'Bonuses are obviously going up,' according to UFC CEO Dana White, but by how much?
Garcia felt pretty sure he was rich. I mean, $35,000? He had plenty of years when he didn't make nearly that much combined. That was some people's whole salary, and they worked hard for it.
'I just blew through that money real fast,' Garcia told me back in 2010. 'Coming from being in the smaller shows and then getting all that money all at once, it seemed like it was never going to run out. I just rode it into the dirt.'
He learned from it, though. So three years later, when the UFC's parent company gave him a $65,000 bonus for another Fight of the Night, this time in what many also hailed as the Fight of the Year against Chan Sung Jung, he saved and invested it. He opened a three-year CD. He renovated his bathroom. You know, adult stuff.
The last performance bonus Garcia received from the UFC was in 2011, when he lost another decision in another Fight of the Night, this time against Nam Phan at UFC 136. This time the bonuses were all $75,000. In other words, the bonuses had more than doubled in the span of four years. Garcia and other fighters could be forgiven, then, if they assumed this trend would continue.
After all, the UFC and its parent company at the time only made more and more money each year. The events went from being broadcast on a niche men's-interest cable network like Spike TV to a major network TV partner in Fox. Then from there the UFC moved on to an even more lucrative deal with ESPN. And in 2026, as we learned this week, it will essentially double its broadcast rights revenue in a deal with Paramount.
But in 2025, UFC bonuses are stuck at $50,000. With the exception of special events like UFC 300, they've held steady at that level for over a decade now. When adjusted for inflation, the $75,000 that Garcia and others received in 2011 is worth approximately $110,000 in today's money. While some events around the same time handed out bonuses worth far less, even the $35,000 Garcia received in 2007 would have been worth around $56,000 in 2025 money.
All that is about to change, according to UFC CEO Dana White. Speaking to reporters Tuesday night, White promised some unspecified revisions to UFC fighter pay in the wake of this blockbuster deal with Paramount. But he did make one concrete financial promise: 'Bonuses are obviously going up, so that will be big.'
White did not say how much bonuses would increase by. But clearly, these bonuses are a big deal to fighters. It's why they regularly plead for them in post-fight interviews. UFC featherweight Dan '50K' Ige even incorporated it as his nickname. Conor McGregor, the biggest star in either MMA or UFC history, delivered an iconic and oft-imitated moment early on in his career, following an impressive TKO win with the exhortation: 'Dana, 60 G's, baby!' (Again, that was 2013, when $60,000 had the the purchasing power of about $88,000 today.)
So how much would UFC performance bonuses actually have to increase in order for it to be a true improvement on those handed out in the past?
One starting point is to perform the simplest math available. The UFC's new broadcast rights deal is bringing in double the money of the previous one? Fine, double the bonuses. That would get us to $100,000 per bonus. But even that would fall short of keeping pace with inflation when compared with those 2011 bonuses.
The biggest performance bonuses the UFC ever handed out were at UFC 300 last year, when each one was worth $300,000. (Max Holloway pocketed two of the four bonuses available, for a total of $600,000 for his knockout win over Justin Gaethje.)
If that became the standard, it would mean $1.2 million in bonuses for every UFC event. Multiplied by 43 events per year, that comes out to $51.6 million per year in performance bonuses, which, to a lot of people, probably sounds like a lot. But it's also about 5% of the UFC's average yearly take in this new broadcast rights deal with Paramount. And that doesn't even factor in any of the other revenue sources, like ticket sales or site fees or international broadcast rights.
Would the UFC actually consider a bonus increase of that magnitude? Based on everything we know it seems … doubtful. That's likely not just because TKO would rather keep the money than pay it out to people who have no real leverage or recourse to force such a reckoning. It's also probably because a fighter who suddenly has $300,000 in the bank is a lot less compliant when it comes to things like stepping in on short notice to plug holes in upcoming fight cards.
Then again, hasn't the UFC told us again and again that it's a meritocracy where you 'eat what you kill'? The whole idea behind the performance bonuses is to motivate fighters to fight hard and put on a show for the fans.
Imagine how much harder a prelim fighter making $20,000 to show would fight if you gave him a crack at a $300,000 bonus. And imagine what a bunch of fights like that might do for Paramount+ subscriptions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Joe Rogan on UFC's Paramount deal: 'Sport is going to go f*cking hypernova'
Joe Rogan sees the UFC's deal with Paramount helping the sport grow exponentially. This week, the UFC signed a massive seven-year, $7.7. billion U.S. broadcasting rights deal exclusively with Paramount that will bring all 43 annual events to streaming on Paramount+, including select "marquee" events that will simulcast on Paramount's flagship network, CBS. With fans no longer having to pay for monthly pay-per-view events, Rogan thinks the viewership numbers will inevitably increase. "Through the roof," Rogan said in a recent episode of his "Joe Rogan Experience" podcast. "And it's a super smart move for Paramount. What a great move to not just have the UFC for seven years, but have it for free. How much does it cost a month? Let's say it's 10 bucks. That's crazy. That's a $120 a year, you could watch every UFC pay-per-view? Two UFC pay-per-views is, like, 140 bucks, right? Isn't it? Aren't they, like, $70? So you get all of them. Everything's free? That's incredible. This sport is going to go f*cking hypernova." Rogan, who Dana White confirmed will be sticking around, hopes the UFC doesn't sever its relationship with ESPN as he still sees value in having some aspects broadcasted there. "By the way, ESPN has everything, too. It's great. I'm kind of bummed out, and I hope they don't lose the relationship that they had with ESPN with all their MMA shows," Rogan said. "I hope they don't go, like, 'F*ck them, they went to Paramount.' I hope it's a mutually beneficial thing, like the UFC at least does some content still on ESPN. "Because I think that's also a big factor in pulling people from casual viewers that watch other sports that might occasionally watch a UFC fight and then they see, like, Dustin Poirier vs. Max Holloway and they're like, 'Holy sh*t,' and then they're hooked. Having that coverage on 'SportsCenter,' that sh*t's huge. Having those post-fight shows on ESPN+, that sh*t is huge for the real dorks like me. That's huge."
TechCrunch
a few seconds ago
- TechCrunch
Google pushes AI into flight deals as antitrust scrutiny, competition heat up
Google on Thursday announced a new AI-powered search tool to help travelers find flight deals — even as regulators continue to question whether the search giant's dominance in travel discovery stifles competition. Called Flight Deals, the new tool is available within Google Flights and is designed to help 'flexible travelers' find cheaper fares. Users can type natural language queries into a search bar — describing how and when they want to travel — and the AI surfaces matching options. These queries can be like 'week-long trip this winter to a city with great food, nonstop only' or '10-day ski trip to a world-class resort with fresh powder,' Google said in a blog post. The tool uses its AI models to understand the nuances of what users are looking for and then goes through live Google Flights data to show relevant results, the company said. Regulators, including the European Commission, are currently investigating how Google may be favoring its own search products — including Google Flights — in ways that harm competition. EU regulators are eyeing Google for enforcement under the Digital Markets Act, aiming to rein in the power of major tech platforms. In response, the Alphabet-owned unit is reportedly planning to propose changes to appease regulators, including the addition of a price-comparison box in search results. Initially, Google has brought Flight Deals in beta, with plans to roll it out in the U.S., Canada, and India over the next week. The company said the goal of the beta release is 'to gather feedback and explore how AI can improve travel planning.' Google did not immediately respond to questions about which Gemini models power the tool, what data sources are used, or what privacy safeguards are in place. The move is part of a broader experiment as Google looks to compete with OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, and other major AI players by integrating generative AI into travel search. Competitors like Expedia, and Indian travel aggregator MakeMyTrip have already rolled out their own AI integrations to streamline trip planning. In that sense, Google is arriving a bit late. But with its scale and reach, the company could still pose a serious challenge — if the tool proves effective and gains traction. Nonetheless, the classic Google Flights interface will continue to exist. The original flight search tool, launched in 2011, is even getting an update with an option to exclude basic economy fares for trips within the U.S. and Canada.
Fast Company
a few seconds ago
- Fast Company
What I wish I'd known: Leadership lessons from a career in storytelling and strategy
For Eric Glass, EVP and chief marketing and communications officer at Dayforce, leadership has always been an evolving story: one of curiosity, vulnerability, and learning to trust his own voice. The idea of using storytelling as a tool for meaning and connection has shaped Glass's approach to business and leadership for decades. 'I've always been anchored in storytelling,' Glass says. 'Writing and narrative have always been how I make sense of things and how I connect with others.' His career has taken him from agency-side consulting to senior in-house roles at major brands like Yahoo!, HP, LinkedIn, and Workday. Now, at Dayforce, he's helping shape how leaders show up for their people—and vice versa. Here he offers some of the wisdom he's gathered along the way. Early on, Glass learned that narrative alone isn't enough, especially in technology, where credibility depends on knowing your stuff inside and out. 'There were times when I had a good kernel of an idea and I'd come in full of energy, but I didn't have enough context,' he says. 'And if you're sitting across from a CEO or a founder, it only takes one or two pointed questions for that to become obvious.' It's a mistake he doesn't make anymore. Today, he knows how important it is to understand the business as deeply as you understand the story you want to tell. That means knowing both the product and the market and being able to communicate them in a way that builds trust with audiences both internally and externally. VULNERABILITY IS A SUPERPOWER Of course, no one has all the answers, not even the EVP of a high-growth, global tech brand. Glass is a big believer in showing what he calls 'the strength of vulnerability,' especially for emerging leaders. 'When you're early in your career, you feel like you have to know everything,' he says. 'I spent too much energy trying to be all things in all situations, and the truth is, it didn't have the impact I wanted. It's okay not to know. What matters is how you figure it out.' That kind of humility boosts your credibility in the long run, he says. 'I appreciate team members at all levels who say, 'I don't know, but here's how I'm going to find out.' That's the kind of person I want to work with.' BAD NEWS DOESN'T AGE WELL If there's one leadership mistake Glass wishes he could undo, it's waiting too long to raise a red flag. Early in his consulting career, he let a client issue fester while trying to solve it behind the scenes. 'I was working on the problem, but I held back from communicating it because I wanted to show up with a solution,' he says. 'By the time I brought it forward, it was too late. I was ultimately kicked off that account, and that had never happened to me before.' The experience left a mark, but it turned out to be a great learning experience. 'Get in front of bad news,' Glass says emphatically. 'Even if you don't have the solution yet, name the problem and bring people into the process. It's better to be transparent early than perfect too late.' Whether it's an underperforming campaign or a team challenge, the sooner an issue is out in the open, the sooner everyone can work toward a solution together. EVERYONE HAS A STORY Glass doesn't believe in leading every team the same way. 'Everyone shows up with their own stuff,' he says. 'The more, as a leader, you can understand what drives each person—what their challenges are, what their magic powers are—the better the relationship will be. And ultimately, the better the outcome.' That means tuning your leadership frequency to match the individuals around you. 'You can coach anybody on the mechanics of marketing and communications. But what you can't coach is that 'fire in the belly.'' That deep drive is what separates employees who just check the boxes from those who inspire innovation, motivate teams or ignite a campaign. As a leader, Glass says, one of the most profound things you can do is help your team find the crucial spark. 'If someone's going through the motions and not feeling the charge, it might be time to shift direction,' Glass says. 'But when they tap into what energizes them? That's when acceleration becomes exponential.'
