
Air India under fire for flying Airbus planes with unchecked emergency escape slides
The warning notices and an investigation report - both reviewed by Reuters - were not in any way related to last week's crash of an Air India Boeing 787-8 plane that killed all but one of the 242 people onboard, and were sent days before that incident.
In the report, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation said spot checks in May on three Air India Airbus planes found that they were operated despite mandatory inspections being overdue on the "critical emergency equipment" of escape slides.
In one case, the watchdog found that the inspection of an Airbus A320 jet was delayed by more than a month before being carried out on May 15. AirNav Radar data shows that during the delay the plane flew to international destinations such as Dubai, Riyadh and Jeddah.
Another case, involving an Airbus A319 used on domestic routes, showed checks were over three months late, while a third showed an inspection was two days late.
"The above cases indicate that aircraft were operated with expired or unverified emergency equipment, which is a violation of standard airworthiness and safety requirements," the DGCA report said.
Air India "failed to submit timely compliance responses" to deficiencies raised by the DGCA, "further evidencing weak procedural control and oversight," it added.
Air India, which was taken over by the Tata Group in 2022 from the government, said in statement that it was "accelerating" verification of all maintenance records, including dates of the escape slides, and would complete the process in the coming days.
In one of the cases, Air India said, the issue came to light when an engineer from AI Engineering Services "inadvertently deployed an escape slide during maintenance".
The DGCA and Airbus did not respond to Reuters queries.
Checks on escape slides are "a very serious issue. In case of accident, if they don't open, it can lead to serious injuries," said Vibhuti Singh, a former legal expert at the government's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau.
The DGCA said in its report that the certificates of airworthiness for aircraft that miss mandatory checks were "deemed suspended".
The warning notices and the report were sent by Animesh Garg, a deputy director of airworthiness in the Indian government, to Air India CEO Campbell Wilson as well as the airline's continuing airworthiness manager, quality manager and head of planning, the documents showed.
An Indian aviation lawyer said such breaches typically attract monetary and civil penalties on both individual executives and the airline.
Wilson told Reuters last year that global parts shortages were affecting most airlines, but the problem was "more acute" for Air India as its "product is obviously a lot more dated", with many planes not refreshed since they were delivered in 2010-2011.
The Indian regulator, like many abroad, often fines airlines for compliance lapses. India's junior aviation minister in February told parliament that authorities had warned or fined airlines in 23 instances for safety violations last year.
Around half of them - 12 - involved Air India and Air India Express, including in one case for "unauthorised entry into cockpit". The biggest fine was $127,000 on Air India for "insufficient oxygen on board" during a flight to San Francisco.
Last week's crash, the causes of which are still being investigated, will further challenge Air India's attempts to rebuild its image, after years of criticism from travellers for poor service.
Air India's Chairman N. Chandrasekaran on Monday told staff the crash should be a catalyst to build a safer airline, urging employees to stay resolute amid any criticism.
In its report, the DGCA also said several Air India aircraft checked by officials had outdated registration paperwork. Air India told Reuters all but one aircraft complied with such requirements and this "poses no impact" to safety.
The DGCA investigation report pulled up the airline for what it described as "inadequate internal oversight."
"Despite prior notifications and identified deficiencies, the organization's internal quality and planning departments failed to implement effective corrective action, indicating systemic control failure," it said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The carbon cost of real estate
India's real estate sector stands on the threshold of a vital transformation. Traditionally shaped by policy reforms, consumer sentiment, and macroeconomic trends, it now faces a new market force: the cost of carbon. With India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) launching in pilot form and commercial real estate entering PAT Cycle VI under the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), carbon management has shifted from voluntary green building efforts to mandatory financial discipline. This is more than an environmental compliance issue — it is an economic recalibration. According to the World Bank, nearly 24% of global emissions are now covered by carbon pricing instruments. Indian buildings, which account for approximately 25% of national emissions today, are poised to become regulated emitters with financial liabilities attached. Developers, investors, and occupiers must now answer a new question: not just 'what is the ROI?' but 'what is the carbon cost?' Carbon pricing is not a policy experiment — it's a new operating reality. The CCTS, enabled by the Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act 2022, will soon introduce emissions accountability for high-consumption sectors, including real estate. The scheme operates on a rate-based Emissions Trading System (ETS), meaning that entities will be assigned intensity benchmarks — like kilograms of CO₂ per square metre — and must meet or beat them or purchase credits to bridge the gap. Unlike the earlier PAT Scheme, which focused on industrial energy efficiency, CCTS will monetise carbon, creating market-driven consequences for poor energy performance. The Bureau of Energy Efficiency has already notified energy-use intensity norms for large buildings, and the upcoming National Carbon Registry will link energy audit outcomes to carbon credit eligibility. Pricing trajectory The pricing trajectory is already being tested. Internal calculations at BEE suggest that carbon credits may trade in the ₹800–₹2,000/tonne range during the pilot phase. For a five-lakh commercial asset emitting 3,000 tonnes annually, this could mean a ₹24 lakh–₹60 lakh recurring liability if corrective measures aren't taken. If the asset overperforms, it could generate surplus credits of equivalent financial value. This dual-edge market mechanism makes carbon performance an active profit-and-loss consideration for developers and asset owners. India's real estate is entering the regulatory lens traditionally reserved for industries like cement, steel, or thermal power. The reason is simple: real estate is responsible for 38% of global energy-related emissions, and in India, commercial buildings alone consume over 180-220 kWh/sq.m./year. When scaled nationally, this amount is more than the total power usage of Bangladesh or Sri Lanka. As CCTS evolves, so will the scrutiny around operational performance. Asset valuations will shift accordingly. A JLL India study from 2024 indicated that Grade-A office assets with IGBC or LEED Gold certifications command 8%–11% higher rental yields than their non-compliant peers. Additionally, buildings with smart meters, rooftop solar, or BMS systems enjoy average energy cost savings of 25%–30%, improving long-term NOI. Institutional capital is already adapting. Blackstone, Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPPIB), and GIC have begun stress-testing Indian real estate assets for ESG compliance. Green premiums are no longer abstract—they show up in deal valuations, especially in REITs. Embassy REIT, for instance, cited its portfolio's 87% green-certified area as a strategic differentiator in its FY24 investor presentation. Conscious occupiers Carbon pricing will not only shape asset ownership economics — it will reshape tenant behaviour. Occupiers, particularly global tech, finance, and consulting firms, are setting internal net-zero targets that require emissions tracking across leased spaces. In 2023, over 45% of Fortune 500 companies operating in India required sustainability disclosures from their landlords as part of lease negotiations. For example, in Bengaluru, a major US-headquartered technology company declined to renew its lease in a premium but non-certified commercial complex, opting instead for a nearby IGBC Platinum-rated building with a 17% higher lease rate. The reason? The new facility allowed for tenant-level emissions monitoring and reporting — a key requirement for their ESG reporting. This tenant shift is now influencing developers' leasing strategies. Green leases, which include shared responsibility for retrofits and energy savings, are gaining popularity. Landlords who can validate energy consumption in real time and participate in decarbonisation efforts are enjoying higher renewal rates and longer lease tenures. A 2024 survey by Colliers India revealed that 72% of tenants would pay more for spaces aligned with sustainability goals. In the era of carbon pricing, building performance is no longer just an engineering parameter — it's a leasing currency. Carbon performance is rapidly becoming a differentiator in capital access. Financial institutions in India and globally are integrating climate risk into their underwriting criteria. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), in its latest discussion paper, encouraged banks to link risk weights to energy-efficiency performance. For developers, this means that greener buildings will receive more favourable financing terms—and potentially more patient capital. Indian commercial real estate has already seen green bonds grow from ₹3,500 crore in 2020 to over ₹11,000 crore in 2024. These bonds are increasingly used to fund green-certified projects with demonstrable carbon reductions. Axis Bank, SBI, and HDFC Ltd. now offer green home loan variants with 10-25 bps rate discounts for IGBC/ GRIHA properties. Moreover, the CCTS introduces the prospect of performance-linked lending. In the EU, banks offer carbon-linked loans where interest rates drop based on verified emissions cuts. This is likely to arrive in India within the next three years. Insurance is also adapting. No longer theoretical Delay will prove expensive as carbon costs are no longer theoretical — they're operational. The smartest developers are now stress-testing their entire pipeline for carbon risk. From conceptual stage to post-occupancy, every decision—from facade material to HVAC selection — impacts emissions exposure. At present, retrofitting a 5-lakh commercial building with solar, VFD pumps, and BMS can cost ₹4 crore–₹6 crore. But with energy savings of 25%-35% and potential carbon credits of 1,500–2,000 tonnes/year, the payback period often falls below five years. In contrast, inaction will soon invite penalties and carbon liabilities exceeding ₹50 lakhs/year for large assets. Some developers are already adapting. RMZ Corp has integrated whole-life carbon analysis into its project planning. Godrej Properties now includes ESG scoring in site selection and capital allocation. These are no longer niche practices — they are rapidly becoming industry standards. The Bureau of Energy Efficiency has proposed mandatory energy-use disclosures in building sanction processes by 2026. Urban local bodies may soon embed carbon offsets in Floor Area Ratio (FAR) approvals, much like London's boroughs. In an economy poised to grow and urbanise rapidly, real estate is uniquely positioned to decouple growth from emissions. Those who embrace this transition will access cheaper capital, retain premium tenants, and build portfolios that are future-ready. The carbon clock is ticking — and the smartest in the industry are already ahead of it. The writer is CEM, CEA, CMVP, EIT, LEED Green Associate.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Maharashtra CM Fadnavis flags rising property prices in Mumbai despite major infra push
Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that despite sweeping infrastructure improvements across the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR), which should have eased supply constraints and moderated property prices, housing prices across the city and peripheral areas continue to rise, underlining the challenges of affordability in India's most expensive real estate market. Independence Day 2025 Modi signals new push for tech independence with local chips Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose gave India its own currency Fadnavis pointed to the expansion of metro lines, highways, and connectivity corridors across MMR that have opened up new catchments for development. 'Normally, with so much infrastructure growth, prices should stabilize. But in Mumbai, they are still going up,' he said while interacting with developers at an Industry event, noting that the demand-supply imbalance remains a structural hurdle. Over the past decade, Mumbai region has seen a wave of big-ticket infrastructure projects aimed at easing congestion and expanding the city's boundaries, from the 21.8-km Mumbai Trans Harbour Link ( Atal Setu ) and the Coastal Road to the rapid expansion of the metro network. The Navi Mumbai International Airport , the Mumbai–Nagpur Samruddhi Expressway, the upcoming Bandra–Versova Sea Link, and upgrades to the suburban rail network are further reshaping how people and goods move across the region. Together, these projects have dramatically improved connectivity, unlocking new catchments for housing and commercial development. In theory, this scale of infrastructure expansion should have helped moderate property prices by dispersing demand more evenly across the region. Yet, prices in Mumbai have continued to climb despite these transformative gains, Fadnavis pointed out. The CM also highlighted the government's long-term growth strategy, including the plan to create a 'Fourth Mumbai' around the upcoming Vadhavan Port in Palghar district. The new urban centre will be backed by significant infrastructure push aimed at attracting cutting-edge industries. Together, these are expected to spur large-scale housing and economic activity. Fadnavis credited the developer community, particularly to collaborate with the government in shaping the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) in Maharashtra and in drafting Mumbai's Development Plan. 'It was one of the first times everybody accepted the plan because it was made with industry participation,' he said. He also underscored the role of redevelopment in reshaping Mumbai—ranging from slum rehabilitation and cluster projects to the BDD chawl redevelopment, billed as Asia's largest urban renewal programme, with completion targeted by 2029. To deliver faster results, he urged developers to adopt global construction technologies that allow high-rises to be built in record time. 'From Fourth Mumbai to redevelopment at the city's core, the opportunities are enormous,' Fadnavis said. 'But unless we bring speed, affordability, and global standards, the dream of a truly reshaped Mumbai will remain incomplete.' He also encouraged the developers to form alliances with the government and even global institutional investors to develop key projects and participate in the transformation of Mumbai through large-scale redevelopment, affordable housing, and the upcoming Third and Fourth Mumbai around the northern periphery of the region.


NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
With No Deal With Putin, Will US Tariff China's Oil Trade? What Trump Said
Washington: US President Donald Trump seems to have softened his stance on Moscow's oil trade after meeting Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. When asked about retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China and India for buying Russian oil, the American leader said he has no immediate plans to consider that, but might do it "in two or three weeks." Trump was asked by Fox News' Sean Hannity if he was now considering punitive actions against Beijing after talks with Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. Before he met with Putin, Trump had claimed Russia lost India as one of its oil clients after Washington announced a penalty on New Delhi over the purchases, which pushed the Russian leader to the negotiation table. America has threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are Russia's top two oil buyers. The US has already imposed an additional 25 per cent tariff on imports of Indian goods last week, citing its continued imports of Russian oil. However, no similar action has been taken against China so far. Beijing's slowing economy is likely to suffer a blow if Trump follows through on a promise to ramp up Russia-related sanctions and tariffs. Chinese President Xi Jinping is working with Trump on a trade deal that could lower tensions - and import taxes - between the world's two biggest economies. But China could be the biggest remaining target, outside of Russia, if Trump ramps up punitive measures.