
Everything You Need to Know About Hair Loss Medications: Where to Buy, Side Effects, and More
Key takeaways
Though there are various options for hair loss medications, sticking to treatments approved by the Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA) may be best to minimize the chance of any side effects.
The most effective prescription medications include finasteride and spironolactone, though spironolactone is not FDA-approved for hair loss.
You try telehealth providers like Roman to get a consultation for hair loss medications that best suit your needs.
A quick look for the best hair loss medications
Dealing with hair loss can be frustrating, and with all the available products, it can add to the overwhelm. Additionally, visiting a dermatologist or hair loss specialist can be expensive.
Medications are available to treat male and female pattern hair loss, and they can help with slowing hair loss, stimulating hair growth, or both. To simplify your options, we dive into the best hair loss medications, their effectiveness, and their side effects. We also give a few of our picks you can look through and see if it's right for you.
Language matters
In this article, we use 'male and female' to refer to someone's sex as determined by their chromosomes, and 'men and women' when referring to their gender (unless quoting from sources using nonspecific language).
Sex is determined by chromosomes, and gender is a social construct that can vary between time periods and cultures. Both of these aspects are acknowledged to exist on a spectrum both historically and by modern scientific consensus.
What is the best medication for hair loss?
With so many medications available for people experiencing hair loss, it is not easy to declare which one works the best overall. User experiences and results will vary from person to person and you may not see the same results as someone else using the same medication.
We will take a look at the most popular hair loss medications, both prescription and over-the-counter options, to help you familiarize yourself with the treatments that a medical professional might recommend.
Minoxidil
When you think of hair loss medications, the brand name Rogaine may come to mind. The active ingredient in Rogaine is minoxidil, a non-prescription hair loss medication that is available over the counter.
Minoxidil is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a treatment for male and female pattern hair loss. But it's used off-label for a variety of hair loss conditions.
While Rogaine is a popular and common brand of minoxidil products, it's not the only option. Minoxidil is available in a variety of over-the-counter hair loss products that are applied topically.
Minoxidil formulas typically consist of liquids, foams, and shampoos. In studies, minoxidil was applied to hair that was completely dry. Most manufacturers suggest you apply it to dry or towel-dried hair.
It can take at least 4 months to see results.
How does minoxidil work?
This medication works, in part, by shortening the resting phase of the hair growth cycle and moving hairs into the active growth phase. However, the exact mechanism by which minoxidil works isn't fully understood yet.
Finasteride
Finasteride is an FDA-approved prescription hair loss medication that is taken orally. It's also available in a few prescription products that are applied topically and are not FDA-approved. However, the FDA has released a warning about the potential side effects of this topical formula, such as irritation and burning.
This hair loss medication can be used to treat male pattern hair loss. A 2021 study showed that finasteride can be used to slow hair loss and help stimulate new hair regrowth in men.
How does finasteride work?
This medication works by blocking the action of an enzyme (5-alpha reductase) that converts the hormone testosterone to another hormone, dihydrotestosterone, that contributes to hair loss.
Spironolactone
Some medications used for hair loss are actually medications for other health conditions. Spironolactone is a diuretic pill that's used to treat high blood pressure, and it can also be used off label as a hair loss treatment for women. It's a prescription drug taken orally. Aldactone is a brand of medication containing spironolactone, but generic versions are also available.
When it comes to hair loss, spironolactone is specifically used for women because it targets certain hormones.
A 2013 review looked at spironolactone as a medication for female pattern hair loss. Research showed it to be an effective treatment for reducing hair loss, especially when combined with minoxidil. Also, a 2023 review showed that topical and oral spironolactone was an effective treatment for androgenic alopecia and was safe for both men and women.
How does spironolactone work?
This medication works by slowing down male hormones called androgens, which includes testosterone. It slows down hair loss due to androgenic alopecia and helps hair regrowth.
Dutasteride
Dutasteride is an oral prescription drug used to treat an enlarged prostate in males. It may also be a treatment option for those with androgenic alopecia.
A 2019 review showed it to have a higher effectiveness than finasteride, and the two have comparable side effects.
It works similarly to finasteride, so it should not be taken by females.
How does dutasteride work?
This medication works much like finasteride. It inhibits the enzyme that converts testosterone into dihydrotestosterone.
What are the side effects of hair loss medication?
When using any topical products or taking oral medications, there may be side effects or possible interactions. If you are concerned about certain side effects or want to know if you can take a hair loss medication with other drugs, consult your doctor or pharmacist.
Side effects of topical hair loss treatments like minoxidil can include:
darkening of body hair
growth of body hair
irritation and dermatitis on the scalp
headaches
lightheadedness
leg swelling
Hair loss medications, such as finasteride and dutasteride, can have side effects related to sexual and mental health, such as:
low sex drive
trouble getting an erection and ejaculating
increased breast size
depression
Side effects of spironolactone can include:
dizziness
lightheadedness
nausea
headache
hyperkalemia
gynecomastia
Spironolactone can also be associated with developmental issues for a fetus. Avoid getting pregnant while taking it.
If you experience any side effects while taking hair loss medications, notify your doctor or pharmacist immediately.
Other treatments for hair loss
Some at-home strategies and lifestyle changes may help minimize hair loss.
Certain vitamins and supplements may be helpful. Vitamin A, vitamin C, B vitamins, and vitamin D are all beneficial for hair health. Iron and zinc may also curb hair loss.
A high protein diet may be recommended. Hair is made up of protein, so getting enough protein in your diet is important for hair growth.
Other professional treatments include laser devices and microneedling. Hair transplants, and platelet-rich plasma procedures may be options to consider as well. Steroid injections are more common treatments for inflammatory hair loss.
When to talk with a doctor
It may be a surprise to you when you first start noticing your hair thinning or begin to see the early signs of hair loss. Maybe, it's even something that you've been aware of for a while and are starting to wonder which medications are available. Either way, addressing hair loss as soon as possible could help you hold onto your hair, slow hair thinning, or even promote hair regrowth.
If you aren't ready to meet with a doctor just yet, there are over-the-counter treatments you could consider using, but those results may take several months to see.
However, if you aren't seeing the results you expect after a few months of use, consider making an appointment with your doctor.
Connecting with a doctor as soon as you see the early signs of hair loss may result in an early diagnosis and both of you can discuss which options are available. If your doctor recommends a medication or dosage that's not available over-the-counter, they can write you a prescription for a stronger medication and can explain the side effects and risks tied to its use.
Frequently asked questions about hair loss medications
What would a dermatologist prescribe for hair loss?
A dermatologist may recommend over-the-counter (OTC) topical minoxidil as a first treatment option. A doctor might also prescribe oral finasteride, which is FDA-approved for certain conditions that cause hair loss. Other prescription medications, such as spironolactone, may be available as an off-label use for hair loss.
A dermatologist may recommend over-the-counter (OTC) topical minoxidil as a first treatment option. A doctor might also prescribe oral finasteride, which is FDA-approved for certain conditions that cause hair loss. Other prescription medications, such as spironolactone, may be available as an off-label use for hair loss.
Which vitamin and mineral deficiencies can cause hair loss?
Hair loss may be a side effect of some nutritional deficiencies. Low levels of vitamin D, selenium, zinc, and iron may cause hair loss. Over-supplementation of some nutrients, such as vitamin A, vitamin E, and selenium, may also cause hair loss.
Hair loss may be a side effect of some nutritional deficiencies. Low levels of vitamin D, selenium, zinc, and iron may cause hair loss. Over-supplementation of some nutrients, such as vitamin A, vitamin E, and selenium, may also cause hair loss.
Takeaway
Your appearance, and therefore your hair, can be a source of confidence. When you notice the signs of hair loss, your confidence may waver. If you're experiencing hair loss, you're not alone.
Many people experience hair loss at some point in their lives, and there are many treatments available. Medications have been shown to be an effective treatment option for hair loss. Many are easy to find using online telemedicine services or after an evaluation with a healthcare professional.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
27 minutes ago
- CBS News
A woman's heart suddenly stopped. Two passing nurses saved her life.
Merryl Hoffman knew she was taking good care of her heart. The 63-year-old attorney didn't smoke or drink, and she was an avid hiker who used to run marathons and other distance races. In her 40s, she had been diagnosed with a leaky mitral valve and underwent surgery to repair it. Every year since, she has seen a cardiologist to check her heart and its function. The reports always came back clear. When Hoffman left her apartment on Manhattan's Upper East Side on Oct. 23, 2025, her heart was the last thing on her mind. She was saddled with her work bag and purse, hightailing it to the subway station so she could make it to work on time. That's when her memory of the day ends. Shortly into her walk, Hoffman experienced a sudden cardiac arrest. Her heart stopped beating. She collapsed to the ground. Doctors later told her it was a severe arrhythmia that could have been fatal — if not for where Hoffman fell. Hoffman had collapsed outside Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's Breast and Imaging Center, about two and a half blocks from her subway station. A patient care technician and a passing runner immediately rushed to her aid. Then, Memorial Sloan Kettering nurses Sabrina Castle and Gianna Formisano stumbled upon the scene while walking to work. "We were so shocked. When we were walking up, people were like 'Nurses, nurses!' We didn't know what we were walking into," Formisano said. "People were grabbing our coffee, taking our bags. It was out of a movie, the way that they were like 'Oh, thank God you're here.'" Sabrina Castle and Gianna Formisano outside the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Memorial Sloan Kettering "They absolutely saved my life" Formisano and Castle took over performing CPR, keeping Hoffman's heart manually beating. She didn't have a pulse, and she had hit her head when she collapsed. The nurses also instructed one of the other bystanders to call an ambulance. Early CPR increases survival for patients in cardiac arrest by "at least two or three fold," said Dr. Jessica Hennessey, a cardiologist at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center. Early CPR means that blood flow to the brain and heart continues, preserving the health of those organs. Bystanders in a medical emergency should call 911 and immediately start CPR, Hennessey advised. CPR can be done with mouth-to-mouth or with just chest compressions, Hennessey said. After five minutes that "felt like forever," the ambulance arrived, Formisano said. Castle and Formisano helped the EMTs load Hoffman into the ambulance. Then, she was taken to NewYork-Presbyterian's cardiac care unit for further treatment. For the small crowd, the day carried on. Castle and Formisano headed to work. After a few hours, they called NewYork-Presbyterian to see if they could find out more about Hoffman's status. They went to the hospital and spoke to a nurse there. "She was like, 'You got her back. She's intubated, she's alive, you saved her life,'" Castle recalled. Hoffman was still unconscious. She told CBS News that she didn't wake up until five days after the collapse. Her family told her that she had been rushed into surgery. Doctors told her that her heart had stopped for several minutes -- and the actions of Castle, Formisano and other bystanders had saved her. "Without them, I was told, there was no doubt I would have died or been brain dead," Hoffman said. "They absolutely saved my life." Hoffman had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placed in her chest to prevent further cardiac arrests. The device shocks the heart if it detects an irregular heartbeat. She also began cardiac rehabilitation. Shortly after, she returned to work. Life began to get back to normal but one question was constantly at the back of her mind: Who had helped save her? A chance reunion While in cardiac rehabilitation, Hoffman found herself telling the story of the strangers who had helped her. A physiologist there overheard her talking about it and thought the story sounded familiar. His girlfriend was friends with two nurses who had helped a woman matching Hoffman's description. After some back and forth, the physiologist connected Hoffman with Castle and Formisano. The trio immediately made plans to get dinner. Hoffman's husband joined them for the meal. There, the nurses were able to fill in the gaps of the October morning when Hoffman collapsed. Sabrina Castle, Merryl Hoffman and Gianna Formisano at the site where Hoffman collapsed. Sabrina Castle and Gianna Formisano "It was very jarring, when they gave my husband and I the blow-by-blow of that morning. There were things we did not know," Hoffman said. "It was pretty incredible." Since that dinner, the women have stayed in touch. Recently, Castle and Formisano even passed Hoffman on the same block where she had collapsed. The three took a photo at the site. "We were like, 'Wow, this is really crazy,'" Formisano said. "'We're running into you on the same spot, on your way to work, on our way to work, but now you're alive and well and in a much different state than when we met you the first time.'"


The Hill
28 minutes ago
- The Hill
How thousands of unreviewed ingredients got into our food — and what FDA can do about it
At least 1,000 ingredients in food products on our grocery store shelves have never been checked for safety by the Food and Drug Administration. Dozens have raised serious safety concerns among experts. How did the FDA allow this? The answer can be found in the agency's lax interpretation of a little-known legal designation that lets companies decide for themselves if ingredients in their products are safe. Fortunately, there are steps the agency can take right now to stem the flow of potentially unsafe ingredients into our food supply. Environmental Defense Fund outlined these steps in a letter we recently sent to the agency, but first let's take a closer look at how we got here. 'Generally Recognized as Safe' is a designation Congress created in 1958 to allow commonly used food ingredients to bypass the FDA's pre-market safety review process. It was meant for food substances — such as oils, vinegar, baking soda and common spices — that were widely considered safe due to their long history of everyday use. Since 1958, this status has been coopted to cover a universe of foods that extends far beyond its original intent. According to FDA regulations, a chemical can receive the designation if experts widely agree that scientific evidence shows its use to be safe. But because 'Generally Recognized as Safe' wasn't meant for newer ingredients, Congress allowed ingredients so designated to skip the FDA's premarket approval process — despite requiring similar evidence for other additives. Under the agency's current interpretation, companies can designate the use of a substance as safe and take products with that substance to market without informing the FDA or the public of its decision. While companies may voluntarily submit a notice to FDA offering safety evidence, they are not required to — and often don't. Our organization estimated that manufacturers have notified FDA of fewer than half of the ingredients they market as safe under the 'Generally Recognized' standard. Companies that do bother to submit a notice to the FDA are free to withdraw it at any point and take their product to market, provided they can cite evidence of its safe use. But this 'evidence' is often far from independent. Companies can, and often do, enlist their own employees or handpicked consultants to conduct their safety assessments. The result is a process riddled with conflicts of interest that lets unsafe foods into Americans' homes. We analyzed 'Generally Recognized as Safe' notices received by the FDA, obtained via a Freedom of Information request, and found that of the 1,163 submitted by companies between 1997 and April 2024, 192 were later withdrawn, with safety concerns cited in at least a dozen cases. We also identified 31 ingredients that companies have advertised to be recognized as safe, such as in press releases, trade publications and on their own websites (see the Appendix of our letter). However, we were unable to find the scientific evidence required under this standard to demonstrate these ingredients are commonly regarded as safe among experts. This raises red flags that FDA should be taking seriously. Although a comprehensive fix to the 'Generally Recognized' standard will require legislation from Congress, there are significant steps the FDA can take right away to ensure a more rigorous determination process that better protects Americans' health. Starting today, the FDA can use existing authority to remove safe designations from ingredients it deems unsafe and take them off the market. It can also notify manufacturers, importers, distributors and retailers that the substance is no longer recognized as safe. In addition, the FDA can enforce the requirement that companies base safety designations on publicly available data. Although this won't curtail companies' ability to self-declare substances as safe, it will require those who do to be transparent in citing their evidence. Third, the FDA can enforce the requirement that safety assessments consider vital health information such as a substance's dietary sources, potential cancer risks and the cumulative health effects of similar substances. Finally, the FDA can make companies revise and resubmit their data for review when they submit 'Generally Recognized as Safe' notices that fail to comply with the criteria. The 'Generally Recognized as Safe' designation is far from a perfect system, but it can work better if it is interpreted and enforced more comprehensively. If the FDA is serious about protecting public health, it should start by fully exercising the tools already at its disposal. Maria Doa is senior director at the Chemicals Policy at Environmental Defense Fund. Maricel Maffini is an independent consultant focused on human and environmental health and chemical safety.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mom Accused of 'Banning' Her Mother From Seeing Her Newborn Because They Don't Want 'Unsolicited Advice'
A woman on Reddit is dealing with her mom's insistence that she come over and spend time with her newborn despite giving birth mere weeks ago She writes that her mom "has a history of prioritizing her own wants/desires over what others want" Though she's tried to compromise, her mother is now complaining to other family members about her and her husband's decisionsA woman is wondering if she's in the wrong after her mother accused her of "banning" the older woman from seeing her new grandchild. In a Reddit post, the anonymous woman writes, "My mother has a history of prioritizing her own wants/desires over what others want. I gave birth last week and invited her to come to the hospital to see the baby." "While at the hospital, she stated that she would be coming over to my house, less than 24hrs after I left the hospital, to 'help out and hold her grandson,' " she continues. "My husband and I wanted to spend time alone as a family after getting home so we told her that she might need to wait until the next weekend to stop by." The post continues: "My mother then stated that we were 'banning' her from seeing 'her grandchild.' She said that her love language is acts of service and I was being mean for not allowing her to come over so soon after birth." So, the woman writes that she and her husband "caved," allowing her mom to come over the day after getting home from the hospital. "During her visit, she proceeded to point out everything she believed we were doing wrong as parents (give him the pacifier, put him in the sun, etc.) and refused to listen when we told her that we did not want unsolicited advice," she writes. Two days later, she got a text from her mom that read, simply, "my grandson misses me." "I told her that we are limiting guests until the baby gets his first vaccines at two months but that she could stop by the house in two weeks to see him if she'd like," she writes in the post. "She does not respond to this message. She texts me two days later and asks me to call her." When the two spoke on the phone, the woman's mom said she was being kept from the baby, stating that she "knows best." "I told her that we are [the] parents and she has no say in what we do with our child or when we would like to have guests over," she writes. "She has now begun to complain to other family members that my husband and I are being overly cautious about our child's health and we don't know what we're doing as parents." She continues in the post: "I'm conflicted because she's my son's grandmother and I want her to feel like a part of his life but I feel like she is overstepping." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. But others on Reddit suggest that maybe the woman hasn't gone far enough. Writes one commenter: "What she's doing is unhinged. Get a doorbell camera. Keep your doors locked, if she has a key just change [your] locks and don't tell her. If she wants to throw a fit like a toddler on social media or send family after you to harass you, count it as a blessing because she's going to give you all the evidence you need for a restraining order." Adds another: "You're not being mean to her. You're being mean to yourselves by allowing her to stomp all over your boundaries. Keep firm and have a conversation with your husband about what to say next time she tries to push. Make sure you're on the same page." Read the original article on People