Mexican authorities accuse Adidas of cultural appropriation
Officials in the southern Mexico state of Oaxaca accused sportswear giant Adidas of cultural appropriation after the fashion brand debuted sandals similar to a traditional design from the region. Designer Willy Chavarria collaborated with Adidas to create the Oaxaca slip on sandal - BFA
The Oaxaca Slip-On sandals were created by American fashion designer Willy Chavarria, who has Mexican heritage, but drew pushback from both state and local officials in Oaxaca, which has one of the highest Indigenous populations in the country.
Oaxaca Governor Salomon Jara first addressed the issue during a press conference on Tuesday, saying the sandals were a "reinterpreted huarache model," particularly one that was uniquely found in the state.
In another instance, Isaias Carranza, a Oaxacan legislator of Indigenous Zapotec descent, wrote on his Facebook account: "The Adidas company, in conjunction with designer Willy Chavarria, appropriated a unique design of the traditional huaraches (sandals) from the people of the Hidalgo Yalalag village."Jara also threatened to take legal action against Chavarria. "This huarache is from Yalalag...we are also going to ask our Yalalag siblings to work with us so we can file a complaint" against the designer, he said at the press conference.For its part, the Ministry of Cultures and Arts of Oaxaca said in a statement that using cultural elements for commercial purposes without the consent of Indigenous peoples was "a violation of our collective rights," demanding that Adidas stop selling the sandals, publicly acknowledge their origin and begin a process of "dialogue and redress of grievances" with the Yalalag community.
The controversy is the latest instance of Mexican officials denouncing major brands or designers using unauthorised Indigenous art or designs from the region, with previous complaints raised about Chinese fast fashion company Shein, Spanish mega-brand Zara and high fashion house Carolina Herrera.
Adidas did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Copyright © 2025 AFP. All rights reserved. All information displayed in this section (dispatches, photographs, logos) are protected by intellectual property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence you may not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way commercially exploit any of the contents of this section without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presses. Tags : Fashion Footwear Sports Media
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
an hour ago
- LeMonde
Trump wields Alaska and Texas gas as global power play
By inviting Vladimir Putin to Alaska on August 15, Donald Trump is putting the territory the United States bought from tsarist Russia in 1867 back on the world's geopolitical map. The 82-kilometer-wide Bering Strait locks the passage from the Pacific to the Arctic, now increasingly free of ice, for the two nuclear powers. Trump is also putting Alaska back on the world energy map. Since taking office, Trump has urged companies to "Drill, baby, drill." His so-called tariff negotiations have pressured allies into buying American liquefied natural gas (LNG): $750 billion over three years from the European Union (EU), $100 billion from South Korea and an unspecified amount from Japan. Meanwhile, Taiwan, the Philippines and Vietnam have expressed interest in US LNG but have not signed binding agreements. These promises and forced expressions of interest are one thing, but the reality on the ground is another. The European pledge, in particular, is completely unrealistic, as we'll get back to later. There are two possible routes to buy natural gas. One is the Gulf of Mexico, where LNG tankers currently depart with Texan shale gas bound for Europe. However, this option is not ideal for Asian buyers, who must sail south of the equator, cross the expensive Panama Canal and then traverse the Pacific.
LeMonde
6 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump orders National Guard into Washington in a political swipe against Democratic elites
On this warm, tranquil August evening, a handful of tourists strolled across the broad lawns of the National Mall, home to the United States' main American political institutions. Washington DC looked more like a sleepy administrative metropolis than the criminal dystopia depicted by Donald Trump. Yet just hours earlier on Monday, August 11, the American president took drastic measures, announcing a federal takeover of the local police and the deployment of the National Guard. "I am announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlum, squalor and worse. This is liberation day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back," Trump declared at a solemn press conference at the White House. The picture he painted was chilling. The president claimed that "our capital has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged out maniacs and homeless people." He held up a chart illustrating that Washington's situation was more critical than Baghdad, Bogotá and Mexico City – "places that you hear about as being the worst places on earth."
LeMonde
8 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump inserts himself into the South Caucasus
That makes three! On Friday, August 8, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev became the third head of state or government to come to the White House and call for the Nobel Peace Prize to be awarded to the American president, following Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Congolese President Félix Tshisekedi. Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet also endorsed Donald Trump for the prize from afar through a letter to the Nobel Committee in Oslo. Is President Trump truly the "peacemaker" he claims to be, boasting of resolving half a dozen conflicts around the world in just seven months? That is for the Nobel Committee to decide. In the Indo-Pakistani conflict, New Delhi denied any American mediation, and fighting resumed in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo despite the peace agreement signed in June in Washington by Tshisekedi and Rwandan President Paul Kagame. The August 8 draft agreement between President Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, reached alongside Trump, looks different. At first glance, it is a striking diplomatic success in a conflict that has pitted two countries in the South Caucasus against each other for 35 years and has already led to two wars. Multiple mediation attempts – led by Moscow, Brussels and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – failed. The dispute appeared unsolvable in this notoriously complex post-Soviet region. Enter Trump and his envoy, former real estate magnate Steve Witkoff, and suddenly a breakthrough was achieved. Russia and Iran the major losers In reality, the Trump team did not start from scratch. At the initiative of Aliyev and Pashinyan, Azerbaijan and Armenia had engaged in a promising bilateral dialogue for nearly two years, without the burdensome patronage of Russian, Turkish or Iranian powers. They took advantage of several factors that profoundly altered the regional political context: the full-scale war in Ukraine, the weakening influence of Russia and Iran – both preoccupied with other priorities – and the emerging roles of new actors like Turkey and China. This confluence of factors created a unique situation in the history of Armenia and Azerbaijan: both countries ultimately managed to keep Russia at arm's length. In March, Yerevan and Baku reached an agreement to normalize their relations. In July, Aliyev and Pashinyan met in Abu Dhabi as their teams worked on a peace agreement. This was Trump's stroke of genius, inserting himself into a positive dynamic already underway, but to which he managed to give a decisive push. The intervention at this stage by the United States – an actor free of historical baggage and considerable economic clout – proved beneficial. The next step is to finalize what is still just a draft agreement, which has not yet been signed by both parties. The much-discussed "TRIPP" (Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity), a corridor whose construction is expected to end the isolation of the Azerbaijani region of Nakhchivan, exists only on paper. Russia and Iran, the main losers in this process, could try to spoil the party. For now, though, Trump can congratulate himself, at little cost, even as the two biggest conflicts he has promised to resolve, the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, remain stubbornly resistant to his "peacemaking" skills.
