logo
Mara Corday, Hollywood starlet of the 1950s, dies at 95

Mara Corday, Hollywood starlet of the 1950s, dies at 95

Boston Globe27-05-2025
Advertisement
She began acting and modeling, landing a contract with Universal-International and appearing in Playboy as one of the magazine's Playmates of the Month in October 1958.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
As an actress, both with Universal and later as a freelancer, Ms. Corday was known for her roles in sci-fi films that captured - in however outlandish and low-budget fashion - Cold War-era anxiety about societal destruction. Some of her films, perhaps in spite of themselves, became cult classics.
In 'Tarantula' (1955), opposite John Agar, Ms. Corday ran from a gargantuan hirsute spider that had escaped from a desert laboratory. 'The Giant Claw' (1957) put her up against a monster bird flying at supersonic speed. (Ms. Corday was newly pregnant while filming the movie and did not reveal her condition to on-set colleagues for fear that she would not be permitted to keep the part.)
Advertisement
Also in 1957, she acted in 'The Black Scorpion,' another of her credits whose titles largely speak for themselves.
Ms. Corday 'was regularly menaced by these bugs-from-hell,' a journalist for the Toronto Star wrote in 1994, recapping her career in a 'whatever happened to' column. 'And somehow, as she screamed, she always managed to put her head back and throw into profile a figure we assume was enhanced by those bras much beloved of '50s moviemakers.'
Ms. Corday confessed that she outsourced to a stand-in some of the more stomach-turning moments of her horror films - she declined to touch mice and rats, for example - and conceded that many of her movies did not strive for film-festival sophistication.
'You're at the mercy of the 'fright,' the 'horror,' or whatever,' she remarked in an interview published in the book 'It Came From Horrorwood' by Tom Weaver. 'You're at the mercy of the special effects people, 'cause if they don't do a good job, then the whole picture goes in the toilet. For instance, 'The Giant Claw'!'
Although she attracted more notice for her thriller fare, Ms. Corday also appeared prolifically in westerns, among them 'Drums Across the River' (1954) with Audie Murphy, 'The Man From Bitter Ridge' (1955) starring Lex Barker, with whom she said she had an offscreen romance, and 'Man Without a Star' (1955) featuring Kirk Douglas.
Her favorite part, she said, was as an alluring young Frenchwoman in 'So This Is Paris' (1954), starring Tony Curtis, Gloria DeHaven, and Gene Nelson, about romance-minded sailors on leave in the City of Love.
Ms. Corday curtailed her acting career after her marriage in 1957 to fellow actor Richard Long and the birth of their three children, making her last on-screen appearance in that phase of her career in 1961.
Advertisement
She told interviewers that her husband severely restricted her professional opportunities, turning down roles without her knowledge or consent and attempting to 'sabotage' her.
'I divorced him ten times the first year of our marriage, getting a lawyer and everything, and thirteen times the second year. He'd plead - literally on his hands and knees, 'Please forgive me, I don't know why I did it, give me another chance,'' she said in an interview published in the book 'Westerns Women' by Boyd Magers and Michael G. Fitzgerald.
Ms. Corday added that she loved her husband and remained in love with him decades after his death in 1974. She credited Eastwood, who had been a fellow contract actor at Universal early in their professional lives, with reviving her career after she was widowed.
'When my insurance ran out, he put me in 'The Gauntlet,'' she recalled, referring to the 1977 action thriller. She continued: 'When it ran out again, he put me in 'Sudden Impact,'' released in 1983. She also appeared with Eastwood in 'Pink Cadillac' (1989) and 'The Rookie' (1990), her two final credits.
Marilyn Joan Watts, the younger of two children, was born in Santa Monica, Calif., on Jan. 3, 1930.
According to an online biography, her family moved frequently during the Depression until her father settled into work as a certified public accountant. A profile published in The Washington Post in 1955 reported that he ran a laundromat and that Corday's mother was a stenographer. Ms. Corday once said her mother had been a bootlegger.
Advertisement
Ms. Corday recalled whiling away entire days at the cinema, falling in love with movies. She was 17 when she was accepted as a showgirl at the Earl Carroll Theatre in Los Angeles and said that her mother forged a birth certificate to help her pass as 18 - and therefore eligible to perform.
'You go over there and see what you can do, or you're going back to school and study stenography and learn typing, and stop this wishful thinking,' she recalled her mother saying.
Ms. Corday excelled in her performances and moved on to dancing engagements in Las Vegas and theatrical productions. Modeling opportunities helped raise her profile.
She had her first credited movie role in the seafaring adventure 'Sea Tiger' (1952) and appeared the following year in 'Money From Home' with Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis.
She had three children, Carey, Valerie, and Greg, but a complete list of survivors could not be confirmed. Efforts to reach her family were not immediately successful.
Ms. Corday's friendship with Eastwood, whom she likened to a brother, dated to their appearance together in 'Tarantula,' in which she had second billing and he had a small uncredited part.
Decades later, their respective levels of prominence reversed, Ms. Corday contributed to one of the most memorable scenes of Eastwood's career. In 'Sudden Impact,' she played the hostage whose life is on the line during the scene in which Eastwood utters his immortal words: 'Go ahead. Make my day.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bob Odenkirk made this movie to impress his 'SNL' buddies
Bob Odenkirk made this movie to impress his 'SNL' buddies

New York Post

time20 hours ago

  • New York Post

Bob Odenkirk made this movie to impress his 'SNL' buddies

Bob Odenkirk is breaking bad. The 'Better Call Saul' star has revealed that he only made the 2021 action movie 'Nobody' because he wanted to impress his former 'Saturday Night Live' colleagues. 'I thought of you guys often when I was exercising and thinking that's just a reason to be doing this is if I could pull it off,' Odenkirk, 62, told Conan O'Brien during the 'Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend' podcast this week. 11 Bob Odenkirk discussing 'Nobody' and its newly released sequel during the 'Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend' podcast. YouTube/@TeamCoco 11 Bob Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell in 2021's 'Nobody.' ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection 'That would blow my friends' minds,' he added. While Odenkirk name-dropped O'Brien, Robert Smigel and Adam Sandler as some of the buddies he wanted to impress, the 'Breaking Bad' actor also included comedian David Spade specifically. 'I kept thinking about Spade, I don't know why,' Odenkirk, who was a writer on 'SNL' from 1987 to 1991, laughed. 'He would go see it and go like, 'What the f–k?'' 11 Adam Sandler, David Spade and the rest of the 'Saturday Night Live' cast in 1992. NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images 11 David Spade and Bob Odenkirk in 'The Odd Couple' in 1999. NBCUniversal via Getty Images Meanwhile, O'Brien recalled how Odenkirk told him about 'Nobody' shortly before the film premiered four years ago. Although the 'Late Night' host didn't think too much of it at the time, he was quickly impressed by Odenkirk's surprising performance. 'When it came out, I was just, 'Oh, he's so good at this,'' O'Brien shared. 11 Conan O'Brien discussing 'Nobody' and its sequel during the 'Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend' podcast. YouTube/@TeamCoco 11 Bob Odenkirk in the first 'Nobody' movie. ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection The comedian was so impacted that he asked Odenkirk for a cameo in the movie's sequel, which hit theaters Friday, Aug. 15. Even though O'Brien did not make the cut for 'Nobody 2,' he is hoping Odenkirk releases a third film so he can land a small role. 'I just want to be beaten,' O'Brien joked. 'I want someone to beat the s–t out of me.' 11 The poster for 'Nobody' (2021). ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection 11 The poster for 'Nobody 2' (2025). ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection 'Nobody' stars Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell, a retired assassin-turned-family man who must return to his former life after his family becomes the target of an unforgiving crime lord. The film's sequel reportedly picks up shortly after the events of the first movie, and Odenkirk's character takes his family on a much-needed vacation. 11 Bob Odenkirk on the red carpet at the SNL 40th Anniversary Special at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in New York City on February 15, 2015. UPI However, they soon find themselves in the crosshairs of a corrupt theme-park operator, a shady sheriff and a bloodthirsty crime boss, and Hutch must once again save his family from the danger. While the sequel only just hit theaters, Odenkirk still teased the possibility of a third 'Nobody' movie on Thursday during an interview with the Associated Press. The two-time Emmy-winner said that he would like to make a third film that ends with his character having nothing left. 11 Bob Odenkirk reprising his role as Hutch Mansell in 'Nobody 2.' ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection 11 Bob Odenkirk as Hutch Mansell in 'Nobody 2.' ©Universal/Courtesy Everett Collection 'Yeah, the moral would be that everything he loves is gone,' Odenkirk told the outlet. 'He burned everything he loved.' 'We let him get away with it because the movie is an entertainment, and it's meant to tell you: Yes, you can let go of your rage in this magical world,' the 'Glengarry Glen Ross' Broadway star continued. 'But in the end, I would think that it's an addiction. And he does want to do it. He does want to have a go, and so does every guy.' 'That's why we have movies,' Odenkirk concluded. 'And that's why we have boxing matches.'

Everything's Coming Up ‘Roblox' As Chris Hansen And Schlep Dig Into Its Predator Problem
Everything's Coming Up ‘Roblox' As Chris Hansen And Schlep Dig Into Its Predator Problem

Forbes

timea day ago

  • Forbes

Everything's Coming Up ‘Roblox' As Chris Hansen And Schlep Dig Into Its Predator Problem

It may be the biggest gaming platform in the world, but Roblox could not have had a worse week. While the problem of adults preying on vulnerable children in the online space, potentially leading to real-world harm, is not new to Roblox, things ramped up dramatically this week with the banning of Schlep, a long-time Roblox community member who made a name for himself catching online predators within the game, and his work actually led to six arrests so far. He says that he himself was 'groomed' in the game when he was younger, and it led him to do this work. Roblox has now banned him, saying that 'vigilantes' have at times created an 'unsafe environment for users,' which many players took to mean the predators they were trying to catch. While that may not have been what Roblox was trying to say, the community blowback was immediate and forceful. The same week, Roblox caught the eye of the Attorney General in Louisiana who announced she was suing the game for failing to protect children, and Roblox issued a lengthy rebuttal to the claims, detailing its various attempts and systems to keep children safe. But what's next, Chris Hansen showing up and telling people to take a seat? Well, about that. There were seemingly hard-to-believe rumors that To Catch a Predator's Chris Hansen was also going to throw a spotlight on Roblox, but Hansen confirmed the project on social media on Friday. He said he has been speaking with law enforcement, victims and working with people like the banned Schlep on the upcoming airing of the completed investigation. Though no, it's unlikely they'll be virtually trapping people like his old show. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Roblox stock is down 9% this past week alone in the wake of all this, and now, it's just issued a bunch of new safety updates trying to prune some of the problems away. That includes blocking users under 17 from Social Hangouts in private spaces. Those would be: And yes, before you ask, there are countless virtual sexual things that do in fact go on in those kinds of spaces, hence why these rules are now being enforced in the first place. There are more changes laid out here, and CEO David Baszucki made a lengthy YouTube video about them (which unsurprisingly, has more downvotes than upvotes): Given how long-running this problem has been, and the sheer size of Roblox, which has more active users than the entire Steam PC ecosystem, it's very clear this is not the last we'll hear of such problems, no matter what changes are made. But these latest situations, the bans, the lawsuits, the uh, Chris Hansen shows, are all still ongoing and we'll have to wait and see what comes from them. Follow me on Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. Pick up my sci-fi novels the Herokiller series and The Earthborn Trilogy.

The Science of Why Humans are Obsessed with Stadium Concerts
The Science of Why Humans are Obsessed with Stadium Concerts

Time​ Magazine

time2 days ago

  • Time​ Magazine

The Science of Why Humans are Obsessed with Stadium Concerts

August 15, 2025 marks the 60th anniversary of a pivotal moment in live music history: The Beatles' infamous performance at Shea Stadium. What began as an unprecedented attempt to accommodate the Fab Four's overwhelming popularity has evolved into a touchstone of pop culture—the modern stadium tour. Today's stadium concerts are more than just supersized live shows; they have become cultural phenomena and socio-economic markers. Perhaps most intriguingly—at least to me—they are also neuroscientific experiments in mass synchronization. In 1965, pop music's demographic was dominated by teenagers with disposable income and a desire to break the self-imposed boundaries of their post-Depression-era parents. The Beatles' audience at Shea was overwhelmingly young, predominantly female, and distinctly American. In the decades since, stadium audiences have expanded in every conceivable way. Through the '80s and '90s artists like U2, Madonna, and Michael Jackson drew increasingly global, multi-generational crowds. Today, truly global music acts like BLACKPINK and Bad Bunny play to stadium audiences worldwide, reflecting the increasing multicultural appeal of contemporary music. And touring artists like Bruce Springsteen, Paul McCartney, Cyndi Lauper, and The Rolling Stones now draw in new followers aside lifelong fans, with three generations of family members often attending together. Fandom itself has transformed. Where fans once relied on the vagaries of radio play and magazine spreads to engage with their favorite artists, today's fans form tightknit communities on social media platforms like TikTok and Discord. Through these digital spaces, enthusiasts exchange theories, share memes, decode Easter eggs, and coordinate elaborate travel plans and ticket-buying strategies months in advance. The shift from passive consumption to active participation has transformed how fans engage with pop music, turning concerts into global events that have expanded well beyond geography and generations. Yet this evolution has created new challenges, chief among them, the skyrocketing cost of being part of the experience. We've gone from $5.10 to see the Beatles at Shea Stadium to Eras Tour tickets with face values ranging from $49 to $449 reselling for up to $20,000 on StubHub and SeatGeek. When my mother wanted to surprise me with tickets to Bryan Adams' Waking Up The Neighbours Tour in 1992, she lined up at the physical box office hours before opening with other eager fans. She forked over $42.50 for two, side-view seats in the lower bowl. Compare that to last year when I battled bots and refreshed my browser every few milliseconds in the hope of scoring four tickets to Olivia Rodrigo's GUTS World Tour before they soared to mortgage-level proportions. By some miracle, I was able to take my three teenage daughters to their first arena show for a relatively low $600. They're now saving their babysitting money and diligently tracking price trends for Benson Boone's American Heart Tour while I'm (half) considering dipping into their college fund to see Bryan Adams again this fall. At what point does the price of admission outweigh the joy of participation? When it came to the Eras Tour, like many other disappointed Swifties, we had to settle for movie screenings and grainy live feeds. Swift didn't stop in our hometown of Montreal. We considered travelling to Toronto, Boston, New York, or Philadelphia. When calculating the costs—tickets, travel, accommodations, meals—our cheapest option turned out to be Lisbon, Portugal. That three-day excursion would have set us back about $6,000 CAD. While that was substantially less than the resale tickets in any nearby city, the financial cost and complicated logistics of participation were too great. Economists often argue that high ticket prices are simply a reflection of market forces—artists, and resellers, can charge more because demand far outstrips supply. Sociologists counter that this trend deepens cultural divides, turning concerts into exclusive experiences for the financially privileged. Despite the costs, stadiums continue to sell out at record speed, raising the question: what is it about live music that makes us willing to pay such a premium? Is it the music itself, the sense of community, or something even more basic? For 30 years, our lab has been exploring why music moves us—literally and figuratively. Many of our studies focus on memory for music, demonstrating that people have a remarkable ability to recall melodies, pitch, tempo, and loudness with surprising accuracy, even without formal music training, suggesting that musical memory operates differently from other forms of memory. We conducted some of the first neuroimaging studies to map the brain's response to music—showing how it lights up the brain, engaging areas responsible for hearing, memory, movement, and emotion all at once. This is why a song can transport you back to a specific moment in time, evoking vivid memories and emotions. Our studies show that when people listen to music they love, it activates brain regions associated with pleasure and reward, helping to explain why a favorite song can feel as satisfying as a good meal or a warm hug. Music's ability to give you chills and make you feel euphoric is tied to the release of natural opioids in the brain, the same chemicals that help relieve pain. Years ago, our lab showed in brain scans that listening to the same piece of music caused people's brain waves to synchronize. Recent studies conducted in real-time, in concert halls, demonstrate that people enjoy music more when the performance is live and experienced as part of a group. Live music triggers stronger emotional responses than recorded music due to the dynamic relationship between the audience and the performers. The visual cues, collective energy, and real-time responsiveness of live music engage more sensory and emotional systems than listening alone, deepening our visceral connection to the experience. Attending a concert is associated with increases in oxytocin, a bonding hormone, enhancing our sense of social connection. When we move together to music—clapping, swaying, or singing in sync—we engage neural circuits involved in motor coordination, empathy, and social prediction, reinforcing our sense of being part of a group. We're literally on the same brainwave! What ties all this together is the simple but profound idea that music is more than just entertainment. From the joy of discovering a new banger to the comfort of an old, familiar tune, music may well be a biological necessity, a fundamental part of being human, wired into our brains and bodies in ways that shape how we think, feel, and connect with one another. Our innate desire for connection might also, in part, explain why a friendship bracelet exchange (inspired by Swift's You're On Your Own Kid) is trending at modern stadium shows: the simple act of swapping beaded bracelets cultivates a microcosm of human connection within a macro-scale experience. It's a ritual that transforms a crowd of thousands into an intimate community, where strangers become momentary friends, bound by shared enthusiasm and a tangible token of group membership. It's a small, tactile gesture that taps into our deep-seated need to bond, to feel seen, and to belong. In a world where digital interactions often replace physical ones, these trinkets are a reminder of the power of touch, of giving, and of creating memories that extend beyond the concert itself. Music has always been a social glue, a way for humans to synchronize their emotions and movements, whether around a Neanderthal campfire or in a packed stadium. And in an era of increasing isolation, these moments of connection feel more vital than ever. Making friendship bracelets to share with your fellow Swifties may be part of the solution. But today's stadium shows aren't just about emotional connection or even entirely about the music—it's also a masterclass in sensory stimulation. The Beatles may have pioneered the stadium format, but their setup was quaint by today's standards. Early stadium shows featured little more than musicians standing in front of a static backdrop, struggling to project their sound through subpar sound systems designed for sports announcers, not music. By the 1980s, technological advancements had changed the game. Pink Floyd's The Wall Tour in 1980 set a new standard for large-scale stage production, with elaborate sets, visual projections, and theatrical storytelling. U2's Zoo TV Tour in 1992 introduced multimedia screens that transformed the stage into a digital playground. More recently, Taylor Swift's Eras Tour involved 70,000 wristbands pulsing in unison, and stage sets transforming from slithering snakes to whimsical fairy-tale forests to cinematic cityscapes. And Beyoncé's 2023 Renaissance Tour incorporated cutting-edge robotics and high-fashion couture, proving that stadium concerts can be as much about visual effects as they are about the music. While many fans view these advances as improvements, others argue that the intimacy and simplicity of early stadium shows have faded, and been replaced by a commercialized, high-stakes industry. The Outlaws Roadshow stadium tour in 2012 left me feeling as though I had overpaid for a lights and lasers show that happened to include the Counting Crows phoning it in somewhere in the background. In the pursuit of grandeur, has some of the raw, unfiltered magic of live music been diluted? And what does all this mean for the future of live music? If the past 60 years of stadium shows (and tens of thousands of years of human music-making) have taught us anything, it's that music, at its core, is about shared experience. We crave the pulse of the bass beneath our feet, the collective chant of a catchy chorus or killer bridge, the unspoken understanding between strangers who, for just one night, are part of something bigger than themselves. As technology continues to evolve and fan communities grow more interconnected, one thing is certain: the stadium concert will remain a space where we come together, not just to listen, but to belong.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store