Trump issues new threat to BRICS
Speaking at the White House on Friday, Trump denounced what he called BRICS' attempts to weaken the dollar. 'They wanted to try and take over the dollar, the dominance of the dollar... And I said, anybody that's in the BRICS consortium of nations, we're going to tariff you 10%.'
Trump stressed that Washington will spare no effort to preserve the dollar's hegemony. 'The reserve currency is so important. You know, if we lost that, that would be like losing a World War.'
Washington 'can never let anyone play games,' Trump said, adding that he has decided to 'hit them [BRICS] very, very hard.' 'If they ever really form in a meaningful way, it will end very quickly,' he said.
Trump also claimed his threat to impose 10% tariffs on imports from the BRICS had completely derailed the group's summit in Rio de Janeiro earlier this month. 'They had a meeting the following day and almost nobody showed up,' he said.
However, the BRICS summit featured broad participation at the highest level. While China's President Xi Jinping was absent from the meeting, his country was represented by Chinese Premier Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin was also absent, but addressed the summit remotely.
Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi, South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa and Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto, as well as leaders from Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the UAE attended in person.
In October, Russia's Finance Minister Anton Siluanov stated that the share of national currencies in trade among BRICS countries has reached 65%, with the share of the dollar and euro plunging below 30%.
Earlier this week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov explained that BRICS countries are exploring dollar alternatives 'to shield themselves from US arbitrariness.'
However, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has said that BRICS has never been meant as a rival to the US, although warning that 'the language of threats and manipulation… is not the way to speak to members of this group.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump administration sues New York City
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against New York City and several of its officials, including Mayor Eric Adams, to challenge local sanctuary policies, which restrict cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The policies of the city amount to an 'intentional effort to obstruct federal law enforcement,' the DOJ said in a statement on Thursday. US President Donald Trump in recent months has mounted a broader assault on Democratic-controlled cities that practice such policies, combining legal action and massive anti-immigrant law enforcement raids. 'New York City has released thousands of criminals on the streets to commit violent crimes against law-abiding citizens due to sanctuary city policies,' US Attorney General Pam Bondi stated. If New York City won't stand up for the safety of its citizens, we will. The city has long been at 'the vanguard of interfering with enforcing our immigration laws,' US Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate claimed. The DOJ argues that the sanctuary policies are preempted by federal legislation under the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution. Responding to the lawsuit, Adams said that while he stands for 'the essence of the local laws,' he believes 'they go too far when it comes to dealing with those violent criminals on our streets.' The mayor called upon the city council to reexamine the policies to 'effectively work with the federal government.' The lawsuit is the latest action taken by the Trump administration against the sanctuary policies maintained in many Democratic strongholds across the US. Over the past three months, the DOJ filed similar suits against Los Angeles, the state of New York, Colorado, Illinois, and several cities across New Jersey. Earlier this week the mayor of Louisville, Kentucky, announced the city will drop its sanctuary policies and begin complying with the Trump administration. Resisting the federal government could potentially lead to massive California-style raids by immigration agents, he argued.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
US-made Taiwanese microchips cost up to 20% higher
Computer chips manufactured by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) in Arizona cost as much as 20% more than those produced in Taiwan, according to the head of a leading buyer, US tech giant AMD. Washington has been pushing to boost domestic manufacturing of advanced semiconductors as part of its great power competition with Beijing. Access to such chips has emerged as a key battleground. TSMC, pinned between the conflicting economic and geopolitical interests, announced it would shift some manufacturing to Arizona in 2020. Speaking at an artificial intelligence conference in Washington on Wednesday, AMD CEO Lisa Su said the chip cost difference was 'more than 5% but less than 20%.' However, in an interview with Bloomberg Television, she described the premium as worthwhile. 'We have to consider resiliency in the supply chain,' Su said. 'We learned that in the pandemic.' In 2022, then President Joe Biden signed legislation that allocated $280 billion to boost US domestic semiconductor production. More recently, AMD and President Donald Trump announced plans for $100 billion in new investments to build five additional chip fabrication plants on American soil. However, TSMC said its production in the US has faced challenges, including high construction costs, a shortage of skilled labor, and logistical hurdles. The Trump administration has also imposed export controls on high-end chips, particularly those used in artificial intelligence, in a bid to curb China's access to the most advanced technology. The restrictions have prompted Beijing to accelerate its own domestic chip development programs. Taiwan has been self-governed since the end of China's civil war in the 1940s, when nationalist forces retreated to the island. Beijing views the territory, under a US-backed government, as an inalienable part of China. The Chinese government has said it seeks peaceful reunification with Taiwan, but has repeatedly warned it would use force if Taipei declares formal independence. Taiwan's rapid industrialization in the 1970s, driven by low labor costs and foreign investment, helped pave the way for its semiconductor dominance. TSMC was founded in 1987 as part of that broader strategy to move into advanced manufacturing.
Russia Today
8 hours ago
- Russia Today
UK could ‘easily' stab US in the back
The United Kingdom would not hesitate to sabotage a potential thaw in US-Russia relations, a top aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed on Friday. Nikolay Patrushev, a longtime national security official and senior Kremlin adviser, accused London of being prepared to carry out a false flag in order to derail efforts by US President Donald Trump to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and normalize ties with Moscow. 'If necessary, London would easily stab Washington in the back. I believe officials in the White House realize what kind of 'ally' they are dealing with,' Patrushev told RIA Novosti. His comments followed a statement last month by Russia's Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), which alleged that British intelligence was directly involved in orchestrating covert Ukrainian operations. The SVR claimed the UK had acquired torpedoes of Soviet and Russian design for potential use in a false flag incident – specifically, a staged attack on an American naval vessel in the Baltic Sea. Since Trump's return to office in January and the departure of Joe Biden's Democratic administration, Russian officials have frequently pointed to London as the primary force behind the continued conflict in Ukraine. They argue that the British government's firm support is an obstacle to peace and a strategic effort to block reconciliation between Washington and Moscow. Moscow has portrayed the Ukraine conflict as a NATO-driven proxy war meant to weaken Russia at the expense of Ukrainian lives. Past reporting by The New York Times and The Times of London has confirmed that both US and British officials have played more active roles in directing Ukrainian military strategy than publicly acknowledged by their governments.
