Army veteran, 84, begins final Tintanic II mission
Michael Stanley, known as Major Mick, first took to the seas and rivers of southern England on his boat, dubbed Tintanic, to raise money for a Ukrainian orphanage in 2020.
He said the orphanage is closing as the majority of children had been rehoused with their extended families and the few remaining were being taken into the Romanian care system.
The 84-year-old, who has so far raised £88,000 by rowing 480 miles, set off from Chichester Yacht Club on Friday as he begins his final year of fundraising with hopes of reaching £100,000 and 500 miles.
Mr Stanley sold the original Tintanic for £480, which he donated to the orphanage, and built Tintanic II, which he will use for the final time this year.
The funds raised in his final challenge will be donated to St Wilfrid's Hospice, based in Chichester.
During his rowing challenges across England, Scotland and Wales, Mr Stanley has met the King and the prime minister, but said the time had come to call it a day.
"My wife isn't too keen on travelling with the boat in the car and I'm starting to run out of ideas," he said.
"It's been a fantastic way of passing the time, but it's the people that have made it so special."
The Duke of Richmond launched Tintanic II from the Chichester Yacht Club, in Birdham, at 11:00 BST on Friday.
Mr Stanley left the pontoon at 11:45 and rowed a short distance to get a few more miles under his belt, before taking on a series of rows later this year.
He said he expected to do more than 500 miles and was even planning to row along the entire northern coast of the Isle of Wight.
Follow BBC Kent on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
Army vet Major Mick, 81, sets sail on Tintanic II
Army veteran launches charity row in homemade boat
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
College wasn't right for me, so I joined the Marines. I was able to travel and avoid student loan debt.
Growing up in Memphis, I felt like I had to choose between college and the military. I decided to join the Marines because I wanted to travel and didn't want to wait four years. The Marines inspired me to be the person I am today, and it was the best option for me. Growing up in Memphis meant choosing between limited paths. If you were tall and skinny, you played basketball. Short and husky meant football. I loved soccer, but was talked out of it early. I tried basketball, but I never made the teams. I also tried my hand at rap, but I knew it would never pay the bills. Only two options were left for me: go to college or join the military. College was the default option, but I never planned for it. I also didn't want to wait four years to make money. When I took a step back, I realized all I wanted to do was travel and work. I asked myself: Why go to college when the military would let me do exactly that right now? I spent months researching the military The military offered adventure that college couldn't provide. The military appealed to me in ways college couldn't. I wanted structure and adventure, to serve something bigger while needing financial stability. College couldn't provide the experiences I craved. I wanted to ride helicopters, drive military trucks, and shoot machine guns. I wanted to live like an action star. The military would pay for education while providing immediate income. College meant student loan debt while waiting four years. When I finally decided on the military, I had to face the difficult choice of deciding which branch was right for me. I created pro and con charts, analyzing myself first and then each of the military branches. I also interviewed recruiters, veterans, and retirees. My decision narrowed down to the Marines or the Army. Unable to decide, I prayed for guidance. That night, I dreamed of myself wearing the blue uniforms, marching with a rifle. When I woke up, I had my answer. The dream told me I was already a Marine. Joining the military was one of the best decisions of my life People in my life tried to dissuade me from joining the Marines, worried I'd be sent to the front lines. But joining gave me the leg up I needed in life and let me live my childhood dreams. I got to be G.I. Joe in the real world. The military introduced me to incredible people and changed my outlook on many things. For example, I didn't like kids before joining, but the service opened me up to them. The Marines also helped me realize that my true dreams lay in travel. I would've never learned that if I stayed in the US on a college campus. I'd planned to do 20 years, but I departed early because I wanted to pursue a nomadic lifestyle. The military taught me I'm in control of my own life Thanks to the military, I have no student loan debt, so I'm free financially. With patience, initiative, and education, you can make anything happen. I had glimpses of this before the military, but service molded these traits in me. My decision to join the military instead of attending college allowed me to become someone I never could have imagined. It gave me the confidence to handle whatever life throws at me and showed me that the path that scares everyone else is often the path you're meant to take.


Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Mom-of-Three Hits Her Limit at In-Laws'—Her Decision Changes Everything
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A mom has no regrets after leaving her in-laws' lake house five days early with her three children. Every summer, Kelly Hubbell (@mysagehaus) and her three children—6, 4 and 2—make the long trek from Portland, Oregon, to her husband's family's lake house in Northern New York. "It's beautiful, nostalgic, and full of people we love," Hubbell, 37, told Newsweek. "But it's also a lot; a five-hour flight, two-hour drive and a ferry." Kelly Hubbell stares at the camera on a flight, left, with her daughter and son sitting next to her, right. Kelly Hubbell stares at the camera on a flight, left, with her daughter and son sitting next to her, right. @mysagehaus In the past, Hubbell said that she tries to go with the flow and will show up with a smile on her face. However, this summer, she reached her breaking point. She was sick, her toddler had just learned to crawl, and routines were completely off. "And then came a six-hour BBQ on the water," Hubbell said. "With three kids going in three directions and no one else actively on duty, I was maxed out. So, we made the call to leave five days early." Predictably, the family was surprised by the mom's swift exit. Her husband was also disappointed but, ultimately, he was supportive and understanding of Hubbell's decision. The mom of three spoke of the invisible pressure that often comes with these annual trips. "Like many women in a partnership, I've often felt a quiet pressure—whether internal or societal—to be the one who keeps the peace, makes things work and doesn't rock the boat," Hubbell said. "I feel a responsibility to make sure everything runs smoothly for everyone." It is the kind of emotional labor many moms silently shoulder until, as Hubbell said, they just can't anymore. Hubbell publicly shared her reasons for leaving the lake house early in a reel on Instagram, which has amassed thousands of views. Many moms on the platform understood her decision, posting messages of support. "Congrats to you for being strong enough to know your mental health matters more than societal stigma," one user wrote. "I get it! We just returned for a family (of 20) vacation. Not just our routines … but your own space!! We love them dearly but we do things differently," another commented. However, it also sparked fierce debate in the comments. "Most of the harshest comments came from men, and they all carried the same message: moms should be quiet; grateful; do it all without complaint," Hubbell said. "But I won't be quiet. Because every time I speak up, more moms [message] me to say, 'Thank you for saying this out loud.'" The experience only solidified Hubbell's commitment to her broader mission: supporting mothers before they burn out. She is the founder and CEO of Sage Haus, a company helping families hire house managers, meal prep chefs and family assistants. And what is Hubbell's message for other moms? "You are not failing because you need help," she said. "You are functioning in a broken system, and if something isn't working, you're allowed to say so. You're allowed to walk away. You're allowed to protect your peace."

13 hours ago
Broken altimeter, ignored warnings: Hearings reveal what went wrong in DC crash that killed 67
Over three days of sometimes contentious hearings this week, the National Transportation Safety Board interrogated Federal Aviation Administration and Army officials about a list of things that went wrong and contributed to a Black Hawk helicopter and a passenger jet colliding over Washington, D.C., killing 67 people. The biggest revelations: The helicopter's altimeter gauge was broken, and controllers warned the FAA years earlier about the dangers that helicopters presented. At one point NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy scolded the FAA for not addressing safety concerns. 'Are you kidding me? Sixty-seven people are dead! How do you explain that? Our bureaucratic process?' she said. 'Fix it. Do better.' Victims of the January crash included a group of elite young figure skaters, their parents and coaches and four union steamfitters from the Washington area. Here is a look at the major takeaways from the hearings about the collision, which alarmed travelers before a string of other crashes and close calls this year added to their worries about flying: The helicopter was flying at 278 feet (85 meters) — well above the 200-foot (61-meter) ceiling on that route — when it collided with the airliner. But investigators said the pilots might not have realized that because the barometric altimeter they were relying on was reading 80 to 100 feet (24 to 30 meters) lower than the altitude registered by the flight data recorder. The NTSB subsequently found similar discrepancies in the altimeters of three other helicopters from the same unit. An expert with Sikorsky, which makes the Black Hawks, said the one that crashed was an older model that lacked the air data computers that make for more accurate altitude readings in newer versions. Army Chief Warrant Officer Kylene Lewis told the board that an 80- to 100-foot (24- to 30-meter) discrepancy between the different altimeters on a helicopter would not be alarming, because at lower altitudes she would be relying more on the radar altimeter than the barometric altimeter. Plus Army pilots strive to stay within 100 feet (30 meters) of target altitude on flights, so they could still do that even with their altimeters that far off. But Rick Dressler of medevac operator Metro Aviation told the NTSB that imprecision would not fly with his helicopters. When a helicopter route like the one the Black Hawk was flying that night includes an altitude limit, Dressler said, his pilots consider that a hard ceiling. Both tried to deflect responsibility for the crash, but the testimony highlighted plenty of things that might have been done differently. The NTSB's final report will be done next year, but there likely will not be one single cause identified for the crash. 'I think it was a week of reckoning for the FAA and the U.S. Army in this accident,' aviation safety consultant and former crash investigator Jeff Guzzetti said. Army officials said the greater concern is that the FAA approved routes around Ronald Reagan International Airport with separation distances as small as 75 feet (23 meters) between helicopters and planes when planes are landing on a certain runway at Reagan. 'The fact that we have less than 500-foot separation is a concern for me,' said Scott Rosengren, chief engineer in the office that manages the Army's utility helicopters. Army Chief Warrant Officer David Van Vechten said he was surprised the air traffic controller let the helicopter proceed while the airliner was circling to land at Reagan's secondary runway, which is used when traffic for the main runway stacks up and accounts for about 5% of flights. Van Vechten said he was never allowed to fly under a landing plane as the Black Hawk did, but only a handful of the hundreds of times he flew that route involved planes landing on that runway. Other pilots in the unit told crash investigators it was routine to be directed to fly under landing planes, and they believed that was safe if they stuck to the approved route. Frank McIntosh, the head of the FAA's air traffic control organization, said he thinks controllers at Reagan 'were really dependent upon the use of visual separation' to keep traffic moving through the busy airspace. The NTSB said controllers repeatedly said they would just 'make it work.' They sometimes used 'squeeze plays' to land planes with minimal separation. On the night of the crash, a controller twice asked the helicopter pilots whether they had the jet in sight, and the pilots said they did and asked for visual separation approval so they could use their own eyes to maintain distance. Testimony at the hearing raised serious questions about how well the crew could spot the plane while wearing night vision goggles and whether the pilots were even looking in the right spot. The controller acknowledged in an interview that the plane's pilots were never warned when the helicopter was on a collision path, but controllers did not think telling the plane would have made a difference at that point. The plane was descending to land and tried to pull up at the last second after getting a warning in the cockpit, but it was too late. An FAA working group tried to get a warning added to helicopter charts back in 2022 urging pilots to use caution whenever the secondary runway was in use, but the agency refused. The working group said 'helicopter operations are occurring in a proximity that has triggered safety events. These events have been trending in the wrong direction and increasing year over year.' Separately, a different group at the airport discussed moving the helicopter route, but those discussions did not go anywhere. And a manager at a regional radar facility in the area urged the FAA in writing to reduce the number of planes taking off and landing at Reagan because of safety concerns. The NTSB has also said the FAA failed to recognize a troubling history of 85 near misses around Reagan in the three years before the collision, NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy said 'every sign was there that there was a safety risk and the tower was telling you that.' But after the accident, the FAA transferred managers out of the airport instead of acknowledging that they had been warned. 'What you did is you transferred people out instead of taking ownership over the fact that everybody in FAA in the tower was saying there was a problem,' Homendy said. 'But you guys are pointing out, 'Welp, our bureaucratic process. Somebody should have brought it up at some other symposium.''