 in lieu of notice and £22,177 for a period of gardening leave that began on the day she left, the FOS said. MPs on the Treasury select committee have hit out at the manner of her departure and criticised the FOS chairwoman Baroness Manzoor for refusing to answer questions on why Thomas left and whether she was forced out. The FOS, which rules on complaints by consumers about financial services firms and can set compensation orders, is under pressure to reform. Rachel Reeves has pledged to curb its powers so it no longer acts like a regulator after complaints from the industry that it has increased the cost of 'mass redress events'. It has been dealing with a significant rise in claims, mainly related to car finance loans, but also because of concerns about other consumer loans and more people complaining about banks' handling of frauds. Dame Meg Hillier, chairwoman of the Treasury committee, said this month: 'The handling of this situation by the senior leadership has been deeply disappointing.' Thomas, a former Virgin Media executive, served for less than three years. She has been replaced by James Dipple-Johnstone as chief ombudsman and Jenny Simmonds as interim chief executive. Manzoor is due to retire on August 1. The FOS received 450,000 new inquiries in the year to March, up from 330,000. The motor finance industry is braced for a judgment from the Supreme Court this Friday that could determine the scale of compensation payments for failing to disclose commissions paid to dealers.


Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Activist investor steps up pressure on Smith & Nephew
The activist investor Cevian Capital has raised its shareholding in Smith & Nephew, increasing pressure on the FTSE 100 medical equipment maker before its half-year results. Filings show Cevian, one of Europe's biggest activist investors, has raised its stake to 8.5 per cent having first publicly emerged with a holding in July last year via a Jersey-based vehicle. Cevian, which had raised it to 7.5 per cent in February, is understood to be the largest shareholder. The stake building comes before half-year results from Smith & Nephew on August 5 where investors will look for signs of a turnaround in the performance of its orthopaedics division, the group's largest. The group remains committed to retaining the business, but following full-year results in February, John Rogers, Smith & Nephew's chief financial officer, outlined scenarios under which it could evaluate options.