logo
Kent NHS trust apologises over ear, nose and throat delays

Kent NHS trust apologises over ear, nose and throat delays

BBC News6 days ago
A trust has apologised after it said nearly 9,000 patients waiting for ear, nose and throat (ENT) referrals at hospitals in Kent have experienced "unnecessary delays".The delays are at the Medway Maritime Hospital in Gillingham and the Darent Valley Hospital in Dartford.The patients impacted include 4,279 adults and children waiting for a first outpatient appointment, and 4,570 existing patients waiting a follow-up appointment, diagnostic test or procedure. Medway NHS Foundation Trust apologised and said it had commissioned a full investigation "to understand how the error occurred and if anyone has come to harm as a result".
It said on Friday it found 8,849 patients waiting to be seen by ENT specialists whose referrals had not been correctly managed in line with NHS waiting time standards. First reported by the Health Service Journal, it is believed that some patients have waited up to five years for an appointment.The patients impacted are predominantly in the Dartford, Gravesham, Swanley, Bexley and Greenwich areas.
'Immediate action'
It is understood that when the referrals were first received, they were reviewed by a clinician and assessed as routine, meaning that no urgent concerns, such as cancer, were identified at the time.Jonathan Wade, interim chief executive of Medway NHS Foundation Trust and chief executive of Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust, apologised for the delays."We have taken immediate action to ensure referrals to this service are correctly managed, with stronger oversight and improved systems in place," he added.Mr Wade said the hospitals were contacting patients to make arrangements for them to be seen as quickly as possible.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hospitals face paying £8,000 a shift to cover striking doctors
Hospitals face paying £8,000 a shift to cover striking doctors

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Hospitals face paying £8,000 a shift to cover striking doctors

Hospitals could be forced to pay as much as £8,000 to cover the shift of a single striking doctor if multiple consultants are needed to staff some wards overnight. Advice on the British Medical Association (BMA) website says consultants asked to cover shifts overnight in a hospital should have a second consultant on call with them to cover higher-level duties. According to the BMA's rate card, for each junior doctor's overnight shift during the strike, two consultants in London would cover it for £334 per hour, or £4,008 for an overnight shift, totalling £8,016 for both consultants. Hospital leaders described it as 'worrying' and said the funds needed to cover a striking doctor were 'unacceptable'. One junior doctor, who is not striking in this round of industrial action but did last year, said some consultants were 'slower' at day-to-day activities on the ward, which sometimes led to multiple consultants covering one overnight shift. 'The type of things that you are doing overnight [are] quite different to the job that you do as a consultant during the day [but] something that the junior, the resident doctors, core and foundation trainees do all the time. Some of these might be quite practical and logistical things that if you're a consultant [you are] not physically used to doing on the computer system. They're the kind of things you need to do quickly overnight,' the doctor said. While consultants could very ably clinically assess patients, they might be 'a bit slow' at the tasks needed overnight, the doctor suggested. 'Sometimes they feel safer, I think … having more of them on because, more from a speed perspective,' the doctor added. • How much do NHS doctors really earn? Here are the facts BMA guidance says some consultants may have 'concerns' about working on wards. ''Acting down' to provide cover for absent resident doctor colleagues may involve tasks that you have not had to perform for many years, and you may have concerns about the ability to carry out certain tasks involved in ward work,' the advice states. 'A consultant has a professional obligation to act within their sphere of competence. As such, you need to be clear with your employer that you do not feel that you can safely and competently perform the work required and that doing [so] may expose you to enhanced risk of medico-legal consequences. If your employer refuses to take the necessary action to make alternative arrangements […] then, as above, you will need to follow our guidance on raising concerns.' One hospital executive said that while the hospital had not used more than one consultant to cover shifts, the cost of cover ran 'into the millions' and further cuts to NHS services might be needed as a result. 'The cost of consultant cover during the period, which runs into millions of pounds, [is a] huge amount of money that is unfunded. It's well publicised that there's a real tension at the moment in the NHS between safe timely services and financial viability,' said the executive, who did not wish to be named. • Striking doctor called off picket line to treat 'very sick' babies 'We're trying to navigate our way along that. Inevitably, if we accumulate debt as a result of paying consultants more to pick up these shifts, that money is not going to be funded by our NHS. So it would be down for each individual NHS organisation to make further cuts to offset the cost of the strikes.' Saffron Cordery, the deputy chief executive of NHS Providers, said: 'Trust leaders are working to minimise the harm and disruption caused by the strike. Ensuring adequate cover to keep patients safe is expensive and there is no extra money to cover this so the unexpected cost is bound to impact on the services they can provide. 'It's really worrying to see the demands for excessive rates to provide this cover. The withdrawal of labour by one staff group should not be seen as a financial opportunity for another. That is totally unacceptable.'

HCA lifts 2025 profit forecast, flags insurance policy uncertainty
HCA lifts 2025 profit forecast, flags insurance policy uncertainty

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

HCA lifts 2025 profit forecast, flags insurance policy uncertainty

July 25 (Reuters) - HCA Healthcare (HCA.N), opens new tab lifted its 2025 profit forecast but said it cannot determine how looming changes to insurance plans under Medicaid and Obamacare will impact 2026 earnings, sending the hospital operator's shares down 2% on Friday. Some COVID-era subsidies under Obamacare are set to lapse in 2026. That would impact patient coverage, lead to a spike in insurance premiums and cause a drop in enrollment numbers, leaving hospital operators such as HCA to foot a heftier bill for compensated care. "We continue to advocate strongly for their extension, but at this point we do not know what the outcome will be," CEO Samuel Hazen said during a call with analysts. Hazen said the company is working on a cost efficiency initiative to offset any impact from the subsidy expiry and other government actions such as Medicaid policy changes and tariffs. Still, the hospital chain operator raised its 2025 profit forecast to between $25.50 and $27 per share, from a range of $24.05 to $25.85 earlier. The latest forecast includes the expected impact from the Trump administration's current and future policies, including potential tariffs on imports. It also posted upbeat second-quarter results. Quarterly revenue rose 6.4% to $18.61 billion, compared with analysts' estimates of $18.50 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. Adjusted profit came in at $6.84 per share, beating estimates of $6.25. However, HCA's same-facility inpatient and outpatient surgeries decreased by 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively, in the quarter ended June 30. Investors appeared concerned about upcoming regulatory changes that could lead to lower medical membership on the Obamacare and Medicaid plans, said Morningstar analyst Julie Utterback. "Share reaction may reflect that profit growth could slow materially for caregivers like HCA in the next couple of years." Utterback said.

Graham Thorpe's care had 'failings' in last months of his life, says coroner
Graham Thorpe's care had 'failings' in last months of his life, says coroner

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Graham Thorpe's care had 'failings' in last months of his life, says coroner

There were 'failings' in the provision of former England cricketer Graham Thorpe's care in the months before he died, a coroner has said, as a conclusion of suicide was recorded at an inquest. Thorpe, 55, died on 4 August 2024 after being struck by a train at a railway station in Surrey. He had 'spiralled into depression' after losing his job as a batting coach in 2022, and tried to take his own life on another occasion, Surrey coroner's court heard. He also asked his wife for help to end his life. The coroner, Jonathan Stevens, said the last time Thorpe was seen in person by healthcare professionals was on 26 March 2024. 'In my judgment there were shortcomings in the care that should have been provided to Graham in the last four months or so of his life,' he said. Stevens added that 'there were failings in the provision of his care', but said that, on the evidence, he could not conclude those failings were gross and that, without them, Thorpe would not have died. He said healthcare appointments were offered to Thorpe, but he 'found it hard to attend these' because of his mental health. Stevens found that 'someone should have gone to see him to properly monitor and assess him, to do a face-to-face risk assessment and understand and address his care needs as required by the care plan'. The inquest heard that healthcare professionals did not consider Thorpe to be in a 'crisis situation' after he missed an appointment with the community mental health team on 28 June. At the time, Thorpe's wife, Amanda, told his care coordinator over the phone that her husband had been asking her 'for help to end his life'. During the same phone consultation, Thorpe said he 'hadn't been out for a while' and 'didn't see the point of being here', but had no immediate plans to act on his suicidal thoughts. The coroner said: 'I don't accept that when Graham was constantly asking his wife to help him end his life, which was a new presentation … that he was not at that point in crisis. 'It's clear there were shortcomings in his care. If he had been seen in those last four months, particularly after that incident on 28 June, I cannot say whether it would or would not have made any difference.' In May 2023, Thorpe had suicidal thoughts and was given inpatient treatment. Stevens said that 'some similar protective measures should have been considered in June 2024'. An investigation was carried out by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS trust after his death. Thorpe was a mainstay of the England men's cricket team for many years, as a batter between 1993 and 2005, and then as a coach for 12 years. During his international career, he struck 16 Test hundreds for England, including a debut century against Australia at Trent Bridge in 1993. In all formats, he represented his country 182 times. Amanda Thorpe told the inquest the termination of his employment with the England and Wales Cricket Board was a 'real shock to Graham', which was the 'start of the decline of his mental health'. Speaking outside the coroner's court, she said: 'We will never get over the tragic loss of Graham, and we miss him every day. He was my best friend, my soulmate, and he was just a joy. And he loved life – but he got very ill.' Mark McGhee, the family's legal representative, said the coroner had found 'significant shortcomings' in the care provided. He said Thorpe's family 'hope that the coroner will address these concerns' so that such a loss 'never happens again'. Jo Lynch, the chief nursing officer for the Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS trust, said: 'We are deeply saddened by the tragic death of Graham Thorpe and our thoughts are with Graham's family and loved ones. 'We will reflect on the coroner's findings and our role in Graham's care with a view to continuous improvement and learning.' In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@ or jo@ In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline on 988, chat on or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store