Seven in 10 parents have taken time off work to revise for their kids' GCSEs
An astonishing seven out of 10 parents have taken time away from work to hit the books alongside their children preparing for GCSEs, reveals a study of 500 parents with kids facing exams this year. It turns out they started to revise some of the subjects three months back, in an attempt to get their head around the curriculum.
Despite their best efforts to familiarise themselves with the current GCSE syllabus, half of all parents polled have struggled to get their heads round what their children are supposed to be learning. While 69% admitted their kids are stressed about the weeks ahead.
In a bid to be supportive, nearly half made up a study schedule, 16% delved into 'An Inspector Calls', and 12% endeavoured to memorise 'Macbeth'. A third have been companions during study sessions, 16% turned to audiobooks, while 12% have pulled all-nighters.
This insight comes courtesy of a study conducted by MyEdSpace, an online education portal now offering free 'Exam Cram Courses' complete with live three-hour tutorial sessions, set to prime students ahead of Maths, English and Science exams.
Co-founder of MyEdSpace, Sean Hirons, said: "Understandably, parents just want to help their kids when it comes to exam season – especially those intense few days just before a big test. But that doesn't have to mean pulling all-nighters themselves or learning Macbeth off by heart."
"Right now, the best thing parents can do for their kids is keep calm, give them some space and make sure they're not forgetting to do the basic things like eating regularly or getting a good night's sleep while they prep."
"We don't want any students, or parents, to be feeling overwhelmed or unsupported during this extremely stressful time of year."
'Math-fluencer' Neil Trivedi, who is part of the MyEdSpace team and has streamed revision classes, reaching more than 43,000 students, said: "Bedding in knowledge evenly across the year is obviously the best way to learn.
"There are ways to optimise the revision process. One way to try and solidify your knowledge is to try and explain your work to a peer, those who study together, succeed together."
Parent's efforts to help manage their kids through this daunting period are welcome for the most part as 65% 'actively' want their mums and dads to help them with revision. Although the research, carried out through OnePoll, found 19% would prefer it if they didn't.
Reasons why include wanting to be independent (46%), thinking they can revise better on their own (36%), and 28% wanting to prove themselves (28%).
Kharis Yanakidis, co-founder of MyEdSpace which aims to defuse the stress of exam season, understands the pressure, stating: "GCSE season can be overwhelming for students and families, so making revision fun and enjoyable can make all the difference.
"That's why our team is made up of expert teachers - many of them previous examiners - who last year helped MyEdSpace students achieve grades 7-9 at more than double the national average."
DON'T SPEND HOURS REMEMBERING FORMULAS:
I've never used a formula booklet in my life, I was able to learn all the relevant formulas from practicing questions, you too will naturally remember them with practice. Even better, you learn to recognise which problem they should be used for.
TEACH TO REMEMBER:
Teach a friend, sibling, or even a stuffed animal a concept you're struggling with - it forces you to consolidate your knowledge.
EVERSE ENGINEER EXAM PAPERS:
Start with the answer, then work backward to understand how to solve the problem.
FOCUS ON PAST EXAM PAPER QUESTIONS:
Textbooks are fine to practice specific mathematics skills - however, during exam season it is most important to gain exam specific exposure. For written subjects, study mark schemes to see exactly what your exam board is looking for.
ADDRESS EVERY MISCONCEPTION:
Do not accept incorrect answers without explanation - if you get a question wrong, make sure you fully understand where you made mistakes and what to address. Do the question again to prove to yourself you have understood your mistake.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Majority of inner London pupils on free meals going to university, data shows
Young people from deprived families in inner London are going to university at a greater rate than children in other parts of England, even as enthusiasm for higher education has levelled off nationally. More than 50% of inner London's pupils on free school meals (FSM) had progressed to higher education by age 19 in 2023-24, compared with fewer than 46% of young people from all backgrounds, and below 20% for pupils on FSM living in a quarter of local authorities outside London. One in 10 of the inner London pupils gained places at selective universities such as those in the Russell Group, double the rate for young people on FSM from elsewhere in England. Prof Graeme Atherton, an associate pro-vice chancellor at the University of West London and an expert in access to higher education, said the extraordinary success of the inner London pupils was due to a combination of factors. 'GCSE attainment rates have been higher in London, and have been for a long time, so that drives participation,' Atherton said. 'There's a greater proclivity, that you can see in some of the data, for those from non-white backgrounds to enter higher education whatever grades they get – and the majority of young people in inner London are non-white. And there's the proximity of higher education institutions, there's lots of them in inner London … There's more universities on your doorstep there. 'Put that all together and you've got a combination that leads to higher participation, and that's across the board. But what's also interesting is the difference between inner and outer London, where the participation rate isn't so high. So maybe it's also something about the critical mass of young people from similar backgrounds.' Sarah Hannafin, the head of policy at the National Association of Head Teachers, said: 'Children's educational attainment and life chances should not be constrained by their family's means or where they live.' The detailed statistics from the Department for Education tracked pupils eligible for FSM at age 15 or younger to age 19, and showed that the 'participation gap' between young people from deprived backgrounds and their better-off peers had shrunk, boosted by the performance of those from London. In particular, the gap narrowed between FSM eligible pupils and others attending 'high tariff' universities requiring top A-level grades. But the national figures showed waning enrolments in 2023-24, which Atherton described as 'stagnant' nationally, following record levels of enrolments during the Covid pandemic. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion He said: 'We're seeing more evidence of student poverty. These young people, aged 17 or 18, they have friends, they have social media, they know what the student experience is like, and that could be off-putting. But overall there's still solid demand with regional differences.' Among students who took A-levels at age 17, 80.6% had gone on to university or other higher education by age 19, a drop of more than two percentage points compared with 2022-23. Among all state school pupils at age 15, the progression rate by age 19 decreased from 46.9% to 45.8% in 2023-24. The biggest exception was among black pupils, where progression to university rose to 63.3% – the biggest increase among any ethnic group since 2009, and the only group to have increased year on year. White pupils were the least likely to progress to higher education by age 19, at 40.5%
BBC News
2 days ago
- BBC News
cly3j63gleqo (GIF Image, 1 × 1 pixels)
PA Media More than 1,500 pupils in England were given incorrect grades for their food and nutrition qualification in 2024 An exam board is facing a £350,000 fine after issuing hundreds of pupils with the wrong GCSE results. More than 1,500 pupils in England were given incorrect grades for their food and nutrition qualification in 2024, a course not offered in Wales, but run by the Cardiff-based WJEC. The WJEC is Wales' largest qualifications awarding body, and also a leading provider in both England and Northern Ireland. Ofqual, England's exam watchdog, said the fine reflected "the serious nature of WJEC's failures and our commitment to protecting the interests of students".
Leader Live
2 days ago
- Leader Live
Exam board faces £350,000 fine after students received wrong GCSE results
More than 1,500 students received the incorrect results for WJEC's Eduqas GCSE food preparation and nutrition qualification last summer. Ofqual, England's exams watchdog, found that exam board WJEC had failed to adjust teachers' marking of coursework – which made up 50% of the qualification – to ensure results were in line with national standards. In total, 847 students received lower grades and 680 received higher grades than they should have. The students who received the incorrect lower grades were eventually issued with the correct grade in October last year. WJEC decided those who received the incorrect higher grades should keep them to avoid unfairly penalising students. The exams regulator is set to fine the exam board £175,000 for the error in external moderation of teachers' marking. Ofqual will also fine WJEC another £175,000 after it found it had breached its conditions concerning how it conducted 'reviews of marking'. Between 2017 and 2023, WJEC allowed 3,926 exam papers to be reviewed by the same assessors who had originally marked at least part of them. One student had their grade increased last year after an independent review of marking was conducted. WJEC also issued credit notes as financial compensation to schools and colleges, for all affected reviews, totalling just in excess of £219,000. In the announcement – which comes just weeks before A-level and GCSE students receive their results – Ofqual said it will work closely with WJEC to ensure the mitigations they have put in place for this summer are effective. Amanda Swann, Ofqual's executive director for general qualifications, said: 'Students must be able to trust that their results accurately reflect their performance and what they know, understand and can do. 'These proposed fines reflect the serious nature of WJEC's failures and our commitment to protecting the interests of students, and maintaining the integrity of our qualifications system. 'This includes the requirement that GCSE, AS and A-level students are entitled to an independent review of their exam marks.' A statement from WJEC said: 'We would like to sincerely apologise to the learners affected by these incidents. 'We take full responsibility and acknowledge that we did not meet the usual high standards expected of us. 'Having co-operated fully with Ofqual throughout the process, we want to reassure learners and centres that we have undertaken a thorough review of our processes and implemented appropriate measures to ensure such incidents do not occur again in the future. 'The measures we successfully introduced in 2024 have proven effective. 'In addition, as part of the corrective action taken to mitigate the issue, we can confirm that we have issued credit notes to all centres affected by the reviews of marking incident.'
