Car-buying frenzy continues, pushing new vehicle prices higher
As car buyers rush to get in front of tariffs — which are widely expected to boost sticker prices — the flood of demand has been pushing new vehicle prices ever higher, with the trend unlikely to stop any time soon, experts said.
In Cox Automotive's Auto Market Report published May 13, Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke said the trend of rising prices continues into May.
'May so far looks like a continuation of April, with urgency to buy diminishing, but the retail vehicle market and the U.S. economy both holding up relatively well," Smoke said.
The job market is "good enough so far," but hiring is slowing, Smoke said, noting that borrowing money to buy a car is getting more expensive. He said the number of low-interest rate deals has decreased by 7 percentage points year-over-year, with interest-free loans also declining.
Smoke's remarks come on the heels of a report from Cox Automotive's Kelley Blue Book published May 12 showed the average transaction price for new vehicles in April surged 2.5% to $48,699 compared with March. Prices rose 1.1% compared with April 2024. Cox said it was the strongest April sales since 2021.
The buying frenzy meant automakers did not have to offer big discounts. Cox said new-vehicle sales incentives fell to about $3,262, or 6.7% of the average transaction price. That's down from 7% of the average transaction price in March. Cox said incentives were at the lowest point since the summer of 2024. Prior to April, the six-month average was 7.4% of average transaction price.
On April 3, President Donald Trump put a 25% tariff — the tax an importer pays on a good when it crosses international borders — on all imported vehicles to encourage more U.S. manufacturing.
Trump was set to then enact 25% tariffs on all imported parts starting May 3. But on April 29, the administration modified the tariffs on foreign auto parts. In a complex formula, the executive orders Trump signed will now allow automakers to be reimbursed for some of those tariffs for the next two years to give them time to find domestically sourced parts.
Still, a Michigan economics group, calculating tariff impact, has estimated that the least-impacted vehicles will still face a $2,000 tariff-induced price hike and the most impacted will see a $15,000 impact.
Cox Executive Analyst Erin Keating explained that new car prices are rising on the heavy demand to get the goods before manufacturers' suggested retail prices go sky high to offset carmaker's tariffs costs.
More: Trump tariffs will slow Michigan growth, kill 13,000 auto-related jobs, experts predict
'Ever since President Trump announced auto tariffs 47 days ago, the cost of new cars has been steadily climbing," Keating said. "Even though there was a surge in shopping and sales early on, the manufacturer's suggested retail prices haven't budged. The pricing landscape is varied depending on the automaker, car segment and specific models — some are cutting incentives, others are in high demand, and the supply isn't evenly distributed across the board.'
Ford Motor Co. has been running a national employee-pricing program that started in early April and runs through July 6. The Dearborn-based automaker is relying on a message of 'holding prices steady' and touting its 'built in America' leadership.
Cox said Ford brand prices and incentives in April were mostly unchanged from March with one standout: The Maverick pickup, which Ford assembles in Mexico, saw lower prices in April. Ford's incentive spending on the Maverick increased to an all-time high of 6.6% of average transaction prices on record monthly sales of 20,183 Mavericks sold in April, Cox said.
More: Tariffs call USMCA's future into question, experts say
In early May, Ford said it is hiking prices on three of its Mexico-produced models effective May 2, becoming one of the first major automakers to adjust sticker prices in response to tariffs. Prices on the Mustang Mach-E all-electric SUV, Maverick and Bronco Sport will increase by as much as $2,000 on some models.
At General Motors, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC brands all posted higher average transaction prices in April compared with March, with little change to incentives, Cox reported. Buick, however, saw lower prices and higher incentives in April.
Import brands Acura and BMW also held prices lower and increased incentive spending last month compared with March.
In the ultraluxury segment, sales of Porsche and Land Rover models accelerated in April because both brands will face higher future costs given 100% of their vehicles are imported, Cox noted. The average transaction price for Porsche led the industry in April at above $114,000, with Land Rover just behind at $113,000. April was the best sales month this year for both brands, pushing the overall industry average transaction price higher.
Car buyers even flocked to all-electric vehicles last month. The Kelley Blue Book team initially estimates new EV prices in April to be $59,255, a 3.7% increase from the year-ago period and a 0.2% increase compared with March. Cox said the March EV average transaction price was revised lower to $59,132.
Jamie L. LaReau is the senior autos writer who covers Ford Motor Co. for the Detroit Free Press. Contact Jamie at jlareau@freepress.com. Follow her on Twitter @jlareauan. To sign up for our autos newsletter. Become a subscriber.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Car prices surge as buyers rush to get in front of tariffs
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term
BEIJING (Reuters) -Billions of dollars of Chinese goods have been impacted by additional U.S. tariffs since 2018, initially under the first Donald Trump presidency and later under the Biden administration. Returning to the White House this year, Trump has imposed even more duties on China. The U.S. tariffs range from those imposed under Section 301 of its trade act due to what Washington claims are unfair Chinese trade practices, to duties under Section 232 levied for national security reasons. This year, Trump has imposed another 20% levies on all Chinese goods, saying Beijing has not done enough to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States. So-called reciprocal tariffs, under which the U.S. will match duties imposed by other countries, have also been levied in a bid to rebalance trade flows. Below are the U.S. tariffs on China effective as of June 12, 2025: Tariff Rate Products Effective date Reciprocal 10% All Paused for 90 days until Aug 10, 2025 Fentanyl 20% All Mar 4, 2025 Section Up to List 1: Pharmaceuticals, July 6, 2018 301 25% iron and steel, aluminium, vehicles and aircraft, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 2: Vehicles, Aug 23, 2018 railway or tramway locomotives, aircraft and their parts, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 3: Prepared May 10, 2019 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, wood products, textiles, precious and base metals, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, machinery and mechanical appliances and more. List 4A: Prepared Feb 14, 2020 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, footwear, wood products, ceramic products, glass, textiles, precious and base metals, machinery and mechanical appliances, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, art, antiques and more. In September 2019, the U.S. imposed 15% tariffs on more than $120 billion of Chinese goods under Section 301, which it then halved to 7.5% less than six months later. The 25% U.S. tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods under the earlier List 1-3 remain unchanged. In September 2024, the U.S. Trade Representative under the Biden administration announced additional tariffs of 25-100% on 14 product groups following a four-year review of the Section 301 tariff actions. The levies were imposed on strategic Chinese sectors or sectors where the United States has made significant domestic investments. Additional tariffs on goods under Section 301: Effective date EVs 100% Sep 27, 2024 Solar cells, syringes and 50% needles Non-lithium-ion battery parts, 25% lithium-ion electrical vehicle batteries, other critical minerals, ship-to-shore cranes, steel and aluminium products, facemasks Semiconductors 50% Jan 1, 2025 Lithium-ion non-electrical 25% Jan 1, 2026 vehicle batteries, medical gloves, natural graphite, permanent magnets In addition to the above duties, the first Trump administration in 2018 imposed a range of tariffs under Section 232 aimed at restricting goods deemed a threat to national security, including all aluminium and steel imports, shutting most Chinese suppliers out of the U.S. market. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
XRP Consolidates Near $2.28 Amid Slew of Wins for Ripple, XRPL
XRP XRP traded in a narrow range over the past 24 hours, consolidating between $2.27 and $2.32 as global trade tensions and diverging central bank policies weighed on investor sentiment. The digital asset demonstrated resilience amid broader market volatility, with strong buying interest emerging at key support levels. News Background Ripple's regulatory wins in Dubai and progress on stablecoin initiatives, such as RLUSD, provide a fundamental tailwind, though traders remain wary amid volatile global conditions. Ondo Finance's Ondo Short-Term U.S. Government Treasuries (OUSG) is now live on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), expanding institutional access to the institutional-grade RWA product onchain. Digital Commercial Paper (DCP), secured by U.S. Treasuries, is now live on the XRP Ledger, enhancing efficiency and accessibility. Administered by Guggenheim Treasury Services, DCP is tokenized and managed through the Zeconomy platform, offering custom maturities up to 397 days. Price Action XRP's price fluctuated between $2.264 and $2.319, representing a 2.37% range that highlights ongoing uncertainty. The token established a high-volume support zone at $2.273-$2.280, where buyers consistently emerged, stabilizing price action despite repeated tests of lower levels. Resistance formed at $2.315, where price rejections occurred during the 11th and 22nd hours, accompanied by above-average volume. In the final hour of trading, XRP experienced a sharp 2.17% decline at 01:55, dropping from $2.285 to $2.280. However, substantial buying volume of 3.9 million units emerged, reinforcing the $2.280 floor. The 01:32 candle showed the highest volume of the session at 1.8 million, confirming buyer interest at lower levels. An ascending support trendline suggests short-term stabilization, with traders eyeing potential breakout scenarios if resistance at $2.315 can be breached. Technical Analysis Recap XRP traded between $2.264 and $2.319, a 2.37% range. High-volume support zone established at $2.273-$2.280, with consistent buyer interest. Resistance formed at $2.315, with multiple price rejections and above-average volume. XRP closed at $2.284, signaling consolidation near the middle of the range. Sharp 2.17% decline at 01:55 (from $2.285 to $2.280) on increased volume. Highest volume observed at 01:32 (1.8M), confirming buyer support at lower levels. Ascending support trendline suggests short-term stabilization and potential breakout if resistance is breached.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Residential solar installer Sunnova files for bankruptcy, plans to sell and wind down operations
This story was originally published on Utility Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Utility Dive newsletter. Sunnova, the second-largest installer of third-party owned residential solar installations by market share, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on Sunday. Although the company's customer base and revenue continued to grow, rising interest rates, inflation, tariffs and other factors had eroded the company's profit margins, rendering it unable to pay its debts, President and CEO Paul Mathews said in the bankruptcy filings. Sunnova plans to sell off 'substantially all' of the company's assets and wind-down any remaining operations following the sale, Mathews said. Sunnova said in a Monday announcement following the filing that it will accept bids on its assets and business operations for the next 45 days; after the sale, the company plans to wind-down any remaining operations and close, Mathews said in court filings. The company has already agreed to sell some assets to a holding company that has received $15 million in financing from global investment firm ATLAS SP Partners, and has also agreed to sell other assets from its new homes business unit to builder Lennar Homes for $16 million, according to the company announcement. 'Today's actions mark a critical step towards securing a value-maximizing outcome for Sunnova's stakeholders,' Mathews said in a statement Monday. 'Throughout this process, maintaining continuity of service for our customers is our top priority as we work to secure a long-term solution for our business operations under new ownership.' Matthews said he was 'incredibly grateful to our dedicated Sunnova team for their hard work and commitment. We have built an innovative power provider, and I continue to believe deeply in the future of our industry and the promise of residential solar and storage.' According to the chapter 11 bankruptcy filings, Sunnova faced 'critically tight liquidity' and expected to run out of cash this April or May if it was unable to secure additional financing. However, the company's efforts to find new lenders earlier this year were unsuccessful, a failure Mathews partially attributed in court documents to uncertainty created by Trump's executive order to freeze spending authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act. Although the courts have paused the implementation of that executive order and restored payouts under the act, the uncertainty it created meant lenders were unwilling to provide Sunnova with additional financing, Mathews said. He also said that although Sunnova grew its revenues and quadrupled its customer count between 2020-2024, market factors such as above-target inflation, prolonged high interest rates and tariffs had diminished the company's profitability. The company attempted to cut costs and free up funds to make its growing debt service payments by focusing on lower-risk installations, and by 2025 had shrunk year-over-year net losses by more than 10%, Mathews said. The company also installed new leadership, including Mathews, and laid off 50% of its workforce earlier this year. However, the new strategy was unable to make up for its previous policy of aggressive spending and borrowing in pursuit of rapid growth. By early 2025 the company was unable to pay its dealer network, which caused its contractors to stop work on projects that were in process and further curtailed the company's incoming cash flows, Mathews said. Recommended Reading Utilities' misguided opposition to community solar in California Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data