Who is Poland's Next President Karol Nawrocki?
Reuters
Polish presidential candidate Karol Nawrocki, backed by the main opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, reacts to the exit polls of the second round of the presidential election, in Warsaw, Poland, June 1, 2025.
WARSAW, June 2 (Reuters) – Karol Nawrocki, the conservative historian who won Poland's presidential election, cultivated a tough-guy image during his campaign, posting videos of himself at shooting ranges and boxing rings.
While his liberal opponent Rafal Trzaskowski played up his European credentials, Nawrocki met Donald Trump at the White House and received the U.S. president's backing for his bid for Poland's top job.
According to the final result from the electoral commission, Nawrocki won the election with 50.89% of the votes.
Unlike other eurosceptics in central Europe, such as Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico or Hungary's Viktor Orban, Nawrocki supports giving military aid to help Ukraine fend off Russia's three-year-old invasion.
But he has said that, if elected, he will oppose membership in Western alliances for Ukraine, a position that seeks to chime with falling support for Ukrainians among Poles, who have hosted more than a million refugees from across the border.
His backers in the Law and Justice (PiS) party had supported fast-tracking membership in the EU and NATO for Kyiv while in power until late 2023.
Nawrocki's critics said he was fuelling unease over Ukrainian refugees at a time when the far-right is highlighting migration, the cost of living and security. He cited his campaign slogan, Poland First.
'Let's help others, but let's take care of our own citizens first,' he said on social media in April.
He is likely to follow a similar path to outgoing President Andrzej Duda, a PiS ally who has used his veto power to block the pro-EU government's efforts to undo the previous PiS administration's judicial reforms. The EU says the PiS reforms undermined the independence of the courts.
THE FIGHT IN THE RIGHT
In the last two weeks, the candidates mostly fought for the support of people who voted for other candidates in the first round, in particular far-right's Slawomir Mentzen who came third with 15% support.
Trzaskowski tried to attract them with promises of deregulation. Nawrocki touted his credentials as head of the Institute of National Remembrance (IPN), support for gun ownership, traditional families and Christian values, but also a critical tone on Ukraine, in sync with Mentzen's.
His wife Marta, a civil servant, and three children featured strongly in his campaign.
Nawrocki's past has been a topic of intense public debate following a series of negative media reports. There were questions over his acquisition of a flat from a pensioner and an admission that he took part in orchestrated brawls.
'All my sports activities were based on the strength of my heart, the strength of my muscles, my fists,' Nawrocki, an amateur boxer, told a debate when confronted over reports he had been involved in mass organised fights between football hooligans. 'It was a fair competition, regardless of the form.'
His Law and Justice party backers have accused the government of orchestrating the controversies with the help of Poland's special services and liberal media. The government rejects these accusations.
Nawrocki portrayed the election as a referendum on the government, which he described as a metropolitan elite out of touch with their concerns.
'I am simply one of you,' he told voters in the eastern town of Biala Podlaska while on the campaign trail.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yomiuri Shimbun
40 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Trump Set to Waive Some Legal Requirements to Boost Critical Minerals
Reuters file photo U.S. President Donald Trump gestures, as he departs for Pennsylvania, on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 30, 2025. June 3 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump is set to use emergency powers and slash legal requirements – including some congressional funding approvals -relating to a law aimed at lifting U.S. production of critical minerals and weapons, according to a document seen by Reuters. Trump's action would apply to the Defense Production Act, a U.S. law that grants the president broad emergency powers to control domestic industries and resources during national security emergencies. The move would represent the latest attempt by the White House to reshape a critical mineral industry dominated by China, the top U.S. economic rival. China is using its leverage in response to Trump's trade war, recently halting critical mineral exports and rattling global supply chains. The document is expected to be published on the Federal Register on Wednesday, the government web site shows. Trump invoked the Korean War-era law in March to help boost domestic production of critical minerals used to make consumer goods, computer chips, robots and advanced weaponry. The law places some restrictions on the president's authority, such as requiring the White House to seek congressional approval for projects over $50 million and forcing project delivery dates within a one-year time frame. The president can waive those requirements in the event of an emergency and Trump is expected to invoke those powers, according to the document seen by Reuters on Tuesday, ahead of its expected publication. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Former President Joe Biden signed similar waivers to speed up production of vaccines and medical equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic. John Paul Helveston, a professor at George Washington University, said U.S. investments in critical minerals represent a long-term solution to the problem, leaving the nation vulnerable to China's trade policy in the short run. 'This all means that if the U.S. wants to have access to these minerals over the next 5-10 years, the U.S. will have to maintain a trade relationship with China,' Helveston said.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Musk Calls Trump's Tax-Cut and Spending Bill ‘a Disgusting Abomination'
Reuters WASHINGTON, June 3 (Reuters) – Billionaire Elon Musk plunged on Tuesday into the congressional debate over President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' that will increase the federal deficit. Several fiscally conservative Republicans in the U.S. Senate supported the views Musk expressed in social media posts, which could complicate the bill's path to passage in that chamber. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Tesla and SpaceX CEO Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination.' He added: 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk's comments hit a nerve. Republican deficit hawks have expressed concerns about the cost of the bill, which would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative accomplishment, while boosting spending on the military and border security. The House of Representatives passed it by one vote last month, after the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the measure would add $3.8 trillion to the federal government's $36.2 trillion in debt. The Senate, also controlled by Trump's Republicans, aims to pass the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' in the next month, though senators are expected to revise the House version. Republicans on the Senate Finance Committee, which oversees tax policy, are due to meet with Trump at the White House on Wednesday afternoon to discuss making the bill's business-related tax breaks permanent, according to Senator Steve Daines, a panel member. Analysts have warned that such a move would greatly increase the measure's cost. Republican Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he disagreed with Musk's assessment about the cost of the bill and stood by the goal of passage by July 4. 'We have a job to do – the American people elected us to do. We have an agenda that everybody campaigned on, most notably the president of the United States, and we're going to deliver on that agenda,' the South Dakota lawmaker told reporters. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson also dismissed Musk's complaints, telling reporters, 'my friend Elon is terribly wrong.' TEST OF INFLUENCE Musk's loud opposition to a bill that Trump has urged Republicans to pass presents a test of his political influence a week after leaving his formal role in the administration as a special government employee with the Department of Government Efficiency came to an end. As DOGE chief, he upended several federal agencies but ultimately failed to deliver the massive savings he had sought. The richest person in the world, Musk had spent nearly $300 million to back Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans in last year's elections. But he has said he would cut his political spending substantially while returning to his role as Tesla TSLA.O CEO. The White House dismissed Tuesday's attack, just as Trump dismissed earlier Musk complaints about the legislation. 'Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill,' spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said at a White House briefing. 'It doesn't change the president's opinion. This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it.' REPUBLICAN DISAGREEMENTS Senate Republicans were divided about the bill even before Musk's missives. Deficit hawks are pushing for deeper spending cuts than the $1.6 trillion over a decade in the House version, while another coalition of rural-state Republicans are pushing to protect the Medicaid healthcare program for low-income Americans. One of the hawks, Senator Mike Lee, called on party members to use the Trump bill and future spending measures to reduce the deficit. 'We must commit now to doing so, as this is what voters justifiably expect – and indeed deserve – from the GOP Congress,' the Utah Republican said on X while reposting Musk's message. Republicans have a 53-47 seat majority in the Senate and can afford to lose support from no more than three members, if they expect to pass the legislation with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance by a July 4 deadline. Another hardliner, Senator Ron Johnson, predicted that lawmakers would not be able to meet the deadline and secure an adequate number of cuts. Lee and Johnson are among at least four Senate hardliners demanding that the bill be changed to restrict the growth of the debt and deficit. The faction of party lawmakers determined to limit spending cuts to project Medicaid beneficiaries and business investments in green energy initiatives is of similar size. 'I certainly have an interest in making sure people with disabilities are not harmed. But also, there's the broad issue of how does it affect hospital reimbursements,' Senator Jerry Moran told reporters. 'There's a set of my colleagues who are pushing to do more. And so it turns on how do you get the votes to pass a bill,' the Kansas Republican said. Other Senate Republicans said lawmakers may have to look elsewhere to boost savings, including the possibility of leaving Trump's much touted tax break proposals for tips, overtime pay and Social Security benefits for later legislation. 'Those are all Democrat priorities. I'm not sure why we shouldn't be doing that in a potential bipartisan bill to create headspace for this bill,' said Republican Senator Thom Tillis.
Japan Today
an hour ago
- Japan Today
Higher metals tariffs kick in as deadline for 'best' offers arrives
By Jasper Ward and Jeff Mason The U.S. tariff rate on most imported steel and aluminum will double on Wednesday as President Donald Trump ratchets up a global trade war on the same day he expects trading partners to deliver their "best offer" in bids to avoid punishing import tax rates on other goods from taking effect in early July. Trump late Tuesday signed an executive proclamation that puts into effect from Wednesday his surprise announcement last week that he was taking the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports that had been in place since March to 50% from 25%. "We started at 25 and then after studying the data more, realized that it was a big help, but more help is needed. And so that is why the 50 is starting tomorrow," White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said in explaining the move at a steel industry conference in Washington on Tuesday. The increase comes into effect at 12:01 a.m. The increase applies to all trading partners except Britain, the only country so far that has struck a preliminary trade agreement with the U.S. during a 90-day pause on a wider array of Trump tariffs. The rate for steel and aluminum imports from the UK - which does not rank among the top exporters of either metal to the U.S. - will remain at 25% until at least July 9. About a quarter of all steel used in the U.S. is imported, and Census Bureau data shows the increased levies will hit the closest U.S. trading partners - Canada and Mexico - especially hard. They rank No. 1 and 3, respectively, in steel shipment volumes to the U.S. Canada is even more exposed to the aluminum levies as the top exporter to the U.S. by far at roughly twice the rest of the top 10 exporters' volumes combined. The U.S. gets about half of its aluminum from foreign sources. Prime Minister Mark Carney's office said Canada was "engaged in intensive and live negotiations to have these and other tariffs removed." The unexpected increase in the levies jolted the market for both metals this week, especially for aluminum, which has seen price premiums more than double so far this year. With little current capacity to increase domestic production, import volumes are likely to be unaffected unless the price increases undercut demand. 'BEST OFFER' DUE DATE Wednesday is also when the White House would like trading partners to submit their proposals for deals that might help them avoid Trump's hefty "Liberation Day" tariffs from taking effect in five weeks. Administration officials have been in active talks with a number of countries since Trump announced a pause on those tariffs on April 9, but to date only the UK deal has come to fruition. Even that agreement, which provided the basis for the carve out from the metals tariffs, is more of a preliminary framework for more talks. With just weeks remaining, the Trump team is eager to bring more deals over the line. Reuters reported on Monday that the U.S. Trade Representative was asking countries to list their best proposals in a number of key areas, including tariff and quota offers for purchase of U.S. industrial and agricultural products and plans to remedy any non-tariff barriers. In turn, the letter promises answers "within days" with an indication of a "landing zone," including what tariff rates countries can be expected to be saddled with after a 90-day pause on the tariffs expires on July 8. At issue for most trading partners is whether they retain the current baseline rate of 10% on most exports to the U.S. after that date, or something sharply higher in many cases. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed the report on Tuesday, saying: 'USTR sent this letter to all of our trading partners just to give them a friendly reminder that the deadline is coming up." Other items requested by the Trump administration include any commitments on digital trade and economic security, along with country-specific commitments, according to the letter. © Thomson Reuters 2025.
